Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:

Closure of patent foramen ovale in the prevention of migraine: not enough evidence in favor

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Diener HC et al. (2007) Patent foramen ovale and migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep 11: 236–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilmshurst P and Nightingale S (2006) The role of cardiac and pulmonary pathology in migraine: a hypothesis. Headache 46: 429–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mortelmans K et al. (2005) The influence of percutaneous atrial septal defect closure on the occurrence of migraine. Eur Heart J 26: 1533–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lapergue B et al. (2006) Frequency of migraine attacks following stroke starts to decrease before PFO closure. Neurology 67: 1099–1100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dowson A et al. (2008) Migraine Intervention With STARFlex Technology (MIST) trial: a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, sham-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of patent foramen ovale closure with STARFlex septal repair implant to resolve refractory migraine headache. Circulation 117: 1397–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mulder EJ et al. (2003) Genetic and environmental influences on migraine: a twin study across six countries. Twin Res 6: 422–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilmshurst PT et al. (2004) Inheritance of persistent foramen ovale and atrial septal defects and the relation to familial migraine with aura. Heart 90: 1315–1320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sackett DL et al. (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 312: 71–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maisel WH and Laskey WK (2005) Patent foramen ovale closure devices: moving beyond equipoise. JAMA 294: 366–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans-Christoph Diener.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schürks, M., Diener, HC. Closure of patent foramen ovale in the prevention of migraine: not enough evidence in favor. Nat Rev Neurol 5, 22–23 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0971

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0971

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing