The Arctic Ocean is acidifying from absorption of man-made CO2. Current predictive models of that acidification focus on surface waters, and their results argue that deep waters will acidify by downward penetration from the surface. Here we show, with an alternative model, the rapid, near simultaneous, acidification of both surface and deep waters, a prediction supported by current, but limited, saturation data. Whereas Arctic surface water responds directly by atmospheric CO2 uptake, deeper waters will be influenced strongly by intrusion of mid-depth, pre-acidified, Atlantic Ocean water. With unabated CO2 emissions, surface waters will become undersaturated with respect to aragonite by 2105 AD and could remain so for ∼600 years. In deep waters, the aragonite saturation horizon will rise, reaching the base of the surface mixed layer by 2140 AD and likely remaining there for over a millennium. The survival of aragonite-secreting organisms is consequently threatened on long timescales.
The Arctic region (Fig. 1) is warming twice as fast as elsewhere in the world1, causing rapid sea-ice cover and thickness decline2 and, according to various emission scenarios, this may lead to an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the end of this century3. The anthropogenic CO2 causing this warming is also acidifying the oceans4, which will modify the carbonate chemistry of the Arctic Ocean5 and pose a serious threat to CaCO3-producing organisms6,7,8. The Arctic Ocean is already exhibiting signs of acidification6,7; this will be strengthened on the disappearance of the sea ice3,5,8, which will enable more efficient ocean–atmosphere gas exchange.
Pre-industrial waters of the deep Arctic basins were largely supersaturated9 with respect to aragonite and calcite (the two most common CaCO3 polymorphs in the marine environment), due to modest metabolic CO2 production in these waters from low rates of organic matter re-mineralization10,11; nevertheless, decreasing deep-water CaCO3 saturation states and undersaturation with respect to aragonite (the more soluble of the two CaCO3 polymorphs) now occur11—also see data below. Considering the potential consequences of these changes to this major, but vulnerable, marine eco-system, it is paramount to be able to predict accurately the future evolution of the carbonate system of the Arctic Ocean. To do so, our knowledge should include the means by which Arctic waters will acidify and the duration of those conditions. Models for the carbonate system of the Arctic Ocean, particularly its deep waters, are, however, surprisingly scarce3,12,13,14. Yamamoto et al.3 examined surface water pH conditions to the year 2100, but they did not address acidification of the deep waters. Steinacher et al.13 and Frölicher and Joos14 predict, using a three-dimensional (3D) circulation-biogeochemical model that, under two reasonable CO2 emission scenarios, acidification will spread into the deeper waters from initially acidified surface waters.
Arctic acidification is, however, likely to be different than pictured by these latter models. Data presented by Miller et al.11 and also calculated from Key et al.15,16 (see below) indicate the recent development and expansion of aragonite undersaturation in deep water, a phenomenon not featured in the predictions made in Frölicher and Joos14. In addition, work by Bates et al.17 and Cai et al.18 questions if surface Arctic waters can act as a continuous source of CO2 for acidification of the deep waters. Furthermore, the results in Steinacher et al.13 and Frölicher and Joos14 appear somewhat inconsistent with the known circulation in the Arctic Ocean19,20,21,22 (Fig. 1). Specifically, Atlantic Ocean water (yellow arrows) enters the Eurasian Basin at intermediate depth, mostly between ∼300 and ∼600 m, via the Barents Sea and the East side of the Fram Strait, with half returning to the Atlantic through the West side of the Fram Strait. The rest of this input enters the Amerasian Basin, to loop back once again into Eurasian Basin, leaving by the West side of the Fram Strait and the Robeson Channel to the Northwest of Greenland. This element of the Arctic circulation indicates that pre-acidified waters from the Atlantic Ocean (Nordic Sea) should enter Arctic waters at intermediate depths, but this seems to be absent in Frölicher and Joos14. In addition, the halocline of the Arctic Ocean is particularly strong19, and effective propagation of acidified surface waters into the deep will necessitate some breakdown of that stratification. Evidence for pycnocline breakdown is currently enigmatic: sea-ice melt and increased river discharge should intensify that stratification, whereas the disappearance of sea ice may increase the fetch and wind-driven mixing, which could erode the halocline. The case for breakdown of the stratification is consequently moot.
On the basis of the observed trends in carbonate chemistry11,15,16 and the physics of the Arctic Ocean noted in the above paragraph, we present predictions from an alternative carbonate-dynamics box model. With unabated CO2 emissions, our model results forecast rapid, near simultaneous, acidification of both surface and deep waters, conditions that will persist for many hundreds to thousands of years. The surface waters will acidify directly by CO2 uptake from the atmosphere, but the intrusion of mid-depth, pre-acidified, Atlantic Ocean water (or possibly from stronger thermohaline overturning) will lower aragonite saturation of the deep waters to the point of undersaturation and lead to a bottom-to-top rise of the saturation horizon. The duration of this undersaturation is a threat to Arctic calcifying organisms.
The boxes used in our model (Fig. 2) represent both the Amerasian Basin (4,250 m maximum depth) and the Eurasian Basin (4,750 m maximum depth), separated by the Lomonosov Ridge. Each basin is divided into surface (0–200 m), intermediate (200–700 m) and deep (>700 m) water boxes, and there exist flows between these boxes and from external sources, that is, rivers, as well as the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Boxes are also included to account for sediment accumulation and benthic CaCO3 dissolution. The justification for the use of a box model is provided in the Methods section.
Our model equations account for and predict the changes in total dissolved CO2 (∑CO2) and carbonate alkalinity (CA) in each of these boxes, as forced by the increasing CO2 in the atmosphere and in water feeding into the Arctic. The model subsequently calculates the pH (National Bureau of Standards) and the aragonite saturation state—see the Methods section with regard to the pH scale. Time-varying ∑CO2 and CA of the Pacific surface and high-latitude Atlantic waters that enter the Arctic are obtained from the output of a previously published global carbon-system model24,25. The atmospheric pCO2 is also calculated by that same model, in a procedure similar to that used by Spall21.
These calculations start with initial water flows, concentrations and parameter values (Methods) believed to have been in place during pre-industrial times, that is, pre-1850 AD (all dates are AD and that suffix is dropped hereafter), as calculated by correcting and averaging compiled ∑CO2 and total alkalinity (TA) data15,16 (Supplementary Figs 1 and 2, and Supplementary Table 1). CA is calculated from TA through standard methods (that is, from pH, total boron concentrations and appropriate dissociation constants). Flow values were obtained as explained in the Methods section, and other assigned parameters can be found in Supplementary Table 1.
The increase in pCO2, which acidifies the oceans, is driven with an extended version of the IS92a emission scenario. That extended IS92a scenario was used in Boudreau et al.24 and is described and displayed in Supplementary Fig. 3. We emphasize that this is not the original IS92a scenario, but a version modified to be consistent with emissions data and atmospheric CO2 levels to 2010 and extended to predict emissions over the next millennia. This scenario may overestimate future emissions, but precaution demands that we focus on the worst possible case.
Carbon dioxide absorption from the atmosphere into the surface Arctic Ocean (dark blue ES,A and ES,E in Fig. 2) is thought to be hindered by persistent ice cover3. Thus, as global warming reduces the extent and duration of ice cover, CO2 adsorption may increase, although that has been debated17,18, as noted above; nevertheless, we include ice melting and corresponding increased CO2 uptake in our model. The evolution of the ice cover with warming has been modelled with both the fast and slow melting scenarios by Yamamoto et al.3 (Supplementary Fig. 4). Both scenarios were tested and our results were identical in both cases, hence, we only report the results with fast melting.
Model output and observed data
Whereas the model results are in the form of ∑CO2 and CA, we are primarily interested in the evolving saturation state of the Arctic waters with respect to aragonite, Ωa
where [Ca2+] is the calcium concentration, [CO32−] is the carbonate ion concentration and K*sp is the stoichiometric solubility product under in situ conditions. A similar equation applies to calculation of the saturation state with respect to calcite. [Ca2+] is calculated from the known salinities of the Arctic Ocean basins. Note that, irrespective of the water chemistry, the aragonite (and calcite) saturation state changes with depth (pressure) in response to the increasing solubility of carbonate minerals25,26, that is, K*sp increases with depth (pressure).
The aragonite saturation horizon (Zsat) is the depth above which the waters are supersaturated with respect to aragonite (Ωa>1) and below which waters are undersaturated (Ωa<1) and in which aragonite will dissolve. To predict the position of that horizon, we coupled our box model to an explicit formula24,27 for Zsat,
where Z1sat is a characteristic depth calculated from the solubility equations25,26 for aragonite and K1sp is the value of K*sp at 1 atm. The short derivation of this latter equation is repeated for completeness in the Methods; note that equation (2) is not dependent on the form of the model being used, that is, a box versus a 3D model.
Central to our interests are the relative roles of atmospheric CO2 forcing (E) and the input of waters from the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans (UT,IA, UT,SP in Fig. 2) in changing the pH and Ωa of the Arctic Ocean. To facilitate this analysis, we created a hypothetical reference state wherein the pCO2 in the Arctic atmosphere follows our prescribed CO2 emissions scenario (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 3), but ∑CO2 and CA of the inflowing Atlantic and Pacific waters do not change with time, labelled ‘constant source’ in our figures; these particular inflows are set to year 2010 values. In contrast, a more realistic model results by allowing Atlantic and Pacific water chemistries to change as dictated by the evolving atmospheric CO2, and those model results are presented with the label ‘variable source’.
The model predicted evolution of the pH (NBS) in the surface and deep waters is illustrated in Fig. 3, assuming our extended IS92a CO2 emissions scenario (Fig. 3a) and constant productivity for both organic matter and CaCO3 (Methods). The surface results are obtained without freshening from melting ice and increased run-off and must be accepted with this caveat.
pH is an inexact measure of the carbonate chemistry of marine waters; consequently, we have also calculated the aragonite (orange lines) and calcite (green lines) saturation states of the surface water, as shown in Fig. 3d,e. Surface waters will become undersaturated with respect to aragonite (Ωa<1), with a minimum between 0.75 and 0.675 attained close to the year 2200 in both basins.
To test our model, we compare our output with available saturation data. Figure 4a is a contour plot of the aragonite saturation state for the Amerasian Basin calculated from the data compilations of Jutterstrom et al.28 and Key et al.15,16, as illustrated in Supplementary Figs 1 and 2. These data indicate a rise of about 500 m over the 1995–2009 period. Figure 4b reproduces the saturation isopleths provided by the 3D model used by Frölicher and Joos14, which are essentially flat over the 1995–2009 data time series. Finally, Fig. 4c displays our model predictions of Ωa isopleths for that same period and reveals that the isopleths are sloped by an amount similar to the data in Fig. 4a, with an upward displacement of ∼300 m, based on the Ωa=1.2 isopleth. Our model predicts slightly more acidic deep water in year 1995 than the data, but the observed and modelled isopleths below 2,000 m are roughly at the same depth in 2009.
Finally, Fig. 5 displays our prediction of the long-term evolution of the aragonite saturation horizon (red lines) and that made by Frölicher and Joos14 (black lines). These plots are explained and analysed below.
The predicted pH will decline rapidly in both Arctic basins over the next 200 years (Fig. 3b,c). Our surface pH predictions (black lines in Fig. 3b,c) are consistent with the changes forecast in Yamamoto et al.3 between the years 2000 and 2100, but are slightly higher in value, due to our slightly higher initial pH values (Methods). Amerasian surface waters will acidify a bit earlier, but the Eurasian waters will attain lower pH values, as they are initially more acidic. The surface pH minimum occurs near the year 2200 in both basins, as our emissions scenario (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 3) reaches a maximum shortly before that year. Thereafter, surface pH will slowly recover towards pre-industrial levels on a timescale >1,500 years. The surface pH values are not sensitive to the mid-depth input of acidifying Atlantic waters, that is, dashed versus solid black lines in Fig. 3b,c.
Deep-water pH in both basins is strongly dependent on the introduction of pre-acidified Atlantic waters, that is, in Fig. 3b,c, compare the dashed blue line generated with constant ∑CO2 and CA in the entering Atlantic water and the solid blue line with acidifying Atlantic water. Deep-water pH would change by <0.2 units if the atmosphere was the only source of anthropogenic CO2 to Arctic waters; instead, as the entering Atlantic waters acidify, they drive a pH decrease of ∼0.8 unit. The minimum pH will occur slightly later in the deep waters than at the surface, that is, closer to the year 2350. There is clearly no evidence from these results that acidified surface waters penetrate effectively into deep waters.
With respect to the saturation state data (Fig. 4a), the Ωa isopleths below 2,000 m rise about 500 m over the sampling period. An even greater shallowing of the Ωa isopleths (∼800 m) is also evident in the data reported in Miller et al.11 (their Fig. 10) over a similar time interval, but we chose not to use those latter data, as we could not establish the reason for discrepancies in their lower overall saturation levels compared with that calculated from the Jutterstrom et al.28 and Key et al.15,16 data. Nevertheless, deep acidification since year 1994 is unequivocal in both data sets.
These rises in saturation isopleths are not contained in the Frölicher and Joos14 model results (Fig. 4b), which implies that those authors appear not have incorporated the process(es) responsible for early, deep-water, acidification/desaturation. Our box model results (Fig. 4c) provide superior data prediction of the deep-water aragonite saturation isopleths. We attribute this success to a better accounting of Atlantic deep-water penetration (UT,IA), but it could also reflect overturning/ventilation of deep waters with surface waters, which is known to occur29,30. We tested this latter hypothesis and found that ventilation rates >4.5 Sv would be needed to quantitatively acidify the deep waters. Given that this amount currently seems excessive, we chose not to pursue this mechanism at this time; nonetheless, this possibility should be explored further through observations and modelling before it is dismissed.
Over a longer timescale, that is, millennia, the chemical evolution of the Arctic basins can be encapsulated by considering the position of the aragonite saturation horizon. Our prediction from equation (2) for the location of Zsat and that from Frölicher and Joos14 are illustrated in Fig. 5a,b as red and black lines, respectively. To aid in the interpretation of this figure, arrows have been added to show the direction of time on a line segment. The black line for Frölicher and Joos14 must be read in two parts: for the period of years 1850–2030, Zsat is positioned at about 3,250 m depth; it then also appears at the base of the mixed layer by the year 2030, as surface waters acidify. As time moves forward, the near-surface Zsat moves deeper, while the deep Zsat initially stays constant at 3,200 m. Around the year 2200, the deeper Zsat position also starts to migrate upward, indicating increasing deep-water acidification. The two horizons meet at about year 2325 at a depth of ∼2,400 m, and the entire deep Arctic Ocean is undersaturated thereafter. This complex bi-directional evolution is primarily driven by downward penetration of acidified waters from the surface.
In contrast, our model, as represented by the solid red lines in Fig. 5a,b, predicts that deep-basin waters were supersaturated to depths closer to 4,000 m in pre-industrial times. Anthropogenically linked undersaturation then appears before year 2000 in the bottom waters of both basins because of deep Atlantic inflow, as well as in the surface waters (as seen in Fig. 4a). The saturation horizon should then move monotonically upward, without any indication of significant penetration from above the halocline. We predict that Zsat will reach the base of the surface mixed layer by about the year 2275 and stay there until ∼2970, which means that the intermediate and deep Arctic Ocean will become completely undersaturated with respect to aragonite slightly before the time predicted by Frölicher and Joos14.
The red dashed lines in Fig. 5a,b illustrate the evolution of a hypothetical Zsat if the entering North Atlantic waters were not to acidify beyond today’s conditions (constant source). A comparison of the solid and dashed red lines shows again that continued acidification and input of Atlantic waters dominates saturation changes in the deep Arctic Ocean and cannot be neglected. This conclusion is reached, however, without taking into account the effects of a possible weakening of CO2 uptake by waters sinking in the Atlantic sub-polar region31.
From an ecological point of view, what is very disturbing in Fig. 5 is that intermediate and deep waters will remain undersaturated with respect to aragonite for a period greater than a millennium. The likelihood that the ecology of deep-water carbonate-secreting organisms could withstand that length of stress and remain unchanged is decidedly slight32.
In conclusion, our investigation of future Arctic acidification-desaturation reveals that both the Amerasian and Eurasian Basins will experience severe undersaturation with respect to aragonite and that acidification of the surface and intermediate/deep waters will be driven by the atmosphere and intermediate-depth Atlantic Ocean water inputs, respectively. Thus, our results reiterate the pressing need to fully apprehend the role of inter-oceanic flows in changing the carbonate chemistry of the Arctic Ocean. In addition, once established, aragonite undersaturation will persist for up to 500 years in surface waters (Fig. 3) and several millennia in deep and intermediate waters (Fig. 5), conditions that constitute a threat to the survival of Arctic calcifying organisms at all depths.
Rationale for a box model
Why did we use a box model rather than a 3D ocean-circulation-biogeochemical model? We thought it prudent to address this point explicitly. The model used yields results for the carbonate system that are very similar to 3D models for the Atlantic–Indian–Pacific Ocean system21. Why does a box model do as well as 3D models? Because the gradients, both vertical and horizontal, of ∑CO2 and CA are small within the oceans, including the Arctic15,16. Supplementary Figs 1 and 2 provide evidence of the small gradients in the carbonate variables in the Arctic. For example, below 200 m, the ∑CO2 changes presently from about 2,135 to 2,165 mM in going from the mid Eurasian Basin to the mid Amerasian Basin, a distance of about 2000, km. Thus over 2,000 km, the change is only 1.3%. As to the future, our model output indicates that the gradients will remain of this order. If the gradients are weak, the spatial resolution provided by 3D models is not necessary to answer the type of questions we present in our paper. In addition, 3D-biogeochemical ocean models are notoriously difficult to integrate very far into the future, and box models do not suffer from that problem.
pH scale differences
Our initial dissolved inorganic carbon and CA concentrations are slightly different than those in Yamamoto et al.3, resulting in moderately higher surface water pH (NBS), that is, 8.38 (Amerasian Basin) and 8.28 (Eurasian Basin) for our model versus 8.22 in Yamamoto et al.3 In comparison, Lansard et al.33 report surface water pH (total proton scale) values anywhere between 7.95 and 8.26 for the southeastern Beaufort Sea; conversion to the NBS scale would raise these values by about 0.09 units, so that our values are within that range.
Model water flows, parameters and initial concentrations
Choosing appropriate parameters for our model is a major challenge, due to lack of constraints on overturning circulation, diffusion, ocean productivity, freshwater input and many other active processes operating in the Arctic. We set our pre-industrial conditions using values that are generally consistent with current knowledge (Supplementary Table 1), and we address our reasoning below.
Within our model (Fig. 2), horizontal flows/exchanges are derived from refs 19, 20, 21, 22 and consist of 0.8 Sv (where Sv=106 m3 s−1) of Pacific surface water entering and leaving the surface Amerasian box (olive green arrows in Fig. 2), while 6 Sv of Atlantic water (pink arrow) enter the intermediate Eurasian box, with 3 Sv (purple arrow) returning to the Atlantic from that same box. The intermediate Amerasian box is ventilated by 2 Sv of circulation from the intermediate Eurasian box (red ‘in’ arrow for that box), with 1 Sv ventilating and connecting the deep Amerasian box with the deep Eurasian box (red ‘down’ arrow) and another 1 Sv leaving the intermediate Amerasian box (red ‘out’ arrow) to balance the outflow through Davis Strait. The deep Eurasian box is ventilated by 1 Sv of water sinking from the intermediate Eurasian box (pink arrow) and 1 Sv returned from the deep Amerasian box (red arrow). Between surface and intermediate boxes, we allow 1 Sv of mixing, while the mixing between intermediate and deep boxes is set to 2 Sv. In addition, Amerasian and Eurasian basins are connected by mixing between surface and intermediate boxes both at 1 Sv. These added mixing flows are not taken from the literature, but are instead determined from the model’s need to reproduce the pre-industrial, steady-state, carbonate chemistry.
The state-of-art estimate of the total net primary productivity (NPP) in the entire Arctic region is about 608 TgC per year in 2011, which is ∼30% increase in 15 years, concordant with ∼9% per decade sea-ice retreat. Assuming that ice cover is 90% of the total Arctic surface Ocean at preindustrial and the current ice cover is 70%, the ice-free open ocean area has increased 200% so far. Therefore, we assume that the total NPP in the pre-industrial Arctic was 240 TgC per year, that 6% occurred in the Arctic Basins and 10% of this basinal NPP sinks into the deep Arctic Basins. (The latter two percentages are highly ill-constrained.) The total export productivity in preindustrial open Arctic Ocean is thus no more than 120 GmolC per year. (This estimate neglects possible direct carbon transfers from the shelves to the deep waters.) This is a small export flux, which has little effect on the carbonate system of the Arctic. With a slightly lower PIC:POC ratio of ∼0.3 compared with today’s average conditions in the world’s ocean, and assuming that the NPP in the Amerasian and the Eurasian Basins are proportional to their surface area, we obtained the export productivity, P, values shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Note CA was obtained from TA after a correction for the borate ion contribution.
Derivation of equation (2)
Equation (2) is not derived from a box model, but can use the carbonate ion concentration calculated from a box model to get the ACD. This is explained in refs. 24, 25 of the main text, but, for clarity, we repeat the logic. The thermodynamic mass-action law for CaCO3 dissolution must hold at the saturation horizon Zsat:
where Kspc(Zsat) is the stoichiometric solubility product of CaCO3 at depth Zsat and [Ca]D and [CO3]D are the concentrations of calcium and carbonate ions in the deep ocean, respectively.
Kspc(Zsat) is a function of temperature, pressure and solution chemistry (unlike true thermodynamic constants), and consequently ocean depth, which can be expressed as an implicit transcendental function of these variables. Nevertheless, Boudreau et al.24 have found that it is possible to express the dependence of Kspc(Zsat) on ocean depth, Z, as a simple exponential to a reasonable degree of accuracy, that is
where K1sp is the solubility product at 1 atm pressure and at the temperature and salinity of the deep ocean, and α is an attenuation constant derived from empirical fits. K1sp can be calculated from a polynomial fit to the experimental determinations. Values of α are derived by assuming that the pressure correction at each temperature is calculable from standard formulas.
Substitution of equation (3) into equation (4) at Zsat produces equation (2). Equation (2) is thus independent of the type of model we used in our paper. To use it, we need to specify [CO3]D, when the other parameters and variables are known. [CO3]D can come from data or from a model, and it can be spatially and temporally variable. However, current data for the oceans, and in this case the Arctic Ocean, show that below a few hundred metres, [CO3]D is almost a constant with depth, because (∑CO2) and TA (and so CA) are very weak functions of depth (Supplementary Figs 1 and 2) and, to first-order approximation, [CO3]D≈CA–∑CO2. As a result, we can use our box model’s prediction of [CO3]D to plug into equation (1) to obtain Zsat.
The FORTRAN computer code used to generate our results (ARCTIC.f) is available from the corresponding author. This code is not necessarily user-friendly, but its main sections and subroutines are documented.
All data used in this paper (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Figs 1 and 2) were previously published and available from the cited sources. Computer-generated results can be reproduced with the code listed above, under code availability.
How to cite this article: Luo, Y. et al. Disparate acidification and calcium carbonate desaturation of deep and shallow waters of the Arctic Ocean. Nat. Commun. 7:12821 doi: 10.1038/ncomms12821 (2016).
B.P.B. and A.M. thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada for their financial support. Dan Kelley (Dalhousie U) provided informative consultations about water circulation in the Arctic.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/