Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Unexpected features of Drosophila circadian behavioural rhythms under natural conditions

Abstract

Circadian clocks have evolved to synchronize physiology, metabolism and behaviour to the 24-h geophysical cycles of the Earth1. Drosophila melanogaster’s rhythmic locomotor behaviour provides the main phenotype for the identification of higher eukaryotic clock genes2,3. Under laboratory light–dark cycles, flies show enhanced activity before lights on and off signals4,5, and these anticipatory responses have defined the neuronal sites of the corresponding morning (M) and evening (E) oscillators6,7. However, the natural environment provides much richer cycling environmental stimuli than the laboratory, so we sought to examine fly locomotor rhythms in the wild. Here we show that several key laboratory-based assumptions about circadian behaviour are not supported by natural observations. These include the anticipation of light transitions, the midday ‘siesta’, the fly’s crepuscular activity, its nocturnal behaviour under moonlight, and the dominance of light stimuli over temperature. We also observe a third major locomotor component in addition to M and E, which we term ‘A’ (afternoon). Furthermore, we show that these natural rhythm phenotypes can be observed in the laboratory by using realistic temperature and light cycle simulations. Our results suggest that a comprehensive re-examination of circadian behaviour and its molecular readouts under simulated natural conditions will provide a more authentic interpretation of the adaptive significance of this important rhythmic phenotype. Such studies should also help to clarify the underlying molecular and neuroanatomical substrates of the clock under natural protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Purchase on Springer Link

Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The afternoon (A) component of locomotor activity.
Figure 2: The morning onset (M onset ) of locomotor activity is dependent on temperature and twilight.
Figure 3: Evening onset is temperature and clock modulated.
Figure 4: Diurnal phenotypes of D. melanogaster.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dodd, A. N. et al. Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science 309, 630–633 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hardin, P. E. Molecular genetic analysis of timekeeping in Drosophila . Adv. Genet. 74, 141–173 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gallego, M. & Virshup, D. M. Post-translational modifications regulate the ticking of the circadian clock. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 139–148 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Helfrich-Forster, C. The locomotor activity rhythm of Drosophila melanogaster is controlled by a dual oscillator system. J. Insect Physiol. 47, 877–887 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins, B. H., Dissel, S., Gaten, E., Rosato, E. & Kyriacou, C. P. Disruption of Cryptochrome partially restores circadian rhythmicity to the arrhythmic period mutant of Drosophila . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 19021–19026 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grima, B., Chelot, E., Xia, R. & Rouyer, F. Morning and evening peaks of activity rely on different clock neurons of the Drosophila brain. Nature 431, 869–873 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stoleru, D., Peng, Y., Agosto, J. & Rosbash, M. Coupled oscillators control morning and evening locomotor behaviour of Drosophila . Nature 431, 862–868 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Majercak, J., Sidote, D., Hardin, P. E. & Edery, I. How a circadian clock adapts to seasonal decreases in temperature and day length. Neuron 24, 219–230 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Collins, B. H., Rosato, E. & Kyriacou, C. P. Seasonal behavior in Drosophila melanogaster requires the photoreceptors, the circadian clock, and phospholipase C. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1945–1950 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Low, K. H., Lim, C., Ko, H. W. & Edery, I. Natural variation in the splice site strength of a clock gene and species-specific thermal adaptation. Neuron 60, 1054–1067 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. United . States Naval Observatory (USNO) Astronomy Application Department. Rise, Set, and Twilight Definitionshttp://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/RST_defs.php〉 (2011)

  12. Tauber, E. et al. Natural selection favors a newly derived timeless allele in Drosophila melanogaster . Science 316, 1895–1898 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamblen-Coyle, M. J., Wheeler, D. A., Rutila, J. E., Rosbash, M. & Hall, J. C. Behavior of period-altered rhythm mutants of Drosophila in light:dark cycles. J. Insect Behav. 5, 417–446 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Helfrich, C. & Engelmann, W. Evidences for circadian rhythmicity in the per0 mutant of Drosophila melanogaster . Z. Naturforsch. C 42, 1335–1338 (1987)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dowse, H. B. & Ringo, J. M. Further evidence that the circadian clock in Drosophila is a population of coupled ultradian oscillators. J. Biol. Rhythms 2, 65–76 (1987)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshii, T., Fujii, K. & Tomioka, K. Induction of Drosophila behavioral and molecular circadian rhythms by temperature steps in constant light. J. Biol. Rhythms 22, 103–114 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Currie, J., Goda, T. & Wijnen, H. Selective entrainment of the Drosophila circadian clock to daily gradients in environmental temperature. BMC Biol. 7, 49 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rieger, D. et al. The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster favors dim light and times its activity peaks to early dawn and late dusk. J. Biol. Rhythms 22, 387–399 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bachleitner, W., Kempinger, L., Wulbeck, C., Rieger, D. & Helfrich-Forster, C. Moonlight shifts the endogenous clock of Drosophila melanogaster . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3538–3543 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kempinger, L., Dittmann, R., Rieger, D. & Helfrich-Forster, C. The nocturnal activity of fruit flies exposed to artificial moonlight is partly caused by direct light effects on the activity level that bypass the endogenous clock. Chronobiol. Int. 26, 151–166 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nitabach, M. N. et al. Electrical hyperexcitation of lateral ventral pacemaker neurons desynchronises downstream circadian oscillators in the fly circadian circuit and induces multiple behavioural period. J. Neurosci. 26, 479–489 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miyasako, Y., Umezaki, Y. & Tomioka, K. Separate sets of cerebral clock neurons are responsible for light and temperature entrainment of Drosophila circadian locomotor rhythms. J. Biol. Rhythms 22, 115–126 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoshii, T., Vanin, S., Costa, R. & Helfrich-Forster, C. Synergic entrainment of Drosophila’s circadian clock by light and temperature. J. Biol. Rhythms 24, 452–464 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Bilodeau-Wentworth, D., Hardin, P. E. & Emery, P. Light and temperature control the contribution of specific DN1 neurons to Drosophila circadian behavior. Curr. Biol. 20, 600–605 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, L. et al. DN1(p) circadian neurons coordinate acute light and PDF inputs to produce robust daily behavior in Drosophila . Curr. Biol. 20, 591–599 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Busza, A., Murad, A. & Emery, P. Interactions between circadian neurons control temperature synchronization of Drosophila behavior. J. Neurosci. 27, 10722–10733 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Daan, S. et al. Lab mice in the field: unorthodox daily activity and effects of a dysfunctional circadian clock allele. J. Biol. Rhythms 26, 118–129 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gatterman, R. et al. Golden hamsters are nocturnal in captivity but diurnal in nature. Biol. Lett. 4, 253–255 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tanoue, S., Krishnan, P., Krishnan, B., Dryer, S. E. & Hardin, P. E. Circadian clocks in antennal neurons are necessary and sufficient for olfaction rhythms in Drosophila . Curr. Biol. 14, 638–649 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosato, E. & Kyriacou, C. P. Analysis of locomotor activity rhythms in Drosophila . Nature Protocols 1, 559–568 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Bastianello for building the natural light simulator, and C. Helfrich-Forster for comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by grants from the European Community (the 6th Framework Project EUCLOCK no. 018741; to R.C. and C.P.K.), the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and National Environmental Research Council (to C.P.K.), the Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award (to C.P.K.) and a Medical Research Council studentship (to E.W.G.) R.C. also thanks the Italian Space Agency (DCMC grant) and the Ministero dell’Università e delle Ricerca (MIUR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.P.K. and R.C. conceived the study. C.P.K. supervised the UK work, and R.C. the Italian component. S.B. conducted all the field experiments in the UK, and S.V., F.S. and M.P. the fieldwork in Italy. S.V. performed the laboratory simulations. S.M. performed the per splicing work, and P.M. the immunocytochemistry experiments. E.W.G. developed the software to analyse the behavioural data. Statistical analyses were performed by S.B., S.V. and C.P.K. C.P.K., S.V., S.B. and R.C. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodolfo Costa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-11 and Supplementary Tables 1-3. (PDF 1355 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanin, S., Bhutani, S., Montelli, S. et al. Unexpected features of Drosophila circadian behavioural rhythms under natural conditions. Nature 484, 371–375 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10991

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10991

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research