Letter | Published:

An enigmatic plant-eating theropod from the Late Jurassic period of Chile

Nature volume 522, pages 331334 (18 June 2015) | Download Citation

Subjects

This article has been updated

Abstract

Theropod dinosaurs were the dominant predators in most Mesozoic era terrestrial ecosystems1. Early theropod evolution is currently interpreted as the diversification of various carnivorous and cursorial taxa, whereas the acquisition of herbivorism, together with the secondary loss of cursorial adaptations, occurred much later among advanced coelurosaurian theropods1,2. A new, bizarre herbivorous basal tetanuran from the Upper Jurassic of Chile challenges this conception. The new dinosaur was discovered at Aysén, a fossil locality in the Upper Jurassic Toqui Formation of southern Chile (General Carrera Lake)3,4. The site yielded abundant and exquisitely preserved three-dimensional skeletons of small archosaurs. Several articulated individuals of Chilesaurus at different ontogenetic stages have been collected, as well as less abundant basal crocodyliforms, and fragmentary remains of sauropod dinosaurs (diplodocids and titanosaurians).

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Change history

  • 17 June 2015

    Minor changes were made to author affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    The interrelationships and evolution of basal theropod dinosaurs. Spec. Pap. Palaeont. 69, 1–213 (2003)

  2. 2.

    The segnosaurian dinosaurs: relics of the prosauropod–ornithischian transition? J. Vert. Paleont. 4 507–515 (1984)

  3. 3.

    , , , & First Late Jurassic dinosaur bones from Chile. J. Vert. Paleont. 28 529–534 (2008)

  4. 4.

    & Geología del área de Puerto Guadal-Puerto Sánchez, región de Aisén del General Carlos Ibáñez del Campo, escala 1:100.000 [in Spanish]. Carta Geológica de Chile 95, 1–117 (2006)

  5. 5.

    Allosaurus fragilis: a revised osteology. Utah Geol. Min. Surv. Bull. 109, 1–163 (1976)

  6. 6.

    et al. A basal dinosaur from the dawn of the Dinosaur Era in Southwestern Pangaea. Science 331 206–210 (2011)

  7. 7.

    Morphological and functional diversity in therizinosaur claws and the implications for theropod claw evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 281 1471–1473 (2014)

  8. 8.

    The Gondwanan theropod families Abelisauridae and Noasauridae. Hist. Biol. 5 1–25 (1991)

  9. 9.

    & Postcranial anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Mussaurus patagonicus (Dinosauria, Sauropodomorpha). J. Vert. Paleont. 33 1138–1168 (2013)

  10. 10.

    Alvarezsauridae, Cretaceous basal birds from Patagonia and Mongolia. Mem. Queensl. Mus. 39, 675–702 (1996)

  11. 11.

    Weishampel, D. BDodson, P., Osmólska, H., & Hilton, R. P. The Dinosauria 2nd edn (Univ. of California Press, 2004)

  12. 12.

    A new species of the primitive dinosaur Thecodontosaurus (Saurischia: Sauropodomorpha) and its implications for the systematics of early dinosaurs. J. Syst. Palaeontology 1 1–42 (2003)

  13. 13.

    The evolution of pelvic osteology and soft tissueson the line to extant birds (Neornithes). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. London 131 123–168 (2001)

  14. 14.

    , & The anatomy and systematics of Eustreptospondylus oxoniensis, a theropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of Oxfordshire, England. Mon. Palaeont. Soc. London 160, 1–82 (2008)

  15. 15.

    Dinosaur monophyly. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 16 723–741 (1996)

  16. 16.

    The tibia and tarsus in Herrerasauridae (Dinosauria, incertae sedis) and the origin and evolution of the dinosaurian tarsus. J. Paleontol. 63, 677–690 (1989)

  17. 17.

    Osteology of Falcarius utahensis: characterizing the anatomy of basal therizinosaurs. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 158 196–230 (2010)

  18. 18.

    The ornithischian dinosaur Hypsilophodon from the Wealden of the Isle of Wight. Bull. Brit. Mus. Geol. London 25, 1–152 (1974)

  19. 19.

    et al. Megaraptor (Dinosauria: Tetanurae) in Australia; evidence for faunal interchange between eastern and western Gondwana during the Early Cretaceous. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 275 2085–2093 (2008)

  20. 20.

    et al. A complete skeleton of a Late Triassic saurischian and the early evolution of dinosaurs. Science 326 1530–1533 (2009)

  21. 21.

    , & The phylogeny of Tetanurae (Dinosauria: Theropoda). J. Syst. Paleont. 10 211–300 (2012)

  22. 22.

    , , & A new North American therizinosaurid and the role of herbivory in “predatory” dinosaur evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276 3505–3511 (2009)

  23. 23.

    & Herbivorous ecomorphology and specialization patterns in theropod dinosaur evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108 232–237 (2011)

  24. 24.

    & in Biomechanics and Evolution (eds Rayner, J. M. V. & Wootton, R. J.) 161–181 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1991)

  25. 25.

    The diet of ostrich dinosaurs (Theropoda: Ornithomimosauria). Palaeontology 48 347–358 (2005)

  26. 26.

    et al. A Jurassic ceratosaur from China helps clarify avian digital homologies. Nature 459 940–944 (2009)

  27. 27.

    Paleobiology of herbivorous dinosaurs. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 42 207–230 (2014)

  28. 28.

    & A new global palaeobiogeographical model for the late Mesozoic and early Tertiary. Syst. Biol. 61 553–566 (2012)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Barrett, A. Milner and R. Butler for comments on early versions of this manuscript. We are grateful to C. Alsina, M. Milani, R. Stoll and M. Aranciaga for field assistance and technical preparation of Chilesaurus specimens. G. Lio executed the silhouette of Chilesaurus in Fig. 1. C. Burke offered support to conduct fieldwork and technical preparation of the specimens. We are indebted to the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2010-066 to F.E.N.) and the Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (no. 1121140 and 1030162 to M.S.) for continuing financial assistance.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Conicet, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “B. Rivadavia”, Av. Ángel Gallardo 470 (C1405DJR), Buenos Aires, Argentina

    • Fernando E. Novas
    • , Leonardo Salgado
    •  & Marcelo P. Isasi
  2. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “B. Rivadavia”, Av. Ángel Gallardo 470 (C1405DJR), Buenos Aires, Argentina

    • Fernando E. Novas
    • , Federico L. Agnolín
    • , Nicolás R. Chimento
    •  & Marcelo P. Isasi
  3. Conicet, Instituto de Investigación en Paleobiología y Geología, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, General Roca 1242, General Roca (8332), Río Negro, Argentina

    • Leonardo Salgado
  4. Instituto de Investigación en Paleobiología y Geología, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, General Roca 1242, General Roca (8332), Río Negro, Argentina

    • Leonardo Salgado
  5. Universidad Andres Bello, Geología, Facultad de Ingeniería, Sazie 2315, Santiago, Chile

    • Manuel Suárez
  6. Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara, Universidad Maimónides, Hidalgo 775(C1405BDB), Buenos Aires, Argentina

    • Federico L. Agnolín
  7. School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK

    • Martín D. Ezcurra
  8. Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería, Avenida Santa María 0104, Santiago 8330177, Chile

    • Rita de la Cruz
  9. Red Paleontológica U-Chile. Laboratorio de Ontogenia y Filogenia, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 7800003, Chile

    • Alexander O. Vargas
    •  & David Rubilar-Rogers
  10. Área Paleontología, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural de Chile, casilla 787, Santiago, Chile

    • David Rubilar-Rogers

Authors

  1. Search for Fernando E. Novas in:

  2. Search for Leonardo Salgado in:

  3. Search for Manuel Suárez in:

  4. Search for Federico L. Agnolín in:

  5. Search for Martín D. Ezcurra in:

  6. Search for Nicolás R. Chimento in:

  7. Search for Rita de la Cruz in:

  8. Search for Marcelo P. Isasi in:

  9. Search for Alexander O. Vargas in:

  10. Search for David Rubilar-Rogers in:

Contributions

F.E.N., L.S., M.S., F.L.A., M.D.E., N.R.C., A.O.V. and D.R.-R. designed the study, collected data, performed the comparative and analytical work, and wrote the paper. R.d.l.C. and M.P.I. collected data and contributed to the writing and discussion.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando E. Novas.

Data have been deposited in ZooBank under Life Science Identifier (LSID) http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7B6DE8C7-C78D-48C0-B818-65C454AEFB58.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Figures and additional references, which are divided into the following sections: Occurrence, age, and preservation of the holotype and referred specimens of Chilesaurus diegosuarezi gen. et sp. nov.; Phylogenetic analyses; and Morphospace analysis.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14307

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.