Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:

Individualization of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer according to molecular tumor characteristics

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Romond EH et al. (2005) Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353: 1673–1684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mamounas EP (1998) Overview of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project neoadjuvant chemotherapy studies. Semin Oncol 25: 31–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher B et al. (1998) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16: 2672–2685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sorlie T et al. (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 10869–10874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365: 1687–1717

  6. Buzdar AU et al. (2005) Significantly higher pathologic complete remission rate after neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and epirubicin chemotherapy: results of a randomized trial in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23: 3676–3685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis MJ et al. (2001) Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 19: 3808–3816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bardou VJ et al. (2003) Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases. J Clin Oncol 10: 1973–1979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hennessy BT et al.: Outcome after pathologic complete eradication of cytologically proven breast cancer axillary node metastases following primary chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol, in press

  10. Lu Y et al. (2004) Molecular mechanisms underlying IGF-I-induced attenuation of the growth-inhibitory activity of trastuzumab (Herceptin) on SKBR3 breast cancer cells. Int J Cancer 108: 334–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nagata Y et al. (2004) PTEN activation contributes to tumor inhibition by trastuzumab, and loss of PTEN predicts trastuzumab resistance in patients. Cancer Cell 6: 117–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saal LH et al. (2005) PIK3CA mutations correlate with hormone receptors, node metastasis, and ERBB2, and are mutually exclusive with PTEN loss in human breast carcinoma. Cancer Res 65: 2554–2559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel N Hortobagyi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1

Some known associations between genomic abnormalities and breast cancer subtypes as defined by the expression of hormone receptors and HER2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hennessy, B., Gonzalez-Angulo, A. & Hortobagyi, G. Individualization of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer according to molecular tumor characteristics. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2, 598–599 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0375

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0375

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing