In Table 1 of this Letter, rows 9 and 10 ([Y/Fe] and [Sr/Fe]) were inadvertently switched for stars number 2, 3 and 4. In addition, the [Y/Fe] value for star number 3 should be +1.50 and not +1.55. The correct Table 1 is shown below, and this also now includes the [Fe/H] values for each of the studied stars (taken from ref. 1 (ref. 4 in the original Letter)). The typical uncertainty in the [Fe/H] values is 0.2 dex. Table 1 has been corrected in the HTML and PDF version of the manuscript.
References
Barbuy, B. et al. VLT-FLAMES analysis of eight giants in the bulge metal-poor globular cluster NGC 6522: oldest cluster in the Galaxy? Astron. Astrophys. 507, 405–415 (2009)
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/nature10000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiappini, C., Frischknecht, U., Meynet, G. et al. Erratum: Imprints of fast-rotating massive stars in the Galactic Bulge. Nature 474, 666 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10185
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10185
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
