## Abstract

Controlled access to the border of the Mott insulating state by variation of control parameters offers exotic electronic states such as anomalous and possibly high-transition-temperature (*T*_{c}) superconductivity. The alkali-doped fullerides show a transition from a Mott insulator to a superconductor for the first time in three-dimensional materials, but the impact of dimensionality and electron correlation on superconducting properties has remained unclear. Here we show that, near the Mott insulating phase, the upper critical field *H*_{c2} of the fulleride superconductors reaches values as high as ∼90 T—the highest among cubic crystals. This is accompanied by a crossover from weak- to strong-coupling superconductivity and appears upon entering the metallic state with the dynamical Jahn–Teller effect as the Mott transition is approached. These results suggest that the cooperative interplay between molecular electronic structure and strong electron correlations plays a key role in realizing robust superconductivity with high-*T*_{c} and high-*H*_{c2}.

## Introduction

The interplay between superconductivity and electron correlations is one of the central issues in condensed matter physics. Superconducting (SC) materials based on Mott insulators, such as two-dimensional (2D) cuprates^{1} and organic charge-transfer salts^{2}, are model platforms that have been extensively studied thus far. A dome-like dependence of the SC transition temperature *T*_{c} as a function of tuning parameters, such as carrier doping and pressure, has been discussed as a fingerprint of unconventional superconductivity^{3}. Recent physical and chemical pressure studies of Cs_{3}C_{60} have revealed that the family of cubic fullerides A_{3}C_{60} (A: alkali metal), where superconductivity emerges from the Mott insulating state driven by dynamical intramolecular Jahn–Teller (JT) distortions and strong Coulomb repulsion, is a new example of superconductors that show a dome-like SC phase diagram as a function of unit-cell volume *V* (refs 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). This suggests the importance of strong electron correlation to SC mechanisms^{10} and the need for further treatment beyond conventional framework of theory^{11}. Recent study has revealed a crossover in the normal state from the conventional Fermi liquid to a nontrivial metallic state where JT distortions persist (JT metal)^{9,12}. There, localized electrons coexist with itinerant electrons microscopically and heterogeneously.

The dependence of the upper critical field *H*_{c2} on *T*_{c} is relevant to the understanding of the dome-like SC phase because *H*_{c2} is determined by the coherence length (the size of the Cooper pair) as well as the strength of the pairing potential. Therefore, *H*_{c2} is also important to understand the underlying mechanism of the superconductivity. However, for the fullerides, *H*_{c2} as a function of *V* has not as yet been determined due to the very large *H*_{c2} and the need for high pressure to access superconductivity in Cs_{3}C_{60}.

Here we report measurements of *H*_{c2} using a pulsed magnetic field in Rb_{x}Cs_{3−x}C_{60}, where superconductivity appears near the Mott transition even at ambient pressure^{9}. In proximity to the Mott transition, *H*_{c2} is enhanced up to ∼90 T, which is the highest among cubic superconductors. We uncovered that *H*_{c2} and the pairing strength increase concomitantly with increasing lattice volume near the Mott transition, suggesting that molecular characteristics as well as electron correlations play important roles for realizing superconductivity with high-*T*_{c} and high-*H*_{c2} in molecular materials.

## Results

## Temperature dependence of upper critical field

*H*_{c2} of the fulleride superconductors (Fig. 1a) Na_{2}CsC_{60}, K_{3}C_{60}, and Rb_{x}Cs_{3−x}C_{60} (0<*x*3), has been measured by a radiofrequency technique in pulsed magnetic fields^{13} up to 62 T (see Methods). In Rb_{x}Cs_{3−x}C_{60} with *x*1, the dynamical JT distortions (Fig. 1b) persist down to low temperature and coexist with the metallic state, and superconductivity emerges from this JT metal state (*V*_{max}<*V*<*V*_{cr}, in Fig. 1c). Figure 2 shows temperature (*T*) variations of frequency shift Δ*f* as a function of the magnetic field *H* for Rb_{x}Cs_{3−x}C_{60} (*x*=2, 0.75, and 0.35) (see also Supplementary Fig. 1). The *T* dependence of *H*_{c2}, *H*_{c2}(*T*), was determined as a point at which Δ*f* intercepts the normal-state background (arrows in Fig. 2). *H*_{c2}(*T*) curves for A_{3}C_{60} are plotted in Fig. 3a,b for *V**V*_{max} and *V*_{max}<*V*<*V*_{cr} in the proximity of the Mott transition, respectively. *H*_{c2}(*T*) increases linearly with decreasing *T* near *T*_{c} and has a tendency to saturate at low temperatures. No obvious upturn of *H*_{c2}(*T*) is found in any of the samples measured, implying that *H*_{c2}(*T*) can be understood within a simple single-band picture despite the multiband nature of the triply degenerate *t*_{1u} orbitals of anions, in contrast to MgB_{2} and iron pnictides where multiband and multigap behaviour with upturn or quasilinear *T* dependence down to *T*∼0 is commonly observed.

## Volume dependence

In spin-singlet superconductors, *H*_{c2} is determined by two distinct effects, i.e., the orbital and the Pauli paramagnetic effect. The orbital limit and Pauli limit are given by and , respectively (Φ_{0}, *ξ*_{GL}, Δ_{0}, and *μ*_{B} are the flux quantum, Ginzburg–Landau (GL) coherence length, superconducting gap and Bohr magneton, respectively)^{14,15}. In a weak-coupling BCS superconductor, the Pauli limit is [T]=1.84*T*_{c}[K]. A simple estimation from gives *ξ*_{GL}=1.8–4.6 nm (Supplementary Table 1), which is comparable to the lattice constant. It should be noted that the fulleride superconductors are in the dirty limit, ℓ≲*ξ*_{0} (ℓ and *ξ*_{0} are the mean free path and Pippard coherence length, respectively), as demonstrated by transport and optical measurements^{16,17}. The orientational disorder of the anions can account for the short ℓ, which is comparable to the intermolecular separation. The relation in the dirty limit, where *ξ*_{0}=*ħv*_{F}/*π*Δ_{0} and (*v*_{F}, *m*, *k*_{F}, and *N* are the Fermi velocity, effective mass, Fermi momentum, and number of electrons per C_{60}, respectively) for the parabolic band approximation yield . In the extreme cases ( or ), *H*_{c2}(0) is determined solely by *H*_{c2}^{orb} or *H*_{P}. However, when these two quantities are comparable, *H*_{c2}(*T*) can be described by the extended WHH formula^{14}, which considers both the orbital and Pauli paramagnetic effects as well as spin–orbit scattering,

where *t*=*T*/*T*_{c}, =0.281*H*_{c2}(*T*)/, , , is the digamma function, and *λ*_{so} is the spin–orbit scattering constant. With fixed , finite *α* reduces *H*_{c2}(0), but it recovers toward the original value with increasing *λ*_{so}, since spin–orbit scattering suppresses the Pauli paramagnetic effect.

was estimated from the initial slope of *H*_{c2}(*T*) since the Pauli paramagnetic effect is not relevant near *T*_{c} (Supplementary Note 1; Supplementary Fig. 2; and Supplementary Table 1). Then, *H*_{c2}(*T*) curves were fitted with *H*_{P} and *λ*_{so} as fitting parameters. As shown by the solid lines in Fig. 3a,b, *H*_{c2}(*T*) curves are well described by equation (1). Figure 3c shows *H*_{c2}(*T*) normalized by as a function of *T*/*T*_{c}. The normalized *H*_{c2}(*T*) curves collapse into a single curve except for Na_{2}CsC_{60}, implying that the parameters *α* and *λ*_{so} are unchanged in a wide *V* region of the phase diagram, resulting in (*α*, *λ*_{so})=(1.5, 4.4). Figure 3d displays the evolution of *H*_{c2}(0) as a function of *V*, together with . *H*_{c2}(0) reaches as high as 88 T in Rb_{x}Cs_{3−x}C_{60} with *x*1 (*V**V*_{max}) very close to the Mott transition. Moreover, *H*_{c2}(0) is clearly larger than at *V*>*V*_{max}, and the difference between *H*_{c2}(0) and becomes pronounced with increasing *V*, although *T*_{c} is almost unchanged near the Mott transition.

## Discussion

*H*_{c2}(0) values reaching ∼90 T are remarkably high for 3D materials. Typical examples of 3D superconductors are cubic Nb_{3}Sn (*H*_{c2}(0)=30 T, *T*_{c}=18 K), which is well known as a material for a SC magnet^{18}, and Ba_{1−x}K_{x}BiO_{3} (*H*_{c2}(0)=32 T, *T*_{c}=28 K)^{19}. MgB_{2} exhibits strong anisotropy (*H*_{c2}(0)=49 T and 34 T parallel to the *ab* plane and *c* axis, respectively, *T*_{c}=39 K)^{18} due to its anisotropic electronic structure. *H*_{c2}(0) of the fullerides is even higher than that of recently discovered H_{3}S superconductors with likely a cubic structure (*H*_{c2}(0)≈70 T, *T*_{c}=203 K)^{20} despite its much higher *T*_{c}. In 2D systems under in-plane applied fields, the orbital effect is quenched and higher *H*_{c2} can be expected. Very large *H*_{c2} compared with low *T*_{c} has been demonstrated in ion-gated MoS_{2} (*H*_{c2}(0)=52 T, *T*_{c}=9.7 K)^{21,22} and monolayer NbSe_{2} (*H*_{c2}(0)=32 T, *T*_{c}=3.0 K)^{23}. In the bulk materials, the in-plane *H*_{c2} of the cuprates is exceptionally high at above 100 T. However, *H*_{c2} is no longer a thermodynamic transition line, but a crossover line due to thermal fluctuations. Contrastingly, *H*_{c2} in pnictides with *T*_{c}≃30 K is as large as that of fullerides^{24}. Therefore, our results highlight the uniquely high *H*_{c2} measured in the fulleride superconductors that are cubic, and thus, 3D.

To understand the underlying mechanisms for the evolution of *H*_{c2}(0), we estimated unknown parameters that determine *H*_{P} and (Supplementary Fig. 1), that is, Δ_{0} and the product of parameters in the normal state . Δ_{0} can be directly estimated from *H*_{P}. In Fig. 3e, the *V* dependences of 2Δ_{0}/*k*_{B}*T*_{c}, which is related to the strength of the pairing interaction, and (*m*_{0} is the bare electron mass) are shown. At low *V*, 2Δ_{0}/*k*_{B}*T*_{c} is comparable to the BCS weak-coupling limit value of 3.52. In contrast with the dome-shaped *T*_{c}, 2Δ_{0}/*k*_{B}*T*_{c} continuously increases with increasing *V* and reaches values as large as 6, indicating a crossover from weak- to strong-coupling superconductivity on approaching the Mott transition. This is in good agreement with the previous nuclear magnetic resonance results for Rb_{x}Cs_{3−x}C_{60} at ambient pressure^{9} and for both fcc- and A15-Cs_{3}C_{60} under pressure^{25,26}, implying universal behaviour in the fullerides. On the other hand, is almost constant, indicating that both *H*_{P}/*T*_{c} and /*T*_{c} are solely proportional to 2Δ_{0}/*k*_{B}*T*_{c}. These results lead to the conclusion that the enhancement of *H*_{c2}(0) is dominated by the strong-coupling effect developing near the Mott transition.

We here recall *H*_{c2}(0) of other families of high-*T*_{c} or strongly correlated superconductors, i.e., cuprates, organic κ-(ET)_{2}X, and pnictides^{24,27,28,29,30,31}, having a dome-like SC phase and a proximate antiferromagnetic phase. In Fig. 4, *H*_{c2}(0)/*T*_{c} is displayed as a function of the relevant tuning parameter for each materials family. We show *H*_{c2}(0) for the in-plane field (**H** ⊥ **c**), where the Pauli paramagnetic effect is dominating, in κ-(ET)_{2}X and pnictides but show *H*_{c2}(0) for the out-of-plane field (**H** || **c**) in cuprates since there are no reliable estimates of *H*_{c2}(0) for **H** ⊥ **c**. A remarkable feature of the fullerides is that *H*_{c2}(0)/*T*_{c} appears to be strongly enhanced at *x*≤1, where the JT metal phase emerges (Fig. 1c), with retaining nearly optimal *T*_{c} and *H*_{c2}(0) values near the Mott transition. This is in marked contrast to the pnictides and cuprates. In the pnictides, *H*_{c2}(0)/*T*_{c} is almost constant across the SC dome. This is ascribed to the variation of Δ_{0}, which linearly scales with *T*_{c} (ref. 32), implying constant coupling strength. Moreover, in pnictides, *T*_{c} and *H*_{c2}(0) are strongly reduced upon decreasing doping, associated with the appearance of the antiferromagnetic phase. Non-monotonic behaviour in cuprates appears with mass enhancement near *p*=0.08 and 0.18, which originates from phase competition between superconductivity and Fermi-surface reconstruction or charge-density-wave order^{27}. This is distinct from the continuous evolution of in the fullerides (Supplementary Fig. 2), suggesting the absence of such competing states. In κ-(ET)_{2}X, there is no competing phase near the Mott transition and the molecular degrees of freedom are not relevant to the superconductivity in contrast to the fullerides. Moreover, the SC pairing is most likely mediated by purely electronic interaction, in contrast to the fullerides, where there is considerable controversy because of comparable energy scales in the electron–phonon and electron-electron interactions^{33,34}. κ-(ET)_{2}X shows qualitatively similar behaviour with the strong-coupling effects near the antiferromagnetic phase^{35}. However, the enhancement of *H*_{c2}(0)/*T*_{c} is much weaker than that in the fullerides. Therefore, the steep enhancement of *H*_{c2}(0)/*T*_{c} and 2Δ_{0}/*k*_{B}*T*_{c} upon entering the JT metal phase cannot be explained solely by the electron correlation effect, highlighting the uniqueness of fullerides among the high-*T*_{c} or strongly correlated superconductors. We also emphasize that it is difficult to reconcile the strong-coupling effect with the electron–phonon coupling alone^{25}. Our results establish the importance of both molecular characteristics, absent in the atom-based superconductors, involving the dynamical JT effect and the resulting renormalization of the electronic structure and electron correlation effects for both the high-*T*_{c} and the high-*H*_{c2} in the fullerides, as supported by the recent theoretical calculations^{33}. This provides a new perspective on realizing robust superconductivity with high *T*_{c} and *H*_{c2} in molecular materials.

## Methods

## Sample synthesis and characterization

Fullerene superconductors Na_{2}CsC_{60}, K_{3}C_{60}, and Rb_{x}Cs_{3−x}C_{60} (0<*x*3) were synthesized by solid-vapor reaction method as described in ref. 9. The samples used here were identical to those in ref. 9. For Rb_{x}Cs_{3−x}C_{60} with *x*=0.5, 1, and 2, our samples correspond to Rb_{0.5}Cs_{2.5}C_{60} (Sample I), RbCs_{2}C_{60} (Sample I), and Rb_{2}CsC_{60} (Sample II) in ref. 9, respectively. The samples were characterized by synchrotron X-ray powder diffraction and magnetization measurements. The phase fraction of the fcc phase was larger than 70% and typical shielding fraction was ∼90%.

## Measurements of *H*
_{c2}

Contactless radiofrequency (r.f.) penetration depth measurements were performed using a proximity detector oscillator technique^{13} and a pulsed magnetic field up to 62 T in Los Alamos NHMFL. The typical resonant frequency was ∼28 MHz. The r.f. technique is highly sensitive to small changes (approximately 1–5 nm) in the r.f. penetration depth *λ*, and thus, it is an accurate method for determining *H*_{c2} of superconductors. Powder samples were compressed into pellets and sealed in thin glass capillaries with a small amount of He gas. Coils that generate and detect microwave signals are directly wound around the capillary (inset of Fig. 2a). The relative change of *λ* is proportional to the relative change of the resonating frequency *f* through the inductance of the coil, that is, Δ*f*/*f*∝Δ*λ*/*λ* (ref. 13). Upper critical field *H*_{c2} was determined from the field dependence of the frequency shift Δ*f* (Supplementary Fig. 1) as the point at which the slope of the r.f. signal in the superconducting state intercepts the slope of the normal state background.

## Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding authors (Y.K. or Y.I.).

## Additional information

**How to cite this article:** Kasahara, Y. *et al*. Upper critical field reaches 90 Tesla near the Mott transition in fulleride superconductors. *Nat. Commun.* **8,** 14467 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14467 (2017).

**Publisher's note**: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

- 1.
Imada, M., Fujimori, A. & Tokura, Y. Metal-insulator transitions.

*Rev. Mod. Phys.***70**, 1039–1263 (1998). - 2.
Kanoda, K. Recent progress in NMR studies on organic conductors.

*Hyperfine Interact.***104**, 235–249 (1997). - 3.
Uemura, Y. J. Commonalities in phase and mode.

*Nat. Mater.***5**, 253–255 (2009). - 4.
Ganin, A. Y.

*et al.*Bulk superconductivity at 38 K in a molecular system.*Nat. Mater.***7**, 367–371 (2008). - 5.
Darling, G. R., Ganin, A. Y., Rosseinsky, M. J., Takabayashi, Y. & Prassides, K. Intermolecular overlap geometry gives two classes of fulleride superconductor: Electronic structure of 38 K

*T*_{c}Cs_{3}C_{60}.*Phys. Rev. Lett.***101**, 136404 (2008). - 6.
Takabayashi, Y.

*et al.*The disorder-free non-BCS superconductor Cs_{3}C_{60}emerges from an antiferromagnetic insulator parent state.*Science***323**, 1585–1590 (2009). - 7.
Ganin, A. Y.

*et al.*Polymorphism control of superconductivity and magnetism in Cs_{3}C_{60}close to the Mott transition.*Nature***466**, 221–225 (2010). - 8.
Klupp, G.

*et al.*Dynamic Jahn-Teller effect in the parent insulating state of the molecular superconductor Cs_{3}C_{60}.*Nat. Commun.***3**, 912 (2012). - 9.
Zadik, R. H.

*et al.*Optimized unconventional superconductivity in a molecular Jahn-Teller metal.*Sci. Adv.***1**, e1500059 (2015). - 10.
Capone, M., Fabrizio, M., Catellani, C. & Tosatti, E. Colloquium: Modeling the unconventional superconducting properties of expanded A

_{3}C_{60}fullerides.*Rev. Mod. Phys.***81**, 943–958 (2009). - 11.
Akashi, R. & Arita, R. Nonempirical study of superconductivity in alkali-doped fullerides based on density functional theory for superconductors.

*Phys. Rev. B***88**, 054510 (2013). - 12.
Baldassarre, L.

*et al.*The strength of electron electron correlation in Cs_{3}C_{60}.*Sci. Rep.***5**, 15240 (2015). - 13.
Altarawneh, M. M., Milke, C. H. & Brooks, J. S. Proximity detector circuits: An alternative to tunnel diode oscillators for contactless measurements in pulsed magnetic field environments.

*Rev. Sci. Instrum.***80**, 066104 (2009). - 14.
Werthamer, N. R., Helfand, E. & Hohenberg, P. C. Temperature and purity dependence of the superconducting critical field, Hc2. III. Electron spin and spin-orbit effects.

*Phys. Rev.***147**, 295–302 (1966). - 15.
Clogston, A. M. Upper limit for the critical field in hard superconductors.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***9**, 266–267 (1962). - 16.
Palstra, T. T. M., Haddon, R. C., Hebard, A. F. & Zaanen, J. Electronic transport properties of K

_{3}C_{60}films.*Phys. Rev. Lett.***68**, 1054–1057 (1992). - 17.
Iwasa, Y., Tanaka, K., Yasuda, T., Koda, T. & Koda, S. Metallic reflection spectra of K

_{3}C_{60}.*Phys. Rev. Lett.***69**, 2284–2287 (1992). - 18.
Gurevich, G.

*et al.*Very high upper critical fields in MgB_{2}produced by selective tuning of impurity scattering.*Supercond. Sci. Technol***17**, 278–286 (2004). - 19.
Affronte, M.

*et al.*Upper critical field of Ba_{1−x}K_{x}BiO_{3}single crystals.*Phys. Rev. B***49**, 3502–3510 (1994). - 20.
Drozdov, A. P., Eremets, M. I., Troyan, I. A., Ksenofontov, V. & Shylin, S. I. Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system.

*Nature***525**, 73–77 (2015). - 21.
Saito, Y.

*et al.*Superconductivity protected by spin-valley locking in ion-gated MoS_{2}.*Nat. Phys.***12**, 144–149 (2016). - 22.
Lu, J. M.

*et al.*Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS_{2}.*Science***350**, 1353–1357 (2015). - 23.
Xi, X. X.

*et al.*Ising pairing in superconducting NbSe_{2}atomic layers.*Nat. Phys.***12**, 139–143 (2016). - 24.
Wang, Z. S.

*et al.*Electron doping dependence of the anisotropic superconductivity in BaFe_{2−x}Ni_{x}As_{2}.*Phys. Rev. B***92**, 174509 (2015). - 25.
Potočnik, A.

*et al.*Size and symmetry of the superconducting gap in the f.c.c. Cs_{3}C_{60}polymorph close to the metal-Mott insulator boundary.*Sci. Rep.***4**, 4625 (2014). - 26.
Wzietek, P.

*et al.*NMR study of the superconducting gap variation near the Mott transition in Cs_{3}C_{60}.*Phys. Rev. Lett.***112**, 066401 (2014). - 27.
Grissonnanche, G.

*et al.*Direct measurement of the upper critical field in cuprate superconductors.*Nat. Commun.***5**, 3280 (2014). - 28.
Shimojo, Y.

*et al.*Upper critical fields of pressurized organic superconductors κ-(BEDT-TTF)_{2}X in the magnetic fields parallel to the layer.*Synth. Met.***133–134**, 197–200 (2003). - 29.
Ohmichi, E., Ishiguro, T., Yamada, J., Anzai, H. & Osada, T. Upper critical field of κ-(BEDT-TTF)

_{2}X (X=Cu[N(CN)_{2}]Br,Cu(NCS)_{2}) in magnetic fields parallel to the layer.*Synth. Met.***133–134**, 245–246 (2003). - 30.
Agosta, C. C.

*et al.*Experimental and semiempirical method to determine the Pauli-limited field in quasi-two-dimensional superconductor as applied to κ-(BEDT-TTF)_{2}Cu(NCS)_{2}: Strong evidence of a FFLO state.*Phys. Rev. B***85**, 214514 (2012). - 31.
Nam, M.-S.

*et al.*Superconducting fluctuations in organic molecular metals enhanced by Mott criticality.*Sci. Rep.***3**, 3390 (2013). - 32.
Xu, Y.-M.

*et al.*Fermi surface dichotomy of the superconducting gap and pseudogap in underdoped pnictides.*Nat. Commun.***2**, 392 (2011). - 33.
Nomura, Y., Sakai, S., Capone, M. & Arita, R. Unified understanding of superconductivity and Mott transition in alkali-doped fullerides from first principles.

*Sci. Adv.***1**, e1500059 (2015). - 34.
Jiang, H.-C. & Kivelson, S. Electronic pair binding and Hund’s rule violations in doped C

_{60}.*Phys. Rev. B***93**, 165406 (2016). - 35.
Elsinger, H.

*et al.*κ-(BEDT-TTF)_{2}Cu[N(CN)_{2}]Br: a fully gapped strong-coupling superconductor.*Phys. Rev. Lett.***84**, 6098–6101 (2000).

## Acknowledgements

We thank Y. Nomura, R. Arita and E. Tosatti for fruitful discussions. This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research (No 25000003), for Young Scientists (B) (No 2474022), and for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas ‘3D Active-Site Science’ (No 26105004) and ‘J-Physics' (No 15H05882) from JSPS, Japan, and SICORP-LEMSUPER FP7-NMP-2011-EU-Japan project (No 283214). This work was also supported by the Mitsubishi Foundation and sponsored by the ‘World Premier International (WPI) Research Center Initiative for Atoms, Molecules and Materials,’ Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan. K.P. and M.J.R. thank EPSRC for support (EP/K027255 and EP/K027212). M.J.R. is a Royal Society Research Professor. RMcD acknowledges support from U.S. Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences ‘Science at 100 T’ program and that a portion of this work was performed at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, which is supported by National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement No DMR-1157490 and the State of Florida.

## Author information

## Affiliations

### Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan

- Y. Kasahara

### Quantum-Phase Electronics Center (QPEC) and Department of Applied Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan

- Y. Takeuchi
- & Y. Iwasa

### Department of Chemistry, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK

- R. H. Zadik
- & R. H. Colman

### WPI—Advanced Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan

- Y. Takabayashi
- & K. Prassides

### NHMFL, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA

- R. D. McDonald

### Department of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZD, UK

- M. J. Rosseinsky

### Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), ERATO Isobe Degenerate π-Integration Project, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan

- K. Prassides

### RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science (CEMS), Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan

- Y. Iwasa

## Authors

### Search for Y. Kasahara in:

### Search for Y. Takeuchi in:

### Search for R. H. Zadik in:

### Search for Y. Takabayashi in:

### Search for R. H. Colman in:

### Search for R. D. McDonald in:

### Search for M. J. Rosseinsky in:

### Search for K. Prassides in:

### Search for Y. Iwasa in:

## Contributions

Y.K. and Y.I. conceived the experiments. Samples were grown and characterized by R.H.Z., Ya. T., R.H.C., M.J.R. and K.P., and prepared for the measurements of *H*_{c2} by Y.K. and Yu. T. Pulse-field experiments were performed by Y.K. with help of R.D.M. in National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Pulsed Field Facility, in Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA. Y.K., K.P. and Y.I. led physical discussions. Y.K. mainly wrote the manuscript.

## Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

## Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Y. Kasahara or Y. Iwasa.

## Supplementary information

## PDF files

- 1.
### Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-2, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary References

- 2.
### Peer Review File

## Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/