Precision spectroscopy by photon-recoil signal amplification

  • Nature Communications 5, Article number: 3096 (2014)
  • doi:10.1038/ncomms4096
  • Download Citation
Published online:


Precision spectroscopy of atomic and molecular ions offers a window to new physics, but is typically limited to species with a cycling transition for laser cooling and detection. Quantum logic spectroscopy has overcome this limitation for species with long-lived excited states. Here we extend quantum logic spectroscopy to fast, dipole-allowed transitions and apply it to perform an absolute frequency measurement. We detect the absorption of photons by the spectroscopically investigated ion through the photon recoil imparted on a co-trapped ion of a different species, on which we can perform efficient quantum logic detection techniques. This amplifies the recoil signal from a few absorbed photons to thousands of fluorescence photons. We resolve the line centre of a dipole-allowed transition in 40Ca+ to 1/300 of its observed linewidth, rendering this measurement one of the most accurate of a broad transition. The simplicity and versatility of this approach enables spectroscopy of many previously inaccessible species.


Precision optical spectroscopy of broad transitions provides information on the structure of molecules1, it allows tests of quantum electrodynamics2, and, through comparison with astrophysical data, probes for a possible variation of fundamental constants over cosmological scales3,4. Nuclear properties are revealed through isotope shift measurements5,6,7,8,9, or absolute frequency measurements10,11. Trapped ions are particularly well suited for such high precision experiments. The ions are stored in an almost field-free environment and can be laser-cooled to eliminate Doppler shifts. These features have enabled record accuracies in optical clocks12,13,14,15. For long-lived excited states such as in atoms with clock transitions, the electron-shelving technique amplifies the signal from a single absorbed photon by scattering many photons on a closed transition through selective optical coupling of one of the two spectroscopy states to a third electronic level16. The invention of quantum logic spectroscopy (QLS)12,17 removed the need to detect the signal on the spectroscopically investigated ion (spectroscopy ion) by transferring the internal state information through a series of laser pulses to the co-trapped, so-called logic ion where the signal is observed via the electron-shelving technique. However, this original implementation of QLS requires long-lived spectroscopy states to implement the transfer sequence. For transitions with a short-lived excited state, spectroscopy of trapped ions is typically implemented through detection of scattered photons in laser-induced fluorescence7,18,19,20,21,22 or detection of absorbed photons in laser absorption spectroscopy23. Neither of the two techniques reaches the fundamental quantum projection noise limit as in the electron-shelving technique24 due to low light collection efficiency in laser-induced fluorescence and small atom-light coupling in laser absorption spectroscopy. In a variation of absorption spectroscopy, the detuning-dependent effect of spontaneous light forces on the motional state of trapped ions is employed to obtain a spectroscopy signal. This has been investigated by observing macroscopic heating on a Doppler-cooled two-ion crystal25, and through a measurement of motional phase change due to photon scattering26.

Here, we present and demonstrate an extension of QLS, which combines the advantages of these techniques and provides a highly sensitive, quantum projection noise-limited signal for the spectroscopy of broad transitions. It is based on detection of momentum kicks from a few absorbed photons near the resonance of a single spectroscopy ion through a co-trapped logic ion. We demonstrate photon recoil spectroscopy (PRS) on the 2S1/22P1/2 transition in a 40Ca+ ion, resolving the line by a factor of 1/300 of its observed linewidth of ~34 MHz and achieve a statistics-limited fractional instability of σy(τ)=5.1 × 10−9, corresponding to 100 absorbed photons for a resolution of 7.2 MHz. This proof-of-principle experiment demonstrates the potential of PRS and its applicability to different species.


Spectroscopy scheme

The principle of PRS is shown in Fig. 1. Starting from the axial motional ground state of the two-ion crystal (Fig. 1a), momentum transfer from photon absorption on the spectroscopy ion results in motional excitation (Fig. 1b). Owing to the strong Coulomb interaction, this excitation is shared by the logic ion where it is converted into a long-lived internal excitation by applying a so-called red-sideband laser pulse, which changes the internal state conditioned on the presence of motional excitation (Fig. 1c)27,28,29. Subsequent electron-shelving detection on the logic ion amplifies the signal of a few absorbed photons on the spectroscopy ion to thousands of scattered photons on the logic ion, providing quantum projection noise-limited detection of motional excitation. This signal is background-free, since spectroscopy and detection are separated in time.

Figure 1: Principle of PRS.
Figure 1

The top part of the figure shows the internal and motional excitation of the two-ion crystal (spectroscopy (spectr.) ion: top, logic ion: bottom). The centre part shows the Wigner phase-space representation of the excited normal mode. Typical timescales for the experimental implementation are shown in the bottom part. (a) Initially, the two-ion crystal is prepared in the ground state of motion through ground-state cooling (GSC) on the logic ion. (b) Absorption of photons from the pulsed spectroscopy laser results in excitation of motion due to photon-induced recoil. Motional displacements are only in momentum, as the pulses are synchronized with the oscillation period of the normal mode. (c) The motionally excited part of the wavefunction containing Fock states |n>0 (represented by the red moon-shaped disc in the phase-space representation) that have no overlap with the ground state |0 is converted into an internal-state excitation of the logic ion by a transfer pulse on the red-sideband (RSB). (d) Electron-shelving detection of the internal state of the logic ion provides the spectroscopy signal.

During interaction with spectroscopy pulses, absorption of a photon displaces the motional state in momentum by ħk, where k is the wavenumber of the spectroscopy light. Efficient excitation of a chosen normal mode is accomplished through application of short (compared with the oscillation period Tm in the trap) spectroscopy laser pulses synchronized to the respective normal mode frequency ωm=2π/Tm (refs 26, 30, 31). The momentum displacement of this mode on absorption of a single photon is given by the Lamb–Dicke factor η (in units of the zero-point momentum fluctuations of the normal mode)32. This motional excitation is shared by the logic ion. It is then converted into an electronic excitation of the logic ion via a transfer pulse on the red-sideband. In a simple model, the excitation signal on the logic ion after this pulse is proportional to the probability of leaving the motional ground state, which is approximately given by

where Na is the number of absorbed photons. Choosing pe=0.5 yields a SNR of 1 in a single experiment, the best allowed by quantum projection noise24. For typical Lamb–Dicke parameters of 0.1, this requires absorption of around 10 photons.

An analytical treatment of the observed signal based on a Fokker–Planck equation qualitatively confirms the favourable scaling with the number of absorbed photons and can be found in Supplementary Note 2.


We have implemented PRS using 25Mg+ as the logic ion to perform an absolute frequency measurement of the 2S1/22P1/2 transition in 40Ca+ with a natural linewidth of 21.6 MHz. A sketch of the experimental setup together with the level scheme of the spectroscopy ion is shown in Fig. 2. Details of the system have been described previously33,34 and are summarized in the Methods section.

Figure 2: Experimental system for photon recoil spectroscopy.
Figure 2

(a) Sketch of the experimental setup showing the linear ion trap with spectroscopy ion (red) and logic ion (blue), the laser beam and magnetic field directions, and the detection system for the logic ion. Doppler cooling, detection and sideband manipulation using stimulated Raman transitions are performed on the 25Mg+ logic ion with light around 280 nm. The two Raman beams are depicted by a single beam corresponding to their relative wave vector Δk. (b) Relevant level scheme for the 40Ca+ spectroscopy ion. Spectroscopy and repumping on 40Ca+ require lasers at wavelengths of 397 nm and 866 nm, respectively. The excited 2P1/2-state can decay back to the 2S1/2 or into the long-lived metastable 2D3/2 state with a branching ratio of 14.5:1.

Resonance line and sensitivity

Figure 3a shows the average of 12 scans across the resonance of the 2S1/22P1/2 transition in 40Ca+ using PRS as described in Fig. 1. Typically 70 spectroscopy pulses per cycle are applied and a cycle is repeated 250 times for each frequency point. After each spectroscopy pulse, a repump pulse is applied to clear out the metastable 2D3/2 state. The observed linewidth of the transition is ~34 MHz, compatible with Zeeman broadening in the applied bias magnetic field of 5.84(1) × 10−4 T and Fourier broadening due to the 50-ns short spectroscopy pulses. An additional line broadening due to saturation of the excitation signal for large motional displacements (ground-state depletion) is avoided by choosing a small number of absorbed photons. The line is a numerical simulation of the spectroscopy signal using a full master equation model (Supplementary Note 3) and corrected for experimental imperfections, such as a reduced signal amplitude (typically ≥0.85) from limited sideband transfer efficiency and a signal offset of typically ≤0.15 due to incomplete ground-state cooling. The photon sensitivity of the signal was determined by taking advantage of the excited 2P1/2 state branching ratio (Fig. 2b). For this, the transition was excited on resonance and the signal amplitudes with and without repumping pulses on 40Ca+ were compared. Figure 3b shows the result as a function of the number of spectroscopy pulses. The Rabi frequency of the spectroscopy laser and the signal per scattered photon is extracted from a numerical simulation of the spectroscopy signal, which takes the excited-state branching ratio of 14.5:1 (ref. 35) into account, corresponding to 15.5 absorbed photons in the absence of any repumping. An excitation of pe=0.5 corresponding to SNR=1 in a single experiment is achieved by absorbing 9.5(1.2) photons, in qualitative agreement with equation 1 for our experimental parameters and confirmed by the analytical model (Supplementary Note 2). This high sensitivity even for a small Lamb–Dicke factor of η=0.108 is a consequence of the exponential scaling with the square of the number of absorbed photons (equation 1).

Figure 3: Photon recoil spectroscopy results.
Figure 3

(a) Frequency scan across the resonance line. The red line is the result of a numerical simulation using calibrated parameters and has been adjusted in amplitude by 0.93 and shifted by 0.15 to account for experimental imperfections (see text for details). (b) On-resonance excitation signal as a function of the number of spectroscopy pulses with (blue circles) and without (red squares) repumper. The solid lines (left axis) are numerical simulations from which the Rabi frequency Ω of the spectroscopy laser is extracted. The dashed and dotted lines (right axis) are derived from the same simulations and give the corresponding integrated number of absorbed photons with and without repumper, respectively. All error bars correspond to 1σ statistical uncertainty.

Absolute frequency measurement

The main result of this work is shown in Fig. 4, where we demonstrate that PRS enables precision spectroscopy at an unprecedented level. It shows the results of a frequency measurement of the 2S1/22P1/2 transition in 40Ca+, which we have implemented using a two-point sampling technique24. For this, we set the probe laser frequency close to the centre of the atomic resonance and probe the excitation probability for constant frequency steps towards the left and right of the resonance centre. The centre frequency is determined from the average of the excitation probabilities p1,r on each side, multiplied with the frequency discriminant given by the experimentally determined slope of the resonance curve. These steps are repeated until the desired frequency uncertainty is achieved. The frequency measurements shown in Fig. 4a have been performed on 5 days within 11 weeks. Fig. 4b shows the relative frequency uncertainty as a function of averaging time τ in form of an overlapping Allan deviation σy(τ) (ref. 36) of the concatenated five measurement runs. The observed instability σy(τ)=5.1 × 10−9 (red line) is in agreement with the expected Allan deviation of 5.8(9) × 10−9 given the measured SNR for a single ion using the true measurement time, including dead time from ground-state cooling and detection. This confirms that the measurement is statistics-limited. The required averaging time can be reduced by at least a factor of ten through speed-optimized ground-state cooling37. For chosen excitation probabilities p1,r, the mean number of scattered photons for each probe cycle can be determined from the calibration shown in Fig. 3b. This allows us to express the relative frequency uncertainty as a function of the number Na of absorbed photons, which is given by σy(Na)=9.5 × 10−8/, corresponding to an uncertainty of 7.2 MHz for 100 absorbed photons.

Figure 4: Absolute frequency measurement results.
Figure 4

(a) Compilation of absolute frequency measurements performed using the two-point sampling technique. The dotted black and dashed green lines give the 68.3% prediction bounds for the measurement and the mean, respectively. (b) Allan deviation of the combined data set. A fit gives an instability of σy(τ)=5.1 × 10−9. The error bars indicate the s.d. of the mean.

Table 1 shows a summary of the evaluated systematic effects for the absolute frequency measurement. Details can be found in the Supplementary Notes 1 and 3. Lineshape asymmetries from an excitation imbalance of Zeeman-shifted line components are strongly suppressed by symmetrical driving of the transition by linearly polarized light. Off-resonant coupling of the spectroscopy laser to other states can cause frequency-dependent AC Stark shifts. We have evaluated both shifts by measuring the line centre frequency as a function of the magnetic field and spectroscopy laser intensity. As expected, the results are compatible with vanishing shifts, limited by the statistical uncertainty of the measurement. Shifts arising from micromotion-induced AC Stark and second-order Doppler effects, as well as lineshape and frequency uncertainties arising from the spectroscopy laser stabilization have been estimated to be well below 1 kHz. The spectral bandwidth of the 125 ns spectroscopy pulses used in the frequency measurements, together with the limited bandwidth of the switching device (an acousto-optical modulator), can cause a shift in the centre frequency of the spectroscopy pulses on the order of ±50 kHz. We calibrate this shift for each experimental run to within 16 kHz.

Table 1: Uncertainty evaluation of the absolute frequency measurement.

Probe-frequency-dependent Doppler heating and cooling effects during excitation result in an asymmetric lineshape of the motional excitation signal. Starting from the motional ground state in our system, we have a precise knowledge of the Doppler-induced shifts through the excitation signal. This allows an accurate analytical and numerical calculation of the shift. From a simple model taking into account Doppler-induced (anti)damping and associated narrowing (spread) of the wave packet in momentum space, this frequency shift is given by

where we have substituted equation 1 for p1,r in the last step. The shift increases for smaller excitation probabilities p1,r used in the two-point sampling technique, corresponding to a larger detuning of the two probe frequencies from resonance and a smaller number of scattered photons. It is worthwhile noting that within the approximations of the model, this shift is independent of the choice of other parameters, such as spectroscopy laser Rabi frequency or the transition linewidth. The result from this simple model agrees very well for typical excitation probabilities between 0.1 and 0.9 with analytical and numerical models including diffusion and drift in position (Supplementary Notes 2 and 3). For smaller excitation probability, the shift is bounded by the trap frequency. From conservatively estimated fluctuations of the detection signal of ±0.1 around p1,r=0.5, we account for a shift of 151(20) kHz. The uncertainty of this residual Doppler shift can be significantly reduced, while at the same time improving the photon sensitivity, by lowering the trap frequency during spectroscopy. A similar, but much stronger effect from heating/cooling processes during spectroscopy of Doppler-cooled ions has been reduced by sympathetic cooling38 and interleaved cooling/spectroscopy pulses20.

The absolute frequency averaged over five individual measurements is 755,222,765,896(88) kHz, of which 78 kHz are from systematic and 42 kHz from statistical uncertainty, in agreement with a previous measurement20, but with an accuracy improved by more than an order of magnitude. To our knowledge, this result represents the most accurate absolute frequency measurement of a broad transition in a trapped ion system, resolving the line centre by a factor of more than 300 of the transition’s observed linewidth7,20,38.


The high photon sensitivity and absolute frequency accuracy of PRS together with its simplicity, requiring only ground-state cooling, enables spectroscopy of atomic and molecular species inaccessible with other techniques. The method is particularly well suited for systems with non-closed transitions or intrinsically low fluorescence rates, such as molecular ions39,40,41, astro-physically relevant metal ions with a complex level structure3,4,42 and highly charged ions43. PRS is also an efficient replacement for the original QLS implementation for long-lived excited states, as it does not require the driving of sideband transitions on the spectroscopy ion, thus lowering the requirements on the spectroscopy laser. Combined with the single-photon sensitivity for high photon energies and the background-free detection, PRS enables direct frequency comb44,45, XUV46,47 and X-ray spectroscopy,48,49 which offer only a small number of photons per spectral bandwidth. This will pave the way for spectroscopic applications ranging from chemistry to fundamental questions in atomic, molecular and nuclear physics.


Experimental methods

We trap a two-ion crystal consisting of 25Mg+ and 40Ca+ in a linear ion trap at single-25Mg+ radial and axial trap frequencies of ~5 MHz and 2.22 MHz, respectively. Using resolved sideband cooling33 on 25Mg+, we cool the in-phase (ip) and out-of-phase (op) axial modes with frequencies fip=1.92 MHz and fop=3.51 MHz to their ground state of motion with a typical residual mean occupation of ≈0.07 and ≈0.02. We have chosen the ip-mode as the spectroscopy mode, as it has the largest Lamb–Dicke parameter of =η=0.108 for the calcium ion. The RSB pulse on the logic ion is implemented by a stimulated Raman transition that is red detuned from the |F=3, mF=3=|↓↔|↑= |F=2, mF=2 transition in the 2S1/2 state (Fig. 5) by the normal mode frequency. As the required π-time for optimum transfer depends on the initial motional state27, we employ a stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP)-like pulse by linearly ramping down the π-Raman beam intensity during 100 μs, while ramping up the intensity of the σ-Raman beam. Although not fully adiabatic, we achieve a more than 80% transfer efficiency of all motionally excited states from |↓ to |↑, independent of their initial state. Internal state discrimination is performed by applying light resonant with the cycling transition |↓ →|e=|2P3/2, F=4, mF=4› (Fig. 5) using the π-detection technique34.

Figure 5: Relevant energy levels and transitions in the magnesium logic ion.
Figure 5

Ground-state cooling and coherent manipulation are implemented through Raman beams (detuned by 9.2 GHz from the excited state), which couple the two qubit states |F=3, mF=3=|↓, |F=2, mF=2=|↑ using π- and σ-polarized light. Laser cooling and internal-state discrimination is performed using resonant light with the |↓↔|F=4, mF=4=|e excited state.

The 397-nm spectroscopy laser consists of a frequency-doubled extended cavity diode laser. The laser light can be frequency tuned via a double-pass acousto-optical modulator (AOM). An additional AOM is used to provide short (50…125 ns) pulses of spectroscopy light. The intensity-stabilized light is delivered to the atom via a single-mode optical fibre to avoid beam-steering errors. The laser is phase-locked to an optical frequency comb, which is referenced to one of the hydrogen masers at the German National Metrology Institute (PTB), providing a direct link to the SI second (PTB) with a relative frequency uncertainty of better than 10−12 for averaging times of ~1 h. The spectroscopy and repump light are linearly polarized in a plane spanned by the magnetic field and the trap axis. Under ideal conditions, this results in equal amounts of σ+ and σ polarized light and an additional π component, providing a symmetric spectrum, independent of the magnetic field.

Frequency measurements

For the final frequency measurement, we employ the two-point sampling method24, where the spectroscopy laser probes the excitation signal at the two frequencies (v1=vprobe−ΔvFWHM/2, vr=vprobevFWHM/2), which ideally provides an excitation of half the maximum excitation. In every single scan, the experiment is repeated on both frequencies for 5 × 250=1,250 times. To reduce the detection error, we employ the π-detection method34 with threshold at 0.5 to extract the excitation probability. This detection scheme is based on post-selection, which inherently reduces the effective number of cycles to a typical value of =1,039(12). This corresponds to a quantum projection noise of σ(p)=≈0.0155. The difference of excitation at the two probe frequencies δp=p(v1)−p(vr)=p1pr is used as an error signal to steer the probe frequency vprobe towards the line centre in the following scan. The uncertainty for the quantity δp rescales to σ(δp)=≈0.0220.

The excitation difference δp is turned into an absolute frequency v by the following relation

where the frequency discriminant D is calibrated for each measurement day experimentally through a measurement of the signal slope around the probe frequencies v1,r.

The final statistical uncertainty for the frequency measurement propagates as

where the first term contains the quantum projection noise and the second one the calibration error for the frequency discriminant.

Concatenating the time-resolved frequency uncertainty from the five measurements shown in Fig. 4a, the overlapping Allan deviation is derived as shown in Fig. 4b. This gives an inferred instability of 5.1 × 10−9 for an averaging time of 1 s. This result is in agreement with the quantum projection noise limit of 5.8(9) × 10−9 estimated according to

where T (=70.5 s) refers to the time for repeating the experimental cycles 1250 times.

The data shown in Fig. 4 are based on a selection of data that have passed statistical tests to check its validity. A total of seven measurement runs, each performed on a different day, have passed normality tests (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Lillifors test, Jarque–Bera test, Shapiro–Wilk test). In a second step, two-sample tests (two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, two-sample t-test) were performed on every combination of two measurements to verify that all the measurements come from the same normal distribution. Two of them did not pass these tests and were excluded from Fig. 4. We suspect that the data was contaminated by drifts in the experimental parameters, such as STIRAP and ground-state cooling efficiency, and calibration of the pulse spectrum.

After excluding the data that fail the distribution tests, the weighted average of all the frequencies measured on a single day is computed according to

with the weight factor w(i)=1/()2. The variance of the mean equals

with N as the number of scans on that measurement day.

A weighted fit of the centre frequencies from different measurement days with the weights 1/ as in Fig. 4a gives the centre frequency v=755, 222, 765, 896 kHz with a statistical uncertainty of 42 kHz.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Wan, Y. et al. Precision spectroscopy by photon-recoil signal amplification. Nat. Commun. 5:3096 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4096 (2014).


  1. 1.

    Frontiers of Molecular Spectroscopy Elsevier (2011).

  2. 2.

    The Hydrogen Atom: Precision Physics of Simple Atomic Systems Springer (2001).

  3. 3.

    et al. Indications of a spatial variation of the fine structure constant. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 191101 (2011).

  4. 4.

    et al. Constraining the variation of fundamental constants at z ~1.3 using 21-cm absorbers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 425, 556–576 (2012).

  5. 5.

    et al. Isotope shifts and hyperfine structure in the transitions in calcium II. Eur. Phys. J. D 2, 33–39 (1998).

  6. 6.

    et al. Laser spectroscopy of calcium isotopes. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Phys. 17, 2197–2211 (1999).

  7. 7.

    et al. Precision spectroscopy of the 3s-3p fine-structure doublet in Mg+. Phys. Rev. A 80, 022503 (2009).

  8. 8.

    , & High resolution isotope shifts and hyperfine structure measurements of tungsten by laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 46, 075003 (2013).

  9. 9.

    , & Precision atomic physics techniques for nuclear physics with radioactive beams. Phys. Scr. 2013, 014017 (2013).

  10. 10.

    et al. The size of the proton. Nature 466, 213–216 (2010).

  11. 11.

    et al. Proton structure from the measurement of 2S-2P transition frequencies of muonic hydrogen. Science 339, 417–420 (2013).

  12. 12.

    et al. Frequency ratio of Al+ and Hg+ single-ion optical clocks; metrology at the 17th decimal place. Science 319, 1808–1812 (2008).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Frequency comparison of two high-accuracy Al+ optical clocks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 070802 (2010).

  14. 14.

    et al. High-accuracy optical clock based on the octupole transition in 171Yb+. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 090801 (2012).

  15. 15.

    , , , & 88Sr+ 445-THz single-ion reference at the 10−17 level via control and cancellation of systematic uncertainties and its measurement against the SI second. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 203002 (2012).

  16. 16.

    Shelved optical electron amplifier. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 20, 60 (1975).

  17. 17.

    et al. Spectroscopy using quantum logic. Science 309, 749–752 (2005).

  18. 18.

    , & High-resolution optical spectra of laser cooled ions. Appl. Phys. 22, 365–368 (1980).

  19. 19.

    et al. Laser spectroscopy of 7,10Be+ in an online ion trap. Phys. Rev. A 74, 052503 (2006).

  20. 20.

    et al. Frequency metrology on the 4s2S1/2-4p2P1/2 transition in 40Ca+ for a comparison with quasar data. Phys. Rev. A 78, 032511 (2008).

  21. 21.

    et al. Isotope shift measurements of >11,9,7Be+. Eur. Phys. J. A 42, 369–373 (2009).

  22. 22.

    , , & Energy levels of Th+ between 7.3 and 8.3 eV. Phys. Rev. A 88, 012512 (2013).

  23. 23.

    , & Absorption spectroscopy at the limit: detection of a single atom. Opt. Lett. 12, 389–391 (1987).

  24. 24.

    et al. Quantum projection noise: population fluctuations in two-level systems. Phys. Rev. A 47, 3554–3570 (1993).

  25. 25.

    , , , & Detection of single-ion spectra by Coulomb-crystal heating. Phys. Rev. A 81, 043428 (2010).

  26. 26.

    et al. Entanglement-enhanced detection of single-photon scattering events. Nat. Photon. 7, 630–633 (2013).

  27. 27.

    et al. Experimental issues in coherent quantum-state manipulation of trapped atomic ions. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 103, 259–328 (1998).

  28. 28.

    , , & Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 281–324 (2003).

  29. 29.

    , & Quantum computing with trapped ions. Phys. Rep. 469, 155–203 (2008).

  30. 30.

    , , , & Nondestructive identification of cold and extremely localized single molecular ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 243201 (2004).

  31. 31.

    , & Resonant few-photon excitation of a single-ion oscillator. Phys. Rev. A 87, 011402 (2013).

  32. 32.

    , , & Sympathetic cooling of mixed-species two-ion crystals for precision spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A 85, 043412 (2012).

  33. 33.

    et al. A single laser system for ground state cooling of 25Mg+. Appl. Phys. B 104, 583–590 (2011).

  34. 34.

    , , & A novel, robust quantum detection scheme. New J. Phys. 14, 023043 (2012).

  35. 35.

    , , , & Precision measurement method for branching fractions of excited P1/2 states applied to 40Ca+. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 023004 (2013).

  36. 36.

    Frequency standards: basics and applications Wiley-VCH (2004).

  37. 37.

    et al. Sympathetic electromagnetically-induced-transparency laser cooling of motional modes in an ion chain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 153002 (2013).

  38. 38.

    et al. Frequency metrology on single trapped ions in the weak binding limit: the 3s1/2-3p3/2 transition in 24Mg+. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 013006 (2009).

  39. 39.

    , & Optical pulse-shaping for internal cooling of molecules. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 18825–18829 (2011).

  40. 40.

    et al. Challenges of laser-cooling molecular ions. New J. Phys. 13, 063023 (2011).

  41. 41.

    & Prospects for Doppler cooling of three-electronic-level molecules. Phys. Rev. A 83, 053404 (2011).

  42. 42.

    et al. inFrom Varying Couplings to Fundamental Physics (eds Martins C., Molaro P. 9–16Springer (2011).

  43. 43.

    Laser spectroscopy for QED tests in highly charged ions. Hyperfine Interact. 199, 131–140 (2011).

  44. 44.

    , , , & United time-frequency spectroscopy for dynamics and global structure. Science 306, 2063–2068 (2004).

  45. 45.

    , & Molecular fingerprinting with the resolved modes of a femtosecond laser frequency comb. Nature 445, 627–630 (2007).

  46. 46.

    , , & Phase-coherent frequency combs in the vacuum ultraviolet via high-harmonic generation inside a femtosecond enhancement cavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 193201 (2005).

  47. 47.

    et al. A frequency comb in the extreme ultraviolet. Nature 436, 234–237 (2005).

  48. 48.

    et al. Soft X-ray laser spectroscopy on trapped highly charged ions at FLASH. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 183001 (2007).

  49. 49.

    et al. An unexpectedly low oscillator strength as the origin of the Fe xvii emission problem. Nature 492, 225–228 (2012).

Download references


We acknowledge the support of DFG through QUEST and grant SCHM2678/3-1. Y.W. acknowledges support from IGSM, J.B.W. acknowledges support from HALOSTAR and Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes, I.D.L. acknowledges support from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. This work was supported by the European Metrology Research Programme (EMRP) in project SIB04. The EMRP is jointly funded by the EMRP participating countries within EURAMET and the European Union. We thank A. Bauch for providing the maser signal, H. Schnatz for help with calibrations, H. Telle for stimulating discussions, and P. Carstens for technical support.

Author information

Author notes

    • Yong Wan
    •  & Florian Gebert

    These authors contributed equally to this work

    • Börge Hemmerling

    Present address: Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA


  1. QUEST Institut, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany

    • Yong Wan
    • , Florian Gebert
    • , Jannes B Wübbena
    • , Nils Scharnhorst
    • , Sana Amairi
    • , Ian D Leroux
    • , Börge Hemmerling
    •  & Piet O Schmidt
  2. Institut für Theoretische Physik und Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert Einstein Institut), Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany

    • Niels Lörch
    •  & Klemens Hammerer
  3. Institut für Quantenoptik, Leibniz Universität Hannover, 30167 Hannover, Germany

    • Piet O Schmidt


  1. Search for Yong Wan in:

  2. Search for Florian Gebert in:

  3. Search for Jannes B Wübbena in:

  4. Search for Nils Scharnhorst in:

  5. Search for Sana Amairi in:

  6. Search for Ian D Leroux in:

  7. Search for Börge Hemmerling in:

  8. Search for Niels Lörch in:

  9. Search for Klemens Hammerer in:

  10. Search for Piet O Schmidt in:


The experimental setup was built by B.H., F.G., Y.W. and P.O.S. The spectroscopy laser was set up and characterized by J.B.W., N.S., I.D.L. and S.A. Y.W. and F.G. performed the experiments, calibrations, and analysed the data together with P.O.S. The numerical simulations were performed by Y.W., N.L. and P.O.S.; the analytical model was developed by N.L. and K.H. The experiment was conceived and supervised by P.O.S. All authors contributed to the discussion and interpretation of the results, and the writing of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piet O Schmidt.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Notes 1-3 and Supplementary References


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.