Article | Open

A role for diatom-like silicon transporters in calcifying coccolithophores

  • Nature Communications 7, Article number: 10543 (2016)
  • doi:10.1038/ncomms10543
  • Download Citation
Published online:


Biomineralization by marine phytoplankton, such as the silicifying diatoms and calcifying coccolithophores, plays an important role in carbon and nutrient cycling in the oceans. Silicification and calcification are distinct cellular processes with no known common mechanisms. It is thought that coccolithophores are able to outcompete diatoms in Si-depleted waters, which can contribute to the formation of coccolithophore blooms. Here we show that an expanded family of diatom-like silicon transporters (SITs) are present in both silicifying and calcifying haptophyte phytoplankton, including some globally important coccolithophores. Si is required for calcification in these coccolithophores, indicating that Si uptake contributes to the very different forms of biomineralization in diatoms and coccolithophores. Significantly, SITs and the requirement for Si are absent from highly abundant bloom-forming coccolithophores, such as Emiliania huxleyi. These very different requirements for Si in coccolithophores are likely to have major influence on their competitive interactions with diatoms and other siliceous phytoplankton.


The biomineralized phytoplankton are major contributors to marine primary productivity and play a major role in carbon export to the deep oceans by promoting the sinking of organic material from the photic zone1,2. The two primary forms of biomineralization found in marine plankton are the precipitation of silica (by diatoms, chrysophytes, synurophytes, dictyochophytes, choanoflagellates and radiolarians) and calcium carbonate (by coccolithophores, foraminifera, ciliates and dinoflagellates)3. These processes require very different chemistries and exhibit no known shared mechanisms. Both silicification and calcification appear to have evolved independently on multiple occasions. However, since in many cases the underlying cellular mechanisms have not been elucidated, the evolutionary processes remain unclear. Improved knowledge of the cellular mechanisms of biomineralization will allow us to understand the impact of past climatic events on the major phytoplankton lineages and better predict their response to future environmental change.

The haptophyte algae are of particular interest in the evolution of biomineralization as they include closely related silicified and calcified representatives. The coccolithophores (Calcihaptophycidae)4 produce an extracellular covering of ornate calcium carbonate plates (coccoliths) and are major contributors to biogenic calcification in the ocean3. The most abundant coccolithophore species in modern oceans are Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica, which belong to the Noelarhabdaceae. These species have a small cell size and are able to form extensive blooms. Larger coccolithophores species such as Coccolithus braarudii and Calcidiscus leptoporus are less numerous, but as they are heavily calcified they are important contributors to global calcification5. Much of our understanding of coccolithophore biology comes from the study of E. huxleyi, but emerging evidence suggests that there is considerable physiological diversity among coccolithophores6.

Though the biomineralized haptophytes are predominately calcified, a representative was recently described, Prymnesium neolepis (formerly Hyalolithus neolepis), which is covered with silica scales and resembles a ‘silicified coccolithophore’7,8,9. The silica scales are produced intracellularly and then deposited outside the plasma membrane, in a manner analogous to coccolith secretion8,10. The Prymnesiales are estimated to have diverged from the coccolithophores around 280 Myr ago11 and P. neolepis is the only known extensively silicified haptophyte. Understanding whether common cellular mechanisms contribute to silica scale production in P. neolepis and coccolith formation in the coccolithophores may help us to understand how these different forms of biomineralization have evolved in the haptophytes and also in other phytoplankton lineages.

Silicification by marine phytoplankton has both contributed to and been influenced by the marked changes in the biogeochemistry of Si in the surface ocean. The diatoms, representing the dominant silicifying phytoplankton in current oceans, appeared only relatively recently in the fossil record (120 Myr ago) and their expansion in the Cenozoic resulted in the extensive depletion of silicate from the surface ocean, leading to the decline of heavily silicified sponges and decreased silicification in radiolarians12,13,14,15. Si has therefore become a limiting nutrient for modern silicifying phytoplankton and is an important factor in competitive interactions with non-silicifying taxa. As the regeneration of available Si from silica dissolution is slow, diatom blooms can deplete Si in the surface ocean sufficiently to prevent further growth. If other nutrients such as nitrate or phosphate are still available, then Si limitation can contribute to seasonal succession, where an initial diatom spring bloom is followed by subsequent blooms of non-siliceous phytoplankton. There is evidence that the low availability of Si is an important contributory factor in the formation of some coccolithophore blooms. Major E. huxleyi blooms in areas such as the North Atlantic, the Black Sea and off the Patagonian shelf have been associated with low silicate availability16,17,18. These observations support the view that the ecological niche of coccolithophores is partly defined by conditions that reduce competition with the fast-growing resource-efficient diatoms, such as in areas of low silicate where other nutrients (for example, nitrate and phosphate) remain available19.

To further understand the evolution of biomineralization in haptophytes, we characterized the cellular mechanisms underlying silica scale formation in P. neolepis. We examine commonalities with other silicified organisms and determine whether any common cellular mechanisms contribute to biomineralization in silicified and calcified haptophytes. Surprisingly, given that it is generally assumed that coccolithophores lack a requirement for Si, we identify that diatom-like Si transporters are present in haptophytes, not only in the silicified P. neolepis but also in some important calcifying coccolithophore species. We demonstrate that Si plays an important role in formation of calcite coccoliths in these coccolithophores, but that the requirement for Si is significantly absent from the most abundant species in present day oceans, E. huxleyi. The findings have important implications for the evolution of the biomineralized phytoplankton and their distribution in both past and modern oceans.


Mechanisms of biomineralization in a silicifying haptophyte

The known mechanisms of biosilicification in eukaryotes involve a number of common elements; a mechanism for Si uptake, an acidic silica deposition vesicle and an organic matrix for catalysing and organizing silica precipitation20. However, there is little evidence for shared mechanisms at the molecular level, suggesting that silicification has evolved independently in many lineages. We therefore examined the mechanisms of silicification in P. neolepis, using both molecular and physiological approaches. At low Si concentrations, Si uptake in diatoms is performed by a family of Na+-coupled high-affinity Si transporters (SITs), although diatoms may also acquire Si by diffusive entry at higher Si concentrations21,22. Silicified sponges and land plants do not contain SITs, but use alternative mechanisms for Si transport23,24. A search for putative Si transporters in the transcriptome of P. neolepis strain PZ241 (Supplementary Fig. 1) identified a single gene bearing similarity to the SITs (PnSIT1). PnSIT1 exhibits 24.9–29.3% identity and 39.8–47.0% similarity to diatom SITs at the amino-acid level (sequences used for comparison were Cylindrotheca. fusiformis AAC49653.1, Thalassiosira. pseudonana ABB81826.1 and Phaeodactylum tricornutum ACJ65494.1). SITs have only previously been identified in siliceous stramenopiles (diatoms and chrysophytes) and choanoflagellates25,26,27. Many features of PnSIT1 are conserved with these SITs, including the 10 predicted transmembrane regions and the pair of motifs (EGxQ and GRQ) between TM2-3 and TM7-8 (ref. 27; Supplementary Fig. 2). We also identified a homologue of the Si efflux protein, Lsi2 in P. neolepis (Supplementary Table 1). Lsi2 is related to the bacterial arsenate transporter ArsB and mediates Si efflux in plant cells28. Lsi2 is also present in diatoms and its transcriptional regulation is highly similar to SIT2 in Thalassiosira pseudonana, although its cellular role has not yet been characterized29. The identification of Lsi2 in P. neolepis suggests that it may play a conserved role in siliceous phytoplankton.

We next determined the presence of an acidic silica deposition vesicle in P. neolepis using the fluorescent dye HCK-123, which partitions into acidic compartments and labels nascent silica (Fig. 1a,b). We found that newly formed silica scales are secreted at the posterior pole of the cell, indicating that the principal cellular components involved in scale formation (silica precipitation in acidic non-Golgi-derived vesicles) are distinct from those involved in coccolith formation (calcite precipitation in alkaline Golgi-derived vesicles and secretion at the anterior pole of the cell)10,30.

Figure 1: Molecular mechanisms of silica scale production in P. neolepis.
Figure 1

(a) Differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy image of P. neolepis cells displaying the loose covering of silica scales. Scale bar, 10 μm. (b) Confocal microscopy of a P. neolepis cell showing incorporation of the fluorescent dye HCK-123 into newly formed silica scales (green). Chlorophyll autofluorescence is shown in red. The 3D-projection was generated from compiling a Z-stack of 15 images. Scale bar, 10 μm. (c) Tricine/SDS–PAGE of organic components released after dissolution of silica scales with NH4F. A SEM image of an isolated silica scale is also shown (Scale bar, 1 μm). The higher molecular weight component around 50 kDa is a single protein that runs as two bands (i, ii), whereas the low-molecular-weight components around 2.5 kDa are long-chain polyamines (LCPA). M, molecular-weight markers. (d) Domain organization of the lipocalin-like protein (LPCL1) identified from both protein bands in NH4F extracted silica scales. The approximate positions of the proline/lysine-rich regions and the calycin domain (IPR012674) are shown. Also shown are the positions of six highly conserved cysteines (asterisk) that may be involved in the formation of disulphide bridges. (e) Long-chain polyamines (LCPAs) from P. neolepis silica scales. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) of the low-molecular-weight NH4F-soluble fraction of silica scales revealed a series of mass peaks separated by 71 Da (highlighted in red), characteristic of N-methyl propyleneimine units. The additional mass peaks ±14 Da may indicate different methylation states, as is commonly observed in LCPAs. The proposed structure of the LCPAs in P. neolepis is shown with the putative lysine residue is highlighted in red.

A search of the P. neolepis transcriptome for mechanisms involved in silica precipitation did not reveal homologues of any of the known silica-associated proteins from diatoms (silaffins, pleuralins and frustulins) or sponges (silicateins)20,31 (Supplementary Table 1). As some of these proteins have a low complexity amino-acid composition and may not be identified by sequence similarity searches, we directly analysed the organic components released by NH4F dissolution of the silica scales. We identified two major organic components using Tricine/SDS–PAGE; a lipocalin-like protein and long-chain polyamines (LCPAs; Fig. 1c). The lipocalin-like protein contains two proline-/lysine-rich regions surrounding a lipocalin domain and represents a novel silica-associated protein (LPCL1, Fig. 1d, Supplementary Fig. 3). The LCPAs from P. neolepis are composed of N-methylated oligopropyleneimine repeats, similar to the silica-associated LCPAs previously characterized from diatoms and sponges32,33, but differ from these LCPAs as the repeat units are linked to a lysine residue rather than putrescine, ornithine or spermidine (diatoms), or butaneamine (sponges) residues (Fig. 1e, Supplementary Fig. 4). Diatoms possess a series of unusual orthologues of the genes involved in polyamine synthesis that are proposed to play a specific role in the formation of LCPAs34. Homologues of these modified genes for polyamine synthesis were not found in the P. neolepis transcriptome, indicating that these modifications may be specific to diatoms.

An expanded family of SITs in haptophytes

Our analyses indicate that there are some similarities in the biosilicification mechanisms between P. neolepis and diatoms, including the silica deposition vesicle and the LCPAs. However, the silica-associated proteins bear no similarity and the only known silicification-related gene products common to both organisms are the Si transporters (SITs and Lsi2). To examine the origins of SITs and Lsi2 in P. neolepis, we performed sequence similarity searches of the Emiliania huxleyi genome and 24 other haptophyte transcriptomes (including six species of coccolithophore) from the Marine Microbial Eukaryote Transcriptome data set ( Homologues of the Si-associated protein LPCL1 from P. neolepis were not found in other haptophytes (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). However, we identified a SIT homologue in the calcifying coccolithophore Scyphosphaera apsteinii that was highly similar to PnSIT1 (66% identity, 76.2% similarity at the amino-acid level). In addition, we found that three coccolithophores (S. apsteinii, Coccolithus braarudii and Calcidiscus leptoporus) possess a SIT-like protein that only contains five transmembrane regions (Fig. 2a,b). The Si efflux protein Lsi2 was not found in these coccolithophores, or in any other haptophyte, with the exception of the non-mineralized prymnesiophyte, Haptolina ericina.

Figure 2: An expanded family of diatom-like Si-transporters (SITs) in haptophytes.
Figure 2

(a) Phylogenetic relationships between haptophytes. The schematic tree shows the currently accepted phylogenetic relationships of the major haptophyte lineages based on multigene phylogenies11. Representative species of each group are indicated, along with the presence of SITs or SITLs in these species. Sensitivity to Ge is shown in red, ND, not determined. Coccolithales. (b) A schematic image of the domain architecture of the SITs and the SITLs indicating the approximate position of the transmembrane domains and of the conserved motifs. (c) A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree based on an alignment of selected SITL proteins with SITs (aligned to the N-terminal SIT domain). Final alignment size was 157 amino acids. The SITLs form a well-supported monophyletic clade. Within the SITLs two distinct clades can be observed. SITL clade I contains haptophytes, metazoa and foraminifera, whereas SITL clade II contains dinoflagellates, a cryptophyte and a dictyochophyte. Bootstrap values >70% (100 bootstraps) and Bayesian posterior probabilities >0.95 (10,000,000 generations) are shown above nodes. Scale bar, substitutions per site.

Comparison of the two haptophyte SITs with 33 other SIT sequences originating from diatoms, chrysophytes and choanoflagellates indicated that all of the highly conserved amino-acid residues identified by Marron et al.26 were also conserved in haptophytes (Supplementary Fig. 2). The single 5TM domain of the SIT-like (SITL) proteins displays a high sequence similarity to the N- and C-terminal 5TM domains of SITs. SITLs also possess the highly conserved EGxQ and GRQ motifs that are proposed to play a role in binding Si26,27, as well as many of the other amino-acid residues that were identified as being highly conserved in SITs (Supplementary Fig. 2). The 5TM+5TM inverted repeat topology of the SITs is characteristic of Na+-coupled transporters with a LeuT fold and is also found in many other membrane transporters36,37. The inverted repeat topology in these transporters is thought to have evolved following gene duplication and fusion of a related transporter that initially existed as a homodimer with inverted symmetry38. Homodimerization of the SITLs may therefore result in a membrane transporter with similar properties to the SITs and it is likely that SITs evolved from a protein resembling the SITLs. SITLs were not found in any other haptophytes or in diatoms, but were present in a range of other eukaryotes, including foraminifera, dinoflagellates and metazoa (such as the polychaetes, Capitella teleta and Platynereis dumerilii and the copepod Calanus finmarchicus) (Fig. 2c). Many calanoid copepods have silicified teeth39 and SITLs may provide a mechanism for Si transport in these ecologically important zooplankton. However, not all of the species that possess SITLs are silicified. The foraminifera and the coccolithophores are the predominant contributors to calcification in our oceans and so the identification of SITLs in these lineages is particularly intriguing.

The SITs from P. neolepis and S. apsteinii form a strongly supported monophyletic clade, suggesting a common evolutionary origin for the haptophyte SITs (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 5). To explain the limited distribution of SITs, Marron et al.26 proposed that horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of SITs may have occurred between stramenopiles and choanoflagellates. However, there is no phylogenetic evidence to support recent HGT of SITs between stramenopiles, choanoflagellates or the haptophytes. The SITL proteins form a monophyletic clade distinct from true SITs, suggesting that they represent a novel but closely related group of transporter proteins (Fig. 2c). When aligned to the SITLs, the individual N- and C-terminal regions of SITs form strongly supported clades, suggesting that the SITs found in stramenopiles, choanoflagellates and haptophytes arose from a single gene duplication event, rather than from a series of more recent duplication events in each lineage (Supplementary Fig. 5). Phylogenetic analyses of Lsi2 provided no indication that haptophytes acquired this gene by recent HGT (Supplementary Fig. 6).

A novel role for Si in coccolithophore calcification

Calcified coccolithophores emerged in the early Mesozoic (c. 220 Myr ago)11, when Si concentrations in the surface oceans were considerably higher than in present day. The distribution of the SITs and SITLs in haptophytes suggests that these transporters were present in ancestral haptophytes, including the last common ancestor of the coccolithophores. Although Si has not been generally identified as a component of calcite coccoliths, a recent study showed that Si is a minor component of the two forms of heterococcolith (muroliths and lopadoliths) found in S. apsteinii40. In many calcifying systems, calcite precipitation occurs by the crystallization of amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC). Recent evidence indicates that silica can modulate the crystallization of calcium carbonate in vitro by acting to modulate the metastability of ACC and facilitate ordered calcite crystal formation41,42,43,44. We therefore hypothesized that Si uptake via SITs or SITLs may contribute to calcification in coccolithophores.

To test this hypothesis, we used the Si analogue germanium (Ge), which competitively inhibits Si uptake in diatoms22 and also prevents Si scale production in P. neolepis (Supplementary Fig. 7). In diatoms, Ge/Si ratios <0.01 do not have an inhibitory effect, but ratios >0.05 inhibit Si uptake and also disrupt Si metabolism within the cell45,46,47. Other silicifying algae, such as the chrysophytes Synura petersenii and Paraphysomonas vestita, are also sensitive to Ge, although growth in Paraphysomonas is only inhibited at much higher Ge/Si ratios than diatoms48,49. In contrast, non-silicified algae are reported to be largely unaffected by Ge50. Our initial experiments to screen for Ge sensitivity in coccolithophores were conducted in low-Si seawater (<0.1 μM), to ensure high Ge:Si ratios (>1). Observations with light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) identified that coccolith formation in S. apsteinii was severely disrupted by the addition of 1 μM Ge, with 73% of cells displaying highly malformed coccoliths after 72 h (compared with 3.3% in Si-replete seawater; Fig. 3). The cup-shaped lopadoliths were severely misshapen, frequently exhibiting additional disorganized calcite precipitation at the apical rim, and the smaller disk-shaped muroliths also exhibited malformation. The addition of 5 μM Ge to C. braarudii and C. leptoporus resulted in the production of severely malformed coccoliths that failed to integrate into the coccosphere and were shed into the surrounding seawater (Fig. 3). In all three species, addition of 100 μM Si suppressed the disruptive effects of Ge on coccolith morphology, suggesting that Ge acts competitively with Si.

Figure 3: A role for Si in coccolith formation.
Figure 3

(a) Representative SEM micrographs demonstrating the effects of Si limitation and Ge addition on coccolith production. C. braarudii, S. apsteinii and C. leptoporus were incubated for 72 h in very low Si seawater (<0.1 μM), which was amended with Ge (1 μM for S. apsteinii or 5 μM for the other two species). C. braarudii and C. leptoporus cells grown in very low Si appeared superficially similar to cells grown in Si-replete seawater (100 μM Si), but closer inspection revealed that many ‘blocky’ coccoliths are apparent (arrowed), indicating a calcification defect related to the lack of Si. The addition of Ge resulted in the production of highly aberrant coccoliths in all three species. In C. braarudii these aberrant liths fail to integrate fully into the coccosphere and were often shed into the media. Both types of heterococcolith in S. apsteinii (the large cup-shaped lopadoliths and the small plate-like muroliths) exhibit extensive malformations. In C. leptoporus the aberrant coccoliths are all co-localized, suggesting that the newly formed liths in this species are secreted in a similar position in the coccosphere. The addition of 100 μM Si to Ge-treated cells markedly reduced the inhibitory effects on calcification. Scale bar, 5 μm. (b) Quantification of the production of aberrant coccoliths in C. braarudii grown in very low Si media for 24 and 72 h, amended with 5 μM Ge or 5 μM Ge+100 μM Si. For this experiment, only highly aberrant coccoliths were scored and more subtle coccolith malformations such as the ‘blocky’ coccoliths observed under low Si were not scored. n=40 cells. For discarded liths 4–7 fields of view were scored containing at least 40 cells. The experiment was repeated four times and representative results are shown. (c) Quantification of the production of aberrant lopadoliths in S. apsteinii grown in low Si media for 72 h, amended with 1 μM Ge, or 1 μM Ge+100 μM Si. n=40 cells. The experiment was repeated four times and representative results are shown. Error bars denote s.e.

To examine the relationship between Ge and Si in greater detail, we grew C. braarudii cells at three different Si concentrations (2, 20 and 100 μM) and examined the effect of a range of Ge concentrations (0.5–20 μM Ge; Fig. 4). Because high Ge/Si ratios completely inhibit biosynthesis and growth in diatoms46, we also assessed the physiological status of the Ge-treated coccolithophores. We found that the inhibitory effects of Ge on calcification (assessed by the accumulation of discarded coccoliths in the media) are dependent on the ratio of Ge/Si, rather than the absolute concentration of Ge. For example, 2 μM Ge results in the production of many aberrant coccoliths at 2 μM Si, but its impacts at 20 and 100 μM Si are progressively reduced. The inhibitory effects of Ge on calcification in C. leptoporus and S. apsteinii were also dependent on the Ge/Si ratio (Supplementary Fig. 8). These data support the hypothesis that Ge is acting to competitively inhibit an aspect of Si uptake and/or metabolism that is required for production of coccoliths.

Figure 4: The inhibitory effects of Ge are dependent on the Ge/Si ratio.
Figure 4

(a) C. braarudii cells were treated with 0, 2, 5 or 20 μM Ge for 48 h in seawater containing 2 μM Si. Effects on coccolith morphology were determined by counting the mean number of discarded liths relative to the cell density. Specific growth rate (per day) and photosynthetic efficiency (the quantum yield of photosystem II, Fv/Fm) were also determined. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 denote treatments that differ significantly from the 0 μM Ge control (one-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak post hoc test, n=3). Error bars denote standard errors. (b) C. braarudii cells treated as in a but in seawater containing 20 μM Si. (c) C. braarudii cells treated as in a but in seawater containing 100 μM Si. Ge had a much lower impact on coccolithophore physiology at higher Si concentrations, suggesting that Ge acts competitively with Si.

At high Ge/Si ratios (>1) both growth and calcification (accumulation of discarded coccoliths) were inhibited in C. braarudii. (Fig. 4). The maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) was only reduced at the very highest Ge/Si ratios. It is possible that the inhibition of growth results from the severe disruption of the calcification process. No effects on growth or photosynthetic efficiency were observed at low Ge/Si ratios, while coccolith defects were still observed, demonstrating that Ge had specifically disrupted calcification (Figs 4 and 5). The unique coccolith morphology of Ge-treated cells is distinct from defects in calcification caused by other stressors, such as nutrient limitation or high temperature51.

Figure 5: Ge causes defects in calcification at low Ge/Si ratios.
Figure 5

(a) C. braarudii cells were treated with 0, 0.5, 1 or 2 μM Ge for 48 h in seawater containing 2 μM Si. Growth, photosynthetic efficiency and the number of discarded liths were determined. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 denote treatments that differ significantly from the 0 μM Ge control (one-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak post hoc test, n=3). (b) SEM (left panel) and bright-field microscopy (right panel) images of C. braarudii cells grown in Ge for 48 h (conditions described in a). Three classes of defective coccolith morphology were observed. (i) ‘Blocky’ coccoliths where the overlapping arrangement of the distal shield is disrupted, but the shape of the coccolith is preserved. (ii) Aberrant coccoliths with highly disrupted morphology (iii) Discarded aberrant coccoliths that are not successfully integrated into the coccosphere. Note that even without Ge treatment ‘blocky’ coccoliths can be observed at 2 μM Si, but these are not present at 100 μM Si. Scale bar, 10 μm. (c) Quantification of the defective coccolith morphology shown in b. At least 40 cells were scored for each treatment. For discarded liths four to seven fields of view were scored containing at least 40 cells. Error bars denote standard errors. Scale bar, 5 μm.

Detailed examination of Si-limited coccolithophores provided direct evidence for a requirement for Si in the calcification process. In Si-replete cultures, defects in coccolith morphology were almost completely absent (Figs 3 and 5). However, highly aberrant coccoliths were consistently observed at a low frequency in both C. braarudii and C. leptoporus cultures after transfer to very low Si seawater (without Ge) for 72 h (Fig. 3a,b). In addition to the appearance of highly aberrant coccoliths, many cells exhibited more subtle but significant defects in coccolith morphology due to Si limitation, such as disorganization of the overlapping elements of the distal shield (termed ‘blocky’ morphology; Fig. 3a). Growth of C. braarudii was not inhibited after 8 days in very low Si (<0.1 μM; Supplementary Fig. 9), indicating that the defects in calcification are not caused by a general disruption of cellular physiology. Defective coccolith morphology was also apparent in C. braarudii and C. leptoporus cultures grown at 2 μM Si, compared to Si-replete cells grown at 100 μM Si (Fig. 5, Supplementary Fig. 8). This is an important observation as it shows calcification defects may occur at ecologically relevant Si concentrations. The slower growing S. apsteinii did not exhibit obvious defects in calcification after transfer to low Si for 72 h, but after 8 days clear defects in coccolith formation were observed, such as missing muroliths or incomplete lopadoliths (Supplementary Fig. 10).

In combination, our results using Ge treatment and Si limitation strongly suggest that Si is required for calcification in certain coccolithophores. The dramatic effects of Ge on these species are surprising as most non-siliceous algae are considered to be insensitive to Ge50,52. However, many previous studies on coccolithophore physiology have focussed on E. huxleyi, a coccolithophore that lacks SITs or SITLs in its genome. When we examined the impact of Ge on E. huxleyi at very low Si (<0.1 μM Si), we found no effects on calcification, with normal coccospheres produced even in the presence of 20 μM Ge (Fig. 6a). Concentrations of Ge up to 20 μM also had no impact on the growth or photosynthetic efficiency of E. huxleyi at 2 μM Si (Fig. 6b), in clear contrast to the marked effects of Ge on C. braarudii. Furthermore, no Ge sensitivity was observed in two further coccolithophore species in which SITs or SITLs appear absent (from their available transcriptome sequence data); G. oceanica, a coccolithophore that is closely related to E. huxleyi, and Pleurochrysis carterae (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Fig. 11). Our results suggest that Si plays an important role in calcification in coccolithophores that possess SITs and/or SITLs, but this requirement for Si is not universal and is notably absent from the abundant bloom-forming coccolithophore species in modern oceans (the Noelaerhabdaceae)4.

Figure 6: Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica are insensitive to Ge.
Figure 6

(a) Representative SEM micrographs for E. huxleyi and G. oceanica following treatment for 72 h in low Si (<0.1 μM) media with different additions of Ge (5 or 20 μM). No effect of Ge on coccolith morphology was observed in either species relative to the control grown in normal seawater media (100 μM Si). Si transporters (SIT/SITL) were not identified the genome of E. huxleyi or the transcriptome of G. oceanica. Scale bar, 2 μm. The results are representative of three independent experiments. (b) E. huxleyi cells were treated with 0, 0.5, 1 or 2 μM Ge for 48 h in seawater containing 2 μM Si. Mean specific growth rate and mean Fv/Fm as a measure of photosynthetic efficiency were determined. No significant differences were noted between treatments and the 0 μM Ge control (one-way ANOVA, n=3). The results are representative of two independent experiments. Error bars denote s.e.


While P. neolepis is the only known haptophyte exhibiting extensive silicification, our results point towards a much broader role for Si in haptophyte physiology. P. neolepis exhibits key similarities with other silicifying eukaryotes, but there is no evidence that silicification in this lineage arose from recent HGT. The mechanisms for silicification in P. neolepis have most likely been assembled independently from existing cellular components. Although P. neolepis contains a Si transporter belonging to the SIT family, the identification of a SIT in the coccolithophore S. apsteinii suggests that the presence of this family of Si transporters greatly predates the emergence of silicification in the haptophytes and may therefore have played an alternative role before being recruited for biomineralization. In diatoms, Thamatrakoln and Hildebrand22 have proposed that SITs may have played an ancestral role in preventing excessive accumulation of intracellular Si in the Si-rich waters of Mesozoic oceans, before they were recruited for frustule formation.

SITs exhibit a very limited distribution in eukaryotes (stramenopiles, haptophytes and choanoflagellates). In the absence of evidence for HGT, an alternative explanation is that this distribution results from multiple losses of a gene that was present in the last common ancestor of these lineages. However, as this ancestor was most likely close to the last common ancestor of all eukaryotes, this scenario requires gene loss of SITs on a massive scale. Two factors that may have contributed to the loss of SITs in eukaryotes are the potential functional redundancy between SITs and SITLs and the extensive depletion of Si from surface oceans in the Cenozoic. However, an alternative scenario that does not require such extensive gene loss is possible as the phylogenetic position of the haptophytes is not fully resolved. Recent phylogenomic evidence suggests a specific association between haptophytes and stramenopiles53,54, with Stiller et al.54 proposing that haptophytes acquired their plastids following endosymbiosis of a photosynthetic stramenopile belonging to the ochrophyta (which includes diatoms and chrysophytes). The associated endosymbiotic gene transfer therefore provides a mechanism through which the haptophytes may have acquired SITs from stramenopiles. The phylogeny of the SITs is not at odds with this scenario, as the proposed endosymbiosis would have occurred before the extensive radiation of the stramenopiles and the haptophytes, but it does infer that the SITs have been lost extensively in both of these taxonomic groups. This scenario does not explain the presence of SITs in choanoflagellates. Although HGT of SITs to or from choanoflagellates is not supported by the phylogeny, it cannot be ruled out and there is evidence for extensive HGT from algae into choanoflagellates55.

Clearly, there are broader evolutionary questions relating to the phylogeny of the haptophytes that must be addressed before we can fully determine the origins of the SITs. Further understanding of the function and roles of the SITLs may also provide important insight into these processes. Nevertheless, our results clearly suggest that an expanded family of SITs were present in ancestral haptophytes and that both SITs and SITLs were present in the ancestor of the calcifying coccolithophores. Therefore, it seems likely that this ancestor possessed the capacity for Si uptake. As Si exhibits the ability to modulate calcite precipitation in vitro42,43, its presence in ancestral coccolithophores may even have facilitated the emergence of extensively calcified coccoliths. We have provided evidence of a role for Si in coccolith formation in S. apsteinii, C. braarudii and C. leptoporus. These results identify that Si uptake via SITs is an important common mechanism contributing to very different modes of biomineralization in two of the major phytoplankton lineages, the diatoms and the coccolithophores.

Lsi2 was not found in coccolithophores with SITs and SITLs, suggesting that its cellular role in P. neolepis and diatoms may relate to the process of silicification. In plants, Lsi2 is proposed to act as a H+/silicic acid exchanger, using an inward H+ gradient to drive the efflux of silicic acid across the plasma membrane28. In silicifying organisms, H+/silicic acid exchangers could act to load the acidic silica deposition vesicle, using the H+ gradient across the vesicle membrane to drive the accumulation of silicic acid. It will therefore be important to identify the cellular localization of Lsi2 in P. neolepis and diatoms.

We do not yet know the cellular mechanisms through which Si contributes to the calcification process. Previous workers have identified a role for Si in bone formation in vertebrates56,57. However, the primary role of Si in bone formation appears to relate to the synthesis of collagen to form the underlying organic matrix, rather than a direct role in the mineralization process58,59. More recently, it has been demonstrated that silica plays an important role in formation of cystoliths, small calcium carbonate deposits that are found in the leaves of some land plants41,60. Although silica is only a minor component of cystoliths, it is essential for the formation of the amorphous calcium carbonate phase that comprises the bulk of the structure60. These studies suggest that Si could act to modulate coccolith formation through a number of mechanisms. Further elucidation of its precise role will enable important insight into the cellular mechanisms of calcification in coccolithophores, which remain poorly understood.

Significantly, our results suggest that requirement for Si in coccolithophore calcification may have been lost by the Noelaerhabdaceae and Pleurochrysidaceae. There are other potential evolutionary scenarios that we cannot rule out at this stage, such as independent evolution of the Si requirement within the Zygodiscales and the Coccolithales, although these scenarios are less parsimonious. The marked decline of surface ocean silicate in the Cenozoic also suggests that loss of the requirement for Si would be more likely than gain. These evolutionary events have important implications for coccolithophore ecology and prompt a re-evaluation of the widely held view that the coccolithophores do not require Si. The Si-requiring coccolithophores identified in this study are important marine calcifiers, with C. braarudii and C. leptoporus contributing significantly to calcite flux to the deep ocean in large parts of the Atlantic Ocean5,61. Although the requirement of these coccolithophores for Si is likely to be considerably lower than that of extensively silicified organisms, Si limitation clearly impairs their ability to calcify. Whether these species encounter significant Si limitation in natural seawaters and can compete effectively for this resource with diatoms and other silicified plankton must be resolved. However, concentrations of silicate in the surface ocean can often reach very low levels, particularly after diatom blooms62. It is possible that small fast-growing coccolithophores, which are best suited to exploit the nutrient-depleted waters following a diatom bloom, may have encountered selective pressure to uncouple calcification from Si uptake to avoid Si limitation. The bloom-forming coccolithophores belonging to the Noelaerhabdaceae, such as E. huxleyi and G. oceanica, may therefore have developed alternative cellular mechanisms to replace the role of Si in coccolith formation. The Noelaerhabdaceae are the most abundant and broadly distributed coccolithophores in modern oceans and their ability to form extensive blooms (often in Si-depleted waters) has likely contributed to their considerable ecological success16,17,18. The differing requirements for Si may therefore have had a profound impact on the physiology of modern coccolithophores and contributed significantly to the evolution and global distribution of this important calcifying lineage.


Algal strains and culture growth

Prymnesium neolepis (NCBI Tax ID 284051) strains TMR5 (RCC3432—Sea of Japan) and PZ241 (RCC1453—Mediterranean Sea) were obtained from the Roscoff Culture Collection. Strain TMR5 was used for all physiological analyses and for RT–PCR. Strain PZ241 was used to generate the transcriptome. Cultures of P. neolepis were maintained in filtered seawater (FSW) supplemented with f/2 nutrients (including 100 μM Na2SiO3.5H2O) under irradiance of 80–100 μmol s−1 m−2 (18:6 h light:dark) at 18 °C. Stock cultures of the coccolithophores Coccolithus braarudii (formerly Coccolithus pelagicus ssp braarudii) (PLY182G), Emiliania huxleyi (PLY-B92/11) and Pleurochrysis carterae (PLY406) were maintained in FSW supplemented with f/2 nutrients (without added Si) and Guillard’s vitamins as previously described40. Calcidiscus leptoporus (RCC1130), Gephyrocapsa oceanica (RCC1303) and Scyphosphaera apsteinii (RCC1456) were maintained in f/2 supplemented with 10% K medium. All coccolithophore cultures were grown at 15 °C under 80–100 μmol s−1 m−2 irradiance (14:10 h light:dark).

Manipulation of seawater Si and addition of Ge

To examine the effect of Si and Ge on coccolithophores, we used a batch of seawater from the Western English Channel in which Si was naturally low (measured at 2 μM using the molybdate-ascorbate assay63). This batch of seawater was used for all subsequent analyses involving the effect of Ge on coccolithophores, except where very low Si concentrations were required (see below). Si concentration was amended by the addition of Na2SiO3.5H2O. Ge was added in the form of GeO2, to give concentrations ranging from 0.5–20 μM. f/2 nutrients (without Si) were added and all coccolithophore cultures were grown under identical conditions (15 °C under 80–100 μmol s−1 m−2 irradiance, 14:10 h light:dark). For growth experiments, coccolithophore cultures were acclimated to 2 μM Si for several generations (1–2 weeks) before the onset of the experimental period. For SEM analysis, all cultures were maintained in 100 μM Si for 1–2 weeks before the onset of the experimental period to prevent accumulation of aberrant coccoliths in the control.

Very low Si seawater was prepared using diatoms to deplete Si as described previously64. One-litre batches of f/2 FSW (without added Si) were inoculated with the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii and allowed to grow into stationary phase (6–10 days). Diatoms were removed by two passages through 0.2-μm filters and the Si concentration was verified on an autoanalyser (Bran+Luebb, Germany) using a molybdate-ascorbate assay63. The initial Si in Gulf Stream Seawater was 5.4 μM and after diatom depletion the Si was below the level of detection (<0.1 μM, hereto referred to as 0Si f/2 FSW). Before inoculation of treatment media, aliquots of cells were washed at least twice by allowing them to settle, drawing off the overlying media, and resuspending in 0Si f/2 FSW. An inoculum of 0Si f/2 FSW washed cells was then added to a tube of the treatment media and monitored over 72 h. Care was taken to ensure final cell numbers did not exceed 2 × 104 cells per ml for E. huxleyi, the most rapidly growing of the three species, thus avoiding any significant changes to the carbonate chemistry of the culture medium over the course of the experimental incubations.

Physiological measurements

Growth rates of coccolithophore cultures were determined by cell counts using a Sedgewick-Rafter counting chamber (C. braarudii, P. carterae) or a Neubauer improved haemocytometer (E. huxleyi). Specific growth rates (per day) were determined from the initial and final cell densities (Nt0, Nt1) using the formula μ=(ln(Nt1)−ln(Nt0))/t). For Ge-treated C. braarudii cultures, an initial cell density of 1.2 × 104 cells per ml was used to ensure sufficient biomass was available after 48 h for measurements of chlorophyll fluorimetry. For these short-term incubations, the control cultures exhibited a specific growth rate between 0.24–0.35 per day and growth of the Ge-treated cultures is shown as a percentage of the control. For Si-limited cultures, an initial cell density of 4.5 × 103 cells per ml was used and growth was monitored over 8 days. Discarded coccoliths of C. braarudii were also counted for selected experiments. As coccolith morphology can be difficult to determine accurately by light microscopy, we did not discriminate between intact and aberrant liths in these analyses. To assess the performance of the photosynthetic apparatus, the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II was determined using a Z985 AquaPen chlorophyll fluorimeter (Qubit Systems, Kingston, Canada). Statistical analyses of these data were performed in SigmaPlot v12.0 software (Systat Software Inc, London, UK).

Fluorescence microscopy of P. neolepis silica scales

One millilitre of P. neolepis cells was incubated with the fluorescent dye LysoTracker yellow HCK-123 or LysoSensor Yellow/Blue DND-160 (Invitrogen; 1 μM, 10 h). Fluorescently labelled scales were imaged by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Zeiss LSM 510 microscope). HCK-123 was viewed using excitation at 488 nm and emission at 500–550 nm. DND-160 was viewed using multiphoton excitation at 740 nm with emission at 435–485 nm and 500–550 nm. Chlorophyll autofluorescence was also detected (emission 650–710 nm).

Extraction of silica-associated organic components

Organic components were extracted from the silica scales of P. neolepis using a modified protocol for diatom frustules65. Cells in mid-exponential growth phase were harvested by low pressure filtration and pelleted by centrifugation (500 × g, 5 min, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). The cells were disrupted by the addition of 10 ml of lysis buffer (2% SDS, 100 mM EDTA, 0.1 M Tris pH 8.0), vortexed and centrifuged at 6,000g for 10 min. The pellet containing the silica scales was washed with lysis buffer a further five times to remove cellular organic material. The silica scales were further purified by centrifugation through a 50% glycerol cushion (3,200g, 2 min) to remove any traces of contaminating low-density organic material, such as the smaller organic scales. The purity of the silica scale preparation was assessed by light microscopy (Nikon Ti Eclipse, Tokyo, Japan) and electron microscopy (both SEM and transmission electron microscopy). No contamination with cell debris or organic scales was observed in the purified preparations of silica scales, although organic scales could clearly be viewed in crude cell extracts. To dissolve the silica component of scales, 2 ml of 10 M NH4F was added to 30–100 mg biosilica sample and vortexed until the pellet was dissolved. 0.5 ml of 6 M HCl was then added to the mixture, vortexed, and the pH was adjusted to 4.5 with 6 M HCl. The sample was incubated at room temperature for 30 min before centrifugation (3,200g, 15 min) and the supernatant was transferred to a 3 kDa cut-off filtration column (Amicon) to concentrate and desalt protein. The concentrate was washed sequentially with 5 ml of 500 mM ammonium acetate, 5 ml of 200 mM ammonium acetate and three times with 5 ml of 50 mM ammonium acetate. The sample was then further concentrated to 150–400 μl and analysed using Tricine/SDS–PAGE with Coomassie Blue staining to stain both proteins and LCPAs66. Staining with silver stain or Stains-All (Sigma), which do not bind to LCPAs, was used to verify that the lower molecular weight component did not contain protein. A trypsin digest was also conducted, where 10 μl of the NH4F soluble extract was incubated with 2 μg of TPCK (tosyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone)-treated trypsin in 100 mM Tris-HCl at pH 8.8 at 37 °C (18 h). Analysis by Tricine/SDS–PAGE revealed that the higher molecular weight component had been removed by trypsin, but the low-molecular-weight component (LCPA) remained. To further confirm that silica scales were not contaminated with cellular debris or organic scales, the purified silica scales were extracted with 5 ml buffer (100 mM EDTA, 0.1 M Tris pH 8.0) in the absence of NH4F dissolution. No organic components were observed following Tricine/SDS–PAGE analysis, indicating that the organic components observed following treatment with NH4F are released by silica dissolution.

Protein identification from silica scale extract

Following Tricine/SDS–PAGE, protein bands were excised from the gel and analysed by peptide mass fingerprinting using a tryptic digest (Alta Bioscience, Abingdon, UK). The P. neolepis transcriptome was used to create a reference proteome. A single protein (LPCL1) was identified, with 8–16 unique peptides identified in each sample. The protein identification was repeated at an alternative facility (Mass Spectrometry Facility, Biosciences, University of Exeter, UK) using an independent protein extract. This gave an identical result identifying 8 unique peptides for LPCL1.

LCPA purification from silica scale extract

LCPAs were separated from the protein fraction by ultrafiltration of 500 μl of the NH4F soluble extract through a 10 kD MW filtre. The LCPAs were then further purified by cation exchange through 2 ml of high S strong cation exchange resin (Bio-Rad, Hemel Hempstead, UK). The column was prepared by washing sequentially with 10 ml of deionised water, 10 ml of 2 M ammonium acetate and then three further times with deionised water. The NH4F extraction was diluted (4.5:100) with deionised water and passed through the column. The resin was then washed three times with 1 ml of 200 mM ammonium acetate and polyamines were eluted by 4 sequential additions of 1 ml of 2 M ammonium acetate. The eluant was neutralized with acetic acid and lyophilized. Long-chain polyamines were analysed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) using an amaZon speed mass spectrometer (Bruker, Bremen). Samples were diluted in H2O/CH3CN (50/50), and injected by direct infusion at a flow rate of 500 nl min−1 using a Captive Spray ion source. MS and MSn spectra were acquired in positive ion mode.

Generation of the P. neolepis transcriptome

A 100-ml culture of P. neolepis strain PZ241 growing in standard conditions (mid-exponential phase, f/2+Si, other growth conditions as described above) was used to generate the transcriptome. Cells were collected 4 h into the light cycle by centrifugation (500g, 5 min). RNA was extracted using the Trizol method (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK), with additional purification using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands). Following reverse transcription using oligo-dT primers, P. neolepis complementary DNA was sequenced by Illumina technology, generating 64,548,084 paired end reads of 75 bp (Genoscope, Evry, France). The paired end reads were assembled by Trinity67, producing 118,473 transcripts, including alternative forms of a total of 83,175 transcripts.

Reverse transcription PCR

Reverse transcription PCR (RT–PCR) was used to verify the expression of selected genes (LPCL1, SIT and SITL) identified in the haptophyte transcriptomes. Fifty-millilitre cultures of P. neolepis (TMR5), C. braarudii, C. leptoporus and S. apsteinii were grown in standard conditions (as described above). Cells were collected 4 h into the light cycle by centrifugation (500g, 5 min). RNA was extracted using the Trizol method (Invitrogen), with additional purification using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen). Complementary DNA was synthesized using either oligo-dT primers (PnSIT1) or gene specific primers (all other products) using Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Gene products were then amplified by PCR (95 °C for 30 s, 54 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 60 s, 35 cycles) (Supplementary Table 3). PCR products were sequenced to confirm the amino-acid sequence of the predicted protein product (Source BioScience, Cambridge, UK). The nucleotide sequences of P. neolepis SIT1 and LPCL1 obtained from the TMR5 strain were 100% identical at the nucleotide level to those identified in the PZ241 transcriptome.

Bioinformatic analyses

Known proteins associated with silicification from diatoms, sponges and land plants were used to search the haptophyte transcriptomes (Supplementary Table S1). The additional haptophyte transcriptomes were obtained from the Marine Microbial Eukaryote Sequencing Project (MMETSP; The genomes of Emiliania huxleyi v1.0 and Thalassiosira pseudonana v3.0 were obtained from the Joint Genome Institute (JGI; Further searches were performed at NCBI (, including Transcriptome Shotgun Assembly (TSA) and Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) databases. Databases were searched using BLASTP and TBLASTN. Position-specific iterative BLAST (PSI-BLAST) was used to identify highly conserved motifs in proteins that exhibit low levels of sequence identity (for example, lipocalins). Each potential hit was manually inspected using a multiple sequence alignment to identify conserved residues and then phylogenetic analyses were performed using both neighbour-joining and maximum likelihood methods within the MEGA5 software package to assess the relationship with known proteins68. For detailed phylogenetic analysis of SITs and SITLs, multiple sequence alignments were generated using MUSCLE and manually inspected for alignment quality. After manual refinement, GBLOCKS 0.91b was used to remove poorly aligned residues69 and then ProtTest was used to determine the best substitution model (WAG with gamma and invariant). Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees were generated using PhyML3.0 software with 100 bootstraps. Bayesian posterior probabilities were calculated using BEAST v1.8, running for 10,000,000 generations70. The identification of potential transmembrane domains in SITLs was performed using Phobius and TMHMM.

Electron microscopy

SEM images of P. neolepis scales were acquired with a JEOL 5000 and JEOL 7001 F microscopes (Jeol, Japan) at 15 keV accelerating voltage. Scales were collected using lysis buffer (2% SDS, 100 mM EDTA, 0.1 M Tris pH 8.00) as described above, but were additionally cleaned by heating at 95 °C for 10 min in the lysis buffer. Purified P. neolepis silica scale material was dried and sputter coated with gold or chromium before imaging. Samples of coccolithophores for SEM were collected by filtration onto a 13-mm 0.4-μm Isopore filter (Millpore EMD), followed by a rinse with 10 ml of 1 mM HEPES buffer (pH 8.2) to remove salts. Filters were air-dried, mounted onto an aluminium stub and sputter coated with 10 nm Pt/Pd (Cressington, USA). Samples were examined with a Phillips XL30S FEG SEM (FEI-Phillips, USA) and imaged in high-resolution secondary electron mode with beam acceleration of 5 kV. Three categories of coccolith morphology were scored. (i) ‘Blocky’ coccoliths where the overlapping arrangement of the distal shield is disrupted, but the overall shape of the coccolith is not disrupted (C. braarudii and C. leptoporus only). (ii) ‘Aberrant’ coccoliths were classified as coccoliths that clearly departed from the typical morphology for any given species. (iii) ‘Discarded aberrant’ coccoliths were classed as those aberrant coccoliths that failed to integrate into the coccosphere. To analyse coccolith morphology, at least 40 cells per treatment were scored for the number of malformed coccoliths present in the coccosphere. Coccoliths on the underside of cells could not be scored and the resultant underestimate of coccoliths per cell was assumed to be the same for any given species. Discarded aberrant coccoliths were counted in four to seven random fields of view in which both cells and loose aberrant coccoliths on the filter were scored (at least 40 cells in total were scored for each treatment). Ge-treated cultures for SEM analysis were grown in single replicates. Each experiment was repeated on multiple independent occasions and in each case the effects of Ge were highly reproducible. A representative example of each experiment is shown. Error bars denote standard error.

Additional information

Accession codes: Sequences from and were submitted to GenBank (KP793098-KP793099, KR677451).

How to cite this article: Durak, G. M. et al. A role for diatom-like silicon transporters in calcifying coccolithophores. Nat. Commun. 7:10543 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10543 (2016).


  1. 1.

    & Factors influencing the sinking of POC and the efficiency of the biological carbon pump. Deep Sea Res. Part II 54, 639–658 (2007).

  2. 2.

    , , & Not all calcite ballast is created equal: differing effects of foraminiferan and coccolith calcite on the formation and sinking of aggregates. Biogeosciences 11, 135–145 (2014).

  3. 3.

    & Biomineralization by photosynthetic organisms: evidence of coevolution of the organisms and their environment? Geobiology 7, 140–154 (2009).

  4. 4.

    , , & in Evolution of Primary Producers in the Sea eds Falkowski P., Knoll A. Elsevier (2007).

  5. 5.

    , & Biogeochemical implications of comparative growth rates of Emiliania huxleyi and Coccolithus species. Biogeosciences 11, 6915–6925 (2014).

  6. 6.

    , & Perturbing phytoplankton: response and isotopic fractionation with changing carbonate chemistry in two coccolithophore species. Clim. Past 6, 771–785 (2010).

  7. 7.

    et al. Ribosomal DNA phylogenies and a morphological revision provide the basis for a revised taxonomy of the Prymnesiales (Haptophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 46, 202–228 (2011).

  8. 8.

    , , , & A haptophyte bearing siliceous scales: Ultrastructure and phylogenetic position of Hyalolithus neolepis gen. et sp nov (Prymnesiophyceae, Haptophyta). Protist 157, 213–234 (2006).

  9. 9.

    , , , & Prymnesium neolepis (Prymnesiaceae), a siliceous Haptophyte from the Southern Indian Ocean. Micropaleontology 60, 475–481 (2014).

  10. 10.

    , , , & Dynamics of the formation and secretion of hetercoccoliths by Coccolithus pelagicus (ssp braarudii). Eur. J. Phycol. 42, 125–1336 (2007).

  11. 11.

    , , & A time line of the environmental genetics of the haptophytes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 161–176 (2010).

  12. 12.

    & Silica, diatoms, and cenozoic radiolarian evolution. Geology 3, 175–177 (1975).

  13. 13.

    , , & Radiolarians decreased silicification as an evolutionary response to reduced Cenozoic ocean silica availability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9333–9338 (2009).

  14. 14.

    , , & Decline in Mesozoic reef-building sponges explained by silicon limitation. Nature 401, 785–788 (1999).

  15. 15.

    , & Evolution of the diatoms: insights from fossil, biological and molecular data. Phycologia 45, 361–402 (2006).

  16. 16.

    et al. Surface biological, chemical, and optical properties of the Patagonian Shelf coccolithophore bloom, the brightest waters of the Great Calcite Belt. Limnol. Oceanogr. 59, 1715–1732 (2014).

  17. 17.

    , , , & Phenological characteristics of global coccolithophore blooms. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 239–253 (2015).

  18. 18.

    et al. Distribution of calcifying and silicifying phytoplankton in relation to environmental and biogeochemical parameters during the late stages of the 2005 North East Atlantic Spring Bloom. Biogeosciences 6, 2155–2179 (2009).

  19. 19.

    & in Coccolithophores: From Molecular Processes to Global Impact eds Thierstein H. R., Young J. R. 75–97 (2004).

  20. 20.

    & Diatoms-from cell wall biogenesis to nanotechnology. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 83–107 (2008).

  21. 21.

    , , & A gene family of silicon transporters. Nature 385, 688–689 (1997).

  22. 22.

    & Silicon uptake in diatoms revisited: a model for saturable and nonsaturable uptake kinetics and the role of silicon transporters. Plant Physiol. 146, 1397–1407 (2008).

  23. 23.

    et al. A silicon transporter in rice. Nature 440, 688–691 (2006).

  24. 24.

    et al. Silica transport in the demosponge Suberites domuncula: fluorescence emission analysis using the PDMPO probe and cloning of a potential transporter. Biochem. J. 381, 665–673 (2004).

  25. 25.

    , , , & Detection of the gene responsible for silicic acid transport in chrysophycean algae. Dokl. Biol. Sci. 408, 256–260 (2006).

  26. 26.

    et al. A family of diatom-like silicon transporters in the siliceous loricate choanoflagellates. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20122543 (2013).

  27. 27.

    , & Comparative sequence analysis of diatom silicon transporters: Toward a mechanistic model of silicon transport. J. Phycol. 42, 822–834 (2006).

  28. 28.

    et al. An efflux transporter of silicon in rice. Nature 448, 209–212 (2007).

  29. 29.

    et al. Whole transcriptome analysis of the silicon response of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. BMC Genomics 13, 499 (2012).

  30. 30.

    Further observations on the fine structure of Chrysochromulina chiton with special reference to the haptonema, ‘peculiar’ golgi structure and scale production. J. Cell. Sci. 2, 265–272 (1967).

  31. 31.

    , , & Silicatein alpha: cathepsin L-like protein in sponge biosilica. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6234–6238 (1998).

  32. 32.

    , , & Species-specific polyamines from diatoms control silica morphology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14133–14138 (2000).

  33. 33.

    , , & Long-chain polyamines (LCPAs) from marine sponge: possible implication in spicule formation. Chembiochem 8, 1729–1735 (2007).

  34. 34.

    Molecular machines encoded by bacterially-derived multi-domain gene fusions that potentially synthesize, N-methylate and transfer long chain polyamines in diatoms. FEBS Lett. 585, 2627–2634 (2011).

  35. 35.

    et al. The Marine Microbial Eukaryote Transcriptome Sequencing Project (MMETSP): illuminating the functional diversity of eukaryotic life in the oceans through transcriptome sequencing. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001889 (2014).

  36. 36.

    & Structure and function of Na+-symporters with inverted repeats. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 19, 425–432 (2009).

  37. 37.

    , , & A study of the evolution of inverted-topology repeats from LeuT-fold transporters using AlignMe. Biochemistry 49, 10702–10713 (2010).

  38. 38.

    & Inverted topologies in membrane proteins: a mini-review. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 8, e201308004 (2013).

  39. 39.

    , , & New insights into the complex architecture of siliceous copepod teeth. Zoology 118, 141–146 (2015).

  40. 40.

    , & Coccolithogenesis in Scyphosphaera apsteinii (Prymnesiophyceae). J. Phycol. 48, 1343–1361 (2012).

  41. 41.

    , & The stabilizing effect of silicate on biogenic and synthetic amorphous calcium carbonate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 13208–13211 (2010).

  42. 42.

    et al. Dehydration and crystallization of amorphous calcium carbonate in solution and in air. Nat. Commun. 5, 3169 (2014).

  43. 43.

    et al. Stabilization of amorphous calcium carbonate in inorganic silica-rich environments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 17859–17866 (2010).

  44. 44.

    , , & Growth behavior of monohydrocalcite (CaCO3.H2O) in silica-rich alkaline solution. Cryst. Growth Des. 15, 564–572 (2015).

  45. 45.

    , & Germanium incorporation into silica of diatom cell-walls. Arch. Microbiol. 92, 11–20 (1973).

  46. 46.

    & Role of silicon in diatom metabolism. A silicon requirement for deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in the diatom Cylindrotheca fusiformis Reimann and Lewin. Exp. Cell Res. 58, 334–342 (1969).

  47. 47.

    & in Silicon and siliceous structures in biological systems eds Simpson T. L., Volcani B. E. 43–68Springer-Velag (1981).

  48. 48.

    & Requirement for silicon in Synura petersenii (Chrysophyceae). J. Phycol. 11, 349–355 (1975).

  49. 49.

    Formation of scales in Paraphysomonas vestita and inhibition of growth by germanium dioxide. J. Protozool. 25, 163–166 (1978).

  50. 50.

    Silicon metabolism in diatoms. V. germanium dioxide, a specific inhibitor of diatom growth. Phycologia 6, 1–12 (1966).

  51. 51.

    , , , & High temperature decreases the PIC/POC ratio and increases phosphorus requirements in Coccolithus pelagicus (Haptophyta). Biogeosciences 11, 3531–3545 (2014).

  52. 52.

    & in Coccolithophores: From Molecular Processes to Global Impact eds Thierstein H. R., Young J. R. 217–249 (2004).

  53. 53.

    & Phylogenomic analysis of Emiliania huxleyi provides evidence for haptophyte-stramenopile association and a chimeric haptophyte nuclear genome. Marine Genomics 21, 31–42 (2015).

  54. 54.

    et al. The evolution of photosynthesis in chromist algae through serial endosymbioses. Nat. Commun. 5, 5764 (2014).

  55. 55.

    , , & The scale and evolutionary significance of horizontal gene transfer in the choanoflagellate Monosiga brevicollis. BMC Genomics 14, 729 (2013).

  56. 56.

    & Growth-promoting effects of silicon in rats. Nature 239, 333 (1972).

  57. 57.

    Silicon. A possible factor in bone calcification. Science 167, 279 (1970).

  58. 58.

    et al. Orthosilicic acid stimulates collagen type 1 synthesis and osteoblastic differentiation in human osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Bone 32, 127–135 (2003).

  59. 59.

    , & A silicon requirement for prolyl hydroxylase-activity. Fed. Proc. 40, 886–886 (1981).

  60. 60.

    et al. Plant cystoliths: a complex functional biocomposite of four distinct silica and amorphous calcium carbonate phases. Chemistry 18, 10262–10270 (2012).

  61. 61.

    , , , & The fate of coccoliths at 48 degrees N 21 degrees W, northeastern Atlantic. Deep Sea Res. Part II 47, 1853–1875 (2000).

  62. 62.

    & Role of diatoms in regulating the ocean’s silicon cycle. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 1103 (2003).

  63. 63.

    & in Methods for the Determination Of Chemical Substances In Marine And Estuarine Environmental Matrices ed Arar E. J. 366.360-361–366.360-313U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997).

  64. 64.

    , & Cell death in three marine diatom species in response to different irradiance levels, silicate, or iron concentrations. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 46, 253–261 (2007).

  65. 65.

    , & Polycationic peptides from diatom biosilica that direct silica nanosphere formation. Science 286, 1129–1132 (1999).

  66. 66.

    Tricine-SDS-PAGE. Nat. Protoc. 1, 16–22 d (2006).

  67. 67.

    et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494–1512 (2013).

  68. 68.

    et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739 (2011).

  69. 69.

    & Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst. Biol. 56, 564–577 (2007).

  70. 70.

    , , & Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1969–1973 (2012).

Download references


We thank Roy Moate, Glenn Harper and Peter Bond (University of Plymouth, UK) for help with electron microscopy imaging, Malcolm Woodward (Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK) for help with silicate analyses, Nicholas Smirnoff and Hannah Florance (University of Exeter, UK) for help with protein sequencing and Nils Kroger and Nicole Poulsen (TU Dresden, Germany) for their guidance on analysing the organic component of the silica scales. This study was funded by EU Interreg IV Marinexus grant. GW and CB acknowledge support from NERC grant (NE/J021954/1). ART acknowledges NSF grant IOS 0949744 and the University of North Carolina Wilmington Microscopy Facility.

Author information

Author notes

    • Grażyna M. Durak
    •  & Alison R. Taylor

    These authors contributed equally to this work

    • Grażyna M. Durak

    Present address: University of Konstanz, Department of Chemistry, Physical Chemistry, Universitätsstr. 10, Box 714, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany


  1. Marine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, Devon PL1 2PB, UK

    • Grażyna M. Durak
    • , Charlotte E. Walker
    • , Declan Schroeder
    • , Colin Brownlee
    •  & Glen L. Wheeler
  2. Department of Biology and Marine Biology, University of North Carolina Wilmington, 601 South College Road, Wilmington, North Carolina, 28403-5915, USA

    • Alison R. Taylor
  3. Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, 29680 Roscoff, France

    • Ian Probert
    • , Colomban de Vargas
    •  & Stephane Audic
  4. School of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK

    • Colin Brownlee


  1. Search for Grażyna M. Durak in:

  2. Search for Alison R. Taylor in:

  3. Search for Charlotte E. Walker in:

  4. Search for Ian Probert in:

  5. Search for Colomban de Vargas in:

  6. Search for Stephane Audic in:

  7. Search for Declan Schroeder in:

  8. Search for Colin Brownlee in:

  9. Search for Glen L. Wheeler in:


G.M.D. characterized the mechanisms of silicification in P. neolepis and identified the requirement for Si in coccolithophores. A.R.T. performed detailed analysis of coccolithophore calcification. C.E.W. performed additional experiments. S.A., I.P., C.d.V. sequenced the transcriptome of P. neolepis. G.M.D., A.R.T., C.B. and G.L.W. designed the study and analysed the data. G.M.D., A.R.T., D.C.S., C.B. and G.L.W. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Colin Brownlee or Glen L. Wheeler.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figures 1-11 and Supplementary Tables 1-3.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BYThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit