Abstract
Chromosome translocations are catastrophic genomic events and often play key roles in tumorigenesis. Yet the biogenesis of chromosome translocations is remarkably poorly understood. Recent work has delineated several distinct mechanistic steps in the formation of translocations, and it has become apparent that non-random spatial genome organization, DNA repair pathways and chromatin features, including histone marks and the dynamic motion of broken chromatin, are critical for determining translocation frequency and partner selection.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stephens, P. J. et al. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144, 27–40 (2011).
Mitelman, F., Johansson, B. & Mertens, F. The impact of translocations and gene fusions on cancer causation. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 233–45 (2007).
Meaburn, K. J., Misteli, T. & Soutoglou, E. Spatial genome organization in the formation of chromosomal translocations. Semin. Cancer Biol. 17, 80–90 (2007).
Dudley, D. D., Chaudhuri, J., Bassing, C. H. & Alt, F. W. Mechanism and control of V(D)J recombination versus class switch recombination: similarities and differences. Adv. Immunol. 86, 43–112 (2005).
Lieber, M. R. The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 181–211 (2010).
Lukas, J., Lukas, C. & Bartek, J. More than just a focus: the chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1161–1169 (2011).
Lukas, C., Bartek, J. & Lukas, J. Imaging of protein movement induced by chromosomal breakage: tiny 'local' lesions pose great 'global' challenges. Chromosoma 114, 146–154 (2005).
Kaye, J. A. et al. DNA breaks promote genomic instability by impeding proper chromosome segregation. Curr. Biol. 14, 2096–2106 (2004).
Lobachev, K., Vitriol, E., Stemple, J., Resnick, M. A. & Bloom, K. Chromosome fragmentation after induction of a double-strand break is an active process prevented by the RMX repair complex. Curr. Biol. 14, 2107–2112 (2004).
Soutoglou, E. et al. Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 675–682 (2007).
Kruhlak, M. J. et al. Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 172, 823–834 (2006).
Jakob, B., Splinter, J., Durante, M. & Taucher-Scholz, G. Live cell microscopy analysis of radiation-induced DNA double-strand break motion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3172–3177 (2009).
Nelms, B. E., Maser, R. S., MacKay, J. F., Lagally, M. G. & Petrini, J. H. In situ visualization of DNA double-strand break repair in human fibroblasts. Science 280, 590–592 (1998).
Aten, J. A. et al. Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains. Science 303, 92–95 (2004).
Krawczyk, P. M. et al. Chromatin mobility is increased at sites of DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Sci. 125, 2127–2133 (2012).
Mine-Hattab, J. & Rothstein, R. Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 510–517 (2012).
Dion, V., Kalck, V., Horigome, C., Towbin, B. D. & Gasser, S. M. Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 502–509 (2012).
Dion, V., Kalck, V., Seeber, A., Schleker, T. & Gasser, S. M. Cohesin and the nucleolus constrain the mobility of spontaneous repair foci. EMBO Rep. 14, 984–991 (2013).
Seeber, A., Dion, V. & Gasser, S. M. Checkpoint kinases and the INO80 nucleosome remodeling complex enhance global chromatin mobility in response to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 27, 1999–2008 (2013).
Dimitrova, N., Chen, Y. C., Spector, D. L. & de Lange, T. 53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility. Nature 456, 524–528 (2008).
Misteli, T. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 128, 787–800 (2007).
Roukos, V., Burman, B. & Misteli, T. The cellular etiology of chromosome translocations. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25, 357–364 (2013).
Misteli, T. Higher-order genome organization in human disease. Cold Spring Harb. Persp. Biol. 2, a000794 (2010).
Nikiforova, M. N. et al. Proximity of chromosomal loci that participate in radiation-induced rearrangements in human cells. Science 290, 138–141 (2000).
Bickmore, W. A. & Teague, P. Influences of chromosome size, gene density and nuclear position on the frequency of constitutional translocations in the human population. Chromosome Res. 10, 707–715 (2002).
Parada, L. A., McQueen, P. G., Munson, P. J. & Misteli, T. Conservation of relative chromosome positioning in normal and cancer cells. Curr. Biol. 12, 1692–1697 (2002).
Branco, M. R. & Pombo, A. Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol. 4, e138 (2006).
Neves, H., Ramos, C., da Silva, M. G., Parreira, A. & Parreira, L. The nuclear topography of ABL, BCR, PML, and RARα genes: evidence for gene proximity in specific phases of the cell cycle and stages of hematopoietic differentiation. Blood 93, 1197–1207 (1999).
Roix, J. J., McQueen, P. G., Munson, P. J., Parada, L. A. & Misteli, T. Spatial proximity of translocation-prone gene loci in human lymphomas. Nat. Genet. 34, 287–291 (2003).
Lukasova, E. et al. Localisation and distance between ABL and BCR genes in interphase nuclei of bone marrow cells of control donors and patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Hum. Genet. 100, 525–535 (1997).
Roccato, E. et al. Proximity of TPR and NTRK1 rearranging loci in human thyrocytes. Cancer Res. 65, 2572–6576 (2005).
Stahl, A. et al. Structural basis for Robertsonian translocations in man: association of ribosomal genes in the nucleolar fibrillar center in meiotic spermatocytes and oocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 5946–5950 (1983).
Nikiforov, Y. E., Koshoffer, A., Nikiforova, M., Stringer, J. & Fagin, J. A. Chromosomal breakpoint positions suggest a direct role for radiation in inducing illegitimate recombination between the ELE1 and RET genes in radiation-induced thyroid carcinomas. Oncogene 18, 6330–6334 (1999).
Cremer, T. & Cremer, C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 292–301 (2001).
Parada, L. A., McQueen, P. G. & Misteli, T. Tissue-specific spatial organization of genomes. Genome Biol. 5, R44 (2004).
Agmon, N., Liefshitz, B., Zimmer, C., Fabre, E. & Kupiec, M. Effect of nuclear architecture on the efficiency of double-strand break repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 694–699 (2013).
Chiarle, R. et al. Genome-wide translocation sequencing reveals mechanisms of chromosome breaks and rearrangements in B cells. Cell 147, 107–119 (2011).
Klein, I. A. et al. Translocation-capture sequencing reveals the extent and nature of chromosomal rearrangements in B lymphocytes. Cell 147, 95–106 (2011).
Zhang, Y. et al. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell 148, 908–921 (2012).
Hakim, O. et al. DNA damage defines sites of recurrent chromosomal translocations in B lymphocytes. Nature 484, 69–74 (2012).
Rocha, P. P. et al. Close proximity to Igh is a contributing factor to AID-mediated translocations. Mol. Cell 47, 873–885 (2012).
Roukos, V. et al. Spatial dynamics of chromosome translocations in living cells. Science 341, 660–664 (2013).
Chuang, C. H. et al. Long-range directional movement of an interphase chromosome site. Curr. Biol. 16, 825–831 (2006).
Dundr, M. et al. Actin-dependent intranuclear repositioning of an active gene locus in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 179, 1095–1103 (2007).
Wu, J. I. & Crabtree, G. R. Cell signaling. Nuclear actin as choreographer of cell morphology and transcription. Science 316, 1710–1711 (2007).
Dion, V. & Gasser, S. M. Chromatin movement in the maintenance of genome stability. Cell 152, 1355–1364 (2013).
Hediger, F., Neumann, F. R., Van Houwe, G., Dubrana, K. & Gasser, S. M. Live imaging of telomeres: yKu and Sir proteins define redundant telomere-anchoring pathways in yeast. Curr. Biol. 12, 2076–2089 (2002).
Zimmer, C. & Fabre, E. Principles of chromosomal organization: lessons from yeast. J. Cell Biol. 192, 723–733 (2011).
Taddei, A., Schober, H. & Gasser, S. M. The budding yeast nucleus. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a000612 (2010).
Chubb, J. R., Boyle, S., Perry, P. & Bickmore, W. A. Chromatin motion is constrained by association with nuclear compartments in human cells. Curr. Biol. 12, 439–445 (2002).
Wiesmeijer, K., Krouwels, I. M., Tanke, H. J. & Dirks, R. W. Chromatin movement visualized with photoactivable GFP-labeled histone H4. Differentiation 76, 83–90 (2008).
Walter, J., Schermelleh, L., Cremer, M., Tashiro, S. & Cremer, T. Chromosome order in HeLa cells changes during mitosis and early G1, but is stably maintained during subsequent interphase stages. J. Cell Biol. 160, 685–697 (2003).
Thomson, I., Gilchrist, S., Bickmore, W. A. & Chubb, J. R. The radial positioning of chromatin is not inherited through mitosis but is established de novo in early G1. Curr. Biol. 14, 166–172 (2004).
Heun, P., Laroche, T., Shimada, K., Furrer, P. & Gasser, S. M. Chromosome dynamics in the yeast interphase nucleus. Science 294, 2181–2186 (2001).
Pliss, A., Malyavantham, K., Bhattacharya, S., Zeitz, M. & Berezney, R. Chromatin dynamics is correlated with replication timing. Chromosoma 118, 459–470 (2009).
Forget, A. L. & Kowalczykowski, S. C. Single-molecule imaging of DNA pairing by RecA reveals a three-dimensional homology search. Nature 482, 423–427 (2012).
Ragunathan, K., Liu, C. & Ha, T. RecA filament sliding on DNA facilitates homology search. eLife 1, e00067 (2012).
Renkawitz, J., Lademann, C. A., Kalocsay, M. & Jentsch, S. Monitoring homology search during DNA double-strand break repair in vivo. Mol. Cell 50, 261–272 (2013).
Gandhi, M. et al. Homologous chromosomes make contact at the sites of double-strand breaks in genes in somatic G0/G1-phase human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9454–9459 (2012).
Lisby, M., Mortensen, U. H. & Rothstein, R. Colocalization of multiple DNA double-strand breaks at a single Rad52 repair centre. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 572–577 (2003).
Torres-Rosell, J. et al. The Smc5-Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 923–931 (2007).
Chiolo, I. et al. Double-strand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic HP1a domain to complete recombinational repair. Cell 144, 732–744 (2011).
Jakob, B. et al. DNA double-strand breaks in heterochromatin elicit fast repair protein recruitment, histone H2AX phosphorylation and relocation to euchromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 6489–6499 (2011).
Kim, J. A., Kruhlak, M., Dotiwala, F., Nussenzweig, A. & Haber, J. E. Heterochromatin is refractory to γ-H2AX modification in yeast and mammals. J. Cell Biol. 178, 209–218 (2007).
Osborne, C. S. Molecular pathways: transcription factories and chromosomal translocations. Clin. Cancer Res. 20, 296–300 (2013).
Osborne, C. S. et al. Myc dynamically and preferentially relocates to a transcription factory occupied by Igh. PLoS Biol. 5, e192 (2007).
Barlow, J. H. et al. Identification of early replicating fragile sites that contribute to genome instability. Cell 152, 620–632 (2013).
Lin, C. et al. Nuclear receptor-induced chromosomal proximity and DNA breaks underlie specific translocations in cancer. Cell 139, 1069–1083 (2009).
Mathas, S. et al. Gene deregulation and spatial genome reorganization near breakpoints prior to formation of translocations in anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 5831–5836 (2009).
Dupre, A. et al. A forward chemical genetic screen reveals an inhibitor of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Nat. Chem. Biol. 4, 119–125 (2008).
Stracker, T. H. & Petrini, J. H. The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 90–103 (2011).
Stewart, G. S. et al. The DNA double-strand break repair gene hMRE11 is mutated in individuals with an ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder. Cell 99, 577–587 (1999).
Williams, R. S. et al. Mre11 dimers coordinate DNA end bridging and nuclease processing in double-strand-break repair. Cell 135, 97–109 (2008).
Dinkelmann, M. et al. Multiple functions of MRN in end-joining pathways during isotype class switching. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 808–813 (2009).
Helmink, B. A. et al. MRN complex function in the repair of chromosomal Rag-mediated DNA double-strand breaks. J. Exp. Med. 206, 669–679 (2009).
Rass, E. et al. Role of Mre11 in chromosomal nonhomologous end joining in mammalian cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 819–824 (2009).
Xie, A., Kwok, A. & Scully, R. Role of mammalian Mre11 in classical and alternative nonhomologous end joining. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 814–818 (2009).
Della-Maria, J. et al. Human Mre11/human Rad50/Nbs1 and DNA ligase IIIalpha/XRCC1 protein complexes act together in an alternative nonhomologous end joining pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 33845–33853 (2011).
Moore, J. K. & Haber, J. E. Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 2164–2173 (1996).
Ferguson, D. O. et al. The nonhomologous end-joining pathway of DNA repair is required for genomic stability and the suppression of translocations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6630–6633 (2000).
Difilippantonio, M. J. et al. DNA repair protein Ku80 suppresses chromosomal aberrations and malignant transformation. Nature 404, 510–514 (2000).
Gao, Y. et al. Interplay of p53 and DNA-repair protein XRCC4 in tumorigenesis, genomic stability and development. Nature 404, 897–900 (2000).
Weinstock, D. M., Brunet, E. & Jasin, M. Formation of NHEJ-derived reciprocal chromosomal translocations does not require Ku70. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 978–981 (2007).
Simsek, D. & Jasin, M. Alternative end-joining is suppressed by the canonical NHEJ component Xrcc4-ligase IV during chromosomal translocation formation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 410–416 (2010).
Boulton, S. J. & Jackson, S. P. Identification of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku80 homologue: roles in DNA double strand break rejoining and in telomeric maintenance. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 4639–4648 (1996).
Boulton, S. J. & Jackson, S. P. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku70 potentiates illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair and serves as a barrier to error-prone DNA repair pathways. EMBO J. 15, 5093–5103 (1996).
Ma, J. L., Kim, E. M., Haber, J. E. & Lee, S. E. Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 proteins define a Ku-independent mechanism to repair double-strand breaks lacking overlapping end sequences. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 8820–8828 (2003).
Difilippantonio, M. J. et al. Evidence for replicative repair of DNA double-strand breaks leading to oncogenic translocation and gene amplification. J. Exp. Med. 196, 469–480 (2002).
Zhu, C. et al. Unrepaired DNA breaks in p53-deficient cells lead to oncogenic gene amplification subsequent to translocations. Cell 109, 811–821 (2002).
Boboila, C. et al. Alternative end-joining catalyzes class switch recombination in the absence of both Ku70 and DNA ligase 4. J. Exp. Med. 207, 417–427 (2010).
Liang, L. et al. Human DNA ligases I and III, but not ligase IV, are required for microhomology-mediated end joining of DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 3297–3310 (2008).
Simsek, D. et al. DNA ligase III promotes alternative nonhomologous end-joining during chromosomal translocation formation. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002080 (2011).
Zhang, Y. & Jasin, M. An essential role for CtIP in chromosomal translocation formation through an alternative end-joining pathway. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 80–84 (2011).
Dobbs, T. A., Tainer, J. A. & Lees-Miller, S. P. A structural model for regulation of NHEJ by DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation. DNA Repair 9, 1307–1314 (2010).
Neal, J. A. & Meek, K. Choosing the right path: does DNA-PK help make the decision? Mutat. Res. 711, 73–86 (2011).
Uematsu, N. et al. Autophosphorylation of DNA-PKCS regulates its dynamics at DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 177, 219–229 (2007).
Palm, W. & de Lange, T. How shelterin protects mammalian telomeres. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 301–334 (2008).
Artandi, S. E. et al. Telomere dysfunction promotes non-reciprocal translocations and epithelial cancers in mice. Nature 406, 641–645 (2000).
Hastings, P. J., Lupski, J. R., Rosenberg, S. M. & Ira, G. Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 551–564 (2009).
Payen, C., Koszul, R., Dujon, B. & Fischer, G. Segmental duplications arise from Pol32-dependent repair of broken forks through two alternative replication-based mechanisms. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000175 (2008).
Pâques, F. & Haber, J. E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63, 349–404 (1999).
Elliott, B., Richardson, C. & Jasin, M. Chromosomal translocation mechanisms at intronic alu elements in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell 17, 885–894 (2005).
Richardson, C. & Jasin, M. Frequent chromosomal translocations induced by DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 405, 697–700 (2000).
Haber, J. E. & Leung, W. Y. Lack of chromosome territoriality in yeast: promiscuous rejoining of broken chromosome ends. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13949–13954 (1996).
Weinstock, D. M., Elliott, B. & Jasin, M. A model of oncogenic rearrangements: differences between chromosomal translocation mechanisms and simple double-strand break repair. Blood 107, 777–780 (2006).
Kloosterman, W. P. et al. Constitutional chromothripsis rearrangements involve clustered double-stranded DNA breaks and nonhomologous repair mechanisms. Cell Rep. 1, 648–655 (2012).
Chiang, C. et al. Complex reorganization and predominant non-homologous repair following chromosomal breakage in karyotypically balanced germline rearrangements and transgenic integration. Nat. Genet. 44, 390–397 (2012).
Liu, P. et al. Chromosome catastrophes involve replication mechanisms generating complex genomic rearrangements. Cell 146, 889–903 (2011).
Lee, J. A., Carvalho, C. M. & Lupski, J. R. A DNA replication mechanism for generating nonrecurrent rearrangements associated with genomic disorders. Cell 131, 1235–1247 (2007).
Hastings, P. J., Ira, G. & Lupski, J. R. A microhomology-mediated break-induced replication model for the origin of human copy number variation. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000327 (2009).
Takata, M. et al. Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J. 17, 5497–5508 (1998).
Weinstock, D. M., Richardson, C. A., Elliott, B. & Jasin, M. Modeling oncogenic translocations: distinct roles for double-strand break repair pathways in translocation formation in mammalian cells. DNA Repair 5, 1065–1074 (2006).
Mao, Z., Bozzella, M., Seluanov, A. & Gorbunova, V. DNA repair by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination during cell cycle in human cells. Cell Cycle 7, 2902–2906 (2008).
Symington, L. S. & Gautier, J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 247–271 (2011).
Polo, S. E. & Jackson, S. P. Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications. Genes Dev. 25, 409–433 (2011).
Misteli, T. & Soutoglou, E. The emerging role of nuclear architecture in DNA repair and genome maintenance. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 243–254 (2009).
Price, B. D. & D'Andrea, A. D. Chromatin remodeling at DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 152, 1344–1354 (2013).
Soria, G., Polo, S. E. & Almouzni, G. Prime, repair, restore: the active role of chromatin in the DNA damage response. Mol. Cell 46, 722–734 (2012).
Mathas, S. & Misteli, T. The dangers of transcription. Cell 139, 1047–1049 (2009).
Liu, Y., Subrahmanyam, R., Chakraborty, T., Sen, R. & Desiderio, S. A plant homeodomain in RAG-2 that binds Hypermethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 is necessary for efficient antigen-receptor-gene rearrangement. Immunity 27, 561–571 (2007).
Matthews, A. G. et al. RAG2 PHD finger couples histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation with V(D)J recombination. Nature 450, 1106–1110 (2007).
Kato, L. et al. Nonimmunoglobulin target loci of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) share unique features with immunoglobulin genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 2479–2484 (2012).
Berger, M. F. et al. The genomic complexity of primary human prostate cancer. Nature 470, 214–220 (2011).
Neumann, F. R. et al. Targeted INO80 enhances subnuclear chromatin movement and ectopic homologous recombination. Genes Dev. 26, 369–383 (2012).
Acknowledgements
The Misteli laboratory is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), NCI, Center for Cancer Research. We dedicate this Review to the memory of Janet Rowley, who boldly founded and thoughtfully guided the field of chromosome translocation biology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roukos, V., Misteli, T. The biogenesis of chromosome translocations. Nat Cell Biol 16, 293–300 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2941
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2941
This article is cited by
-
Single-cell diploid Hi-C reveals the role of spatial aggregations in complex rearrangements and KMT2A fusions in leukemia
Genome Biology (2022)
-
Clinical, cytogenetic, and genomic analyses of an Ecuadorian subject with Klinefelter syndrome, recessive hemophilia A, and 1;19 chromosomal translocation: a case report
Molecular Cytogenetics (2022)
-
Ku70 affects the frequency of chromosome translocation in human lymphocytes after radiation and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Radiation Oncology (2022)
-
Location in the nucleus foretells chromosome anomalies
Nature (2022)
-
The spectrum of chromosomal translocations in the Arab world: ethnic-specific chromosomal translocations and their relevance to diseases
Chromosoma (2022)
