Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Gene silencing by synthetic U1 Adaptors

This article has been updated

Abstract

We describe a gene silencing method that employs a mechanism of action distinct from those of antisense and RNA interference. U1 Adaptors are bifunctional oligonucleotides with a 'target domain' complementary to a site in the target gene's terminal exon and a 'U1 domain' that binds to the U1 small nuclear RNA component of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (U1 snRNP) splicing factor. Tethering of U1 snRNP to the target pre-mRNA inhibits poly(A)-tail addition, causing degradation of that RNA species in the nucleus. U1 Adaptors can inhibit both endogenous and reporter genes in a sequence-specific manner. Comparison of U1 Adaptors with small interfering RNA (siRNA) using a genome-wide microarray analysis indicates that U1 Adaptors have limited off-target effects and no detectable adverse effects on splicing. Further, targeting the same gene either with multiple U1 Adaptors or with a U1 Adaptor and siRNA strongly enhances gene silencing.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The U1 Adaptor concept.
Figure 2: U1 Adaptor–mediated inhibition of reporter plasmid expression.
Figure 3: Effect on activity of changes in U1 domain length, location and composition.
Figure 4: Inhibition of endogenous RAF1.
Figure 5: Inhibition of the endogenous PCSK9 and enhanced inhibition with multiple Adaptors.
Figure 6: Co-transfection of U1 Adaptors and an siRNA enhances silencing.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Change history

  • 20 February 2009

    In the version of this article initially published online, the numbers ten and 15 were reversed in the nucleotide composition on the second page, column 1, lines 13-14. The error has been corrected for the print, PDF and HTML versions of this article.

References

  1. Hannon, G.J. & Rossi, J.J. Unlocking the potential of the human genome with RNA interference. Nature 431, 371–378 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim, D.H. & Rossi, J.J. Strategies for silencing human disease using RNA interference. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 173–184 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elbashir, S.M. et al. Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature 411, 494–498 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beckley, S.A. et al. Reduction of target gene expression by a modified U1 snRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 2815–2825 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fortes, P. et al. Inhibiting expression of specific genes in mammalian cells using modified U1 snRNPs targeted to terminal exons of pre-mRNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8264–8269 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, P., Kronenberg, M., Jiang, X. & Rowe, D. Modified U1 snRNA suppresses expression of a targeted endogenous RNA by inhibiting polyadenylation of the transcript. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1512–1517 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Will, C.L. & Luhrmann, R. Protein functions in pre-mRNA splicing. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 320–328 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Furth, P.A., Choe, W., Rex, J.H., Byrne, J.C. & Baker, C.C. Sequences homologous to 5′ splice sites are required for the inhibitory activity of papillomavirus late 3′ untranslated regions. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5278–5289 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guan, F., Caratozzolo, R.M., Goraczniak, R., Ho, E.S. & Gunderson, S.I. A bipartite U1 site represses U1A expression by synergizing with PIE to inhibit nuclear polyadenylation. RNA 13, 2129–2140 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gunderson, S.I., Polycarpou-Schwarz, M. & Mattaj, I.W. U1 snRNP inhibits pre-mRNA polyadenylation through a direct interaction between U170K and poly(A) polymerase. Mol. Cell 1, 255–264 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abad, X. et al. Requirements for gene silencing mediated by U1 snRNA binding to a target sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2338–2352 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goraczniak, R. & Gunderson, S.I. The regulatory element in the 3′-untranslated region of human papillomavirus 16 inhibits expression by binding CUG-binding protein 1. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 2286–2296 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kauppinen, S., Vester, B. & Wengel, J. Locked nucleic acid (LNA), high affinity targeting of RNA for diagnostics and therapeutics. Drug Discov. Today. Technol. 2, 287–290 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurreck, J., Wyszko, E., Gillen, C. & Erdmann, V.A. Design of antisense oligonucleotides stabilized by locked nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 1911–1918 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grünweller, A. et al. Comparison of different antisense strategies in mammalian cells using locked nucleic acids, 2′-O-methyl RNA, phosphorothioates and small interfering RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3185–3193 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Novina, C.D. & Sharp, P.A. The RNAi revolution. Nature 430, 161–164 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. De Paula, D., Bentley, M.V. & Mahato, R.I. Hydrophobization and bioconjugation for enhanced siRNA delivery and targeting. RNA 13, 431–456 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lennox, K.A. et al. Characterization of modified antisense oligonucleotides in Xenopus laevis embryos. Oligonucleotides 16, 26–42 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Giles, R.V., Ruddell, C.J., Spiller, D.G., Green, J.A. & Tidd, D.M. Single base discrimination for ribonuclease H-dependent antisense effects within intact human leukaemia cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 954–961 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sridhar, S.S., Hedley, D. & Siu, L.L. Raf kinase as a target for anticancer therapeutics. Mol. Cancer Ther. 4, 677–685 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Monia, B.P., Johnston, J.F., Geiger, T., Muller, M. & Fabbro, D. Antitumor activity of a phosphorothioate antisense oligodeoxynucleotide targeted against C-raf kinase. Nat. Med. 2, 668–675 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lau, Q.C., Brüsselbach, S. & Müller, R. Abrogation of c-Raf expression induces apoptosis in tumor cells. Oncogene 16, 1899–1902 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McQuisten, K.A. & Peek, A.S. Identification of sequence motifs significantly associated with antisense activity. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 184 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hemmings-Mieszczak, M., Dorn, G., Natt, F.J., Hall, J. & Wishart, W.L. Independent combinatorial effect of antisense oligonucleotides and RNAi-mediated specific inhibition of the recombinant rat P2X3 receptor. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 2117–2126 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rose, S.D. et al. Functional polarity is introduced by Dicer processing of short substrate RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 4140–4156 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, D.H. et al. Synthetic dsRNA dicer substrates enhance RNAi potency and efficacy. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 222–226 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Meister, G. & Tuschl, T. Mechanisms of gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. Nature 431, 343–349 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Judge, A.D., Bola, G., Lee, A.C. & MacLachlan, I. Design of noninflammatory synthetic siRNA mediating potent gene silencing in vivo. Mol. Ther. 13, 494–505 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Soutschek, J. et al. Therapeutic silencing of an endogenous gene by systemic administration of modified siRNAs. Nature 432, 173–178 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Morrissey, D.V. et al. Potent and persistent in vivo anti-HBV activity of chemically modified siRNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1002–1007 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Manoharan, M. RNA interference and chemically modified small interfering RNAs. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 8, 570–579 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Crooke, S.T. Antisense strategies. Curr. Mol. Med. 4, 465–487 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhao, J., Hyman, L. & Moore, C. Formation of mRNA 3′ ends in eukaryotes, mechanism, regulation, and interrelationships with other steps in mRNA synthesis. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63, 405–445 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Danckwardt, S., Hentze, M.W. & Kulozik, A.E. 3′ end mRNA processing, molecular mechanisms and implications for health and disease. EMBO J. 27, 482–498 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ko, B. & Gunderson, S.I. Identification of new poly(A) polymerase-inhibitory proteins capable of regulating pre-mRNA polyadenylation. J. Mol. Biol. 318, 1189–1206 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Pfaffl, M.W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Baserga, S.J. & Steitz, J.A. The diverse world of small ribonucleoproteins. In The RNA World First Edition (eds. Gesteland, R.F. and Atkins, J.F.) 359–382 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants GM057286 and CA119934 to S.I.G. and R43GM085863 to M.A.B. We thank members of the Gunderson lab, the Rutgers University/University of Medicine and Dentistry New Jersey RNA community and IDT corporation for advice and comments during the course of this work. We also thank Chris Jakubowski and Nick Zaphiros for helping to perform experiments shown in Supplementary Figs. 7, 8 and 11, and we thank Kim Lennox for help in editing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.I.G. and R.G. conceived the project and are co-inventors of the U1 Adaptor technology. R.G. performed the bulk of the wet bench experimental work, with some assistance from S.I.G. All authors contributed to experimental design, data interpretation and preparation of the manuscript. M.A.B. provided most of the U1 Adaptors employed and assisted with antisense and RNAi aspects of the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel I Gunderson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.I.G. and R.G. are employed by Rutgers University and are co-inventors of the U1Adaptor Technology. Rutgers Univesity has submitted a PCT application on this invention and is the sole owner of the technology. Recently S.I.G. and R.G. started a company with the goal to further develop and ultimately to commercialize the U1 Adaptor technology. M.A.B. is employed by integrated DNA Technologies (IDT), which offers oligonucleotides for sale similar to some of the compounds described in the paper. IDT is not a publicly traded company and M.A.B. does not own any shares or equity in it.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Figures 1–18, Data (PDF 4132 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goraczniak, R., Behlke, M. & Gunderson, S. Gene silencing by synthetic U1 Adaptors. Nat Biotechnol 27, 257–263 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1525

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1525

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing