Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

Comparing the efficacy of intravenous iron and oral iron in nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease

Abstract

This Practice Point commentary discusses the findings and limitations of a phase III trial by Spinowitz et al. that compared oral and intravenous iron therapies in nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. In total, 304 patients were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive either two 510mg doses of intravenous ferumoxytol within 5±3 days or 200mg of elemental oral iron daily for 21 days. At day 35, hemoglobin levels had increased significantly more in patients who had received intravenous ferumoxytol than in those who had received oral iron therapy. Ferumoxytol was well tolerated. The superiority of ferumoxytol over other intravenous iron preparations, however, needs to be investigated, and optimal serum ferritin levels for the nondialysis CKD population need to be defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Hörl WH (2007) Clinical aspects of iron use in the anemia of kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 382–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deicher R and Hörl WH (2006) New insights into the regulation of iron homeostasis. Eur J Clin Invest 36: 301–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Spinowitz BS et al. (2008) Ferumoxytol for treating iron deficiency anemia in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 19: 1599–1605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Wyck DB et al. (2006) A randomized, controlled trial comparing IV iron sucrose to oral iron in anemic patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD. Kidney Int 68: 2846–2856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Agarwal R et al. (2006) A randomized controlled trial of oral versus intravenous iron in chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol 26: 445–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stoves J et al. (2001) A randomized study of oral vs intravenous iron supplementation in patients with progressive renal insufficiency treated with erythropoietin. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16: 967–974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Charytan C et al. (2005) Comparison of intravenous iron sucrose to oral iron in the treatment of anemic patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis. Nephron Clin Pract 100: c55–c62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Macdougall IC et al. (2005) Administration of intravenous iron sucrose as a 2-minute push to CKD patients: a prospective evaluation of 2,297 injections. Am J Kidney Dis 46: 283–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author has declared associations with the following companies: Pharmacosmos Pharmaceuticals (honoraria) and Vifor-International (consultant).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hörl, W. Comparing the efficacy of intravenous iron and oral iron in nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 4, 530–531 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0913

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0913

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing