This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Erickson RA (2004) EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 60: 267–279
Klapman JB et al. (2003) Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol 98: 1289–1294
Larghi A et al. (2004) EUS-guided Trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 59: 185–190
Varadarajulu S et al. (2004) Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy 36: 397–401
Itoi T et al. (2005) Puncture of solid pancreatic tumors guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: a pilot study series comparing Trucut and 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needles. Endoscopy 37: 362–366
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Rachel Jones, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verna, E., Larghi, A. How effective is endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 3, 200–201 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0467
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0467