Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 434–439 (2012); published online 22 April 2012; corrected online 23 April 2012; corrected after print 7 June 2012
In the version of this article initially published online, in the Online Methods “Ion Torrent Sequencing” section, the sentence beginning with “Ten milligrams of this DNA was fragmented with a Bioruptor instrument....” should have read “Ten micrograms....” and in the “454 GS Junior sequencing” section, “(500 total)” should have read “(500 ng total).” The errors have been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of this article.
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/nbt.2198
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loman, N., Misra, R., Dallman, T. et al. Correction: Corrigendum: Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms. Nat Biotechnol 30, 562 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0612-562f
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0612-562f
This article is cited by
-
Patient specific circulating tumor DNA fingerprints to monitor treatment response across multiple tumors
Journal of Translational Medicine (2020)
-
DNA Strand Displacement Reaction: A Powerful Tool for Discriminating Single Nucleotide Variants
Topics in Current Chemistry (2020)
-
RACS: rapid analysis of ChIP-Seq data for contig based genomes
BMC Bioinformatics (2019)
-
Performance and microbial ecology of a nitritation sequencing batch reactor treating high-strength ammonia wastewater
Scientific Reports (2016)
-
Quantitative assessment of the robustness of next-generation sequencing of antibody variable gene repertoires from immunized mice
BMC Immunology (2014)
