Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

Pugh et al. reply

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Integrated Genome Viewer view of MAGI3-AKT3 translocation sites (MAGI3 intron 9 and AKT3 intron 1) from whole genome sequence (WGS) data (top section), ExomePlus capture of frozen tumour (middle section) and ExomePlus capture of FFPE tumour (bottomsection).
Figure 2: Allelic fraction detected for somatic mutations in whole genome sequencing of frozen tumour, ExomePlus capture of frozen tumour, and ExomePlus capture of FFPE tumour, compared to allelic fraction of the MAGI3-AKT3 fusion.

References

  1. Mosquera, J.-M. et al. MAG13AKT3 fusion in breast cancer amended. Nature 520, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14265 (2015).

  2. Banerji, S. et al. Sequence analysis of mutations and translocations across breast cancer subtypes. Nature 486, 405–409 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nature Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cibulskis, K. et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nature Biotechnol. 31, 213–219 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerlinger, M. et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 883–892 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490, 61–70 (2012).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Meyerson.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pugh, T., Banerji, S. & Meyerson, M. Pugh et al. reply. Nature 520, E12–E14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14266

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14266

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research