Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Technical Report
  • Published:

A PCR-based amplification method retaining the quantitative difference between two complex genomes

Abstract

With the increasing emergence of genome-wide analysis technologies (including comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)1, expression profiling on microarrays2, differential display (DD)3, subtractive hybridization, and representational difference analysis (RDA)4,5), there is frequently a need to amplify entire genomes or cDNAs by PCR to obtain enough material for comparisons among target and control samples. A major problem with PCR is that amplification occurs in a nonlinear manner and reproducibility is influenced by stray impurities6. As a result, when two complex DNA populations are amplified separately, the quantitative relationship between two genes after amplification is generally not the same as their relation before amplification7. Here we describe balanced PCR, a procedure that faithfully retains the difference among corresponding amplified genes by using a simple principle. Two distinct genomic DNA samples are tagged with oligonucleotides containing both a common and a unique DNA sequence. The genomic DNA samples are pooled and amplified in a single PCR tube using the common DNA tag. By mixing the two genomes, PCR loses the ability to discriminate among the different alleles and the influence of impurities is eliminated. The PCR-amplified pooled samples can be separated using the DNA tag unique to each individual genomic DNA sample. The principle of this method has been validated with synthetic DNA, genomic DNA, and cDNA applied on microarrays. By removing the bias of PCR, this method allows a balanced amplification of allelic fragments from two complex DNAs even after three sequential rounds of PCR. This balanced PCR approach should allow genetic analysis in minute laser-microdissected tissues, paraffin-embedded archived material, or single cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Description and proof of principle for balanced PCR.
Figure 2: Screening of prostate and lung cDNA on Affymetrix microarrays.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ

References

  1. Kallioniemi, A. et al. Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 2156–2160 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R.W. & Brown, P.O. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270, 467–470 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liang, P. & Pardee, A.B. Differential display of eukaryotic messenger RNA by means of the polymerase chain reaction. Science 257, 967–971 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lisitsyn, N. & Wigler, M. Cloning the differences between two complex genomes. Science 259, 946–951 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hubank, M. & Schatz, D.G. Identifying differences in mRNA expression by representational difference analysis of cDNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 5640–5648 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heid, C., Stevens, J., Livak, K. & Williams, P. Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res. 6, 986–994 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lucito, R. et al. Genetic analysis using genomic representations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4487–4492 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, Y. et al. Reproducible and inexpensive probe preparation for oligonucleotide arrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, E66 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shirota, Y., Kaneko, S., Honda, M., Kawai, H.F. & Kobayashi, K. Identification of differentially expressed genes in hepatocellular carcinoma with cDNA microarrays. Hepatology 33, 832–840 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bartosiewicz, M., Trounstine, M., Barker, D., Johnston, R. & Buckpitt, A. Development of a toxicological gene array and quantitative assessment of this technology. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 376, 66–73 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Gelder, R.N. et al. Amplified RNA synthesized from limited quantities of heterogeneous cDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 1663–1667 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sgroi, D.C. et al. In vivo gene expression profile analysis of human breast cancer progression. Cancer Res. 59, 5656–5661 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Emmert-Buck, M.R. et al. Laser capture microdissection. Science 274, 998–1001 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zimmermann, J.W. & Schultz, R.M. Analysis of gene expression in the preimplantation mouse embryo: use of mRNA differential display. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 5456–5460 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Klein, C.A. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, and DNA sequence analysis of single cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4494–4499 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Youmell, M., Park, S.J., Basu, S. & Price, B.D. Regulation of the p53 protein by protein kinase C alpha and protein kinase C zeta. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 245, 514–518 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chakrabarti, S. et al. Highly selective isolation of unknown mutations in diverse DNA fragments: toward new multiplex screening in cancer. Cancer Res. 60, 3732–3737 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dallman, M.J. & Porter, A.C.G. PCR1: A Practical Approach (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Ardlie (Genomics Collaborative) and D. Sgroi (Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Pathology) for helpful comments and suggestions. This work was supported in part by Genomics Collaborative (Cambridge, MA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Mike Makrigiorgos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Makrigiorgos, G., Chakrabarti, S., Zhang, Y. et al. A PCR-based amplification method retaining the quantitative difference between two complex genomes. Nat Biotechnol 20, 936–939 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt724

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt724

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing