Article | Open

The oldest record of ornithuromorpha from the early cretaceous of China

Published online:


Ornithuromorpha is the most inclusive clade containing extant birds but not the Mesozoic Enantiornithes. The early evolutionary history of this avian clade has been advanced with recent discoveries from Cretaceous deposits, indicating that Ornithuromorpha and Enantiornithes are the two major avian groups in Mesozoic. Here we report on a new ornithuromorph bird, Archaeornithura meemannae gen. et sp. nov., from the second oldest avian-bearing deposits (130.7 Ma) in the world. The new taxon is referable to the Hongshanornithidae and constitutes the oldest record of the Ornithuromorpha. However, A. meemannae shows few primitive features relative to younger hongshanornithids and is deeply nested within the Hongshanornithidae, suggesting that this clade is already well established. The new discovery extends the record of Ornithuromorpha by five to six million years, which in turn pushes back the divergence times of early avian lingeages into the Early Cretaceous.


Ornithuromorpha is the clade of birds that all living birds but not Enantiornithes nest in refs 1, 2. Until now the earliest record of this group was from the lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation (125 Ma), the middle phase in the evolution of the Jehol Biota—the most important and diverse fossil avifauna known to science1,3,4. More than half the known diversity of Mesozoic birds belongs to this biota, which includes, from the oldest to the youngest, the Protopteryx horizon and the Yixian and Jiufotang Formations, which together encompass over ten million years of avian evolution (130.7–120 Ma)5. Bio- and lithostratigraphic works confirmed that the Protopteryx-bearing deposits in Sichakou basin of Fengning Country are referable to the interbedded shales from the lower part of the Huajiying Formation5,6. Recent 40Ar/39Ar dating produced a weighted mean age of 130.7 Ma for this horizon7. Therefore, the Huajiying Formation is the second oldest avian-bearing deposit in the world, only after the Upper Jurassic Solnhofen Limestones that preserve Archaeopteryx in Germany6. Only three avian taxa have been collected from this horizon: the basal confuciusornithiform Eoconfuciusornis and two enantiornithines Protopteryx and Eopengornis8,9,10. Here we report on the first two ornithuromorph fossils from the same locality as the holotype of Protopteryx fengningensis in Sichakou basin8, which constitute the earliest known record of Ornithuromorpha. These two specimens are referable to a single taxon, which appears to be deeply nested within the Hongshanornithidae, a fairly diverse clade of small, specialized wading ornithuromorphs. Currently, four hongshanornithids, Hongshanornis longicresta, Longicrusavis houi, Parahongshanornis chaoyangensis and Tianyuornis cheni, have been reported from the Yixian and Jiufotang Formations in Inner Mongolia and Liaoning2,11,12,13,14. These new specimens reported here push back the first appearance datum of Ornithuromorpha by approximately six million years.


Systematic paleontology

         Aves          Ornithothoraces          Ornithuromorpha          Hongshanornithidae

Type genus. Hongshanornis, Zhou and Zhang11.

Archaeornithura meemannae gen. et sp. nov.

Etymology. The generic name is derived from Greek ‘Archae’ and ‘ornithura’, meaning ‘ancient ornithuromorph’. The specific name is in honour of Dr Meemann Chang for her continuous support of the study of the Jehol Biota.

Holotype. An articulated partial skeleton with feathers (STM7-145), housed at the Tianyu Natural History Museum of Shandong (STM), China (Fig. 1).

Figure 1: Holotype of Archaeornithura meemannae gen. et sp. nov., STM7-145.
Figure 1

(a) Main slab; (b) counter slab. Anatomical abbreviations: al, alular digit; ba, basicranium; co, coracoid; cv, cervical vertebrae; d I–IV, pedal digit I–IV; fe, femur; fi, fibula; fu, furcula; hu, humerus; ma, major digit; mi, minor digit; pr, primary remiges; pu, pubis; ra, radius; re, rectrices; sc, scapula; st, sternum; ti, tibiotarsus; tm, tarsometatarsus; ul, ulna. Scale bars, 10 mm.

Paratype. An articulated partial skeleton with feathers (STM7-163; Supplementary Fig. 1).

Locality and horizon. Protopteryx horizon in Sichakou basin, Fengning County, Hebei, northeastern China; Lower Cretaceous Huajiying Formation6,7.

Differential diagnosis. The new taxon is referable to the Hongshanornithidae and can be distinguished from the known hongshanornithids by the following combined features: it differs from Hongshanornis and Longicrusavis, in that the cranial margin of the sternum is strongly vaulted; it is distinguished from Hongshanornis and Parahongshanornis, in that the zyphoid process of the sternum is well developed and squared; it differs from other hongshanornithids except Longicrusavis, in that the alular digit extends further distally than the major metacarpal; it is distinguishable from other hongshanornithids except Parahongshanornis, in that the penultimate phalanx of the major digit is longer than the preceding phalanx; and the new taxon has proportionally shorter femur relative to the tarsometatarsus.


The skull is not well preserved in either specimen (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. 1). The cervical vertebrae are poorly preserved in articulation with the skull; 10 vertebrae are preserved including the ring-like axis, although the exact position of the cervicothoracic transition cannot be determined due to poor preservation. The vertebrae are clearly not elongated, being approximately equal in width and length, as in other hongshanornithids (Figs 1 and 2b,c; Supplementary Fig. 1). The thoracic vertebrae are only preserved in the counter slab of STM7-145, covered by the sternum. The synsacrum appears to comprise 9–10 vertebrae, although preservation makes this estimate equivocal. Six free caudals are followed by a poorly preserved pygostyle (Fig. 3e). The transverse processes of the caudal vertebrae are less than the width of the centrum in length and caudolaterally directed, at least in the first free caudal. Two well-preserved uncinate processes are preserved in the counter slab of STM7-163, and they are straight and tapered (Fig. 2a). Although not in articulation with the ribs, we infer they would have crossed at least one rib, reaching and potentially crossing a second. Four sets of gastralia are preserved in articulation in STM7-163 (Supplementary Fig. 2b).

Figure 2: Pectoral girdle and sternum of Archaeornithura meemannae gen. et sp. nov., in comparison with other hongshanornithids.
Figure 2

(a) STM7-163, counter slab (zyphoid process of the sternum is outlined by a dash line); (b) STM7-145, main slab; (c) photograph and (d) line drawing of STM7-145, counter slab. Line drawing (not scaled) of furcula and sternum of other hongshanornithids: (e) Hongshanornis longicresta; (f) Longicrusavis houi; (g) Tianyuornis cheni; (h) Parahongshanornis chaoyangensis. Anatomical abbreviations: ca, carina; co, coracoid; cv, cervical vertebrae; fu, furcula; hy, hypocleidium; lt, lateral trabecula of the sternum; ne, supracoracoidal nerve foramen; pc, procoracoid process; sc, scapula; sl, sternocoracoidal process; st, sternum; uc, uncinate process; zp, zyphoid process of the sternum. Scale bars, 5 mm.

Figure 3: Detail anatomy of Archaeornithura meemannae gen. et sp. nov.
Figure 3

(a) Photograph and (b) line drawing of the left wing, STM7-145, counter slab; (c) line drawing of hands of other hongshanornithids (not scaled; from left): Hongshanornis longicresta, Longicrusavis houi, Tianyuornis cheni, Parahongshanornis chaoyangensis; (d) STM7-163, counter slab; (e) STM7-163, main slab; (f) feet, STM7-163, main slab. Anatomical abbreviations: al, alular digit; am, alular metacarpal; ca, caudal vertebrae (six vertebrae counted); del, deltopectoral crest; d I–IV, pedal digit I–IV; hu, humerus; is, ischium; ma, major digit; mam, major metacarpal; mi, minor digit; mim, minor metacarpal; mt I, metatarsal I; pb, pubic boot; pu, pubis; py, pygostyle; ra, radius; sp, supracondylar process; ti, tibiotarsus; tm, tarsometatarsus; ul, ulna. Scale bars, 10 mm (a,f), 5 mm (d,e).

The scapula is curved, as in other ornithuromorph birds, but the distal end is not well preserved in either specimen (Figs 1 and 2c). The furcula is typically hongshanornithid: delicate, U-shaped, with tapered omal margins and a small tubercle-like hypocleidium as in Tianyuornis and Parahongshanornis12,13,14, which, however, is short and sharply tapered in Hongshanornis (Fig. 2)11. In contrast, a hypocleidium is absent from most other Cretaceous ornithuromorphs, although a short one has been reported in Schizooura15. The furcular symphysis is much thicker craniocaudally compared with the omal rami as in Hongshanornis, whereas the furcula appears to be nearly of equal thickness throughout in Longirostravis and Tianyuornis12,13. The coracoid is narrow along the proximal half, and wide distally with a well-developed sternocoracoidal process (Fig. 2b), as in hongshanornithids and most other ornithuromorphs2,12,13,14. Although poorly preserved, a procoracoid process is visible on the right coracoid in the counter slab of both specimens; it is medially oriented although the distal half appears more cranially directed (Fig. 2b). This process is perforated at the base by a small circular supracoracoidal nerve foramen. The coracoid is preserved in the dorsal view in the counter slab of STM7-163 (Fig. 2b); the acrocoracoid is blunt, the scapular cotyla is deeply concave, and the laterally positioned glenoid is developed as a weak convexity. Distally, the corpus is concave, more so than the condition in Yixianornis but not so deeply as in some Late Cretaceous enantiornithines16. The sternum is not well preserved, but a fragment in STM7-163 indicates the rostral margin is vaulted as in Tianyuornis and Parahongshanornis (Fig. 2d,g,h)13,14, but more pointed than in Longicrusavis and Hongshanornis, in which the cranial margin is broad and parabolic (Fig. 2e,f)2,11,12. A well-developed zyphoid process is present and squared in shape, as in Longicrusavis and Tianyuornis (Fig. 2a,f,g)12,13, whereas the process is absent in Hongshanornis and Parahongshanornis, and the corresponding lateral margin only bulges laterally (Fig. 2e,h)11,14. A second fragment in the same slab indicates that the lateral trabecula was short and narrow as in other hongshanornithids, with a distinct triangular distal expansion similar to that of Tianyuornis but smaller (Supplementary Fig. 2a)13.

The humerus is short and robust with a large rounded deltopectoral crest that extends 44% the length of the humerus and slightly exceeds the width of the shaft, as in other hongshanornithids (Fig. 3a). The distal margin is perpendicular to the shaft. The condyles are well developed and bulbous, and a dorsal supracondylar process is present as in other hongshanornithids (Fig. 3a; Supplementary Fig. 2d)2,12; however, the process has so far been reported only in Ichthyornis among other Mesozoic birds2,17. The ulna is bowed and more robust than the straight radius as in all basal birds. An olecranon process is not developed. The carpometacarpus appears to be fused proximally but not distally in STM7-145. All the metacarpals are straight, and the minor metacarpal is less than half the thickness of the major metacarpal. The alular metacarpal bears a small extensor process that is less than half the width of the articular facet of this metacarpal. The alular digit is long, with half of the ungual extending just beyond the distal margin of the major metacarpal as in Longicrusavis, whereas in other hongshanornithids, only the tip of the ungual slightly surpasses the distal end of the major metacarpal (Fig. 3a,c). The ungual phalanx of the alular digit is larger and more recurved than that of the major digit, as in other hongshanornithids2,11,12,13,14. The first phalanx of the major digit is mediolaterally compressed and caudally expanded, as in other ornithuromorphs. As in Parahongshanornis, the penultimate phalanx is longer than the preceding phalanx, whereas these two phalanges are subequal in length in other hongshanornithids (Table 1). The minor digit only preserves a single reduced wedge-shaped phalanx that tapers distally. A second phalanx, which is extremely reduced in other hongshanornithids2,11,12,13,14, may have being missing due to preservation. Similar to other hongshanornithids, the forelimb is much shorter than the hindlimb, with an intermembral index (humerus+ulna/femur+tibiotarsus) of 0.84 (Table 1), whereas the forelimb is typically longer in other Early Cretaceous ornithuromorphs18,19.

Table 1: Comparative measurements of Archaeornithura meemannae gen. et sp. nov. and other hongshanornithid taxa.

The pelvic girdle is not well preserved in either specimen; the ilium is displaced cranially in STM7-145. Visible in the main slab, the cranial margin is convex, while the lateral margin proximal to the acetabulum is concave; the two margins are separated by a weakly developed ventral hook present in most ornithuromorphs and some enantiornithines. The pubes are long and contact along their distal tenth but remain unfused, as in Hongshanornis (Supplementary Fig. 2c). Although incomplete, the distal ends of pubes are well preserved in lateral and medial views in the counter slab of STM7-163, revealing a small distally expanded boot as in Hongshanornis and Parahongshanornis (unclear in Tianyuornis and Longirostravis; Fig. 3d,e)2,14. The ischia appear to be just over half the length of the pubes, straight, narrow and tapered along their distal halves (Fig. 3e), lacking the low dorsal process located mid-corpus and the concave ventral margin present in most other ornithuromorphs, including Yixianornis and Piscivoravis20,21.

The femora are short and fairly robust, approximately equal in length to the tarsometatarsi; in contrast, the femur is considerably longer than the latter in most other basal birds, including Jeholornis, Sapeornis, Confuciusornis, enantiornithines and ornithuromorphs18,19. The tibiotarsus is proportionally shorter than other hongshanornithids relative to the tarsometatarsus. As in Longicrusavis, the fibula is preserved bowing out from the tibiotarsus, not appressed against it, and only appears to extend to the midshaft of the tibiotarsus12. The proximal medial surface bears a shallow excavation, visible on the left side in the counter slab of STM7-163.

The tarsometatarsi are well preserved in the main slab of STM7-163 (Fig. 3f). They are fully fused, although the individual metatarsals can be distinguished. Overall, the foot is very similar to other hongshanornithids2,11,12,13,14. The proximal half of metatarsal III is plantarly displaced relative to metatarsals II and IV, as in all ornithuromorphs. Metatarsal III is the longest and metatarsals II and IV end approximately at the same level. The hallux is small and placed above the trochlea of the other digits as in most ornithuromorphs including other hongshanornithids. The first phalanx is approximately as long as metatarsal I itself; the ungual phalanx is more strongly recurved than that of the other digits. As in other hongshanornithids, the phalanges decease in length distally, digit III is the longest and digit II is substantially shorter than IV.

Both specimens preserve nearly complete plumage (Figs 1 and 4; Supplementary Fig. 1). Six long asymmetrical primary remiges are preserved in the left wing of the main slab in the holotype (Fig. 4a); the second and third feathers are the longest. The primary remiges are overlain by a layer of short feathers, which measure just under half the length of the primary remiges themselves—we interpret these feathers as the dorsal coverts (Fig. 4a,b). They appear to be symmetrical, definitely lacking the strong asymmetry present in the primary remiges in which the leading edge vane is less than one-third the width of the trailing edge vane (Fig. 4a). Portions of a few secondary feathers are also preserved; these appear to be narrower than the primary remiges and symmetrical with rounded distal margins. An alula is preserved in both specimens, composed of at least three feathers in STM7-163, visible where the alular digit is disarticulated on the left side (Fig. 4d). The rounded distal margins of three large symmetrical pennaceous feathers are preserved near the right foot in STM7-145 (Figs 1 and 4b). These feathers are staggered so that each medial feather ends distal to the lateral feather, suggesting that these feathers represent the distal portion of an incomplete fan-shaped array of rectrices, like that present in Hongshanornis (IVPP V14533 and DNHM D2945/6)2.

Figure 4: Plumage of Archaeornithura meemannae gen. et sp. nov.
Figure 4

(a) Left wing, STM-7-145, main slab; (b) right wing, STM-7-145, main slab; (c) covert feathers over the skull and neck, STM 7-163, counter slab; (d) alular feathers on the left alular digit, STM7-163, main slab. Abbreviations: af, alular feather; dc, dorsal coverts; pr, primary remiges; re, rectrices. Scale bars, 10 mm (ac), 5 mm (d).

Short rachis-less covert feathers are found all over the body, particularly well preserved in STM7-163 (Supplementary Fig. 1). These feathers cover the head, neck, shoulders, extend off the proximal ulna and humerus and line the caudal end of the body (Fig. 4c; Supplementary Fig. 1). These feathers are notably absent from the distal three-quarters of the tibiotarsus in both specimens (Figs 1 and 4a; Supplementary Fig. 1), consistent with the wading habitat inferred for hongshanornithids12.


Archaeornithura is referable to the Hongshanornithidae, which is distinguishable from other Cretaceous ornithuromorphs by the following synapomorphies: the U-shaped furcula bears a tubercle-like hypocleidium; the humerus has a well-developed supracondylar process; the manus is longer than the humerus; the forelimb is shorter than the hindlimb with an intermembral index of about 0.8; and the femur and tarsometatarsus are subequal in length, while the former is considerably longer in most other basal birds. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using a comprehensive matrix targeted at Mesozoic birds (58 taxa and 262 characters; Supplementary Data 1 and Supplementary Data 2)22; the results confirm the close affinity between the new specimens and younger hongshanornithids, resolving all purported members together in a clade, the Hongshanornithidae (Fig. 5; Supplementary Fig. 3). This represents the most diverse recognized clade of Early Cretaceous ornithuromorphs. Synapomorphies of the Hongshanornithidae retained from the analysis include: teeth present throughout the premaxillary (character 4:0); mandibular ramus sigmoidal in shape (character 42:1); acromion process of scapula nearly parallel to the scapular shaft in costal or lateral view (character 98:1); dorsal supracondylar process of humerus developed (character 134:2); second phalanx of the major digit longer than the proximal one (character 171:0); intermembral index between 0.7 and 0.9 (character 177:1); the claw of the fourth pedal digit smaller than that of other digits (character 256:1); and the ratio (length of tibiotarsus/tarsometatarsus) between 2 and 1.6 (character 257:1). Archaeornithura is resolved to be the sister taxon to the younger Tianyuornis and this clade is supported by two synapomorphies: outermost trabecula of sternum with a simple bulb-like distal expansion (character 113:1; Supplementary Fig. 2a) and metatarsals II–IV partially fused with discernible sutural contacts (222:1; Fig. 3f). It is notable that, despite being the oldest recognized ornithuromorph, Archaeornithura is deeply nested within the Hongshanornithidae, which itself is more deeply nested within Ornithuromorpha than some taxa known entirely from younger deposits15,17,18,21,22. These inconsistencies between stratigraphy and phylogeny require the presence of ghost lineages and a much earlier origination date for the Ornithuromorpha, which in turn pushes back the divergence time with enantiornithines and other primitive avian lineages.

Figure 5: Cladogram showing the systematic position of Archaeornithura meemannae among Mesozoic birds.
Figure 5

Bootstrap and bremer values are labelled to the corresponding nodes in normal and bold italic formats, respectively.

Archaeornithura preserves fairly advanced plumage including a well-developed alula and fan-shaped rectrices (Figs 1 and 4; Supplementary Fig. 1). Both the alula (bastard wing) and a fan-shaped tail are aerodynamically important for living birds during slow flight and increases manoeuvrability23,24. These advanced feather structures are inferred to be plesiomorphic at least to Ornithothoraces2,10; an alula is also present in the basal enantiornithine Protopteryx from the same locality8. Because the alular digit is well developed in both hongshanornithids and Protopteryx (extends beyond the distal end of the major metacarpal), the morphology of the alula would be expected to somewhat differ from that in living birds. However, preservation of the alula in a Mesozoic bird has never been clearer than as preserved in STM7-163 (Fig. 4d), which reveals a morphology that is remarkably similar to that in living birds: it is formed by at least three feathers (three to five in living birds), with the short proximal feather ending level with the alular digit and the longer feathers extending to the end of the major digit. Both Archaeornithura and Hongshanornis preserve a fan-shaped array of rectrices2, a feature plesiomorphic to Ornithuromorpha and apparently lost in Enantiornithes10. Enantiornithines and the Confuciusornithiformes typically have only a pair of elongated rachis-dominant rectrices8,9,25,26. The rachis of these feathers is proportionately wide and always preserves a longitudinal stripe, which is interpreted as a central groove in some studies10,26. More recently, the same striped morphology was recognized in the primary feathers of Confuciusornis and enantiornithines, supporting hypotheses that rachis-dominated feathers are modified flight feathers10. Archaeornithura documents this feather morphology for the first time in the Ornithuromorpha; a medial stripe is visible in the rachises of some of the primary remiges. Although evidence from Archaeopteryx indicates modern feather morphology including fully pennaceous coverts and rachises that clearly lacked a longitudinal groove27, these features are absent in Jehol birds despite the huge wealth of specimens25,26. This suggests that modern feather morphologies evolved independently within the Archaeopteryx lineage and a derived subset of ornithuromorphs.

Bird fossils are extremely rare in the Mesozoic fossil record, and until the wealth of specimens discovered from Early Cretaceous deposits in northeastern China, very little was known about the early evolution of birds1,3,4. The Jehol Biota encapsulates a unique window into the biology and morphology of the oldest known avifauna; however, this fauna is clearly already well within the diversification of birds, given that both ornithothoracine clades are present3,28. Until now no ornithuromorphs had been described from the Huajiying Formation, which preserves very few fossil birds10; because diversity is low and geographic area is restricted, the Huajiying Formation is interpreted as the earliest stage in the diversification of the Jehol Biota. However, the discovery of a new species belonging to the specialized clade of waders—the Hongshanornithidae, indicates that ornithuromorphs themselves were already quite specialized at this point in their evolution. This also strongly supports inferences that this clade originated in a semi-aquatic environment1,29,30.


Provenance of the two specimens of A. meemannae

The two specimens (STM7-145, 7-163) of A. meemannae were acquired by the Tianyu Natural History Museum of Shandong from a fossil dealer. The dealer confirmed that the fossils were collected from the same locality of the holotype of Protopteryx fengningensis (IVPP V11665) in Sichakou basin of Fengning Country, Hebei Province, northeastern China. Lithostratigraphic and biostratigraphic fieldworks have been performed in the basin for years, and confirm that the Protopteryx-bearing horizon belongs to the Lower member of the Huajiying Formation5,6,8. The Cretaceous Strata cropping out in Sichakou basin consist of the Huajiying Formation and the overlying Qingshila Formation; the Huajiying Formation consists of lacustrine deposits with abundant pyroclastics, and all the known fossil birds, including the two specimens of A. meemannae, were unearthed from the lower part of the Huajiying Formation (‘Sichakou sedimentary member’ in ref. 6). Currently, no fossil birds have been reported from the Qingshila Formation. A weighted mean age of 130.7 Ma was reported using 40Ar/39Ar dating of the K-feldspars samples from the interbedded tuffs about 6 m below the Protopteryx-bearing layer7, largely consistent with previous results using the SHRIMP U-Pb method31. The two specimens of A. meemannae are preserved in slabs that are identical to the matrixes containing the holotype of Protopteryx fengningensis, Eoconfuciusornis zhengi and Eopengornis martini, in that all the slabs are composed of tufaceous siltstones, which are grey in colour and rigid in nature, consistent with mineralogical composition of the birds-bearing deposits from the lower part of the Huajiying Formation6. We have compared hundreds fossil birds, housed in the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, which are unearthed from the Yixian and Jiufotang Formations from a wide geological area in Jehol Biota. We have noticed that these slabs are off-white (rather than grey as in the Archaeornithura-bearing slabs) in colour and mainly composed of weakly laminated siliciclastic sandstones and shales, which are conspicuously softer than the bird-bearing slabs from the Huajiying Formation (including the slabs containing A. meemannae). In addition, we have requested the dealer to show us the exact locality where these two specimens were unearthed, and confirmed that they were collected from the Huajiying Formation in Sichakou basin. Detail comparisons and geological correlation indicate that the slabs preserving the two specimens of A. meemannae are identical in all visible lithological features to the sediments of the lower part of the Huajiying Formation. Therefore, the provenance of the two specimens of A. meemannae can be justified. The two specimens of A. meemannae are housed in the Tianyu Natural History Museum of Shandong and are publicly accessible.

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the modified data set of Wang et al.22, a comprehensive morphological character matrix targeting the phylogeny of Mesozoic birds (Supplementary Data 1 and 2. Rahonavis was removed from the data set, given the fact that recent studies indicate that Rahonavis is an unenlagiine dromaeosaurid rather than a bird32,33. Two enantiornithines, Elsornis and Iberomesornis, were removed because of their incompleteness. Two recently reported Jehol birds, Eopengornis martini (enantiornithine) and Piscivoravis lii (ornithuromorph), were added and scored from their holotypes (STM24-1, IVPP V17078)10,21. All the known hongshanornithids were included, and Archaeornithura, Parahongshanornis and Tianyuornis were coded from their corresponding holotypes. The revised data matrix consists of 58 taxa (55 are Mesozoic birds), scored across 262 morphological characters. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using PAUP software package version 4.0b10 (ref. 34), with the following settings: all characters equally weighted; unconstrained heuristic search starting with Wagner trees; 1,000 replicates of random stepwise addition (branch swapping: tree-bisection-reconnection) holding 10 trees at each step; and branches are collapsed to create polytomies if the minimum branch length is equal to zero. Bootstrap and Bremer values were calculated as indices of support. Bootstrap values were performed using the TNT software package (ref. 35) with default setting, except that 1,000 replicates were used. Only nodes with bootstrap values greater than 50% are shown in Fig. 5. Bremer values were calculated using the bremer scripts embedded in TNT.

The phylogenetic analysis produced four most parsimonious trees of 997 steps, and had a consistency index of 0.367 and retention index of 0.684 (Supplementary Fig. 3). The strict consensus tree is well resolved, and the new cladogram is essentially consistent with previous studies with regards to the placement of major clades10,17,18,22,29,36. In the strict consensus tree, Longicrusavis, Parahongshanornis and Hongshanornis form the successive outgroups to Tianyuornis+Archaeornithura clade, and these five taxa together constitute a clade, the Hongshanornithidae (Fig. 5).

Nomenclatural Acts

This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank, the proposed online registration system for the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix ‘’. The LSIDs for this publication are:

Additional information

How to cite this article: Wang, M. et al. The oldest record of ornithuromorpha from the early cretaceous of China. Nat. Commun. 6:6987 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7987 (2015).


  1. 1.

    & Mesozoic birds of China—a synoptic review. Vertebr. Palasiat. 44, 74–98 (2006).

  2. 2.

    et al. A new specimen of the Early Cretaceous bird Hongshanornis longicresta: insights into the aerodynamics and diet of a basal ornithuromorph. PeerJ 2, e234 (2014).

  3. 3.

    , & An exceptionally preserved Lower Cretaceous ecosystem. Nature 421, 807–814 (2003).

  4. 4.

    , , , & The remarkable fossils from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of China and how they have changed our knowledge of Mesozoic life. Proc. Geol. Assoc. 119, 209–228 (2008).

  5. 5.

    , , & The Jehol Biota: definition and distribution of exceptionally preserved relicts of a continental Early Cretaceous ecosystem. Cretaceous Res. 44, 30–38 (2013).

  6. 6.

    et al. On the horizon of Protopteryx and the early vertebrate fossil assemblages of the Jehol Biota. Chin. Sci. Bull. 53, 2820–2827 (2008).

  7. 7.

    et al. The 40Ar/39Ar dating of the early Jehol Biota from Fengning, Hebei Province, northern China. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 7, Q04001 (2006).

  8. 8.

    & A primitive enantiornithine bird and the origin of feathers. Science 290, 1955–1959 (2000).

  9. 9.

    , & A primitive confuciusornithid bird from China and its implications for early avian flight. Sci. China D 51, 625–639 (2008).

  10. 10.

    et al. Insights into the evolution of rachis dominated tail feathers from a new basal enantiornithine (Aves: Ornithothoraces). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 113, 805–819 (2014).

  11. 11.

    & Discovery of an ornithurine bird and its implication for Early Cretaceous avian radiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18998–19002 (2005).

  12. 12.

    , & A new ornithuromorph (Aves: Ornithothoraces) bird from the Jehol Group indicative of higher-level diversity. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 30, 311–321 (2010).

  13. 13.

    , , , & New information on Hongshanornithidae (Aves: Ornithuromorpha) from a new subadualt specimen. Vertebr. Palasiat. 52, 217–232 (2014).

  14. 14.

    , & A new ornithurine bird (Hongshanornithidae) from the Jiufotang Formation of Chaoyang, Liaoning, China. Vertebr. Palasiat. 49, 195–200 (2011).

  15. 15.

    , & A new basal beaked ornithurine bird from the Lower Cretaceous of western Liaoning, China. Vertebr. Palasiat. 50, 9–24 (2012).

  16. 16.

    & in: Mesozoic Birds: Above the Heads of Dinosaurs eds Chiappe L. M., Witmer L. M. 240–267University of California (2002).

  17. 17.

    & A redescription of Chaoyangia beishanensis (Aves) and a comprehensive phylogeny of Mesozoic birds. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 11, 889–906 (2013).

  18. 18.

    & A beaked basal ornithurine bird (Aves, Ornithurae) from the Lower Cretaceous of China. Zool. Scr. 35, 363–373 (2006).

  19. 19.

    Taxonomical Revision, Ontogenetic, Ecological and Phylogenetic Analyses of Enantiornithes (Aves: Ornithothoraces) of China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (2014).

  20. 20.

    , & Insight into the evolution of avian flight from a new clade of Early Cretaceous ornithurines from China and the morphology of Yixianornis grabaui. J. Anat. 208, 287–308 (2006).

  21. 21.

    , & A new piscivorous ornithuromorph from the Jehol Biota. Hist. Biol. 26, 608–618 (2014).

  22. 22.

    , , & A new diverse enantiornithine family (Bohaiornithidae fam. nov.) from the Lower Cretaceous of China with information from two new species. Vertebr. Palasiat. 52, 31–76 (2014).

  23. 23.

    On the aerodynamics of birds’ tails. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 340, 361–380 (1993).

  24. 24.

    , , , & An early Cretaceous bird from Spain and its implications for the evolution of avian flaight. Nature 382, 442–445 (1996).

  25. 25.

    , & Feathers and ‘feather-like’ integumentary structures in Liaoning birds and dinosaurs. Geol. J. 41, 395–404 (2006).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Homology and potential cellular and molecular mechanisms for the development of unique feather morphologies in early birds. Geosciences 2, 157–177 (2012).

  27. 27.

    , & New specimen of Archaeopteryx provides insights into the evolution of pennaceous feathers. Nature 511, 79–82 (2014).

  28. 28.

    & Vertebrate diversity of the Jehol Biota as compared with other lagerstätten. Sci. China Earth Sci. 53, 1894–1907 (2010).

  29. 29.

    , & A new basal ornithurine bird (Jianchangornis microdonta gen. et sp. nov.) from the lower cretaceous of China. Vertebr. Palasiat. 47, 299–310 (2009).

  30. 30.

    et al. A nearly modern amphibious bird from the Early Cretaceous of northwestern China. Science 312, 1640–1643 (2006).

  31. 31.

    , & SHRIMP U-Pb zircon age of Later Mesozoic tuff (lava) in Luanping basin, norther Hebei, and its implications. Acta Petrol. Mineral. 22, 237–244 (2003).

  32. 32.

    et al. A new dromaeosaurid theropod from Ukhaa Tolgod (Ömnögov, Mongolia). Am. Mus. Novit. 1–51 (2006).

  33. 33.

    , , , & A basal dromaeosaurid and size evolution preceding avian flight. Science 317, 1378–1381 (2007).

  34. 34.

    PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods) Version 4 (Sinauer Associates (2002).

  35. 35.

    , & TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24, 774–786 (2008).

  36. 36.

    et al. Phylogenetic support for a specialized clade of Cretaceous enantiornithine birds with information from a new species. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 29, 188–204 (2009).

Download references


We thank Zongda Zhang for the reconstruction of the specimen. This research was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2012CB821906), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41172020, 41372014, 41472023 and 41172016), the National Science Foundation for Fostering Talents in Basic Research of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (J1210008) and the Australian Research Council grant (DE140101879).

Author information


  1. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China

    • Min Wang
    • , Jingmai K. O’Connor
    •  & Zhonghe Zhou
  2. Institue of Geology and Paleontology, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong 276000, China

    • Xiaoting Zheng
    • , Xiaoli Wang
    • , Yan Wang
    •  & Xiaomei Zhang
  3. Tianyu Natural History Museum of Shandong, Pingyi, Shandong 273300, China

    • Xiaoting Zheng
    • , Xiaoli Wang
    • , Yan Wang
    •  & Xiaomei Zhang
  4. Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales 2019, Australia

    • Graeme T. Lloyd


  1. Search for Min Wang in:

  2. Search for Xiaoting Zheng in:

  3. Search for Jingmai K. O’Connor in:

  4. Search for Graeme T. Lloyd in:

  5. Search for Xiaoli Wang in:

  6. Search for Yan Wang in:

  7. Search for Xiaomei Zhang in:

  8. Search for Zhonghe Zhou in:


Z.Z., X.Z., M.W. and J.K.O’C. designed the project. M.W., Z.Z., J.K.O’C., G.T.L., X.W., Y.W. and X.W. performed the research. M.W. performed the phylogenetic analysis. M.W., Z.Z., J.K.O’C. and G.T.L. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Min Wang or Zhonghe Zhou.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Figures

    Supplementary Figures 1-3

Word documents

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data 1

    Description of morphological character used in the phylogenetic analysis

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Data 2

    Morphological character scorning in the phylogenetic analysis


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit