Article | Open

Membrane cholesterol access into a G-protein-coupled receptor

  • Nature Communications 8, Article number: 14505 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/ncomms14505
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Cholesterol is a key component of cell membranes with a proven modulatory role on the function and ligand-binding properties of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Crystal structures of prototypical GPCRs such as the adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) have confirmed that cholesterol finds stable binding sites at the receptor surface suggesting an allosteric role of this lipid. Here we combine experimental and computational approaches to show that cholesterol can spontaneously enter the A2AR-binding pocket from the membrane milieu using the same portal gate previously suggested for opsin ligands. We confirm the presence of cholesterol inside the receptor by chemical modification of the A2AR interior in a biotinylation assay. Overall, we show that cholesterol’s impact on A2AR-binding affinity goes beyond pure allosteric modulation and unveils a new interaction mode between cholesterol and the A2AR that could potentially apply to other GPCRs.

Introduction

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are complex signalling machines that are embedded in the cell membrane. They are able to respond to extracellular signalling stimulus by triggering diverse intracellular pathways of high relevance for human biology. Despite tremendous advances in characterizing GPCR structure and activation mechanisms, relatively little is known about the role of the membrane environment or of specific membrane lipid composition in receptor function.

Recent work shows that membrane phospholipids can allosterically modulate the activity1 and oligomerization2 of GPCRs. In addition, membrane cholesterol significantly modulates the stability, ligand-binding properties and function of several GPCRs (reviewed in refs 3, 4, 5, 6). Specifically, the presence of cholesterol in cell membranes can either enhance7,8,9,10,11 (that is, positively modulate) or decrease12,13,14,15 (that is, negative modulation) ligand binding and/or functional properties of different GPCRs (see Supplementary Table 1 for a comprehensive summary). A well-known example of this modulation is observed in rod outer segments for the prototypical receptor rhodopsin, where higher cholesterol concentrations in newly formed basal disks are used by these cells to stabilize the structure of metarhodopsin I (MI), thus hampering the formation of the active intermediate metarhodopsin II (MII)16,17,18,19.

Whether this modulation is exerted through indirect effects20,21 (that is, changes in membrane properties), direct interactions22,23,24,25 between cholesterol and GPCRs, or both, has for long been a matter of intense debate (see ref. 6 for a recent review on this topic). Specific cholesterol-binding sites have been identified at the surface of different GPCRs26, suggesting a potential allosteric role of cholesterol in modulating GPCR function. Intriguingly, other studies postulate that closely related cholesterol derivatives can even modulate the function of certain class-A GPCRs from the orthosteric binding pocket thus acting like conventional class-A GPCR ligands. For instance, oxysterol is thought to follow this binding mode at the Epstein–Barr virus-induced G-protein coupled receptor 2 (GPR183)27 or the chemokine receptor CXCR2 (ref. 28). Similarly, oxysterol derivatives are known allosteric modulators of the oncoprotein Smoothened29 (SMO), a class F GPCR. A very recent crystal structure of SMO shows one cholesterol molecule in the binding site of the extracellular domain of this receptor30.

The adenosine A2AR receptor (A2AR) is a class-A GPCR that plays a major role in the heart and brain by regulating oxygen consumption and blood flow31. In fact, in the central nervous system (CNS)32, the A2AR constitutes a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of Alzheimer and Parkinson’s disease33,34. Cholesterol binding to the A2AR at allosteric sites has been previously demonstrated by a high-resolution X-ray crystal structure (PDB ID 3EML)24. Computational work has further quantified allosteric cholesterol binding to the receptor surface35,36 and suggested a stabilizing effect on the apo-form of the A2AR35. However, the ability of cholesterol to impact ligand-binding properties at the A2AR remains unclear.

For this purpose, in the present study we analysed the influence of cholesterol depletion on ligand binding and studied the dynamics of cholesterol–A2AR interaction by extensive long-scale molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Our simulation data reveals an unexpected mechanism of cholesterol action on ligand binding consisting on the entry of a cholesterol molecule into the receptor transmembrane bundle. Different lipophilic ligands that bind to the orthosteric site of class A GPCRs are suggested to access the protein from the membrane milieu (reviewed in ref. 6). Interestingly, in recent crystal structures of rhodopsin37,38, a molecule of a commonly used detergent (that is, n-octyl β-D-glucopyranoside) replaced retinal from the ligand-binding pocket. Therefore, as recently discussed by Gimpl6, it would seem plausible that cholesterol can access the interior of class A GPCRs like the A2AR. To validate this mechanism of action, we used a specifically tailored experimental approach to assess cholesterol impact on chemical modification of the A2AR interior. Taken together, our combined long-scale MD simulation and experimental results show that cholesterol can compete with orthosteric ligands by entering the receptor interior from the membrane side.

Results

Effect of cholesterol depletion on A2AR ligand binding

To investigate the effect of membrane cholesterol on A2AR-binding properties, we removed cholesterol from the membrane and monitored the specific binding of the radioligand [3H]ZM241385 (Fig. 1), a selective antagonist of this receptor. We depleted membrane cholesterol by treating C6 glioma cells with methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD), a specific cholesterol-sequestering agent, for time lengths between 0 and 50 min (Fig. 1). Our data indicate that MβCD is able to deplete around 70–80% of membrane cholesterol after 30 min. To accurately assess the level of cholesterol depletion, we carried out targeted lipidomics in plasma membranes. Remarkably, 40 min treatment with 5 mM MβCD according to the described protocol in the method section depletes up to 61% of cholesterol from the membrane (Supplementary Fig. 1). In addition, further radioligand binding assays using the former membrane preparations (Supplementary Fig. 2) confirm the effect we describe in Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3 using intact cells.

Figure 1: A2AR-specific binding and cholesterol content.
Figure 1

Time course of 5 mM MβCD addition on [3H]ZM241385-specific binding to A2AR in intact cells and membrane cholesterol content. This experiment was carried out using a saturating radioligand concentration of 40 nM. Mean±s.e.m. values obtained from n=3 separate experiments carried out in triplicate. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 significantly different from control value (time 0, n=5) according to a Student’s t-test.

To rule out any cytotoxic effect of MβCD or WSC treatment, cell viability was determined at 20, 40 and 60 min after MβCD or WSC treatments using the XTT method (see Methods). As shown in Supplementary Fig. 4A, neither MβCD nor WSC treatments affected cell viability. Here it is worth to highlight that cells remain viable despite the depletion of more than 60% of their membrane cholesterol using the MβCD treatment detailed in the Methods. Likewise, protein content did not significantly change after 20, 40 and 60 min incubation with either MβCD or WSC (Supplementary Fig. 4B). Moreover, cells did not display any significant change in number (Supplementary Fig. 5a), morphology (Supplementary Fig. 5b and Supplementary Movie 1), or division processes.

Remarkably, the lack of cholesterol increases the specific binding of [3H]ZM241385 to the A2AR by more than 100% (30 min) when compared to non-treated cells (0 min) (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3). Longer incubation times with MβCD (that is, 240 min) did not result in higher levels of A2AR specific binding (469.7±13.7 fmol per mg protein, n=2), likely due to a compensatory mechanism to maintain cholesterol homeostasis in treated cells. Saturation binding experiments using a wide range of radioligand concentrations confirm this inhibitory effect (see Fig. 2). To validate the reversibility of this effect, we replenished membranes with cholesterol using water-soluble cholesterol (WSC) (Fig. 3).

Figure 2: Effect of MβCD on specific A2AR binding in C6 intact cells.
Figure 2

Control (closed circles) and 5 mM MβCD (40 min) (open circles) treated cells were incubated with different concentrations of [3H]ZM241385 as described in the Methods. These results are mean±s.e.m. values obtained from six separate experiments carried out in duplicate. Kinetic parameters (Bmax and Kd) of the corresponding saturation binding curves are indicated at the bottom the figure. **P<0.01 significantly different from control value according to a Student’s t-test.

Figure 3: A2AR-specific binding in intact cells.
Figure 3

A2AR [3H]ZM241385 radioligand binding was determined after treatment with 5 mM methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD), and/or 1 mM water soluble cholesterol (WSC) for 40, 50 or 90 min. Bars 5 and 6 represent a sequential treatment (that is, first MβCD is added, then a washing step, and finally WSC for 40 or 50 min). These experiments were carried out under saturating radioligand concentration (that is, 40 nM). Mean±s.e.m. values obtained from n=3 (columns 2, and 4–6), n=4 (column 3), and n=5 (column 1) separate experiments carried out in triplicate. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 significantly different from control value &P<0.05 and &&P<0.01 significantly different from MβCD value according to a Student’s t-test.

Adequate cholesterol depletion and insertion into the membrane was monitored in intact cells and plasma membrane fractions by filipin fluorescence staining (Supplementary Figs 6 and 7) and targeted lipidomic analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1). Interestingly, addition of cholesterol significantly decreases [3H]ZM241385 binding in cell membranes either untreated (Fig. 3, columns 1, 3 and 4) or previously depleted from cholesterol using MβCD (Fig. 3, columns 2, 5 and 6). This clearly suggests that cholesterol has an inhibitory effect on [3H]ZM241385 binding to the A2AR. This effect was confirmed in membranes from control cells by competitive binding experiments in the presence of increasing WSC concentrations (see Fig. 4 and Supplementary Note 1). To rule out that the former effect is the result of a higher number of A2ARs available due to an inhibition of receptor internalization by MβCD, we performed new binding assays in the presence of different inhibitors of endocytosis (see details in Supplementary Note 2). As shown in Supplementary Fig. 8, inhibiting endocytosis does not significantly modulate A2AR specific binding, hence demonstrating that receptor internalization is not involved in the cholesterol-mediated modulation of A2AR-specific binding. While cholesteryl hemisuccinate, a cholesterol derivative, enhances the stability and activity of detergent-solubilized A2ARs39, our data clearly shows that naturally occurring cholesterol has an inhibitory effect on [3H]ZM241385 binding to the A2AR in more physiological environments (that is, intact cells and cell membrane preparations). Our findings go along with previous experimental evidence in several class A GPCRs reporting a negative cholesterol-mediated modulation of ligand binding (Supplementary Table 1).

Figure 4: WSC competition binding curve in C6 plasma membranes.
Figure 4

Plasma membranes isolated from control cells were incubated with 20 nM [3H]ZM241385 and different WSC concentrations (1 μM to 3 mM) as described in the Methods section. These results are mean±s.e.m. values obtained from three different samples analysed in duplicate.

All-atom MD simulations of cholesterol interaction sites

To shed light on the structural basis of the observed cholesterol modulation, we carried out a complete set of atomistic MD simulations of the A2AR (Supplementary Table 2). As described in the Methods section, we used a comprehensive set of lipids of different chains, nature and length to model a native-like lipid bilayer rich in cholesterol (Supplementary Table 3). The crystal structure of the A2AR40 was embedded in the former membrane and the system was solvated, neutralized, adjusted to an ionic strength of 150 mM Na+Cl and equilibrated following standard protocols (see Methods). First, we simulated a set of 4 × 1 μs replicas to study the frequency and stability of the interaction between cholesterol and the A2AR. The analysis of the accumulated 4 μs shows that in average 12 cholesterol molecules are in contact (below 2.9 Å) with the A2AR throughout the simulation (Supplementary Fig. 9). This value is in agreement with the number of cholesterol molecules required for an ideal conformational stability of the A2AR experimentally observed in cholesterol-rich micelles39.

While our simulations show several transient cholesterol–A2AR interactions (light grey bars, Fig. 5 right), certain cholesterol molecules establish permanent binding interactions to the receptor over nearly 100% of the simulation time (dark grey bars, Fig. 5 right). To spot preferred cholesterol interaction sites at the A2AR surface, we used a 3D volumetric map to depict the density of cholesterol molecules in the simulation (Fig. 5 left and Supplementary Fig. 10). In agreement with Lee et al.36 our data show that transmembrane helices 2 and 3 (TM2–3), TM3-4-5 and TM7-1 are preferred interaction areas of cholesterol at the A2AR surface. Notably, one of the predicted interaction sites, namely TM2–3, overlaps with one of the cholesterol binding sites shown in the experimental high-resolution structure of A2AR in complex with ZM241385 (ref. 24; Fig. 5 left). However, as described in ref. 36, cholesterol does not seem to significantly occupy the upper TM5–6 region, where another binding site was observed in the crystal structure.

Figure 5: Cholesterol volumetric maps and contact frequency.
Figure 5

(a) Volumetric maps of cholesterol density around the aligned structure of the A2AR (white cartoon) for replica 1 (yellow), 2 (green), 3 (red) and 4 (orange). Density maps for individual replicas 1–4 can be also seen in Supplementary Fig. 10. Experimentally observed cholesterol molecule in the recently published high-resolution structure of Liu et al.24 (PDB:4EIY) is shown in cyan surface. Protein is viewed from the extracellular side, helices are labelled and loops are not depicted for clarity. (b) Normalized contact frequency (%) (y axis) of cholesterol molecules (x axis) interacting with the A2AR (that is, below 2.9 Å) during each 1 μs trajectory (replicas 1, 2, 3 and 4). Here we consider cholesterol–A2AR binding interactions to be stable or transient when the normalized contact frequency is above (dark grey bars) or below (light grey bars) 95%, respectively.

Cholesterol accesses the A2AR interior in MD simulations

Strikingly, the volumetric analysis also shows high cholesterol density inside the transmembrane bundle of the A2AR (Fig. 5, left) indicating that cholesterol entered the A2AR from the membrane milieu. A visual inspection of the individual trajectories shows that one cholesterol molecule spontaneously accesses the interior of the protein from the extracellular leaflet through helices TM5–6 occupying a key area of the orthosteric binding pocket (see replica 1 in Fig. 5 and Supplementary Movies 2 and 4). Although cholesterol has been shown to occupy deeply buried sites in other membrane proteins41, this is the first dynamic view of membrane cholesterol spontaneously invading the orthosteric binding pocket of a GPCR.

To exclude simulation artefacts and better explore the cholesterol entry pathway, we performed new simulations and studied the tendency of cholesterol to access the A2AR. First, we selected four representative snapshots from the original cholesterol entrance trajectory (that is, replica 1) prior to the complete invasion of the receptor (Fig. 6). Then, each starting point was used to re-spawn 10 new trajectories of 100 ns each (that is, 10 × 4 × 100). To quantify cholesterol progression towards the interior of the protein, we monitored the distance between cholesterol and residue E1.39 (Fig. 6). In most of these short trajectories, cholesterol does not back away from the receptor but it stays bound or progresses towards the interior of the receptor. As shown in Fig. 6 and Supplementary Table 4, cholesterol progression is much faster once cholesterol slightly tilts down (Fig. 6a,b) adopting a favored position to enter the receptor. Inclusion of intracellular loop 3 (ICL3) do not have a significant effect (Supplementary Fig. 11). These data clearly suggest that cholesterol can spontaneously access the A2AR through a portal gate between TM5 and 6.

Figure 6: Short simulation replicas of cholesterol entrance.
Figure 6

Boxplots display the distance between the centre of mass of cholesterol and residue E1.39 for a set of 40 replicate simulations of 100 ns. Four different starting positions (ad) re-spawned from the original cholesterol entrance trajectory were used to run each 10 replicates (that is, 1–10, 11–20, 21–30, 31–40). The distance at the beginning of the simulation as measured from the snapshot used to re-spawn each set of 10 trajectories (that is, ad) is represented as one single red horizontal line in each of the graphs. Average distance for each set of replicates is reported in Supplementary Table 4. Inset figures show the initial structure of the A2AR (in blue) and cholesterol residue (in orange) used to start each set of simulations. E1.39 residue is displayed as van der Waals spheres. The BENDIX75 plugin for VMD was used to depict protein helices. Protein loops were omitted for clarity.

The nature of the membrane environment could be one of the driving forces behind the spontaneous cholesterol entrance into the A2AR. As shown in Supplementary Movie 3, an unsaturated phospholipid (in yellow) along with a cluster of four cholesterol molecules seem to influence cholesterol entrance by preventing it from diffusing back to the membrane bulk. To study the impact of membrane composition, we substituted the compact membrane environment used so far by a pure 1-palmitoyl-2-oleyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) bilayer (see Methods) leaving intact both the target cholesterol and the A2AR (see Methods). Interestingly, in the absence of a more compact and thicker membrane (Supplementary Fig. 12), cholesterol progression towards the interior of the protein is significantly diminished after 100 ns (see Supplementary Fig. 13 and Supplementary Table 4). Therefore, our simulations suggest that the ability of cholesterol to access the interior of the A2AR can be modulated by the nature of the membrane environment.

The sequence of events during cholesterol entrance is depicted in Fig. 7. Initially, cholesterol is interacting with other membrane lipids (not shown) and water molecules (Fig. 7a) until it leaves this preferred position plunging its polar head into the hydrophobic core of the membrane (Fig. 7a,b). Next, cholesterol descends along TM5–6 guided by the formation of a hydrogen bond with the hydroxyl group of Y5.411 side chain (Fig. 7b). At this point, TM5 and TM6 are tightly packed involving an aromatic cluster of staggered residues F5.45, F4.44, H6.52 and W6.48 (red arrows, Fig. 7b). Thereafter, cholesterol tilts 90° and pushes aside the aromatic side chains of residues F5.45 and F5.44 (Fig. 7c,d) attracted by water molecules and residue E169 at the extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) (Fig. 7c). This creates a protein gateway between TM5 and TM6 that cholesterol uses to make its way into the A2AR to interact with E169 both directly and indirectly through contact with water molecules (dashed red lines in Fig. 7c). Finally, cholesterol completely enters the receptor attracted by E1.39 at TM1 (Fig. 7d). At this stage, the polar head engages into a hydrogen bonding network formed by Y7.36, E1.39 and water molecules. During the entrance of cholesterol, the communication between protein residues in the aromatic network is partially disrupted (F5.45–F4.44 and F4.44–H6.52, see red crosses in Fig. 7c,d), thus likely hampering the reverse progression of cholesterol towards the membrane bulk. However, cholesterol intercalation between helices TM5 and 6 does not involve marked protein rearrangements (Supplementary Movies 2–4).

Figure 7: Cholesterol entrance.
Figure 7

(ad) Four snapshots from a 2 μs MD trajectory showing cholesterol entrance through helices TM5–6 of the A2AR. Left panel: view from the membrane side towards the receptor surface (grey surface), right panel: detailed structural representation of relevant residues that interact with cholesterol during its penetration into the receptor.

To better characterize the behaviour of cholesterol inside the receptor, we extended three of the original 100 ns replicas (namely replicas 1, 35 and 38 in Fig. 6) up to 10 μs (3 × 10 μs). Once inside the receptor, cholesterol molecules explore the interior of the protein by establishing transient interactions rather than adopting a stable binding pose. Interestingly, our simulations show that cholesterol highly populates a specific area of the A2AR binding pocket (yellow surface, Fig. 8a and Supplementary Movie 4) that highly overlaps with the classical orthosteric binding site and the position of the ZM241385 ligand bound to the A2AR crystal structure (PDB:3EML) (red sticks, Fig. 8a). Consequently, our data indicate that, if cholesterol reaches the interior of the protein, it will likely hamper the binding of A2AR ligands such as ZM241385 to the orthosteric binding site. This finding represents one plausible mechanism behind the observed increase in [3H]ZM241385 binding upon cholesterol depletion.

Figure 8: Cholesterol behaviour inside A2AR in long-scale MD simulations.
Figure 8

(a) Average position of cholesterol in the orthosteric binding site calculated over the accumulated 3 × 10 μs (yellow transparent map) superimposed onto the crystallized A2AR in complex with the ZM241385 antagonist (red sticks, PDB:3EML). A single snapshot of cholesterol position at the end of each 10 μs simulation is depicted in yellow sticks. (b) Position of C3.30 in the binding site crevice with respect to ZM241385 and cholesterol molecules (position at 10 μs of three individual MD trajectories). (c) Model of the C3.30 chemically modified with MTSEA-B in the A2AR binding site crevice.

Experimental validation of cholesterol occupying A2AR

Providing experimental evidence for a native membrane lipid occupying the interior of a GPCR is a challenging mission. Cholesterol has been shown to bind the A2AR surface in recent X-ray data24. However, there is currently no structural hint or experimental evidence pointing towards cholesterol ability to occupy the interior of this receptor. In this study, in an attempt to provide experimental evidence supporting our computational findings, we adapted a biochemical assay originally used in GPCRs by Javitch et al.42 for scanning residues exposed to the binding-site crevice in the dopamine D2 receptor. This assay takes advantage of the fact that thiol groups of cysteine residues facing the binding-site crevice of a GPCR will selectively react with hydrophilic and sulfhydryl-specific reagents such as derivatives of methanethiosulfonate (MTS) (detailed in Supplementary Note 3). As shown by the A2AR crystal structure (PDB: 3EML)24 (see Supplementary Fig. 14 and Supplementary Table 5), water-accessible cysteine residues with a free sulfhydryl group are only found in the interior of the receptor. In our experiments, we chemically modified by biotinylation these water-exposed cysteines using N-biotinylaminoethyl–methanethiosulfonate (MTSEA-B), a positively charged MTS derivative similar in size and molecular weight to the ZM241385 ligand (see Methods). Figure 8c illustrates that biotinylation of residue C3.30 (green sticks) results in a modified side chain that occupies a large region of the orthosteric binding site that overlaps with the preferred binding site of cholesterol as well as of ZM241385 (yellow and red sticks, respectively, Fig. 8b). As shown in Supplementary Fig. 15, chemically modified cysteine residues C5.46 and C6.56 yield a similar overlap with the ZM241385 ligand. Accordingly, if cholesterol is able to invade the A2AR-binding pocket as proposed by our simulations, cysteine biotinylation should be hindered in cholesterol-rich membranes compared to cholesterol-depleted membranes.

Based on this conceptual framework, we designed a new set of radioligand binding experiments using MTSEA-B to covalently modify cysteine residues in the A2AR interior and MβCD to deplete membrane cholesterol (Fig. 9). Experiments are schematically depicted in Fig. 9b. First, we used two control experiments where we measured [3H]ZM241385 in untreated (Bar 1) and cholesterol-depleted cells (Bar 2). These control experiments corroborated that cholesterol depletion by MβCD favours specific binding of [3H]ZM241385 (Bar 2) by three fold when compared with untreated conditions (Bar 1). Then, we assessed if cysteine residues in the A2AR interior are susceptible to MTSEA-B biotinylation in cholesterol-depleted conditions, where no competition between cholesterol and [3H]ZM241385 is expected. We observe that after cholesterol depletion, biotinylation reduces [3H]ZM241385 binding by 40% (Bar 3) when compared with treatment with MβCD alone (Bar 2).

Figure 9: Biotinylation experiments.
Figure 9

(a) Effect of the MTSEA-B reagent and cholesterol depletion on [3H]ZM241385-specific binding (mean±s.e.m.) at a saturating radioligand concentration of 40 nM. (b) Scheme of cholesterol influence on receptor biotinylation according to the experimental results presented in a. Bar 1 (control, n=11): ZMA binding in untreated (cholesterol-containing) control cells yields low ZMA binding due to cholesterol shielding effect. Bar 2 (n=5): ZMA binding in MβCD-treated cell membranes (cholesterol-depleted) results in highest ZMA binding due to an empty binding pocket. Bar 3 (n=4): biotinylation of a cholesterol-depleted binding pocket results in a high degree of biotinylation in the orthosteric binding pocket. As the binding pocket is occupied by the biotinylated side chain of C3.30, ZMA binding is reduced. Bar 4 (n=4): low biotinylation degree due to the shielding effect of cholesterol in the binding pocket. Subsequent removal of the shielding agent cholesterol with MβCD results in an empty binding pocket that allows for high ZMA binding. Bar 5 (n=4): lowest ZMA binding due to the accumulated hindering effect of biotinylation and cholesterol. CHL, cholesterol (yellow); BIO, biotinylation (green); MβCD, methyl-β-cyclodextrin (blue); ZMA, ZM241385 ligand (red). In a **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 significantly different from control 1, &P<0.05 significantly different between them (bars 3 and 4) according to a Student’s t-test.

This marked reduction in specific binding strongly indicates that at least one of the cysteine residue in the A2AR interior (Supplementary Note 3) is susceptible to biotinylation and confirms that its chemically modified side chain occupies the orthosteric-binding site (Fig. 9c). In the next measurement, we tested the influence of cholesterol binding in cysteine biotinylation (Bar 4). Remarkably, [3H]ZM241385 binding increases by about 25% (Fig. 9, Bars 3–4) when receptors are treated with MTSEA-B prior to cholesterol depletion. This suggests that cholesterol has a shielding effect by protecting cysteine residues from biotinylation inside the receptor. Thus, this observation supports the presence of a cholesterol molecule inside the A2AR transmembrane bundle with the ability to block access of MTSEA-B to water-accessible cysteine residues. Finally, we observe that if the system is biotinylated in the presence of cholesterol and cholesterol is not removed afterwards (Bar 5), there is an additive effect of cholesterol and biotinylation that hampers binding of [3H]ZM241385, yielding less specific binding than in control conditions (Bar 1).

Cholesterol entry/exit pathways

Our data strongly suggest that a cholesterol molecule can penetrate the A2AR from the membrane side. In fact, membrane access of molecules to class-A GPCRs has been reported for few other cases such as the lipid receptor S1P1 (ref. 43), the cannabinoid CB2 receptor44 and the opsin receptor45. Among them, retinal uptake into the opsin receptor is probably the best-studied case where two potential gateways for ligand uptake or release have been described45. The larger opening (gateway 1) between helices 5 and 6 has initially been proposed to allow for retinal loading, whereas a smaller gate between helices 1 and 7 (gateway 2) allows for ligand exit46. In contrast, more recent studies point to a retinal entrance/exit in the opposite sense47,48. The complete tunnel pathway for retinal into the binding pocket of opsin including gateways 1 and 2 can be detected using the Caver software49 (red surface, Fig. 10a). In comparison, Caver computation for the simulated A2AR (150 ns) reveals three gateways 1 to 3 (yellow surface, Fig. 10b). The last largest gateway 3 is the classical channel for ligand entrance from the extracellular side into the receptor. The smallest gateway 2 is directed towards helices 1 and 7 whereas the intermediate gateway 1 is located between helices 5 and 6 (yellow surface, Fig. 10b). Remarkably, we find that gateway 1 is flanked by two residues, namely V5.40 and F5.44, which are conserved between the A2AR and opsin (Fig. 10a,b). Hence, our data indicate that the opening that cholesterol uses to penetrate into the A2AR is identical to the opening that retinal takes to enter/exit the opsin receptor.

Figure 10: Tunnel pathway comparison between opsin and A2AR.
Figure 10

Gateways and tunnel pathways for (a) the high-resolution structure opsin (3CAP)—red surface and (b) the simulated A2AR (150 ns)—yellow surface computed using the Caver software49. Top: view from the membrane side, bottom: view from the extracellular side showing omitting gateway 3 for clarity in the A2AR.

Unveiling the putative exit pathway of cholesterol from the A2AR is currently beyond the reach of all-atom unbiased simulations. If cholesterol behaved in a similar way to classical GPCR ligands, this entry/exit pathway could occur via the extracellular domain, as suggested elsewhere28,50. However, due to the large hydrophobic moiety of the cholesterol molecule, it is not likely that cholesterol abandoning the A2AR-binding pocket via the extracellular aqueous phase is energetically favoured. To determine the energetic cost of such exit route, we carried out a set of biased simulations (see Methods) where we computed the free energy profile (PMF) of extracting cholesterol from the binding site into the extracellular water phase. These simulations confirm that the energetic cost of a complete cholesterol exit from its observed binding site to the water phase is as high as 120 kJ·mol−1 (Supplementary Fig. 16). Hence, it is more likely that cholesterol leaves the A2AR via the transmembrane helices. In this context, we find that TM2-TM1 or TM7-TM1 could be possible cholesterol exit ways, as detailed in Supplementary Note 4. Notably, TM7-TM1 exit is in line with A2AR channels that have been computed using the Caver software (Fig. 10b) as well as with the described gateway 2 in the crystallized structure of opsin (Fig. 10a)47,48.

Discussion

In the present work, we have studied the effect of membrane cholesterol on the ligand-binding properties of the A2AR. Our in vitro experiments demonstrate that cholesterol significantly decreases the binding of the antagonist [3H]ZM241385 to the A2AR. Molecular insights obtained in this and other studies point to numerous allosteric binding sites at the A2AR surface that could potentially be involved in reducing ZM241385 binding. However, our work reveals an additional and unexpected mode of cholesterol action. We have observed that cholesterol modulates orthosteric ligand binding at the A2AR after entering from the membrane side. These results have been validated combining both computational and specifically tailored experimental approaches.

Our study suggests that the gateway that cholesterol uses to enter the A2AR is evolutionarily conserved and identical to the retinal gateway present in the opsin receptor. Since molecules of a similar size and amphipathic nature have been shown to access the retinal-binding pocket37, it is reasonable to speculate that the negative modulation exerted by cholesterol on rhodopsin function16,17,18,19 could be partly mediated by the new mechanism proposed here. Taken all together, cholesterol is likely to modulate A2AR ligand-binding properties through a mixed mode of action, namely both orthosteric- and allosterically. Nevertheless, further research shall be aimed to unveil the exact contribution of each mode of cholesterol-mediated modulation at this or other GPCRs.

All in all, our results provide an important advance in the understanding of the interplay between cholesterol and the A2AR. Ultimately, our work highlights the importance of considering the influence of different levels of membrane cholesterol in GPCR function and stresses the importance of accounting for these particular cholesterol effects in the study of cardiovascular and CNS disorders. From a broader perspective, our work opens the door to new studies on the effects of cholesterol and other endogenous lipids in GPCRs modulation. This knowledge paves new roads for exploring potential therapeutic uses of membrane sterols or sterol-mimetic molecules in GPCR drug discovery.

Methods

Cholesterol and MTSEA-B experiments

Materials—[3H]ZM241385 ([2-3H](4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-fury1) [1,2,4] triazolo [2,3-α] [1,3,5] triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol 27.4 Ci mmol−1) was purchased from ARC (St Louis, MO, USA). The reagents MβCD, WSC, MTSEA-B and Theophylline were acquired from Sigma Aldrich (Madrid, Spain). Dynasore (3-Hydroxynaphthalene-2-carboxylic acid (3,4-dihydroxybenzylidene)hydrazide) and Pitstop 2 (N-[5-(4-bromobenzylidene)-4-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1,3-thiazol-2-yl]naphthalene-1-sulfonamide) were from Abcam Biochemicals (Cambridge, UK). Liquid scintillation cocktails were supplied by Perkin Elmer (Boston, MA, USA). Additional reagents were of analytical grade.

Cell culture

C6 cells from rat glioma were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium was supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% fetal calf serum, 1% nonessential amino acids and antibiotics. Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 (ref. 51).

Plasma membrane isolation

Cells were homogenized on ice-cold isolation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2-containing protease inhibitors) and centrifuged at 4 °C for 5 min at 1,000g in a Beckman JA 21 centrifuge. The supernatant was centrifuged at 4 °C for 20 min at 27,000g and the pellet was resuspended in isolation buffer51.

Radioligand binding assays

Specific binding to A2AR was assayed in intact C6 cells in the different conditions analysed. Intact cells grown in 24-well plates were incubated with 40 nM [3H]ZM241385 (that is, saturating ligand concentration, based in our previous work52). Adenosine deaminase (ADA, 5 U ml−1 ) was used to remove endogenous adenosine. [3H]ZM241385 ranging from 1.25 to 40 nM was utilized in saturation binding assays, where 5 mM theophylline was used to obtain non-specific binding. After 2 h at 25 °C, cells were washed with ice-cold culture medium, lysed with 0.2% SDS, and transferred to vials to count radioactivity. Two wells from each plate were employed for protein content measurement. When binding assays were performed in plasma membranes, fifty to one hundred micrograms of protein were pre-incubated with 5 U ml−1 ADA for 30 min at 25 °C and maintained for 2 h at 25 °C in the presence of 20 or 40 nM [3H]ZM241385. Non-specific binding was also obtained with 5 mM theophylline, as in previous work52. For competition binding experiments, different (1 μM–3 mM) concentrations of WSC were used to displace total binding of 20 nM [3H]ZM241385. Binding to plasma membranes was finished by rapid filtration through Whatman GF/B filters, which were immediately washed and counted. Radioactivity measurements in vials or filters were performed in a Microbeta Trilux liquid scintillation counter (Wallac).

Cholesterol analysis in intact cells

Cholesterol content in intact C6 cells was measured with a Cholesterol Quantitation kit (MAK043) from Sigma (Madrid, Spain), following manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, samples (106 cells) were extracted with 200 μl of chloroform:isopropanol:IGEPAL CA-630 (7:11:0.1) in a microhomogenizer. After centrifugation at 13,000g for 10 min to remove insoluble material, the organic phase of samples (160 μl) was transferred to a new tube and dried at 50 °C in a SpeedVac for 30 min to remove chloroform. Dried lipids were then dissolved with 200 μl of the Cholesterol Assay Buffer. Fifty microlitres of samples and standards (1–5 ng) were added to 50 μl of reaction mixture and absorbance at 570 nm measured after 60 min incubation at 37 °C.

Filipin fluorescence staining

A cell-based Cholesterol Assay Kit from Abcam (Cambridge, UK) was performed in intact C6 cells in order to visualize and measure cholesterol by using Filipin III as a fluorescence probe of cholesterol. Briefly, after removal of culture medium from wells, cells were fixed for 10 min and washed (3 × 5 min). Filipin III solution was added to each well assayed and maintained in the dark for 45 min at room temperature. After washing of cells (2 × 5 min) fluorescence images were obtained with a digital camera (Leica DFC350FX), attached to a Leica DMI6000B (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) fluorescent microscope using × 20 HCX PL FLUOTAR objective.

Depletion and reloading of cholesterol in living C6 cells

To extract cholesterol, the cells were incubated with 5 mM MβCD for indicated period of time at 37 °C. Cholesterol enrichment of the cells was started using 1 mM WSC for indicated period of time at 37 °C. Finally, chemical modification of the A2AR-binding pocket by biotinylation was performed with N-biotinylaminoethylmethanethiosulfonate (MTSEA-B). This compound was dissolved in DMSO, and aliquots of 100 mM stock solution were thawed just prior to use. When needed, cells were incubated in 500 μM MTSEA-B for 5 min at 37 °C. In all cases, treatment was performed in serum-free medium.

Lipidomic analysis

Plasma-membrane preparations were isolated from control (n=3), 5 mM MβCD 40 min (n=2) and 1 mM WSC 50 min (n=2) treated cells. Membrane samples containing deuterated cholesterol D7 as internal standard were mixed with an equal volume (0.1 ml) of methanol and two volumes (0.2 ml) of chloroform. After each addition tubes were vortexed for 10 s. Chloroform phase (lower) was transferred to a glass tube after centrifugation for 15 min at 4 °C and at 1,000g. This last step was repeated twice. The chloroform phase was evaporated in a Speed Vac (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Barcelona, Spain) and resuspended in 50 μl of methanol:chloroform (3:1)53,54. These lipid extracts (2 μl) were analysed by mean of mass-spectrometry using a HPLC 1290 series coupled to an ESI-Q-TOF MS/MS 6520 (Agilent Technologies, Barcelona, Spain). LC/MS analysis required an XBridge BEH C18 shield column (100 mm × 2.1 mm ID × 1.7 μm) from Waters (Milford, MA, USA) kept at 80 °C. Mobile phases (0.5 ml min−1) consisted of 20 mM ammonium formate (pH 5) (A) and methanol (B). The gradient profile was: 50–70% B in 14 min, 70–90% B in 50 min, isocratic separation of 90% B during 15 min, 90–100% B in 5 min, and maintained so for an additional 5 min55. This protocol allowed the orthogonal characterization of lipids based on exact mass (<10 p.p.m.) and on retention time features. Collection of data was achieved in both positive and negative electrospray ionization time-of-flight modes and performed in full-scan mode at 100–3,000 m/z in an extended dynamic range (2 GHz), using N2 (5 l min−1, 300 °C) as nebulizer gas. The capillary voltage was 3,500 V (1 scan per s). Data were recorded and analysed by MassHunter Data/Qualitative analysis software (Agilent Technologies, Barcelona, Spain) to obtain the molecular features of the samples56.

Inhibition of endocytosis in living C6 cells

To inhibit endocytosis, C6 cells were incubated with 80 μM Dynasore, a cell-permeable dynamin inhibitor, or 25 μM Pitstop 2, for 20 or 40 min at 37 °C (see Supplementary Note 3 for more details).

Cell viability assay

Cells were seeded (104 cells per well) and grown in 96-well tissue culture plate and incubated with 0.3 mg ml−1 XTT solution (sodium 3′-[1-(phenylaminocarbonyl)-3,4-tetrazolium]-bis (4-methoxy-6-nitro) benzene sulfonic acid hydrate) for 30 min at 37 °C in control, MβCD- or WSC-treated cells. The cleavage of XTT to form an orange formazan dye by viable cells was monitored by reading absorbance at 475 and 690 nm according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Cell Proliferation Kit II, Roche, Mannheim, Germany).

Protein determination

Protein concentration was measured by the Lowry method, using bovine serum albumin as standard.

Statistical analysis

The binding data were analysed using Student’s t-test, one-way analysis of variance and nonlinear regression fitting to saturation:

or competition:

binding curves with the GraphPad Prism 5.0 program (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences between mean values were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.

Water-accessible cysteine residues in the A2AR

According to high-resolution crystallography data40, water-accessible cysteine residues with free sulfhydryl groups are only found in the interior of the receptor as all extracellular water-accessible cysteines are engaged in disulfide bonds and therefore cannot react with the biotinylation reagent (see detailed description in Supplementary Note 3). Among these residues, C3.30 is the closest one to the ZMA ligand and is therefore used as representative in this manuscript (Fig. 8c).

Classical (non-biased) MD simulations

All non-biased simulations were performed using the ACEMD simulation package57. The CHARMM36 (ref. 58), CHARMM36c (ref. 59) and CHARMM27 (ref. 60) force fields were used to represent lipids, cholesterol and proteins, respectively. A list of all simulations performed in this work is displayed in Supplementary Table 2.

Set-up. First, a multicomponent lipid bilayer of 100 × 100 Å2 (in the membrane plane) was built using the CHARMM-GUI membrane builder61. The exact lipid composition is described below. This membrane was equilibrated for 1 μs in the NPT ensemble. Next, the crystal structure of the adenosine A2AR (PDB:3EML)40 was manually embedded into the equilibrated membrane using VMD1.9 (ref. 62). The intracellular loop 3 (ICL3) of the A2AR, not resolved in any of the current GPCR crystal structures, was omitted and all titratable residues were left in the dominant protonation state at pH 7. Next, an NPT equilibration phase was performed to accommodate water and lipid molecules to the protein and to promote further mixing (see below).

Initial production runs. Each of the equilibrated replicas above was simulated for 1 μs in the NVT ensemble (simulation set 1 in Supplementary Table 2).

Short replicas. Four different snapshots of the specific trajectory where cholesterol enters the receptor (see Results section) were manually selected (Fig. 6). Each of these snapshots served as a starting seed for 10 new replicas (4 × 10) that were run for 100 ns in the NVT ensemble (simulation set 2 in Supplementary Table 2). To rule out an effect of ICL3 omission, we performed a similar set of simulations where the ICL3 was included (see simulation protocol below and Supplementary Fig. 11). To validate the membrane effect on cholesterol entrance, we substituted all membrane lipids by POPC. First, four new structures were generated by removing all lipid molecules from the starting four seeds used above. The CHARMM-GUI membrane builder61 was then used to embed each structure into a pure POPC bilayer of 100 × 100 Å2. Systems were then minimized and equilibrated (see below). Similarly, each seed was used to simulate 100 ns of 4 × 10 replicas in the NVT ensemble (simulation set 3 in Supplementary Table 2). To rule out an effect of ICL3 omission, we performed a similar set of simulations where the ICL3 was included (see below).

Long replicas. To study the behaviour of cholesterol inside the receptor, we chose 3 of the 100 ns trajectories where cholesterol seemed to have an effective progression towards the interior of the receptor (that is, replicas 1, 35 and 38 in Fig. 6). These simulations were run for 10 μs in the NVT ensemble (simulation set 5 in Supplementary Table 2).

System composition. We aimed to create a membrane environment as physiologically relevant as possible, by following key general tendencies observed in specific brain post-mortem studies relevant for the adenosine A2AR receptor (A2AR) biology63,64,65,66,67,68. The CHARMM-GUI membrane builder61 was used to build a multicomponent membrane by using key representative lipids (that is, polyunsaturated phospholipids, cholesterol or sphingomyelin) while keeping an adequate balance between all components. Thus, our membrane was made of cholesterol, saturated phospholipids, mono- and polyunsaturated phospholipids and sphingomyelin (Supplementary Table 2). As described in the main manuscript, one A2AR receptor was then embedded into this membrane using VMD 1.9 (ref. 62) and the system was then solvated, neutralized and the ionic strength was adjusted using the CHARMM-GUI membrane builder61. Thereafter, a VMD script was used to re-hydrate the membrane patch using 30 water molecules (TIP3P model) per lipid. The exact composition of the simulation systems is detailed in Supplementary Table 1. The lipid composition used yielded a protein-to-lipid ratio of 1:337.

Simulation protocol. As described in the Methods section of the main manuscript, simulation sets 1 and 2 (Supplementary Table 1) share a common building phase, whereas the set-up of simulation sets 3 and 4 involved a complete substitution of the membrane environment or the inclusion of the ICL3, respectively. At the beginning of the equilibration phase for simulations sets 1 and 2 (Supplementary Table 2), harmonic positional restraints were applied to the Cα atoms of the protein and the system was simulated for 10 ns. Such constraints were gradually released from the receptor over 5 ns and the system was further equilibrated for 100 ns. In simulations set 3 (that is, POPC), harmonic positional restraints were applied to all atoms of both protein and cholesterol and the system was equilibrated for 20 ns in the NPT ensemble. In simulation set 4 (that is, ICL3 included), after 10,000 steps of minimization, a gradual release of different applied harmonic constraints was used during 40 ns phase in the NPT ensemble. Harmonic restraints were first applied during 10 ns to all atoms of the system except for the intracellular polar head region of all membrane lipids. Constraints were then released for all water and ion atoms and the system was simulated for another 10 ns. Subsequently, the ICL3 region was released and the system (that is, only protein and target cholesterol restrained) was further equilibrated for 20 ns. NPT simulations were carried out at 310 K and 1 bar using the Berendsen barostat69 with a relaxation time of 400 and 2 fs integration time step. NVT simulations were run at 310 K, using the Langevin thermostat70 with a damping coefficient of 5 ps−1 and 4 fs integration time step. All along the simulations, van der Waals and short-range electrostatic interactions were cut off at 9 Å and the particle mesh Ewald method71 was used to compute the long-range electrostatic interactions.

Inclusion of ICL3. The ICL3 structure was taken from PDB:3PWH and included in the A2AR structure using MODELLERv9.10 (ref. 72) and VMD62. The system was first minimized and the ICL3 subsequently equilibrated and relaxed for 50 ns in the NPT ensemble (see simulation protocol above).

In silico model and conformational analysis for MTSEA-B chemical modification

In a first step, the side chain of cysteines (C3.30, C5.46 and C6.56) of the A2AR (PDB:3EML) was chemically modified by attaching MTSEA-B using the builder tool of the MOE package (version 2016.08). In a second step, the conformational space of such chemical modification was explored using the LowModeMD method in the MOE package with: Rejection Limit 100, Iteration Limit 100, RMS Gradient 0.1, MM Iteration Limit 500, RMSD Limit 0.5, Energy Window 100, Conformation Limit 1000 and applying the Amber10:EHT force field. As a result of this search, we obtained 98 different conformers for the chemically modified residues C3.30 and C5.46 and 96 conformers for the chemically modified residue C6.56, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 15.

Umbrella sampling simulations and free-energy calculations

Biased simulations were used to compute the free energy of cholesterol extraction from the inside of the A2AR. To this end, we used the simulation engine Gromacs v5 (ref. 73) in combination with the CHARMM36 force field58. The recommended settings including the usage of Verlet lists, PME with 1.2 nm cutoff for electrostatics and a cutoff function for the Van de Waals at 1.2 nm with a force-switch starting at 1.0 nm were used74. The composition of the system is detailed in Supplementary Table 3. The potential of mean force was computed along the direction perpendicular to the membrane (that is, z axis). No bias was introduced at the xy axis, that is, molecules could freely diffuse in the membrane plane (xy). The biased reaction coordinate was defined as the distance along the z axis between the centre of mass of the A2AR backbone and the oxygen atom of cholesterol. In total, 35 different windows were probed. Harmonic restraints with a force constant of 2,000 kJ·mol−1·nm2 were imposed along the reaction coordinate. To ensure an adequate overlap between neighbouring windows, each window is separated by 0.1 nm along the reaction coordinate. Based on the quality of the data and the presence of large energy barriers, each window was simulated within 200–600 ns. The accumulated simulation exceeds 8 μs. The reaction coordinate was monitored every 10 fs within each window. The last frame of the 200 ns simulation of the previous window was used as the starting configuration of the next one. Although this protocol cannot be used to simulate all windows in parallel, it drastically improves the equilibration time for each window. The first window corresponds to the cholesterol deeply buried in the ligand cavity. In the last windows, cholesterol moves freely in the water solution. We used the g_wham tool distributed with gromacs v5 (ref. 73) to compute the PMF (Supplementary Fig. 16) disregarding the first 50 ns of each trajectory to avoid sampling potential non-equilibrium configurations. Autocorrelation time of the data was used to minimize correlation effects and to select the appropriated gathering frequency in the PMF curves. Bootstrapping of 1,000 samples was used to estimate the standard deviation of the PMF results.

Tunnel pathway calculations

Tunnel pathways were computed using the Caver software49. The starting point coordinates were set to centre of the binding pocket of opsin and A2AR. Computations were carried out using a shell radius 3 Å, shell depth 4 Å, a probe radius of 1.1 Å for the opsin receptor and 1.4 Å for the A2AR. Obtained results were plotted using the VMD software.

Data availability

The authors declare that all data necessary to support the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information Files. Additional data that were omitted from the paper are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Crystal structure coordinates from the Protein Data Bank (3EML, 3PWH, 4EIY) were used in this study.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Guixà-González, R. et al. Membrane cholesterol access into a G-protein-coupled receptor. Nat. Commun. 8, 14505 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14505 (2017).

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Allosteric regulation of G protein-coupled receptor activity by phospholipids. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 35–39 (2015).

  2. 2.

    et al. Membrane omega-3 fatty acids modulate the oligomerisation kinetics of adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors. Sci. Rep. 6, 19839 (2016).

  3. 3.

    & The function of G-protein coupled receptors and membrane cholesterol: specific or general interaction? Glycoconj. J. 26, 711–720 (2009).

  4. 4.

    & Membrane cholesterol in the function and organization of G-protein coupled receptors. Subcell. Biochem 51, 381–398 (2010).

  5. 5.

    & Uncovering the intimate relationship between lipids, cholesterol and GPCR activation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21, 802–807 (2011).

  6. 6.

    Interaction of G protein coupled receptors and cholesterol. Chem. Phys. Lipids 199, 61–73 (2016).

  7. 7.

    , & Cholesterol as modulator of receptor function. Biochemistry 36, 10959–10974 (1997).

  8. 8.

    & CXCR4 function requires membrane cholesterol: implications for HIV infection. J. Immunol. 168, 4121–4126 (2002).

  9. 9.

    & Inhibition of chemokine receptor function by membrane cholesterol oxidation. Exp. Cell Res. 291, 36–45 (2003).

  10. 10.

    et al. Differential effects of modification of membrane cholesterol and sphingolipids on the conformation, function, and trafficking of the G protein-coupled cholecystokinin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 2176–2185 (2005).

  11. 11.

    et al. Cholesterol reduction by methyl-β-cyclodextrin attenuates the delta opioid receptor-mediated signaling in neuronal cells but enhances it in non-neuronal cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 73, 534–549 (2007).

  12. 12.

    , , & Cholesterol-dependent modulation of type 1 cannabinoid receptors in nerve cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 81, 275–283 (2005).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Cholesterol as a determinant of cooperativity in the M2 muscarinic cholinergic receptor. Biochem. Pharmacol. 74, 236–255 (2007).

  14. 14.

    , , & Membrane cholesterol content influences binding properties of muscarinic M2 receptors and differentially impacts activation of second messenger pathways. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 606, 50–60 (2009).

  15. 15.

    et al. Localization of the kappa opioid receptor in lipid rafts. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 317, 1295–1306 (2006).

  16. 16.

    , & Cholesterol modulation of photoreceptor function in bovine retinal rod outer segments. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 20727–20730 (1990).

  17. 17.

    , , & Modulation of metarhodopsin formation by cholesterol-induced ordering of bilayer lipids? Biochemistry 29, 9143–9149 (1990).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Effect of cholesterol on rhodopsin stability in disk membranes. BBA—Protein Struct. Mol 1297, 77–82 (1996).

  19. 19.

    , & Manipulation of cholesterol levels in rod disk membranes by methyl-β-cyclodextrin: effects on receptor activation. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 20139–20145 (2002).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Cholesterol increases kinetic, energetic, and mechanical stability of the human β2-adrenergic receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E3463–E3472 (2012).

  21. 21.

    , , & Cholesterol modulates the membrane effects and spatial organization of membrane-penetrating ligands for G-protein coupled receptors. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 12046–12057 (2010).

  22. 22.

    et al. High-resolution crystal structure of an engineered human beta2-adrenergic G protein-coupled receptor. Science 318, 1258–1266 (2007).

  23. 23.

    et al. A specific cholesterol binding site is established by the 2.8Å structure of the human β2-adrenergic receptor. Structure 16, 897–905 (2008).

  24. 24.

    et al. Structural basis for allosteric regulation of GPCRs by sodium ions. Science (80-. ) 337, 232–236 (2012).

  25. 25.

    et al. Structure of a class C GPCR metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 bound to an allosteric modulator. Science 344, 58–64 (2014).

  26. 26.

    , & Cholesterol as a co-solvent and a ligand for membrane proteins. Protein Sci. 23, 1–22 (2014).

  27. 27.

    et al. Molecular characterization of oxysterol binding to the epstein-barr virus-induced gene 2 (GPR183). J. Biol. Chem. 287, 35470–35483 (2012).

  28. 28.

    et al. Oxysterols act as promiscuous ligands of class-A GPCRs: in silico molecular modeling and in vitro validation. Cell Signal. 26, 2614–2620 (2014).

  29. 29.

    et al. Oxysterols are allosteric activators of the oncoprotein Smoothened. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 211–220 (2012).

  30. 30.

    et al. Structural basis of Smoothened regulation by its extracellular domains. Nature 535, 517–522 (2016).

  31. 31.

    & Purinergic signaling and blood vessels in health and disease. Pharmacol. Rev. 66, 102–192 (2014).

  32. 32.

    & Potential therapeutic relevance of adenosine A2B and A2A receptors in the central nervous system. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 11, 664–674 (2012).

  33. 33.

    , , & Potential therapeutic interest of adenosine A2A receptors in psychiatric disorders. Curr. Pharm. Des 14, 1512–1524 (2008).

  34. 34.

    et al. Role of adenosine A2A receptors in Parkinsonian motor impairment and l-DOPA-induced motor complications. Prog. Neurobiol. 83, 293–309 (2007).

  35. 35.

    et al. A role for a specific cholesterol interaction in stabilizing the Apo configuration of the human A2A adenosine receptor. Structure 17, 1660–1668 (2009).

  36. 36.

    & Predictions for cholesterol interaction sites on the A2A adenosine receptor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 16512–16515 (2012).

  37. 37.

    et al. Opsin, a structural model for olfactory receptors? Angew. Chemie—Int. Ed 52, 11021–11024 (2013).

  38. 38.

    et al. Crystal structure of a common GPCR binding interface for G protein and arrestin. Nat. Commun. 5, 4801 (2014).

  39. 39.

    , , & The morphology and composition of cholesterol-rich micellar nanostructures determine transmembrane protein (GPCR) activity. Biophys. J. 100, L11–L13 (2011).

  40. 40.

    , & The 2.6 angstrom crystal structure of a human A2A adenosine receptor bound to an antagonist. Science 322, 1211–1217 (2008).

  41. 41.

    , , , & Embedded cholesterol in the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14418–14423 (2008).

  42. 42.

    , , & A cysteine residue in the third membrane-spanning segment of the human D2 dopamine receptor is exposed in the binding-site crevice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10355–10359 (1994).

  43. 43.

    et al. Crystal structure of a lipid G protein-coupled receptor. Science 335, 851–855 (2012).

  44. 44.

    et al. A lipid pathway for ligand binding is necessary for a cannabinoid G protein-coupled receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 17954–17964 (2010).

  45. 45.

    , , , & Crystal structure of the ligand-free G-protein-coupled receptor opsin. Nature 454, 183–187 (2008).

  46. 46.

    & Topology of class A G protein-coupled receptors: insights gained from crystal structures of rhodopsins, adrenergic and adenosine receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 75, 1–12 (2009).

  47. 47.

    et al. A ligand channel through the G protein coupled receptor opsin. PLoS ONE 4, e4382 (2009).

  48. 48.

    et al. Effect of channel mutations on the uptake and release of the retinal ligand in opsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 5247–5252 (2012).

  49. 49.

    et al. CAVER: a new tool to explore routes from protein clefts, pockets and cavities. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 316 (2006).

  50. 50.

    & Ligand entry and exit pathways in the beta2-adrenergic receptor. J. Mol. Biol. 392, 1102–1115 (2009).

  51. 51.

    , & Internalization of metabotropic glutamate receptor in C6 cells through clathrin-coated vesicles. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 99, 54–66 (2002).

  52. 52.

    , , & Endogenous expression of adenosine A1, A2 and A3 receptors in rat C6 glioma cells. Neurochem. Res. 32, 1056–1070 (2007).

  53. 53.

    et al. 7-dehydrocholesterol efficiently supports Ret signaling in a mouse model of Smith-Opitz-Lemli syndrome. Sci. Rep 6, 28534 (2016).

  54. 54.

    et al. Lipidomic and metabolomic analyses reveal potential plasma biomarkers of early atheromatous plaque formation in hamsters. Cardiovasc. Res. 97, 642–652 (2013).

  55. 55.

    , , , & Comprehensive blood plasma lipidomics by liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1217, 4087–4099 (2010).

  56. 56.

    , , , & Molecular formula and METLIN personal metabolite database matching applied to the identification of compounds generated by LC/TOF-MS. J. Biomol. Tech 19, 258–266 (2008).

  57. 57.

    , & ACEMD: accelerating biomolecular dynamics in the microsecond time scale. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5, 1–9 (2009).

  58. 58.

    et al. Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: validation on six lipid types. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 7830–7843 (2010).

  59. 59.

    , & Update of the cholesterol force field parameters in CHARMM. J. Phys. Chem. B 116, 203–210 (2012).

  60. 60.

    & All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 5647, 3586–3616 (1998).

  61. 61.

    , , & CHARMM-GUI membrane builder for mixed bilayers and its application to yeast membranes. Biophys. J. 96, 50–58 (2009).

  62. 62.

    , & VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).

  63. 63.

    et al. Selective deficits in the omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid in the postmortem orbitofrontal cortex of patients with major depressive disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 62, 17–24 (2007).

  64. 64.

    et al. Abnormalities in the fatty acid composition of the postmortem orbitofrontal cortex of schizophrenic patients: gender differences and partial normalization with antipsychotic medications. Schizophr. Res. 91, 37–50 (2007).

  65. 65.

    et al. Deficits in docosahexaenoic acid and associated elevations in the metabolism of arachidonic acid and saturated fatty acids in the postmortem orbitofrontal cortex of patients with bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 160, 285–299 (2008).

  66. 66.

    et al. Lipid alterations in lipid rafts from Alzheimer’s disease human brain cortex. J. Alzheimers Dis. 19, 489–502 (2010).

  67. 67.

    et al. Severe alterations in lipid composition of frontal cortex lipid rafts from Parkinson’s disease and incidental Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Med. 17, 1107 (2011).

  68. 68.

    , , , & Altered fatty acid concentrations in prefrontal cortex of schizophrenic patients. J. Psychiatr. Res. 47, 636–643 (2013).

  69. 69.

    , , , & Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684 (1984).

  70. 70.

    & Molecular dynamics simulation for polymers in the presence of a heat bath. Phys. Rev. A 33, 3628–3631 (1986).

  71. 71.

    , & Particle mesh Ewald: an N·log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 27709, 13–16 (1993).

  72. 72.

    , , , & Protein structure modeling with MODELLER. Methods Mol. Biol. 426, 145–159 (2008).

  73. 73.

    et al. Gromacs: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2, 19–25 (2015).

  74. 74.

    , & CHAMBER: comprehensive support for CHARMM force fields within the AMBER software. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 109, 3767–3772 (2009).

  75. 75.

    , & Bendix: intuitive helix geometry analysis and abstraction. Bioinformatics 28, 2193–2194 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.S. and R.G.-G. acknowledge support from Fundació La Marató de TV3 (091010), Instituto de Salud Carlos III FEDER (CP12/03139 and PI15/00460), and the GLISTEN European Research Network. F.S., M.P., J.S. and R.G.-G. acknowledge support from Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (Grant Number: SAF2009-13609-C04-04) and H2020 Project MedBioinformatics under Grant Agreement Number 634143. P.W.H. and R.G.-G. acknowledge support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG HI 1502/ 1-1, WO 1908/2-1, SFB 740) SFB70 and the Norddeutscher Verbund für Hoch- und Höchstleistungsrechner (HLRN). M.Mar. and J.L.A. acknowledge support from Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BFU2011–23034) and JCCM (PEII-2014-030-P). I.R.-E. acknowledges support from AGAUR and European Social Fund (2015 FI_B00145). H.M.-S. and M. Man acknowledge financial support from the Academy of Finland and thank the CSC—IT Center for Science (Espoo, Finland) for providing computational resources.

Author information

Author notes

    • Ramon Guixà-González
    •  & José L. Albasanz

    These authors contributed equally to this work

Affiliations

  1. Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Department of Experimental and Health Sciences of Pompeu Fabra University (UPF)—Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), 08003 Barcelona, Spain

    • Ramon Guixà-González
    • , Ismael Rodriguez-Espigares
    • , Manuel Pastor
    • , Ferran Sanz
    • , Maria Martí-Solano
    •  & Jana Selent
  2. Institut für Medizinische Physik und Biophysik, AG ProteiInformatics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany

    • Ramon Guixà-González
    •  & Peter W. Hildebrand
  3. Department of Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, and Biochemistry, Faculty of Science and Chemical Technologies and Faculty of Medicine of Ciudad Real. Regional Center of Biomedical Research (CRIB), University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM), 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain

    • José L. Albasanz
    •  & Mairena Martín
  4. Department of Physics, Tampere University of Technology (TUT), PO Box 692, FI-33101 Tampere, Finland

    • Moutusi Manna
    •  & Hector Martinez-Seara
  5. Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-16610 Prague, Czech Republic

    • Hector Martinez-Seara

Authors

  1. Search for Ramon Guixà-González in:

  2. Search for José L. Albasanz in:

  3. Search for Ismael Rodriguez-Espigares in:

  4. Search for Manuel Pastor in:

  5. Search for Ferran Sanz in:

  6. Search for Maria Martí-Solano in:

  7. Search for Moutusi Manna in:

  8. Search for Hector Martinez-Seara in:

  9. Search for Peter W. Hildebrand in:

  10. Search for Mairena Martín in:

  11. Search for Jana Selent in:

Contributions

R.G.-G. designed and performed the classical MD simulations with contribution from J.S., I.R.-E. and P.W.H. M.Man. and H.M.-S. performed the umbrella sampling simulations. H.M.-S. performed the free energy calculations. J.L.A. and M.Mar. performed cholesterol and MTSEA-B experiments. J.S. performed tunnel pathway calculations. P.W.H., M.P. and F.S. gave technical support and conceptual advice. R.G.G. and J.S. wrote the paper with contributions from J.-L.A., M.Mar., M.M.-S., H.M.-S, and comments from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mairena Martín or Jana Selent.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Tables, Supplementary Notes, Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary References.

  2. 2.

    Peer Review File

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Movie 1

    Growth of C6 glioma cells in control conditions or in the presence of 5 mM MβCD or 1 mM WSC. Time lapse movie (1 frame/minute) of cells growing for 100 minutes.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Movie 2

    MD trajectory showing one cholesterol molecule (liquorice and orange transparent surface) entering the A2AR (grey surface) from the membrane milieu. The cholesterol molecule belongs to the upper leaflet of the bilayer (i.e. extracellular). Other lipids, water and ions were omitted for clarity.

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Movie 3

    One DOPC (yellow) and four cholesterol molecules (grey) of the surrounding membrane bulk seem to assist the entrance of cholesterol (red) into the A2AR (purple) by preventing it from diffusing back to the membrane bulk. All lipids shown belong to the upper leaflet of the bilayer (i.e. extracellular). Other lipids, water and ions were omitted for clarity.

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Movie 4

    Cholesterol (van der Waals spheres) entrance into the A2AR (grey) viewed from the extracellular side. Main aromatic/aliphatic (purple) and polar (orange) residues interacting with cholesterol are shown (licorice representation). Other lipids, protein loops and water or ions were omitted for clarity.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BYThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/