Letter | Published:

Zero outward flow velocity for plasma in a heliosheath transition layer

Nature volume 474, pages 359361 (16 June 2011) | Download Citation


Voyager 1 has been in the reservoir of energetic ions and electrons that constitutes the heliosheath since it crossed the solar wind termination shock1,2,3 on 16 December 2004 at a distance from the Sun of 94 astronomical units (1 au = 1.5 × 108 km). It is now 22 au past the termination shock crossing4. The bulk velocity of the plasma in the radial–transverse plane has been determined5 using measurements of the anisotropy of the convected energetic ion distribution6. Here we report that the radial component of the velocity has been decreasing almost linearly over the past three years, from 70 km s−1 to 0 km s−1, where it has remained for the past eight months. It now seems that Voyager 1 has entered a finite transition layer of zero-radial-velocity plasma flow, indicating that the spacecraft may be close to the heliopause, the border between the heliosheath and the interstellar plasma. The existence of a flow transition layer in the heliosheath contradicts current predictions7—generally assumed by conceptual models—of a sharp discontinuity at the heliopause.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. Voyager 1 in the foreshock, termination shock, and heliosheath. Science 309, 2020–2024 (2005)

  2. 2.

    et al. Crossing the termination shock into the heliosheath: magnetic fields. Science 309, 2027–2029 (2005)

  3. 3.

    et al. Voyager 1 explores the termination shock region and the heliosheath beyond. Science 309, 2012–2020 (2005)

  4. 4.

    , , & Variations of low-energy ion distributions measured in the heliosheath. AIP Conf. Proc. 1302, 51–57 (2010)

  5. 5.

    et al. The Low Energy Charged Particle (LECP) experiment on the Voyager spacecraft. Space Sci. Rev. 21, 329–354 (1977)

  6. 6.

    et al. Voyager 1 exited the solar wind at a distance of 85 au from the Sun. Nature 426, 45–48 (2003)

  7. 7.

    et al. The dynamic heliosphere: outstanding issues. Space Sci. Rev. 143, 57–83 (2009)

  8. 8.

    exploration: What a long, strange trip it’s been. Nature 454, 24–25 (2008)

  9. 9.

    The heliopause. Rev. Geophys. 28, 97–115 (1990)

  10. 10.

    , , , & Imaging the interaction of the heliosphere with the interstellar medium from Saturn with Cassini. Science 326, 971–973 (2009)

  11. 11.

    , , & ENA (E > 5 keV) images from Cassini and Voyager “ground truth”: suprathermal particle pressure in the heliosheath. AIP Conf. Proc. 1302, 79–85 (2010)

  12. 12.

    , , & in Physics of the Heliosphere: A 10-Year Retrospective (eds , & ) (10th Annu. Internat. Astrophys. Conf., American Institute of Physics, 2011)

  13. 13.

    et al. Implications of generalized Rankine-Hugoniot conditions for the PUI population at the Voyager 2 termination shock. AIP Conf. Proc. 1302, 133–141 (2010)

  14. 14.

    et al. Kinetic-gasdynamic modeling of the heliospheric interface. Space Sci. Rev. 146, 329–351 (2009)

  15. 15.

    Physics of the solar wind-local interstellar medium interaction: role of magnetic fields. Space Sci. Rev. 146, 295–327 (2009)

Download references


This work was supported at The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory by NASA. We are grateful to J. Aiello (for assistance with our graphical presentation) and R. McNutt (for a historical summary of heliosheath terminology).

Author information


  1. Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, Maryland 20723, USA

    • Stamatios M. Krimigis
    • , Edmond C. Roelof
    • , Robert B. Decker
    •  & Matthew E. Hill
  2. Academy of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece

    • Stamatios M. Krimigis


  1. Search for Stamatios M. Krimigis in:

  2. Search for Edmond C. Roelof in:

  3. Search for Robert B. Decker in:

  4. Search for Matthew E. Hill in:


S.M.K. contributed most of the text; E.C.R. contributed to the text and provided theory interpretation; and R.B.D. performed the data analysis with the assistance of M.E.H.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stamatios M. Krimigis.

About this article

Publication history







By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.