In this Letter, the superscript in the ultraviolet luminosity was listed incorrectly as ‘−41’ rather than ‘41’ in the last sentence of the second paragraph from the bottom in the left column of page 1. It should have read LUV ≈ 3 × 1041 erg s−1. This has been corrected online.
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/nature14440
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, Y., Kulkarni, S., Howell, D. et al. Erratum: A strong ultraviolet pulse from a newborn type Ia supernova. Nature 524, 502 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14605
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14605
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
