Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Article
  • Published:

In vivo selection of protease cleavage sites from retrovirus display libraries

Abstract

Phage display libraries are widely used for selection and optimization of polypeptide ligands or protease substrates. Because they are expressed and amplified in bacterial hosts, phage are not ideal for displaying eukaryotic polypeptldes or for probing mammalian cells. As retroviruses do not suffer from these limitations we constructed plasmids encoding replication-competent murine leukemia viruses displaying a virally encoded epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain at the N-terminus of the envelope glycoprotein. The EGF-displaying viruses replicated freely on EGF receptor-poor cells without deleting the displayed EGF domain but did not propagate on EGF receptor-rich cells because they were sequestered by the EGF receptors. A retrovirus display library was then generated by diversifying the seven-residue linker between the envelope glycoprotein and the displayed EGF domain. Selective pressure for loss of EGF receptor-binding activity was applied to the library by serial passage on EGF receptor-rich HT1080 cells. The selected viruses propagated on these cells with wild-type efficiencies, a phenotype that was conferred by intracellular cleavage of their displayed linker sequences. The selected linker sequences invariably presented arginine-rich motifs matching the consensus cleavage signal for furin-like proteases. Retrovirus display libraries can be used for the selection of polypepHdes interacting with components of living mammalian cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Little, M., Fuchs, P., Breitling, F., and Dübel, S. 1993. Bacterial surface presentation of proteins and peptides: an alternative to phage technology? Trends in Biotechnology 11: 3–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stahl, S. and Uhlen, M. 1997. Bacterial surface display: trends and progress. Trends in Biotechnology 15: 185–192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boder, E.T. and Withrup, K.D. 1997. Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptlde libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 15: 553–557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. O'Neil, K.T. and Hoess, R.H. 1995. Phage display: protein engineering by direct evolution. Curr. Opln. Struct. Blot. 5: 443–449.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Winter, G., Grifiths, A.D., Hawkins, R.E., and Hoogenboom, H.R. 1994. Making antibodies by phage display technology. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12: 433–455.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Matthews, D.J. and Wells, J.A. 1993. JA Substrate phage: selection of protease substrates by monovalent phage display. Science 260: 11–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Russell, S.J., Hawkins, R.E. and Winter, G. 1993. Retroviral vectors displaying functional antibody fragments. Nucleic Acids Res. 21: 1081–1085.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cosset F-L and Russell, S.J., 1996. Targeting retrovirus entry.Gene Ther 3: 946–956.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nilson, B.H.K., Morilng, F.J., and Russell, S.J. 1996. Targeting of retroviral vectors through protease-substrate interactions. Gene Ther. 3: 280–286.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peng, K-W., Morling, F.J., Cosset, F-L, Murphy, G., and Russell,, S.J. 1997. A gene delivery system activatable by disease-associated matrix metalloproteinases. Hum. Gene Ther. 8: 729–738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cosset, F-L, Morilng, F.J., Takeuchi, Y., Weiss, R.A., Collins, M.K.L, and Russell, S.J. 1995. Retroviral retargeting by envelopes expressing an N-terminal binding domain. J. Virol. 69: 6314–6322.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakayama,K 1997. Furin: arriammalian subtilisin/Kex2p-like endoprotease involved in processing of a wide variety of precursor proteins. Biochemical Journal 327: 625–635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Seidah, N.G. and Chretien, M. 1997. Eukaryotic protein processing: endoproteolysis of precursor proteins. Curr. Opln. Biotechnol. 8: 602–607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Temin, H.M. 1993. Retrovirus variation and reverse transcription: abnormal strand transfers result in retrovirus genetic variation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 900–6903.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Colicelli, J. and Goff, S.P. 1986. Sequence and spacing requirements of a retrovirus integration site. J. Mol. Biol. 199: 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shinnick, T.M., Lerner, R.A., and Sutoliffe, G. 1981. Nucleotide sequence of Moloney murine leukaemia virus. Nature 293: 543–548.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bell, G.I., Fong, N.M., Stempien, M.M., Wornsted MA, Caput, D., Ku, L.L. et al. 1986. Human epidermal growth factor precursor: cDNA sequence expression In vitro and gene organisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 11: 8427–8446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Coombs, S.G., Dang, AT., Madison, E.L, and Corey, D.R. 1996. Distinct mechanisms contribute to stringent substrate specificity of tissue-plasminogen activator. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 4461–4467.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buchholz, C., Peng, KW., Morling, F. et al. In vivo selection of protease cleavage sites from retrovirus display libraries. Nat Biotechnol 16, 951–954 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1098-951

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1098-951

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing