Commentary | Published:

Realizing the impacts of a 1.5 °C warmer world

Nature Climate Change volume 6, pages 735737 (2016) | Download Citation

The academic community could make rapid progress on quantifying the impacts of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C, but a refocusing of research priorities is needed in order to provide reliable advice.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Report on the structured expert dialogue on the 2013–2015 review FCCC/SB/2015/INF.1 (UNFCCC, 2015).

  2. 2.

    5 °C or 2 °C: a conduit's view from the science-policy interface at COP20 in Lima, Peru. Climate Change Res. (2015).

  3. 3.

    et al. Four degrees and beyond: the potential for a global temperature increase of four degrees and its implications. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 369, 6–19 (2011).

  4. 4.

    & Anthropogenic contributions to global occurrence of heavy-precipitation and high-temperature extremes. Nature Clim. Change 5, 560–564 (2015).

  5. 5.

    et al. Differential climate impacts for policy relevant limits to global warming: the case of 1.5 and 2 °C. Earth Syst. Dynam. 6, 2447–2505 (2015).

  6. 6.

    & Geoscience after Paris. Nature Geosci. 9, 187–189 (2016).

  7. 7.

    The best available science to inform 1.5 °C policy choices. Nature Clim Change (2016).

  8. 8.

    et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  9. 9.

    & The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 90, 1095–1107 (2009)

  10. 10.

    , , & Embracing uncertainty in climate change policy. Nature Clim. Change 5, 917–920 (2015).

  11. 11.

    5 °C and climate change after the Paris Agreement. Nature Clim. Change 6, 222–234 (2016).

  12. 12.

    et al. Does extreme precipitation intensity depend on the emissions scenario? Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 8767–8774 (2015).

  13. 13.

    et al. Dependence of precipitation scaling patterns on emissions scenarios for representative concentration pathways. J. Clim. 26, 8868–8879 (2013).

  14. 14.

    et al. Emission scenario dependencies in climate change assessments of the hydrological cycle. Climatic Change 99, 321–329 (2010).

  15. 15.

    & Pattern scaling: its strengths and limitations, and an update on the latest model simulations. Climatic Change 122, 459–471 (2014).

  16. 16.

    & Future temperature in southwest Asia projected to exceed a threshold for human adaptability. Nature Clim. Change 6, 197–200 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Liability for climate change. Nature 421, 891–892 (2003).

  18. 18.

    et al. Negative emissions physically needed to keep global warming below 2 °C. Nature commun. 6, 7958 (2015).

  19. 19.

    et al. Characterizing loss and damage from climate change. Nature Clim. Change 4, 938–939 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

R.A.B. is supported by the European Commission's 7th Framework Programme (EU/FP7) under grant agreement 603864 (HELIX) and the DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme GA01101. D.M. is supported by the ACE-Africa project, P.M.F. is supported by a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award and H.S. is supported by the Program for Risk Information on Climate Change.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK

    • Daniel Mitchell
    • , Rachel James
    •  & Myles Allen
  2. School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK

    • Piers M. Forster
  3. Met Office Hadley Centre, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK and the College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Hatherley Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter, EX4 4PS, UK

    • Richard A. Betts
  4. Center for Global Environmental Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan

    • Hideo Shiogama

Authors

  1. Search for Daniel Mitchell in:

  2. Search for Rachel James in:

  3. Search for Piers M. Forster in:

  4. Search for Richard A. Betts in:

  5. Search for Hideo Shiogama in:

  6. Search for Myles Allen in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Mitchell.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3055

Further reading

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing