Letter | Published:

Clouds in the atmosphere of the super-Earth exoplanet GJ 1214b

Nature volume 505, pages 6972 (02 January 2014) | Download Citation



Recent surveys have revealed that planets intermediate in size between Earth and Neptune (‘super-Earths’) are among the most common planets in the Galaxy1,2,3. Atmospheric studies are the next step towards developing a comprehensive understanding of this new class of object4,5,6. Much effort has been focused on using transmission spectroscopy to characterize the atmosphere of the super-Earth archetype GJ 1214b (refs 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17), but previous observations did not have sufficient precision to distinguish between two interpretations for the atmosphere. The planet’s atmosphere could be dominated by relatively heavy molecules, such as water (for example, a 100 per cent water vapour composition), or it could contain high-altitude clouds that obscure its lower layers. Here we report a measurement of the transmission spectrum of GJ 1214b at near-infrared wavelengths that definitively resolves this ambiguity. The data, obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope, are sufficiently precise to detect absorption features from a high mean-molecular-mass atmosphere. The observed spectrum, however, is featureless. We rule out cloud-free atmospheric models with compositions dominated by water, methane, carbon monoxide, nitrogen or carbon dioxide at greater than 5σ confidence. The planet’s atmosphere must contain clouds to be consistent with the data.


We observed 15 transits of the planet GJ 1214b with the Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) instrument on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) between 27 September 2012 and 22 August 2013 Universal Time (ut). Each transit observation (visit) consisted of four orbits of the telescope, with 45-min gaps in phase coverage between target visibility periods due to Earth occultation. We obtained time-series spectroscopy from 1.1 µm to 1.7 µm during each observation. The data were taken in spatial scan mode, which slews the telescope during the exposure and moves the spectrum perpendicularly to the dispersion direction on the detector. This mode reduces the instrumental overhead time by a factor of five compared to staring mode observations. We achieved an integration efficiency of 60%–70%. We extracted the spectra and divided each exposure into five-pixel-wide bins, obtaining spectrophotometric time series in 22 channels (resolution R ≡ λλ ≈ 70). The typical signal-to-noise ratio per 88.4-s exposure per channel was 1,400. We also created a ‘white’ light curve summed over the entire wavelength range. Our analysis incorporates data from 12 of the 15 transits observed, because one observation was compromised by a telescope guiding error and two showed evidence of a starspot crossing.

The raw transit light curves for GJ 1214b exhibit ramp-like systematics comparable to those seen in previous WFC3 data10,18,19. The ramp in the first orbit of each visit consistently has the largest amplitude and a different shape from ramps in the subsequent orbits. Following standard procedure for HST transit light curves, we did not include data from the first orbit in our analysis, leaving 654 exposures. We corrected for systematics in the remaining three orbits using two techniques that have been successfully applied in prior analyses10,18,20. The first approach models the systematics as an analytic function of time. The function includes an exponential ramp term fitted to each orbit, a linear trend with time for each visit, and a normalization factor. The second approach assumes that the morphology of the systematics is independent of wavelength, and models each channel with a scalar multiple of the time series of systematics from the white-light curve fit. We obtained consistent results from both methods (see Extended Data Table 1), and report here results from the second. See the Supplementary Information and Extended Data Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 for more detail on the observations, data reduction and systematics correction.

We fitted the light curves in each spectroscopic channel with a transit model21 to measure the transit depth as a function of wavelength; this constitutes the transmission spectrum. See Fig. 1 for the fitted transit light curves. We used the second systematics correction technique described above and fitted a unique planet-to-star radius ratio Rp/Rs and normalization C to each channel and each visit, and a unique linear limb-darkening parameter u to each channel. We assumed a circular orbit22 and fixed the inclination i to be 89.1°, the ratio of the semi-major axis to the stellar radius a/Rs to be 15.23, the orbital period P to be 1.58040464894 days, and the time of central transit Tc to be 2454966.52488 BJDTDB. These are the best-fit values to the white-light curve.

Figure 1: Spectrophotometric data for transit observations of GJ 1214b.
Figure 1

a, Normalized and systematics-corrected data (points) with best-fit transit models (lines), offset for clarity. The data consist of 12 transit observations and are binned in phase in 5-min increments. The spectroscopic light curve fit parameters are transit depth, a linear limb-darkening coefficient, and a normalization term to correct for systematics. A unique transit depth is determined for each observation and the measured transit depths are consistent from epoch to epoch in all channels. b, Binned residuals from the best-fit model light curves. The residuals are within 14% of the predicted photon-limited shot noise in all spectroscopic channels. The median observed root-mean-square in the spectroscopic channels is 315 p.p.m., before binning. c, Histograms of the unbinned residuals (coloured lines) compared to the expected photon noise (black lines). The residuals are Gaussian, satisfying a Shapiro–Wilk test for normality at the α = 0.1 level in all but one channel (1.24 µm). The median reduced χ2 value for the spectroscopic light curve fits is 1.02.

The measured transit depths in each channel are consistent over all transit epochs (see Extended Data Fig. 5), and we report the weighted average depth per channel. The resulting transmission spectrum is shown in Fig. 2. Our results are not significantly affected by stellar activity, as we discuss further in the Supplementary Information. Careful treatment of the limb darkening is critical to the results, but our limb-darkening measurements are not degenerate with the transit depth (see Extended Data Fig. 4) and agree with the predictions from theoretical models (see Extended Data Fig. 6). Our conclusions are unchanged if we fix the limb darkening on theoretical values. We find that a linear limb-darkening law is sufficient to model the data. For further description of the limb-darkening treatment, see the Supplementary Information.

Figure 2: The transmission spectrum of GJ 1214b.
Figure 2

a, Transmission spectrum measurements from our data (black points) and previous work (grey points)7,8,9,10,11, compared to theoretical models (lines). The error bars correspond to 1σ uncertainties. Each data set is plotted relative to its mean. Our measurements are consistent with past results for GJ 1214b using WFC3 (ref. 10). Previous data rule out a cloud-free solar composition (orange line), but are consistent with either a high-mean-molecular-mass atmosphere (for example, 100% water, blue line) or a hydrogen-rich atmosphere with high-altitude clouds. b, Detailed view of our measured transmission spectrum (black points) compared to high-mean-molecular-mass models (lines). The error bars are 1σ uncertainties in the posterior distribution from a Markov chain Monte Carlo fit to the light curves (see the Supplementary Information for details of the fits). The coloured points correspond to the models binned at the resolution of the observations. The data are consistent with a featureless spectrum (χ2 = 21.1 for 21 degrees of freedom), but inconsistent with cloud-free high-mean-molecular-mass scenarios. Fits to pure water (blue line), methane (green line), carbon monoxide (not shown), and carbon dioxide (red line) models have χ2 = 334.7, 1067.0, 110.0 and 75.4 with 21 degrees of freedom, and are ruled out at 16.1σ, 31.1σ, 7.5σ and 5.5σ confidence, respectively.

The transmission spectrum we report here has the precision necessary to detect the spectral features of a high-mean-molecular-mass atmosphere for the first time. However, the observed spectrum is featureless. The data are best-fitted with a flat line, which has a reduced χ2 of 1.0. We compare several models to the data that represent limiting-case scenarios in the range of expected atmospheric compositions17,23. Depending on the formation history and evolution of the planet, a high-mean-molecular-mass atmosphere could be dominated by water (H2O), methane (CH4), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2) or nitrogen (N2). Water is expected to be the dominant absorber in the wavelength range of our observations, so a wide range of high-mean-molecular-mass atmospheres with trace amounts of water can be approximated by a pure H2O model. The data show no evidence for water absorption. A cloud-free pure H2O composition is ruled out at 16.1σ confidence. In the case of a dry atmosphere, features from other absorbers such as CH4, CO or CO2 could be visible in the transmission spectrum. Cloud-free atmospheres composed of these absorbers are also excluded by the data, at 31.1σ, 7.5σ and 5.5σ confidence, respectively. Nitrogen has no spectral features in the observed wavelength range, but our measurements are sensitive to a nitrogen-rich atmosphere with trace amounts of spectrally active molecules. For example, we can rule out a 99.9% N2, 0.1% H2O atmosphere at 5.6σ confidence. Of the scenarios considered here, a 100% CO2 atmosphere is the most challenging to detect because CO2 has the highest molecular mass and a relatively small opacity in the observed wavelength range. Given that the data are precise enough to rule out even a CO2 composition at high confidence, the most likely explanation for the absence of spectral features is a grey opacity source, suggesting that clouds are present in the atmosphere. Clouds can block transmission of stellar flux through the atmosphere, which truncates spectral features arising from below the cloud altitude24.

To illustrate the properties of potential clouds, we perform a Bayesian analysis on the transmission spectrum with a code designed for spectral retrieval of super-Earth atmospheric compositions25. We assume a two-component model atmosphere of water and a solar mix of hydrogen and helium gas, motivated by the fact that water is the most abundant icy volatile for solar abundance ratios. Clouds are modelled as a grey, optically thick opacity source below a given altitude. See Fig. 3 for the retrieval results. For this model, the data constrain the cloud-top pressure to less than 10−2 mbar for a mixing ratio with mean molecular mass equal to solar and less than 10−1 mbar for a water-dominated composition (both at 3σ confidence). At the temperatures and pressures expected in the atmosphere of GJ 1214b, equilibrium condensates of ZnS and KCl could form in the observable part of the atmosphere. Although these species could provide the necessary opacity, they are predicted to form at much higher pressures (deeper than 10 mbar for a 50 × solar metallicity model)16, requiring that clouds be lofted high from their base altitude to explain the spectrum we measured. Alternatively, photochemistry could produce a layer of hydrocarbons in the upper atmosphere, analogous to the haze on Saturn’s moon Titan14,16.

Figure 3: Spectral retrieval results for a two-component (hydrogen/helium and water) model atmosphere for GJ 1214b.
Figure 3

The colours indicate posterior probability density as a function of water mole fraction and cloud-top pressure. Black contours mark the 1σ, 2σ and 3σ Bayesian credible regions. Clouds are modelled as having a grey opacity, with transmission truncated below the cloud altitude. The atmospheric modelling assumes a surface gravity of 8.48 m s−2 and an equilibrium temperature equal to 580 K.

The result presented here demonstrates the capability of current facilities to measure very precise spectra of exoplanets by combining many transit observations. This observational strategy has the potential to yield the atmospheric characterization of an Earth-size planet orbiting in the habitable zone of a small, nearby star. Transmission spectrum features probing five scale heights of a nitrogen-rich atmosphere on such a planet would have an amplitude of 30 parts per million (p.p.m.), which is comparable to the photon-limited measurement precision we obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope. However, our findings for the super-Earth archetype GJ 1214b, as well as emerging results for other exoplanets18,26,27, suggest that clouds may exist across a wide range of planetary atmosphere compositions, temperatures and pressures. Clouds do not generally have constant opacity at all wavelengths, so further progress in this area can be made by obtaining high-precision data with broad spectral coverage. Another way forward is to focus on measuring exoplanet emission and reflection spectra during secondary eclipse, because the optical depth of clouds viewed at near-normal incidence is lower than that for the slant geometry observed during transit24. Fortunately, the next generation of large ground-based telescopes and the James Webb Space Telescope will have the capability to make such measurements, bringing us within reach of characterizing potentially habitable worlds beyond our Solar System.

Online Content Any additional Methods, Extended Data display items and Source Data are available in the online version of the paper; references unique to these sections appear only in the online paper.


  1. 1.

    et al. One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations. Nature 481, 167–169 (2012)

  2. 2.

    et al. The false positive rate of Kepler and the occurrence of planets. Astrophys. J. 766, 81 (2013)

  3. 3.

    , & A plateau in the planet population below twice the size of Earth. Astrophys. J. 770, 69 (2013)

  4. 4.

    , & Ocean planet or thick atmosphere: on the mass-radius relationship for solid exoplanets with massive atmospheres. Astrophys. J. 673, 1160–1164 (2008)

  5. 5.

    , & The atmospheric signatures of super-Earths: how to distinguish between hydrogen-rich and hydrogen-poor atmospheres. Astrophys. J. 690, 1056–1067 (2009)

  6. 6.

    & Three possible origins for the gas layer on GJ 1214b. Astrophys. J. 716, 1208–1216 (2010)

  7. 7.

    , & A ground-based transmission spectrum of the super-Earth exoplanet GJ 1214b. Nature 468, 669–672 (2010)

  8. 8.

    et al. Observational evidence for a metal-rich atmosphere on the super-Earth GJ1214b. Astrophys. J. 731, L40 (2011)

  9. 9.

    et al. The optical and near-infrared transmission spectrum of the super-Earth GJ 1214b: further evidence for a metal-rich atmosphere. Astrophys. J. 743, 92 (2011)

  10. 10.

    et al. The flat transmission spectrum of the super-Earth GJ1214b from Wide Field Camera 3 on the Hubble Space Telescope. Astrophys. J. 747, 35 (2012)

  11. 11.

    et al. Spitzer transits of the super-Earth GJ1214b and implications for its atmosphere. Astrophys. J. 765, 127 (2013)

  12. 12.

    & The nature of the atmosphere of the transiting super-Earth GJ 1214b. Astrophys. J. 716, L74–L79 (2010)

  13. 13.

    , , & Thermal evolution and structure models of the transiting super-Earth GJ 1214b. Astrophys. J. 733, 2 (2011)

  14. 14.

    , & The atmospheric chemistry of GJ 1214b: photochemistry and clouds. Astrophys. J. 745, 3 (2012)

  15. 15.

    & Theoretical transit spectra for GJ 1214b and other “super-Earths”. Astrophys. J. 756, 176 (2012)

  16. 16.

    et al. Quantitatively assessing the role of clouds in the transmission spectrum of GJ 1214b. Astrophys. J. 775, 33 (2013)

  17. 17.

    & How to distinguish between cloudy mini-Neptunes and water/volatile-dominated super-Earths. Astrophys. J. 778, 153 (2013)

  18. 18.

    et al. Infrared transmission spectroscopy of the exoplanets HD 209458b and XO-1b using the Wide Field Camera-3 on the Hubble Space Telescope. Astrophys. J. 774, 95 (2013)

  19. 19.

    et al. Probing the extreme planetary atmosphere of WASP-12b. Icarus 225, 432–445 (2013)

  20. 20.

    et al. Transmission spectroscopy of the hot-Jupiter WASP-12b from 0.7 to 5 microns. (2013)

  21. 21.

    & Analytic light curves for planetary transit searches. Astrophys. J. 580, L171–L175 (2002)

  22. 22.

    , , , & GJ 1214 reviewed. Trigonometric parallax, stellar parameters, new orbital solution, and bulk properties for the super-Earth GJ 1214b. Astron. Astrophys. 551, A48 (2013)

  23. 23.

    et al. A framework for characterizing the atmospheres of low-mass low-density transiting planets. Astrophys. J. 775, 80 (2013)

  24. 24.

    The effect of condensates on the characterization of transiting planet atmospheres with transmission spectroscopy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 364, 649–653 (2005)

  25. 25.

    & Atmospheric retrieval for super-Earths: uniquely constraining the atmospheric composition with transmission spectroscopy. Astrophys. J. 753, 100 (2012)

  26. 26.

    , , , & Detection of atmospheric haze on an extrasolar planet: the 0.55–1.05 µm transmission spectrum of HD 189733b with the Hubble Space Telescope. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 385, 109–118 (2008)

  27. 27.

    , , & A featureless transmission spectrum for the Neptune-mass exoplanet GJ 436b. Nature (this issue)

Download references


This work is based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope that were obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract number NAS 5-26555. These observations are associated with program GO-13021. Support for this work was provided by NASA through a grant from the Space Telescope Science Institute, the National Science Foundation through a Graduate Research Fellowship (to L.K.), the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation through a Sloan Research Fellowship (to J.L.B.), NASA through a Sagan Fellowship (to J.-M.D.), and the European Research Council (for D.H. under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme, FP7/2007-2013 Grant Agreement number 247060).

Author information


  1. Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

    • Laura Kreidberg
    • , Jacob L. Bean
    • , Kevin B. Stevenson
    •  & Andreas Seifahrt
  2. CASA, Department of Astrophysical and Planetary Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA

    • Jean-Michel Désert
  3. Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91101, USA

    • Jean-Michel Désert
  4. Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    • Björn Benneke
    •  & Sara Seager
  5. Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA

    • Drake Deming
  6. Department of Astronomy, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA

    • Zachory Berta-Thompson
  7. MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

    • Zachory Berta-Thompson
  8. Centre de Recherche Astrophysique de Lyon, 69364 Lyon, France

    • Derek Homeier


  1. Search for Laura Kreidberg in:

  2. Search for Jacob L. Bean in:

  3. Search for Jean-Michel Désert in:

  4. Search for Björn Benneke in:

  5. Search for Drake Deming in:

  6. Search for Kevin B. Stevenson in:

  7. Search for Sara Seager in:

  8. Search for Zachory Berta-Thompson in:

  9. Search for Andreas Seifahrt in:

  10. Search for Derek Homeier in:


L.K. led the data analysis (with contributions from J.L.B., D.D., K.B.S. and A.S.). J.L.B and J.-M.D. conceived the project and wrote the telescope time proposal (with contributions from B.B., D.D., S.S. and Z.B.-T.). L.K., J.L.B., J.-M.D., D.D. and Z.B.-T. planned the observations. B.B. and S.S. developed and performed the theoretical modelling. D.H. calculated the theoretical stellar limb darkening. J.L.B. led the overall direction of the project. L.K., J.L.B., J.-M.D. and B.B. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Kreidberg.

The data used in this work can be accessed at the NASA Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes (http://archive.stsci.edu).

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text and Data and additional references.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading

  • 1.

    Quantum scattering of KCl with He/para-H2$\mbox{H}_{2}$: potential energy surface and rate coefficients at low temperature

    • E. Sahnoun
    • , C. Nkem
    • , A. Naindouba
    • , K. Hammami
    • , N. Jaïdane
    •  & L. C. Owono Owono

    Astrophysics and Space Science (2018)

  • 2.

    Haze production rates in super-Earth and mini-Neptune atmosphere experiments

    • Sarah M. Hörst
    • , Chao He
    • , Nikole K. Lewis
    • , Eliza M.-R. Kempton
    • , Mark S. Marley
    • , Caroline V. Morley
    • , Julianne I. Moses
    • , Jeff A. Valenti
    •  & Véronique Vuitton

    Nature Astronomy (2018)

  • 3.

    Atmospheric reconnaissance of the habitable-zone Earth-sized planets orbiting TRAPPIST-1

    • Julien de Wit
    • , Hannah R. Wakeford
    • , Nikole K. Lewis
    • , Laetitia Delrez
    • , Michaël Gillon
    • , Frank Selsis
    • , Jérémy Leconte
    • , Brice-Olivier Demory
    • , Emeline Bolmont
    • , Vincent Bourrier
    • , Adam J. Burgasser
    • , Simon Grimm
    • , Emmanuël Jehin
    • , Susan M. Lederer
    • , James E. Owen
    • , Vlada Stamenković
    •  & Amaury H. M. J. Triaud

    Nature Astronomy (2018)

  • 4.

    A chemical survey of exoplanets with ARIEL

    • Giovanna Tinetti
    • , Pierre Drossart
    • , Paul Eccleston
    • , Paul Hartogh
    • , Astrid Heske
    • , Jérémy Leconte
    • , Giusi Micela
    • , Marc Ollivier
    • , Göran Pilbratt
    • , Ludovic Puig
    • , Diego Turrini
    • , Bart Vandenbussche
    • , Paulina Wolkenberg
    • , Jean-Philippe Beaulieu
    • , Lars A. Buchave
    • , Martin Ferus
    • , Matt Griffin
    • , Manuel Guedel
    • , Kay Justtanont
    • , Pierre-Olivier Lagage
    • , Pedro Machado
    • , Giuseppe Malaguti
    • , Michiel Min
    • , Hans Ulrik Nørgaard-Nielsen
    • , Mirek Rataj
    • , Tom Ray
    • , Ignasi Ribas
    • , Mark Swain
    • , Robert Szabo
    • , Stephanie Werner
    • , Joanna Barstow
    • , Matt Burleigh
    • , James Cho
    • , Vincent Coudé du Foresto
    • , Athena Coustenis
    • , Leen Decin
    • , Therese Encrenaz
    • , Marina Galand
    • , Michael Gillon
    • , Ravit Helled
    • , Juan Carlos Morales
    • , Antonio García Muñoz
    • , Andrea Moneti
    • , Isabella Pagano
    • , Enzo Pascale
    • , Giuseppe Piccioni
    • , David Pinfield
    • , Subhajit Sarkar
    • , Franck Selsis
    • , Jonathan Tennyson
    • , Amaury Triaud
    • , Olivia Venot
    • , Ingo Waldmann
    • , David Waltham
    • , Gillian Wright
    • , Jerome Amiaux
    • , Jean-Louis Auguères
    • , Michel Berthé
    • , Naidu Bezawada
    • , Georgia Bishop
    • , Neil Bowles
    • , Deirdre Coffey
    • , Josep Colomé
    • , Martin Crook
    • , Pierre-Elie Crouzet
    • , Vania Da Peppo
    • , Isabel Escudero Sanz
    • , Mauro Focardi
    • , Martin Frericks
    • , Tom Hunt
    • , Ralf Kohley
    • , Kevin Middleton
    • , Gianluca Morgante
    • , Roland Ottensamer
    • , Emanuele Pace
    • , Chris Pearson
    • , Richard Stamper
    • , Kate Symonds
    • , Miriam Rengel
    • , Etienne Renotte
    • , Peter Ade
    • , Laura Affer
    • , Christophe Alard
    • , Nicole Allard
    • , Francesca Altieri
    • , Yves André
    • , Claudio Arena
    • , Ioannis Argyriou
    • , Alan Aylward
    • , Cristian Baccani
    • , Gaspar Bakos
    • , Marek Banaszkiewicz
    • , Mike Barlow
    • , Virginie Batista
    • , Giancarlo Bellucci
    • , Serena Benatti
    • , Pernelle Bernardi
    • , Bruno Bézard
    • , Maria Blecka
    • , Emeline Bolmont
    • , Bertrand Bonfond
    • , Rosaria Bonito
    • , Aldo S. Bonomo
    • , John Robert Brucato
    • , Allan Sacha Brun
    • , Ian Bryson
    • , Waldemar Bujwan
    • , Sarah Casewell
    • , Bejamin Charnay
    • , Cesare Cecchi Pestellini
    • , Guo Chen
    • , Angela Ciaravella
    • , Riccardo Claudi
    • , Rodolphe Clédassou
    • , Mario Damasso
    • , Mario Damiano
    • , Camilla Danielski
    • , Pieter Deroo
    • , Anna Maria Di Giorgio
    • , Carsten Dominik
    • , Vanessa Doublier
    • , Simon Doyle
    • , René Doyon
    • , Benjamin Drummond
    • , Bastien Duong
    • , Stephen Eales
    • , Billy Edwards
    • , Maria Farina
    • , Ettore Flaccomio
    • , Leigh Fletcher
    • , François Forget
    • , Steve Fossey
    • , Markus Fränz
    • , Yuka Fujii
    • , Álvaro García-Piquer
    • , Walter Gear
    • , Hervé Geoffray
    • , Jean Claude Gérard
    • , Lluis Gesa
    • , H. Gomez
    • , Rafał Graczyk
    • , Caitlin Griffith
    • , Denis Grodent
    • , Mario Giuseppe Guarcello
    • , Jacques Gustin
    • , Keiko Hamano
    • , Peter Hargrave
    • , Yann Hello
    • , Kevin Heng
    • , Enrique Herrero
    • , Allan Hornstrup
    • , Benoit Hubert
    • , Shigeru Ida
    • , Masahiro Ikoma
    • , Nicolas Iro
    • , Patrick Irwin
    • , Christopher Jarchow
    • , Jean Jaubert
    • , Hugh Jones
    • , Queyrel Julien
    • , Shingo Kameda
    • , Franz Kerschbaum
    • , Pierre Kervella
    • , Tommi Koskinen
    • , Matthijs Krijger
    • , Norbert Krupp
    • , Marina Lafarga
    • , Federico Landini
    • , Emanuel Lellouch
    • , Giuseppe Leto
    • , A. Luntzer
    • , Theresa Rank-Lüftinger
    • , Antonio Maggio
    • , Jesus Maldonado
    • , Jean-Pierre Maillard
    • , Urs Mall
    • , Jean-Baptiste Marquette
    • , Stephane Mathis
    • , Pierre Maxted
    • , Taro Matsuo
    • , Alexander Medvedev
    • , Yamila Miguel
    • , Vincent Minier
    • , Giuseppe Morello
    • , Alessandro Mura
    • , Norio Narita
    • , Valerio Nascimbeni
    • , N. Nguyen Tong
    • , Vladimiro Noce
    • , Fabrizio Oliva
    • , Enric Palle
    • , Paul Palmer
    • , Maurizio Pancrazzi
    • , Andreas Papageorgiou
    • , Vivien Parmentier
    • , Manuel Perger
    • , Antonino Petralia
    • , Stefano Pezzuto
    • , Ray Pierrehumbert
    • , Ignazio Pillitteri
    • , Giampaolo Piotto
    • , Giampaolo Pisano
    • , Loredana Prisinzano
    • , Aikaterini Radioti
    • , Jean-Michel Réess
    • , Ladislav Rezac
    • , Marco Rocchetto
    • , Albert Rosich
    • , Nicoletta Sanna
    • , Alexandre Santerne
    • , Giorgio Savini
    • , Gaetano Scandariato
    • , Bruno Sicardy
    • , Carles Sierra
    • , Giuseppe Sindoni
    • , Konrad Skup
    • , Ignas Snellen
    • , Mateusz Sobiecki
    • , Lauriane Soret
    • , Alessandro Sozzetti
    • , A. Stiepen
    • , Antoine Strugarek
    • , Jake Taylor
    • , William Taylor
    • , Luca Terenzi
    • , Marcell Tessenyi
    • , Angelos Tsiaras
    • , C. Tucker
    • , Diana Valencia
    • , Gautam Vasisht
    • , Allona Vazan
    • , Francesc Vilardell
    • , Sabrine Vinatier
    • , Serena Viti
    • , Rens Waters
    • , Piotr Wawer
    • , Anna Wawrzaszek
    • , Anthony Whitworth
    • , Yuk L. Yung
    • , Sergey N. Yurchenko
    • , María Rosa Zapatero Osorio
    • , Robert Zellem
    • , Tiziano Zingales
    •  & Frans Zwart

    Experimental Astronomy (2018)

  • 5.

    Three eras of planetary exploration

    • Andrew P. Ingersoll

    Nature Astronomy (2017)


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.