Letter | Published:

Holograms for acoustics

Nature volume 537, pages 518522 (22 September 2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Holographic techniques are fundamental to applications such as volumetric displays1, high-density data storage and optical tweezers that require spatial control of intricate optical2 or acoustic fields3,4 within a three-dimensional volume. The basis of holography is spatial storage of the phase and/or amplitude profile of the desired wavefront5,6 in a manner that allows that wavefront to be reconstructed by interference when the hologram is illuminated with a suitable coherent source. Modern computer-generated holography7 skips the process of recording a hologram from a physical scene, and instead calculates the required phase profile before rendering it for reconstruction. In ultrasound applications, the phase profile is typically generated by discrete and independently driven ultrasound sources3,4,8,9,10,11,12; however, these can only be used in small numbers, which limits the complexity or degrees of freedom that can be attained in the wavefront. Here we introduce monolithic acoustic holograms, which can reconstruct diffraction-limited acoustic pressure fields and thus arbitrary ultrasound beams. We use rapid fabrication to craft the holograms and achieve reconstruction degrees of freedom two orders of magnitude higher than commercial phased array sources. The technique is inexpensive, appropriate for both transmission and reflection elements, and scales well to higher information content, larger aperture size and higher power. The complex three-dimensional pressure and phase distributions produced by these acoustic holograms allow us to demonstrate new approaches to controlled ultrasonic manipulation of solids in water, and of liquids and solids in air. We expect that acoustic holograms will enable new capabilities in beam-steering and the contactless transfer of power, improve medical imaging, and drive new applications of ultrasound.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. An updatable holographic three-dimensional display. Nature 451, 694–698 (2008)

  2. 2.

    A revolution in optical manipulation. Nature 424, 810–816 (2003)

  3. 3.

    et al. Holographic acoustic elements for manipulation of levitated objects. Nat. Commun. 6, 8661 (2015)

  4. 4.

    & Bypassing absorbing objects in focused ultrasound using computer generated holographic technique. Med. Phys. 38, 6407–6415 (2011)

  5. 5.

    A new microscopic principle. Nature 161, 777–778 (1948)

  6. 6.

    & Reconstructed wavefronts and communication theory. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 1123–1130 (1962)

  7. 7.

    in Digital Holography and Three-Dimensional Display Ch. 1 (ed. Poon, T.) 1–49 (Springer, 2006)

  8. 8.

    Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out 2nd edn (Academic, 2014)

  9. 9.

    & Ultrasonic arrays for non-destructive evaluation: a review. NDT Int. 39, 525–541 (2006)

  10. 10.

    et al. Mechanical evidence of the orbital angular momentum to energy ratio of vortex beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 194301 (2012)

  11. 11.

    , & Observation of a single-beam gradient force acoustical trap for elastic particles: acoustical tweezers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 024301 (2016)

  12. 12.

    , & Acoustic rotational manipulation using orbital angular momentum transfer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 034301 (2012)

  13. 13.

    Introduction to Fourier Optics 3rd edn (Roberts & Co., 2005)

  14. 14.

    , , , & Imaging analysis of digital holography. Opt. Express 13, 2444–2452 (2005)

  15. 15.

    , & The kinoform: a new wavefront reconstruction device. IBM J. Res. Dev. 13, 150–155 (1969)

  16. 16.

    & Limits of scalar diffraction theory and an iterative angular spectrum algorithm for finite aperture diffractive optical element design. Opt. Express 8, 705–722 (2001)

  17. 17.

    , & Computer-generated holograms from 3D-objects written on twisted-nematic liquid crystal displays. Opt. Commun. 140, 299–308 (1997)

  18. 18.

    & Acoustically trapped colloidal crystals that are reconfigurable in real time. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6226–6230 (2014)

  19. 19.

    et al. Manipulation of particles in two dimensions using phase controllable ultrasonic standing waves. Proc. R. Soc. A (2011)

  20. 20.

    , , , & Acoustophoretic contactless transport and handling of matter in air. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12549–12554 (2013)

  21. 21.

    , & Manipulation of micrometer sized particles within a micromachined fluidic device to form 2D patterns using ultrasound. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 778–785 (2007)

  22. 22.

    et al. Single beam acoustic trapping. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 073701 (2009)

  23. 23.

    et al. Independent trapping and manipulation of microparticles using dexterous acoustic tweezers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 154103 (2014)

  24. 24.

    et al. Elastomeric microparticles for acoustic mediated bioseparations. J. Nanobiotechnol. 11, 22 (2013)

  25. 25.

    & Radiation force of an arbitrary acoustic beam on an elastic sphere in a fluid. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 133, 661–676 (2013)

  26. 26.

    , , , & Optical forces arising from phase gradients. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 013602 (2008)

  27. 27.

    & Radiation force on a spherical object in an axisymmetric wave field and its application to the calibration of high-frequency transducers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 713–724 (1996)

  28. 28.

    & Parametric study of single-axis acoustic levitation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 881–883 (2001)

  29. 29.

    et al. Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science 347, 1349–1352 (2015)

  30. 30.

    Additive manufacturing of biologically-inspired materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 359–376 (2016)

  31. 31.

    & Propagation and backpropagation for ultrasonic wavefront design. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 44, 1–13 (1997)

  32. 32.

    & Band-limited angular spectrum method for numerical simulation of free-space propagation in far and near fields. Opt. Express 17, 19662–19673 (2009)

  33. 33.

    & in Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook Ch. 60 (ed. ) 1021–1031 (Springer, 2007)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Weber and M. Fratz for suggestions. This work was in part supported by the Max Planck Society and by the European Research Council (ERC grant agreement 278213).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems, Heisenbergstrasse 3, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany

    • Kai Melde
    • , Andrew G. Mark
    • , Tian Qiu
    •  & Peer Fischer
  2. Institute for Physical Chemistry, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany

    • Peer Fischer

Authors

  1. Search for Kai Melde in:

  2. Search for Andrew G. Mark in:

  3. Search for Tian Qiu in:

  4. Search for Peer Fischer in:

Contributions

P.F. initiated the project. K.M. conceived of the hologram and developed the workflow for the hologram generation. T.Q. fabricated the holograms. K.M. and A.G.M. designed and performed the experimental demonstrations. P.F. directed the research project. A.G.M., K.M. and P.F. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors filed two patent applications related to the use of acoustic holograms.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peer Fischer.

All photographs were taken by the authors. The target image of the dove in Fig. 1a is a modified rendition of a picture for which the authors hold a commercial license, and is available at https://www.vectoropenstock.com/vectors/preview/71432/whitedove-laurel-peace-symbol.

Reviewer Information

Nature thanks B. Drinkwater, A. Nield and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Extended data

Supplementary information

Videos

  1. 1.

    Acoustic particle assembly

    The container, filled with a suspension of silicone particles in water, is positioned above the acoustic hologram with the transducer located in the back. The scene is observed from the top. Initially the sound field is off and the particles are at rest. When the transducer is turned on, the particles collect at the top window of the container (towards observer) and assemble in the form of the “Dove of Peace”. The trapping sites are defined by the projected sound pressure image. When the system is turned off the ensemble collapses and particles settle to the bottom of the container.

  2. 2.

    Acoustic surfers

    Two objects, in the form of spherical caps, move along circular paths of opposite direction. The scene is first observed from the side then from above. The outer object has a diameter of 4 mm and the inner object a diameter of 2 mm, with both heights being equal to 0.5 mm. The radii for the inner and outer trajectory are 8 mm and 16 mm, respectively, and the projected acoustic phase gradient for both paths is about 1 rad/mm. This corresponds to a topological charge of +8 for the inner path and -16 for the outer path. The objects will follow the closed contour indefinitely until the transducer is turned off. The same projected phase gradient is then used to propel different objects. The last part demonstrates the effect of an open contour. Observed from above, a blue spherical cap of 4 mm diameter and 0.5 mm height is manually placed at the start of the open trajectory with a phase gradient of about 1 rad/mm. The yellow line marks the tracked particle position in each frame. At the end of the contour the particle is ejected and free to float over the water surface.

  3. 3.

    Wave propagation z-scan

    This video shows the amplitude (left) and phase (right) plot of the calculated, propagating acoustic field for the open contour phase gradient image. The video shows the field while scanning along the z-direction. The z coordinate is displayed above the amplitude plot. The image plane is located at z = 30 mm.

  4. 4.

    Double droplet levitation

    Close up view of the air cavity with the hologram positioned at the top and the transducer at the bottom. Two water droplets are manually loaded into the traps using a syringe needle. Their diameters are approximately 1.1 mm.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19755

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.