Letter | Published:

Calving fluxes and basal melt rates of Antarctic ice shelves

Nature volume 502, pages 8992 (03 October 2013) | Download Citation

  • A Corrigendum to this article was published on 23 October 2013

Abstract

Iceberg calving has been assumed to be the dominant cause of mass loss for the Antarctic ice sheet, with previous estimates of the calving flux exceeding 2,000 gigatonnes per year1,2. More recently, the importance of melting by the ocean has been demonstrated close to the grounding line and near the calving front3,4,5. So far, however, no study has reliably quantified the calving flux and the basal mass balance (the balance between accretion and ablation at the ice-shelf base) for the whole of Antarctica. The distribution of fresh water in the Southern Ocean and its partitioning between the liquid and solid phases is therefore poorly constrained. Here we estimate the mass balance components for all ice shelves in Antarctica, using satellite measurements of calving flux and grounding-line flux, modelled ice-shelf snow accumulation rates6 and a regional scaling that accounts for unsurveyed areas. We obtain a total calving flux of 1,321 ± 144 gigatonnes per year and a total basal mass balance of −1,454 ± 174 gigatonnes per year. This means that about half of the ice-sheet surface mass gain is lost through oceanic erosion before reaching the ice front, and the calving flux is about 34 per cent less than previous estimates derived from iceberg tracking1,2,7. In addition, the fraction of mass loss due to basal processes varies from about 10 to 90 per cent between ice shelves. We find a significant positive correlation between basal mass loss and surface elevation change for ice shelves experiencing surface lowering8 and enhanced discharge9. We suggest that basal mass loss is a valuable metric for predicting future ice-shelf vulnerability to oceanic forcing.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , & Melting of ice shelves and the mass balance of Antarctica. J. Glaciol. 38, 375–387 (1992)

  2. 2.

    in Glaciers, Ice Sheets and Sea Level: Effect of a CO2-Induced Climatic Change 210–215 (National Academic, 1985)

  3. 3.

    & Ice-ocean interaction on Ronne Ice Shelf, Antarctica. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 791–813 (1991)

  4. 4.

    & Rapid bottom melting widespread near Antarctic ice sheet grounding lines. Science 296, 2020–2023 (2002)

  5. 5.

    & Melting and freezing beneath Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1477 (2003)

  6. 6.

    , , , & A new, high-resolution surface mass balance map of Antarctica (1979–2010) based on regional atmospheric climate modeling. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L04501 (2012)

  7. 7.

    , & Contribution of giant icebergs to the Southern Ocean freshwater flux. J. Geophys. Res. 111, C03004 (2006)

  8. 8.

    et al. Antarctic ice-sheet loss driven by basal melting of ice shelves. Nature 484, 502–505 (2012)

  9. 9.

    , , & Extensive dynamic thinning on the margins of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Nature 461, 971–975 (2009)

  10. 10.

    & Assessment of the importance of ice-shelf buttressing to ice-sheet flow. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L04503 (2005)

  11. 11.

    & Glacier surge after ice shelf collapse. Science 299, 1560–1562 (2003)

  12. 12.

    & Rapid disintegration of the Wordie Ice Shelf in response to atmospheric warming. Nature 350, 328–330 (1991)

  13. 13.

    , , & Bioavailable iron in the Southern Ocean: the significance of the iceberg conveyor belt. Geochem. Trans. 9, 7 (2008)

  14. 14.

    , , , & Analysis of velocity field, mass balance, and basal melt of the Lambert Glacier-Amery Ice Shelf system by incorporating Radarsat SAR interferometry and ICESat laser altimetry measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B11102 (2010)

  15. 15.

    , & New oceanographic data from beneath Ronne Ice Shelf, Antarctica. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 167–170 (1997)

  16. 16.

    , & in Ocean, Ice, and Atmosphere: Interactions at the Antarctic Continental Margin 285–299 (Antarct. Res. Ser. 75, AGU, 1998)

  17. 17.

    Impact of Antarctic ice shelf basal melting on sea ice and deep ocean properties. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L10307 (2004)

  18. 18.

    , & Ice-shelf basal melting in a global finite-element sea-ice/ice-shelf/ocean model. Ann. Glaciol. 53, (2012)

  19. 19.

    & Antarctic ice-shelf thickness from satellite radar altimetry. J. Glaciol. 57, 485–498 (2011)

  20. 20.

    , & Ice flow of the Antarctic ice sheet. Science 333, 1427–1430 (2011)

  21. 21.

    et al. Lower satellite-gravimetry estimates of Antarctic sea-level contribution. Nature 491, 586–589 (2012)

  22. 22.

    , , , & Twenty-first-century warming of a large Antarctic ice-shelf cavity by a redirected coastal current. Nature 485, 225–228 (2012)

  23. 23.

    , & Glaciological and oceanographic calculations of the mass balance and oxygen isotope ratio of a melting ice shelf. J. Glaciol. 30, 161–170 (1984)

  24. 24.

    , , & Distribution of marine ice beneath the Amery Ice Shelf. Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, 2241–2244 (2001)

  25. 25.

    , , , & Marine ice in Larsen ice shelf. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L11604 (2009)

  26. 26.

    , & Core drilling through the Ross ice shelf (Antarctica) confirmed basal freezing. Science 207, 1463–1465 (1980)

  27. 27.

    et al. Substantial primary production in the land-remote region of the central and northern Scotia Sea. Deep-Sea Res. II 59–60, 47–56 (2012)

  28. 28.

    et al. Iron from melting glaciers fuels phytoplankton blooms in the Amundsen Sea (Southern Ocean): phytoplankton characteristics and productivity. Deep-Sea Res. II 71–76, 32–48 (2012)

  29. 29.

    et al. Free-drifting icebergs: hot spots of chemical and biological enrichment in the Weddell Sea. Science 317, 478–482 (2007)

  30. 30.

    et al. Mass changes of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets and shelves and contributions to sea-level rise: 1992–2002. J. Glaciol. 51, 509–527 (2005)

  31. 31.

    , & An improved semi-empirical model for the densification of Antarctic firn. Cryosphere 5, 809–819 (2011)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the ice2sea programme of the European Union Seventh Framework Programme, grant number 226375. This work is ice2sea contribution number 139. M.R.v.d.B., J.T.M.L. and S.R.M.L. acknowledge funding from the Netherlands Polar Programme. J.L.B. was supported by NERC grant NE/I027401/1.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Bristol Glaciology Centre, School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK

    • M. A. Depoorter
    • , J. L. Bamber
    •  & J. A. Griggs
  2. Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands

    • J. T. M. Lenaerts
    • , S. R. M. Ligtenberg
    •  & M. R. van den Broeke
  3. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA

    • G. Moholdt

Authors

  1. Search for M. A. Depoorter in:

  2. Search for J. L. Bamber in:

  3. Search for J. A. Griggs in:

  4. Search for J. T. M. Lenaerts in:

  5. Search for S. R. M. Ligtenberg in:

  6. Search for M. R. van den Broeke in:

  7. Search for G. Moholdt in:

Contributions

M.A.D. produced the results, led the development of the study and wrote the manuscript. J.L.B. had the idea for the study and contributed to the development of the methods, to the discussion of results and, extensively, to writing the manuscript. J.A.G. produced the calving-front elevation error and provided the ice-shelf elevation. J.T.M.L. and M.R.v.d.B. provided the SMB data and error analysis. S.R.M.L. and M.R.v.d.B. provided the firn data and error analysis. G.M. provided the grounding-line and ice-shelf mask data and discussion. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. A. Depoorter or J. L. Bamber.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains a Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, Supplementary Figures 1-6 and Supplementary References.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12567

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.