Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Mitotic trigger waves and the spatial coordination of the Xenopus cell cycle

Subjects

Abstract

Despite the large size of the Xenopus laevis egg (approximately 1.2 mm diameter), a fertilized egg rapidly proceeds through mitosis in a spatially coordinated fashion. Mitosis is initiated by a bistable system of regulatory proteins centred on Cdk1 (refs 1, 2), raising the possibility that this spatial coordination could be achieved through trigger waves of Cdk1 activity3. Using an extract system that performs cell cycles in vitro, here we show that mitosis does spread through Xenopus cytoplasm via trigger waves, propagating at a linear speed of approximately 60 µm min−1. Perturbing the feedback loops that give rise to the bistability of Cdk1 changes the speed and dynamics of the waves. Time-lapse imaging of intact eggs argues that trigger waves of Cdk1 activation are responsible for surface contraction waves, ripples in the cell cortex that precede cytokinesis4,5. These findings indicate that Cdk1 trigger waves help ensure the spatiotemporal coordination of mitosis in large eggs. Trigger waves may be an important general mechanism for coordinating biochemical events over large distances.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Trigger waves in Cdk1 activation.
Figure 2: Rapid, linear propagation of mitotic entry and exit through Xenopus cytoplasm.
Figure 3: The Wee1/Myt1 inhibitor PD0166285 accelerates the trigger waves.
Figure 4: Surface contraction waves in intact Xenopus eggs.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pomerening, J. R., Sontag, E. D. & Ferrell, J. E., Jr Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2. Nature Cell Biol. 5, 346–351 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sha, W. et al. Hysteresis drives cell-cycle transitions in Xenopus laevis egg extracts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 975–980 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Novak, B. & Tyson, J. J. Modeling the cell division cycle: M-phase trigger, oscillations, and size control. J. Theor. Biol. 165, 101–134 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hara, K. Cinematographic observation of “surface contraction waves” (SCW) during the early cleavage of axolotl eggs. Wilhelm Roux Arch. Dev. Biol. 167, 183–186 (1971)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hara, K., Tydeman, P. & Kirschner, M. A cytoplasmic clock with the same period as the division cycle in Xenopus eggs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 77, 462–466 (1980)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackman, M., Lindon, C., Nigg, E. A. & Pines, J. Active cyclin B1-Cdk1 first appears on centrosomes in prophase. Nature Cell Biol. 5, 143–148 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Newport, J. & Kirschner, M. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. Characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell 30, 675–686 (1982)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerhart, J. C. in Biological Regulation and Development Vol. 2 (ed. Goldberger, R. F. ) 133–316 (Plenum, 1980)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Tyson, J. J. & Keener, J. P. Singular perturbation theory of traveling waves in excitable media (a review). Physica D 32, 327–361 (1988)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Markevich, N. I., Tsyganov, M. A., Hoek, J. B. & Kholodenko, B. N. Long-range signaling by phosphoprotein waves arising from bistability in protein kinase cascades. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 61 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reynolds, A. R., Tischer, C., Verveer, P. J., Rocks, O. & Bastiaens, P. I. EGFR activation coupled to inhibition of tyrosine phosphatases causes lateral signal propagation. Nature Cell Biol. 5, 447–453 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Luther, R. Raumliche fortplanzung chimischer reaktionen. Z. Elektrochemie 12, 596–600 (1906)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bonnet, J., Coopman, P. & Morris, M. C. Characterization of centrosomal localization and dynamics of Cdc25C phosphatase in mitosis. Cell Cycle 7, 1991–1998 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Murray, A. W. Cell cycle extracts. Methods Cell Biol. 36, 581–605 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Winfree, A. T. Two kinds of wave in an oscillating chemical sollution. Faraday Symp. Chem. Soc. 9, 38–46 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, Y. et al. Radiosensitization of p53 mutant cells by PD0166285, a novel G(2) checkpoint abrogator. Cancer Res. 61, 8211–8217 (2001)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakamura, N., Tokumoto, T., Ueno, S. & Iwao, Y. The cytoskeleton-dependent localization of cdc2/cyclin B in blastomere cortex during Xenopus embryonic cell cycle. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 72, 336–345 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rankin, S. & Kirschner, M. W. The surface contraction waves of Xenopus eggs reflect the metachronous cell-cycle state of the cytoplasm. Curr. Biol. 7, 451–454 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shinagawa, A., Konno, S., Yoshimoto, Y. & Hiramoto, Y. Nuclear involvement in localization of the initiation site of surface contraction waves in Xenopus eggs. Dev. Growth Differ. 31, 249–255 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Perez-Mongiovi, D., Chang, P. & Houliston, E. A propagated wave of MPF activation accompanies surface contraction waves at first mitosis in Xenopus. J. Cell Sci. 111, 385–393 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Foe, V. E. & Alberts, B. M. Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behaviour during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 61, 31–70 (1983)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Haskins, E. F. Stemonitis flavogenita (Myxomycetes) – plasmodial phase (aphanoplasmodium). Film E 2000, Institut Wissenschaftliche Film, Göttingen. Pub. Wiss. Film Sekt. Biol. 8, 1–14 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Clutterbuck, A. J. Synchronous nuclear division and septation in Aspergillus nidulans. J. Gen. Microbiol. 60, 133–135 (1970)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gladfelter, A. S., Hungerbuehler, A. K. & Philippsen, P. Asynchronous nuclear division cycles in multinucleated cells. J. Cell Biol. 172, 347–362 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Trunnell, N. B., Poon, A. C., Kim, S. Y. & Ferrell, J. E., Jr Ultrasensitivity in the regulation of Cdc25C by Cdk1. Mol. Cell 41, 263–274 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, Q. & Ferrell, J. E., Jr The Cdk1-APC/C cell cycle oscillator circuit functions as a time-delayed ultrasensitive switch. Nature Cell Biol. 15, 519–525 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hausen, P. & Riebesell, M. in The Early Development of Xenopus laevis: An Atlas of the Histology plate 12 (Springer, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H. Funabiki and M. Dasso for providing GFP–NLS protein and constructs, E. Sontag and L. Wang for discussions and calculations, T. Tsai for sharing his unpublished data on the effects of PD0166285 on Xenopus embryos, Q. Yang for helping to build the ordinary differential equation model upon which our partial differential equation model is based, G. Dey, H. Stone and B. Sullivan for discussions, S. Quake and the Quake laboratory for advice, J. Chen and the Chen laboratory for the use of their microscope and discussions, J. Pomerening for discussions and technical advice, the Stanford Cell Sciences Imaging Facility for technical assistance, and members of the Ferrell laboratory for discussions. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM046383 and GM077544) and by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship and a Lieberman Fellowship (to J.B.C.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.B.C. performed experiments and calculations, analysed data and helped write the paper. J.E.F. performed calculations, analysed data and helped write the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jeremy B. Chang or James E. Ferrell Jr.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Figures 1-4 and additional references. (PDF 1030 kb)

Mitotic waves in Xenopus extracts in Teflon tubes

Nuclei appear as green circles that disappear (nuclear envelope breakdown) and reappear (nuclear envelope formation). The channel width is 100 µm. This movie corresponds to the experiment plotted in Fig. 2b. Images were obtained at a rate of 1 image per min and are shown at a rate of 15 frames per sec. (MOV 6009 kb)

Trigger waves vs. phase waves

This video is from the experiment shown in Fig. 2c. Again, the channel width is 100 µm and images were obtained at a rate of 1 image per min and are shown at a rate of 15 frames per sec. (MOV 9244 kb)

Surface contraction waves in fertilized Xenopus eggs

Two waves of pigmentation can be seen just prior to the first mitotic cleavage. Related to Fig. 4d. Images were obtained at a rate of 1 image per 10 sec and are shown at a rate of 75 frames per sec. (MOV 3740 kb)

Surface contraction waves in parthenogenetically-activated Xenopus eggs

Three pairs of waves are seen in this video. Related to Fig. 4e. Images were obtained at a rate of 1 image per 10 sec and are shown at a rate of 75 frames per sec. (MOV 3588 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, J., Ferrell Jr, J. Mitotic trigger waves and the spatial coordination of the Xenopus cell cycle. Nature 500, 603–607 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12321

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12321

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing