Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Timing of carbon emissions from global forest clearance

Abstract

Land-use change, primarily from conventional agricultural expansion and deforestation, contributes to approximately 17% of global greenhouse-gas emissions1. The fate of cleared wood and subsequent carbon storage as wood products, however, has not been consistently estimated, and is largely ignored or oversimplified by most models estimating greenhouse-gas emissions from global land-use conversion2,3. Here, we estimate the fate of cleared wood and timing of atmospheric carbon emissions for 169 countries. We show that 30 years after forest clearance the percentage of carbon stored in wood products and landfills ranges from about 0% to 62% globally. For 90 countries, less than 5% of carbon remains after 30 years, whereas 34 countries have more than 25% in storage. Higher storage rates result primarily from a greater percentage of long-lived products such as wood panels and lumber, and tend to occur in countries with predominantly temperate forests. Alternatively, lower storage rates are associated with a greater fraction of non-merchantable wood and more wood used for energy and paper production, which tend to occur in countries with predominantly tropical forests. Hence, the country and fate of cleared wood can considerably affect the timing of greenhouse-gas emissions from forest clearance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Fraction of carbon remaining in wood products and landfills following land clearance for different time horizons.
Figure 2
Figure 3: Carbon storage following land clearance as a fraction of initial above-ground biomass.
Figure 4: Fate of carbon following forest clearance for four countries.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barker, T., Bashmakov, L., Bernstein, J. E. & Bogner, J. E. in IPCC Climate Change 2007: Mitigation (eds Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., Bosch, P. R., Dave, R. & Meyer, L. A.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  2. US Environmental Protection Agency Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) Regulatory Impact Analysis Report No. EPA-420-R-10-006 (US EPA, 2010).

  3. EU Joint Research Centre Indirect Land use Change from Increased Biofuels Demand Report No. EUR 24485 EN (EU Joint Research Centre, 2010).

  4. Lambin, E. F. & Meyfroidt, P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3465–3472 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibbs, H. K. et al. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16732–16737 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Searchinger, T. et al. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land use change. Science 319, 1238–1240 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S. & Hawthorne, P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319, 1235–1238 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Melillo, J. M. et al. Indirect emissions from biofuels: How important? Science 326, 1397–1399 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Plevin, R. J., O’Hare, M., Jones, A. D., Torn, M. S. & Gibbs, H. K. Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels’ indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 8015–8021 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hertel, T. W. et al. Effects of US maize ethanol on global land use and greenhouse gas emissions: Estimating market-mediated responses. Bioscience 60, 223–231 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lapola, D. M. et al. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3388–3393 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Arima, E. Y., Richards, P., Walker, R. & Caldas, M. M. Satistical confirmation of indirect land use change in the Brazilian Amazon. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 024010 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marland, G. & Schlamadinger, B. Biomass fuels and forest-management strategies: How do we calculate the greenhouse-gas emissions benefits? Energy 20, 1131–1140 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schlamadinger, B. & Marland, G. The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle. Biom. Bioener. 10, 275–300 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marland, G. & Schlamadinger, B. Forests for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution? A sensitivity analysis. Biom. Bioener. 13, 389–397 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pingoud, K., Perala, A-L. & Pussinen, A. Carbon dynamics in wood products. Mitigat. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 6, 91–111 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miner, R. & Perez-Garcia, J. The greenhouse gas and carbon profile of the global forest products industry. For. Product. J. 57, 80–90 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Skog, K. E. Sequestration of carbon in harvested wood products for the United States. For. Produc. J. 58, 56–72 (2008).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pingoud, K., Pohjola, J. & Valsta, L. Assessing the integrated climatic impacts of forestry and wood products. Silva Fenn. 44, 155–175 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Heath, L. S. et al. Greenhouse gas and carbon profile of the US forest products industry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 3999–4005 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Baccini, A. et al. Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps. Nature Clim. Change 2, 182–185 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. IPCC IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Vol. 4 (IGES Japan, 2006).

  23. Food and Agricultural Organization Forest Resources Assessment (FAO, 2010).

  24. Ince, P. J., Kramp, A. D., Skog, K. E., Spelter, H. N. & Wear, D. N. US Forest Products Module: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment Research paper FPL-RP-662 Report No. USDA Forest Service (Forest Products Laboratory, 2011).

  25. Marland, E. S., Stellar, K. & Marland, G. H. A distributed approach to accounting for carbon in wood products. Mitigation Adapt. Strat. Glob. Change 15, 71–91 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.M.E. and S.Y. acknowledge the financial support from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation and the California Air Resources Board. J.M.E. acknowledges Sustainable Transportation Center fellowship support. Any mistakes or errors are the responsibility of the authors alone.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.M.E. and S.Y. identified research questions and conceptualized the study. J.M.E. constructed the model and carried out the analysis. J.M.E, S.Y. and K.E.S. analysed the results and revised/improved the study approach.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Mason Earles.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mason Earles, J., Yeh, S. & Skog, K. Timing of carbon emissions from global forest clearance. Nature Clim Change 2, 682–685 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1535

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1535

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing