Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

James et al. reply

Abstract

Replying to S. Saavedra & D. B. Stouffer Nature 500, 10.1038/nature12380 (2013)

Saavedra and Stouffer1 claim that the results of James et al.2 are a consequence of the method used to randomize interaction matrices. We recognize the importance of examining alternative randomization schemes and have repeated our analysis using their methods. However, we find no evidence that ‘reconfirms the importance of nestedness in mutualistic communities’1.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Accounting for degree distribution does not give a meaningful relationship between nestedness and persistence.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saavedra, S. & Stouffer, D. B. “Disentangling nestedness” disentangled. Nature 500, http://dx.doi.org/nature12380 (2013)

  2. James, A., Pitchford, J. W. & Plank, M. J. Disentangling nestedness from models of ecological complexity. Nature 487, 227–230 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fortuna, M. A. et al. Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 811–817 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bascompte, J., Jordano, P., Melián, C. J. & Olesen, J. The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9383–9387 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bastolla, U. et al. The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity. Nature 458, 1018–1020 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Almeida-Neto, M., Guimarães, P., Guimarães, P. R., Loyola, R. D. & Ulrich, W. A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos 117, 1227–1239 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Staniczenko, P. P. A., Kopp, J. C. & Allesina, S. The ghost of nestedness in ecological networks. Nature Commun. 4, 1391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2422 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex James.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

James, A., Pitchford, J. & Plank, M. James et al. reply. Nature 500, E2–E3 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12381

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12381

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing