Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Chemical genetic interrogation of natural variation uncovers a molecule that is glycoactivated

Abstract

Natural variation in human drug metabolism and target genes can cause pharmacogenetic or interindividual variation in drug sensitivity1,2. We reasoned that natural pharmacogenetic variation in model organisms could be systematically exploited to facilitate the characterization of new small molecules. To test this, we subjected multiple Arabidopsis thaliana accessions to chemical genetic screens and discovered 12 accession-selective hit molecules. As a model for understanding this variation, we characterized natural resistance to hypostatin, a new inhibitor of cell expansion. Map-based cloning identified HYR1, a UDP glycosyltransferase (UGT), as causative for hypostatin resistance. Multiple lines of evidence demonstrate that HYR1 glucosylates hypostatin in vivo to form a bioactive glucoside. Additionally, we delineated a HYR1 substrate motif and used it to identify another molecule modulated by glucosylation. Our results demonstrate that natural variation can be exploited to inform the biology of new small molecules, and that UGT sequence variation affects xenobiotic sensitivity across biological kingdoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Natural variation in small-molecule sensitivity exists between A. thaliana accessions.
Figure 2: The natural hypostatin resistance locus HYR1 is a UGT1A1 homolog.
Figure 3: Glucosylation activates hypostatin.
Figure 4: HYR1 modulates sensitivity to multiple xenobiotics.
Figure 5: An SNP explains most natural variation in hypostatin sensitivity.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Evans, W.E. & McLeod, H.L. Pharmacogenomics–drug disposition, drug targets, and side effects. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 538–549 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roses, A.D. Pharmacogenetics and the practice of medicine. Nature 405, 857–865 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796–815 (2000).

  4. Alonso-Blanco, C. & Koornneef, M. Naturally occurring variation in Arabidopsis: an underexploited resource for plant genetics. Trends Plant Sci. 5, 22–29 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Koornneef, M., Alonso-Blanco, C. & Vreugdenhil, D. Naturally occurring genetic variation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 141–172 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergelson, J., Stahl, E., Dudek, S. & Kreitman, M. Genetic variation within and among populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 148, 1311–1323 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nordborg, M. et al. The pattern of polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biol. 3, e196 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmid, K.J., Ramos-Onsins, S., Ringys-Beckstein, H., Weisshaar, B. & Mitchell-Olds, T. A multilocus sequence survey in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals a genome-wide departure from a neutral model of DNA sequence polymorphism. Genetics 169, 1601–1615 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell-Olds, T. & Schmitt, J. Genetic mechanisms and evolutionary significance of natural variation in Arabidopsis. Nature 441, 947–952 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weigel, D. & Nordborg, M. Natural variation in Arabidopsis. How do we find the causal genes? Plant Physiol. 138, 567–568 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cutler, S. & McCourt, P. Dude, where's my phenotype? Dealing with redundancy in signaling networks. Plant Physiol. 138, 558–559 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Coutinho, P.M., Deleury, E., Davies, G.J. & Henrissat, B. An evolving hierarchical family classification for glycosyltransferases. J. Mol. Biol. 328, 307–317 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guillemette, C. Pharmacogenomics of human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzymes. Pharmacogenomics J. 3, 136–158 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bowles, D., Lim, E.K., Poppenberger, B. & Vaistij, F.E. Glycosyltransferases of lipophilic small molecules. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57, 567–597 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim, E.K. et al. The activity of Arabidopsis glycosyltransferases toward salicylic acid, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, and other benzoates. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 586–592 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Priest, D.M. et al. Use of the glucosyltransferase UGT71B6 to disturb abscisic acid homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 46, 492–502 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brazier-Hicks, M. & Edwards, R. Functional importance of the family 1 glucosyltransferase UGT72B1 in the metabolism of xenobiotics in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 42, 556–566 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kroemer, H.K. & Klotz, U. Glucuronidation of drugs. A re-evaluation of the pharmacological significance of the conjugates and modulating factors. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 23, 292–310 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mulder, G.J. Pharmacological effects of drug conjugates: is morphine 6-glucuronide an exception? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 13, 302–304 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Teutonico, R.A., Dudley, M.W., Orr, J.D., Lynn, D.G. & Binns, A.N. Activity and accumulation of cell division-promoting phenolics in tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiol. 97, 288–297 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shao, H. et al. Crystal structures of a multifunctional triterpene/flavonoid glycosyltransferase from Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell 17, 3141–3154 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Offen, W. et al. Structure of a flavonoid glucosyltransferase reveals the basis for plant natural product modification. EMBO J. 25, 1396–1405 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Keurentjes, J.J. et al. The genetics of plant metabolism. Nat. Genet. 38, 842–849 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Girke, T., Cheng, L.C. & Raikhel, N. ChemMine. A compound mining database for chemical genomics. Plant Physiol. 138, 573–577 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ilic, K., Berleth, T. & Provart, N.J. BlastDigester–a web-based program for efficient CAPS marker design. Trends Genet. 20, 280–283 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Clough, S.J. & Bent, A.F. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 16, 735–743 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cutler, S.R., Ehrhardt, D.W., Griffitts, J.S. & Somerville, C.R. Random GFP:cDNA fusions enable visualization of subcellular structures in cells of Arabidopsis at a high frequency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3718–3723 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada Discovery grant, a Canadian Research Chair and a Canadian Foundation for Innovation startup grant to S.R.C., and an NSERC postgraduate fellowship to R.S.P. We thank P. McCourt and P. Roy for discussion and comments on the manuscript; A. Young of the University of Toronto Mass Spectrometry Facility for MS analyses; J. Coleman, R. Sage and the University of Toronto Department of Botany for purchasing compounds; and T. Kwok and P. Roy for tests on C. elegans. Lastly, we thank an anonymous reviewer for alerting us to ref. 20.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.Z. performed the Chembridge natural variation screen, cloned HYR1 and characterized hypostatin. T.F.C. performed the natural variation screens of 82 novel bioactive compounds, with assistance from R.S.P. and S.E.A. for the molecules chuboxypyr and polarazine. A.K.K. performed and interpreted, and C.K.L. supervised, the hypostatin LC-MS studies. S.R.C. conceived the project, assisted in experimental design and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean R Cutler.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–2, Supplementary Tables 1–6 and Supplementary Methods (PDF 328 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Chow, T., Puckrin, R. et al. Chemical genetic interrogation of natural variation uncovers a molecule that is glycoactivated. Nat Chem Biol 3, 716–721 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2007.32

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.2007.32

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing