Abstract
A central aim of quantum information processing is the efficient entanglement of multiple stationary quantum memories via photons. Among solid-state systems, the nitrogen-vacancy centre in diamond has emerged as an excellent optically addressable memory with second-scale electron spin coherence times. Recently, quantum entanglement and teleportation have been shown between two nitrogen-vacancy memories, but scaling to larger networks requires more efficient spin-photon interfaces such as optical resonators. Here we report such nitrogen-vacancy-nanocavity systems in the strong Purcell regime with optical quality factors approaching 10,000 and electron spin coherence times exceeding 200 μs using a silicon hard-mask fabrication process. This spin-photon interface is integrated with on-chip microwave striplines for coherent spin control, providing an efficient quantum memory for quantum networks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The coupling between photons and quantum states of an emitter is efficient in the strong Purcell regime, in which the emitter interacts primarily with one optical mode. This regime is reached when the overall Purcell enhancement exceeds one (F>1)1. In the case of a nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centre, only a small fraction of the overall photoluminescence (PL) is emitted via the zero-phonon line (ZPL) transitions2. Therefore, one has to differentiate between the overall Purcell enhancement F and the spectrally resolved spontaneous emission (SE) rate enhancement FZPL=F/DW, where DW is the Debye–Waller factor. When the NV ZPL is coupled to a cavity with quality factor Q and mode volume Vmode, the enhancement is given by
where is the maximum spectrally resolved SE rate enhancement3 and quantifies the angular and spatial overlap between the dipole moment (μ) and the cavity mode electric field (E). A high can be realised in photonic crystal (PhC) nanocavities due to their small mode volumes4 Vmode~(λ/n)3 and their large quality factors. One-dimensional (1D) and 2D PhC cavities in diamond5,6,7 have reached Q factors of 6,000 and 3,000 and FZPL up to 7 and 70, respectively. However, the only spin measurement demonstrated on a cavity-coupled NV showed a ~1 μs Rabi envelope decay from an NV hosted in a nanodiamond coupled to a gallium phosphide PhC cavity8. No spin coherence measurements have been reported on single-crystal diamond cavities, leaving unverified the potential of NV-cavity systems as quantum memories.
Here we present a new fabrication scheme that enables exceptionally long-spin coherence times exceeding 200 μs, record-high nanocavity quality factors near the NV ZPL emission, as well as the demonstration of an NV in the strong Purcell regime with FZPL of ~62. Our results experimentally validate the promise of long-spin coherence NV-cavity systems for scalable quantum repeaters and quantum networks.
Results
Simulation
The cavities were designed using finite-difference time-domain simulations9 to maximize by optimizing the ratio of Q/Vmode (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Note 1). As shown in Fig. 1, the nanocavity is based on a suspended 1D diamond PhC structure with lattice constant a, beam width w=2.4a and thickness h=0.7a. A linear increase of the lattice constant from 0.9a to a in increments of 0.02a per period away from the centre defines the cavity defect state. The fundamental cavity mode of the optimized structure yielded a simulated Q=6.02 × 105 and Vmode=1.05(λ/n)3.
Nanofabrication using silicon masks
The cavities were patterned in high-purity single-crystal diamond using a new fabrication process that employs silicon (Si) membranes as etch masks. The diamond was fabricated by microwave (MW) plasma-assisted chemical vapour deposition (CVD), polished to 5 μm thickness and finally thinned to ~200 nm using a combination of chlorine- and oxygen-reactive ion etching (Methods). NVs were created by implantation of 15N and subsequent annealing (Fig. 2a). The Si masks were produced by electron beam lithography and cryogenic plasma etching (sulfur hexafluoride and oxygen) from Si-on-insulator wafers with ~220-nm thick device layers10. This resulted in high-quality masks ~100 × 100 μm2 in area. These were subsequently placed onto the diamond membranes using a transfer process described in the Methods (Fig. 2b). This Si mask transfer process enables nano-patterning without the need of resist coating onto the substrate and is compatible with sample sizes down to several tens of square micrometers. We used oxygen plasma11 to etch the Si mask pattern into the pre-thinned ~200-nm diamond membranes (Fig. 2c). After mask removal, the patterned diamond membranes were transferred onto a Si chip with integrated MW striplines (Fig. 2d). Because the Si mask can be fabricated with excellent quality, thanks to the availability of mature fabrication technology for this material, this process yields diamond PhCs with low surface roughness and uniform, vertical sidewalls. We observed a high yield (94%) of cavities with resonances close to NV ZPL in a single fabrication run, with a maximum Q of 9,900±200 (Fig. 2e). Cavity resonances spectrally <637 nm are suitable for NV ZPL coupling via gas deposition tuning, while longer wavelength resonances can be blue detuned by thermal oxidation and oxygen plasma etching5,7.
Optical characterization
We optically characterized samples at ambient and cryogenic (~18 K) temperatures using home-built confocal microscope set ups with 532 nm continuous-wave laser excitation. PL imaging (Fig. 3a) was used to identify NVs spatially within cavity centres, and spectral measurements determined the separation between the NV ZPL transitions and cavity resonances. Cavity system A (circled in Fig. 3a) contains a single NV, as verified by antibunching in the second-order autocorrelation function. Figure 3b,c plots the initial PL spectrum of system A, showing a cavity peak (Q=1,700±300) blue detuned from the ZPL, as well as two ZPL branches Ex and Ey. These are split by 286 GHz due to local strain in the diamond lattice12. As shown in Fig. 3b, the cavity resonance was then gradually red shifted by gas deposition13 to overlap with the NV ZPL transitions, resulting in strong PL enhancements (Methods). To determine FZPL, a rate equation model is used to analyze the transition dynamics of the NV centre (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Note 2). In this simplified five-level model, we account for the SE rates of the phonon side-band (PSB) transitions and the different ZPL transition rates for the on- and off-resonance cases. The zero-phonon excited state to ground state transition rates of the NV are assumed to be enhanced by the factor FZPL. One important input parameter of our model is the fraction of ZPL to total intensity, quantified by the DW factor2, which we estimate from an off-resonance spectrum to be DW=0.028. By substituting this factor into the rate equation model, we determine FZPL of 8 (15) for transition Ex (Ey) in system A. To show that our simplified rate equation model gives a reliable prediction of FZPL, we considered a second analysis method. By comparing the ZPL intensity for coupled and uncoupled cases (Fig. 3c), we can determine the ZPL SE coupling efficiency into the cavity mode parameterized by a factor , where is the intensity of the cavity-enhanced ZPL and IPSB is the intensity of the PSB. This method is valid in the weak excitation limit where the low population of the excited state does not influence the ratio of , where is the overall PL intensity when the NV ZPL is on resonance and is the overall PL intensity when the NV ZPL is off resonance (see Supplementary Note 2). From F~β/(1−β), we can then deduce the increase in SE rate FZPL=F/DW=10 (17) for the Ex (Ey) transition, yielding similar values compared with the rate equation analysis.
These rate enhancements are still lower than theoretically expected, as determined by the Q and the transverse-electric (TE) polarization of the cavity mode. This is because the Purcell enhancement depends strongly on the spatial and angular overlap, and FZPL is generally much lower than the maximum possible value, , especially in samples with low NV density (~1 NV per μm2 in the case of system A). Moreover, for the {100} diamond crystal used here, the maximum Purcell enhancement is reduced to , since 35.3° is the smallest angle between the TE-cavity field and the NV dipole (that is, crystal) orientation. Using the rate equation model for system A, we calculate an overlap factor for transition Ex (Ey), indicating a factor of 1/ξ~10 (6) off from the theoretically expected maximum for our cavity design due to the non-ideal spatial and polarization overlap. The difference in ξ between Ex and Ey is attributed to different orientations of the two orthogonal NV dipoles with respect to the TE-cavity mode14.
To reduce the deviation from the theoretical maximum and to investigate NV-nanocavity systems in the strong Purcell regime where >50% of the emission is coupled into a cavity mode, we studied another sample with the same cavity designs and a higher density of NVs (~10 μm−2). Figure 3d shows the PL spectrum of NV-nanocavity system B with QB=3,300±50. Out of four ZPL transitions, one was strongly enhanced by the cavity mode; we attribute the remaining ZPL transitions to spatially decoupled NV centres within the ~2-μm diameter microscope collection spot through the cryostat window. We observed both a change in SE lifetime from the off-resonant case τoff~18.4 ns to the on-resonant case τon~6.7 ns and a strong increase in emission from this NV ZPL when tuned onto resonance with the cavity (Fig. 3d,e). Due to the presence of multiple ZPL transitions and their accumulated PSBs, we cannot measure directly their individual DW factors, which are required to precisely determine the SE rate enhancement FZPL as a function of DW. We therefore used two independent measurements to determine FZPL and DW: (i) the rate equation model (as done for system A) and (ii) the radiative lifetime modification according to FZPL=(τbulk/τon−τbulk/τoff)/DW (Fig. 3e). Solving this system of equations gives FZPL=62 and DW=0.019 for a measured τbulk~12.5 ns (the average lifetime of NVs in the un-patterned diamond membrane). The DW has been reported in a range from 0.01 to 0.19 at low temperature2, and has been shown to vary significantly with temperature shifts15; because of this wide variability, we emphasize that it is important to obtain DW from separate measurements, as this strongly influences the estimated value of FZPL. From a measured FZPL of 62, we calculate a beta factor (β) of 0.54 which implies that the NV being enhanced is coupling >50% of its emission into one cavity mode. This value intuitively expresses that the overall NV emission was strongly redistributed towards the ZPL from 1.9 to 54%. Furthermore, by comparing our experimental enhancement to the theoretical expectation using the overlap factor , we find only threefold difference to the maximum value.
Spin measurements
The cavity-coupled NV centres exhibit excellent spin coherence times (T2) similar to the parent CVD crystal. Figure 4a shows the spin-preserving Ex and Ey optical transitions14 of NV-nanocavity system A with associated magnetic sublevels ms=−1, 0,1. A small static magnetic field of ~2 mT was applied along the NV axis to lift the degeneracy of the ms=±1 spin states. The metastable spin singlet states (E1, A1) enable optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) measurements14, but we do not expect the transition rate between these levels to be modified by the cavity because the PhC bandgap, targeted near the ZPL at 637 nm, does not overlap with the 1,042 nm line. Figure 4b shows ODMR under continuous optical and MW excitation, indicating the ms=0→±1 spin transitions. Separate Rabi oscillation measurements (Fig. 4c) under pulsed excitation indicate a Rabi envelope decay time16 of . (Please refer to Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Note 3 for T1 measurements.) The phase coherence time F2 is measured using a Hahn echo to cancel the dephasing by quasi-static magnetic fields16. From the single-exponential17 decay envelope of the revivals in Fig. 4d, we estimate T2~230 μs. Such T2 values are typical for our parent high-purity electronic-grade diamond crystal, indicating that our novel Si mask nanofabrication process preserves long electron spin coherence times. This coherence time is more than 2 orders of magnitude longer than previously reported values for cavity-coupled NV centres8 and semiconductor quantum dots18,19.
Discussion
We use the relevant NV-nanocavity parameters to determine the possible impact of our system on established and potential future applications. NV-nanocavity system B lies in the strong Purcell regime with β=0.54, which would lead to a ~800-fold increase in entanglement generation rates between two distant NVs compared with present schemes without cavity enhancement, assuming the same collection efficiency as in previously reported experiments20 (Supplementary Note 4). For alternative collection schemes, it is possible to couple an optical fibre to a 1D cavity (similar to the one used in this work) through an intermediate waveguide with a total coupling efficiency of 85% (ref. 21), so even higher entanglement rates are achievable. Recently achieved quantum teleportation rates based on differentiating the excited spin states with high selectivity would also significantly benefit from this speed-up22. Another entanglement protocol relies on state-dependent reflectivity (resonant scattering) of an incoming photon on the cavity23. In this approach, the overall Purcell enhancement is important because it determines the probabilities of reflection and no reflection. If we neglect pure dephasing, we can set C, the cooperativity, equal to F and the reflection probability23 is approximately given by 1−(1+4F)/(1+4F+4F2). Therefore, it is important to reach a high F>1. We show here a value of F~1.2 in principle enabling the discussed entanglement scheme. However, we did not measure the dephasing properties and cannot confirm that we are operating in a regime without pure dephasing. These estimations indicate that coupling long-lived NVs to single-crystal diamond cavities is a critical step towards long-distance quantum entanglement and large-scale quantum networks.
In conclusion, we have introduced a fabrication process for the creation of NV-nanocavity systems in the strong Purcell regime with consistently high Q factors, while preserving the long-spin coherence times of NVs24. These systems enable coherent spin control of cavity-coupled semiconductor qubits with coherence times exceeding 200 μs — an increase by 2 orders of magnitude over previously reported cavity-coupled solid-state qubits8,18,19. Such systems with specific NV-cavity coupling parameters can also be used for high-fidelity readout due to the modification of spin dynamics of cavity-coupled NVs25. Our on-chip architecture could be used to efficiently scale NV-nanocavity systems to many quantum memories connected via photons26,27,28,29.
The membrane-transfer process introduced here is well-suited for building such networks as it allows the screening and subsequent integration of high-performance NV-nanocavity systems30,31,32,33 into photonic integrated circuits equipped with MW circuits for multiple electron and nuclear spin control34,35, waveguide-integrated superconducting detectors36 and low-latency logic devices for feed forward37. Spatial implantation of NVs into the mode field maximum or cavity fabrication around a single NV38 appear promising to increase the NV-nanocavity overlap probability. Many of the schemes discussed above require coherent optical control of single or multiple NV spins in cavities that exhibit low spectral diffusion and lifetime-limited ZPL transitions; recent work on near-surface implanted NVs shows it is in principle possible to eliminate spectral diffusion even under 532 nm excitation39,40. With these advances, multiple NV-nanocavity systems operating in the strong Purcell regime and having long-spin coherence times would form scalable quantum memories for quantum repeaters41, spin-based microprocessors42 and quantum networks43.
Methods
Fabrication
In the first fabrication step, high-purity (14N<10 p.p.b.) single-crystal diamond plates were grown by MW-plasma-assisted CVD and were laser cut to a thickness of ~200 μm, where the area of the starting diamond sample falls in the range of 2 × 2 mm. The plates were polished down to ~5 μm membranes using a cast iron scaif. For the creation of NVs, a layer of nitrogen atoms was implanted at 80 keV energy and located ~100 nm from the surface. System A was implanted at a dosage of 5 × 1010 15N per cm2 and system B at 5 × 1011 15N per cm2. The membrane was annealed in a MTI OTF-1500X-4 vacuum furnace (1.5 × 10−6 mbar) for 2 h at 850 °C to mobilize lattice defects, which combine with 15N atoms to form NV centres. Next, the membrane was turned over and thinned down to ~200 nm using plasma etching (Oxford ICP-RIE) with a mixture of chlorine and argon gases at a etch rate of ~2 μm h−1. This recipe yielded a smooth surface (root-mean-square<1 nm) after 4.8 μm etching. The thinned membranes generally exhibited inhomogeneous thicknesses (100 to 300 nm) over hundreds of micrometers. The membrane was divided into tens of smaller pieces (each ~100 × 100 μm in size), which were transferred onto separate Si substrates using a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-tipped tungsten probe. The Si PhC masks were designed and fabricated to match the thickness of each membrane, so that cavity resonances would fall near the NV’s ZPL, and then transferred onto the membranes using a PDMS-tipped probe. Oxygen plasma dry etching (Trion RIE at 20 sccm gas flow, 50 mTorr pressure and 100 W power) was used to transfer the pattern into the membranes. After the etch, little erosion was found on the Si PhC masks. A tungsten probe was used to remove Si masks from diamond membranes. Finally, an SF6 isotropic dry etch removed the Si underneath to suspend the cavity structures. MW striplines were produced separately on intrinsic Si using a standard semiconductor fabrication process, followed by a lift-off step for metal deposition into the Si trenches. Finally, the diamond devices were integrated into the MW architecture using a PDMS-tipped probe.
Low-temperature gas tuning
Characterization of the optical properties of the sample at cryogenic temperatures was performed via PL measurements in a continuous flow He cryostat (CCS-XG-M/204N, Janis) at ~18 K. The sample was mounted inside the isolation vacuum and accessed through a window-corrected objective (LD Plan-Neofluar × 63, Zeiss numerical aperture=0.75). The NVs contained in the diamond cavity structures were excited with a 532-nm continuous-wave laser (Coherent Compass 315M). Fluorescence from the sample was collected in a confocal configuration and sent to fibre-coupled single photon detectors (SPCM-AQR, Perkin Elmer), while spectra were taken via free-space coupling into a spectrometer (Isoplane SCT320, Princeton Instruments). To spectrally tune the cavity mode into resonance with the ZPL, the cryostat was equipped with a nozzle near the cold finger for controlled gas flow onto the sample44. This feature can be used for condensation and ice formation of gas (for example, Xe) onto the sample, hence changing the effective refractive index of the diamond membrane. This refractive index change allows for spectrally red-tuning cavity resonances at a rate of ~8 pm s−1. To take full advantage of this tuning technique, the cavities were designed to have resonances spectrally blue shifted from the ZPL. Xe gas can then be used to achieve precise in situ tuning of the cavity to overlap its resonance with the ZPL. We note that the cavity tuning was observed within seconds of the Xe being released, indicating no further gas dynamics. Reheating the sample to room temperature reverses the tuning. Using this procedure, we were able to repeatedly tune over a range of ~31 nm without significant degradation of the cavity Q.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Li, L. et al. Coherent spin control of a nanocavity-enhanced qubit in diamond. Nat. Commun. 6:6173 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7173 (2015).
References
Su, C., Greentree, A. D. & Hollenberg, L. C. L. Towards a picosecond transform-limited nitrogen-vacancy based single photon source. Opt. Express 16, 6240–6250 (2008).
Zhao, H.-Q., Fujiwara, M. & Takeuchi, S. Suppression of fluorescence phonon sideband from nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond nanocrystals by substrate effect. Opt. Express 20, 15628–15635 (2012).
Santori, C., Fattal, D. & Yamamoto, Y. Single-Photon Devices and Applications Wiley-VCH (2010).
Tiecke, T. G. et al. Nanophotonic quantum phase switch with a single atom. Nature 508, 241–244 (2014).
Riedrich-Möller, J. et al. One-and two-dimensional photonic crystal microcavities in single crystal diamond. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 69–74 (2011).
Faraon, A., Santori, C., Huang, Z., Acosta, V. M. & Beausoleil, R. G. Coupling of nitrogenvacancy centers to photonic crystal cavities in monocrystalline diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 033604 (2012).
Hausmann, B. J. M. et al. Coupling of NV centers to photonic crystal nanobeams in diamond. Nano Lett. 13, 5791–5796 (2013).
Englund, D. et al. Deterministic coupling of a single nitrogen vacancy center to a photonic crystal cavity. Nano Lett. 10, 3922–3926 (2010).
Eichenfield, M., Camacho, R., Chan, J., Vahala, K. J. & Painter, O. A picogram-and nanometre-scale photonic-crystal optomechanical cavity. Nature 459, 550–555 (2009).
Lipson, M. Silicon photonics: an exercise in self control. Nat. Photonics 1, 18–19 (2007).
Li, L. et al. Reactive ion etching: optimized diamond membrane fabrication for transmission electron microscopy. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 31, 06FF01 (2013).
Batalov, A. et al. Low temperature studies of the excited-state structure of negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy color centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 195506 (2009).
Srinivasan, K. & Painter, O. Optical fiber taper coupling and high-resolution wavelength tuning of microdisk resonators at cryogenic temperatures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 031114 (2007).
Doherty, M. W. et al. The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond. Phys. Rep. 528, 1–45 (2013).
Plakhotnik, T., Doherty, M. W., Cole, J. H., Chapman, R. & Manson, N. B. All-optical thermometry and thermal properties of the optically detected spin resonances of the NV center in nanodiamond. Nano Lett. 14, 4989–4996 (2014).
Hanson, R., Gywat, O. & Awschalom, D. D. Room-temperature manipulation and decoherence of a single spin in diamond. Phys. Rev. B 74, 161203 (2006).
Hodges, J. S. et al. Long-lived NV− spin coherence in high-purity diamond membranes. N. J. Phys. 14, 093004 (2012).
Carter, S. G. et al. Quantum control of a spin qubit coupled to a photonic crystal cavity. Nat. Photonics 7, 329–334 (2013).
Tartakovskii, A. Quantum emitters: route to indistinguishable photons. Nat. Photonics 8, 427–429 (2014).
Bernien, H. et al. Heralded entanglement between solid-state qubits separated by three metres. Nature 497, 86–90 (2013).
Gröblacher, S., Hill, J. T., Safavi-Naeini, A. H., Chan, J. & Painter, O. Highly efficient coupling from an optical fiber to a nanoscale silicon optomechanical cavity. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 181104 (2013).
Pfaff, W. et al. Unconditional quantum teleportation between distant solid-state quantum bits. Science 345, 532–535 (2014).
Nemoto, K. et al. Photonic architecture for scalable quantum information processing in diamond. Phys. Rev. X 4, 031022 (2014).
Bar-Gill, N., Pham, L. M., Jarmola, A., Budker, D. & Walsworth, R. L. Solid-state electronic spin coherence time approaching one second. Nat. Commun. 4, 1743 (2013).
Young, A. et al. Cavity enhanced spin measurement of the ground state spin of an nv center in diamond. New J. Phys. 11, 013007 (2009).
Cirac, J. I., Zoller, P., Kimble, H. J. & Mabuchi, H. Quantum state transfer and entanglement distribution among distant nodes in a quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3221–3224 (1997).
Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet. Nature 453, 1023–1030 (2008).
Kim, H., Bose, R., Shen, T. C., Solomon, G. S. & Waks, E. A quantum logic gate between a solid-state quantum bit and a photon. Nat. Photon. 7, 373–377 (2013).
Noda, S., Fujita, M. & Asano, T. Spontaneous-emission control by photonic crystals and nanocavities. Nat. Photon. 1, 449–458 (2007).
Wolters, J., Kabuss, J., Knorr, A. & Benson, O. Deterministic and robust entanglement of nitrogen vacancy centers using low-Q photonic crystal cavities. Phys. Rev. A 89, 060303 (2014).
Burkard, G. & Awschalom, D. D. A cavity-mediated quantum CPHASE gate between NV spin qubits in diamond. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.6351 (2014).
Bayn, I. et al. Fabrication of triangular nanobeam waveguide networks in bulk diamond using single-crystal silicon hard masks. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 211101 (2014).
Mouradian, S. L. et al. The scalable integration of long-lived quantum memories into a photonic circuit. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.7965 (2014).
Neumann, P. et al. Single-shot readout of a single nuclear spin. Science 329, 542–544 (2010).
Dolde, F. et al. Room-temperature entanglement between single defect spins in diamond. Nat. Phys. 9, 139–143 (2013).
Najafi, F. et al. On-chip detection of entangled photons by scalable integration of single-photon detectors. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.4244 (2014).
Benson, O. Assembly of hybrid photonic architectures from nanophotonic constituents. Nature 480, 193–199 (2011).
Riedrich-Möller, J. et al. Deterministic coupling of a single silicon-vacancy color center to a photonic crystal cavity in diamond. Nano Lett. 14, 5281–5287 (2014).
Chu, Y. et al. Coherent optical transitions in implanted nitrogen vacancy centers. Nano Lett. 14, 1982–1986 (2014).
Wolters, J., Sadzak, N., Schell, A. W., Schro¨der, T. & Benson, O. Measurement of the ultrafast spectral diffusion of the optical transition of nitrogen vacancy centers in nano-size diamond using correlation interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 027401 (2013).
Childress, L., Taylor, J., Sorensen, A. S. & Lukin, M. Fault-tolerant quantum communication based on solid-state photon emitters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 070504 (2006).
Awschalom, D. D., Bassett, L. C., Dzurak, A. S., Hu, E. L. & Petta, J. R. Quantum spintronics: engineering and manipulating atom-like spins in semiconductors. Science 339, 1174–1179 (2013).
O’Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A. & Vučković, J. Photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photon. 3, 687–695 (2009).
Mosor, S. et al. Scanning a photonic crystal slab nanocavity by condensation of xenon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 141105 (2005).
Acknowledgements
Fabrication and experiments were supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR Grant No. FA9550-11-1-0014, supervised by Gernot Pomrenke). Research carried out in part at the Center for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, which is supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-98CH10886. T.S. was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. E.H.C. was supported by the NASA Office of the Chief Technologist’s Space Technology Research Fellowship. M.E.T. was supported in part by the AFOSR Quantum Memories MURI. M.E.T. and J.M. were supported by the NSF IGERT program Interdisciplinary Quantum Information Science and Engineering (iQuISE). We would like to thank Fernando Camino, Daniel Kleppner, Hannah Clevenson, Catherine Lee, Sara Mouradian, Ren-Jye Shiue, Aaron Stein, Greg Steinbrecher and Cheng-Chia Tsai for their advice and assistance. We would also like to thank Hassaram Bakhru for nitrogen ion implantation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.L. optimized cavity design and fabricated diamond cavity samples. T.S., E.H.C. and M.W. performed the optical and spin measurements and analyzed the data. L.L., T.S., E.H.C. and D.E. wrote the paper. I.B., O.G., M.L. and J.M. helped develop the new fabrication process. M.E.T. helped implantation and annealing of the diamond samples. J.G. helped with simulation. M.C. helped with optical measurements. M.L.M. and D.J.T. provided CVD diamond membranes. D.E. conceived and directed the project. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 1-3, Supplementary Notes 1-4 and Supplementary References (PDF 378 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, L., Schröder, T., Chen, E. et al. Coherent spin control of a nanocavity-enhanced qubit in diamond. Nat Commun 6, 6173 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7173
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7173
This article is cited by
-
Extreme anti-reflection enhanced magneto-optic Kerr effect microscopy
Nature Communications (2020)
-
Percolation-based architecture for cluster state creation using photon-mediated entanglement between atomic memories
npj Quantum Information (2019)
-
Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies
Nature Reviews Materials (2018)
-
Quantum electrodynamics near a photonic bandgap
Nature Physics (2017)
-
Scalable focused ion beam creation of nearly lifetime-limited single quantum emitters in diamond nanostructures
Nature Communications (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.