Nature 469, 203–206 (2011)
In this Letter, the statement in the abstract and main text that the banded birds had a survival rate “16% lower than non-banded birds” should in fact say that they had a survival rate “16 percentage points lower than non-banded birds”. Also, the abstract should state that banded birds had 41% fewer chicks, rather than 39%.
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/nature09630
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saraux, C., Le Bohec, C., Durant, J. et al. Erratum: Reliability of flipper-banded penguins as indicators of climate change. Nature 471, 254 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09858
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09858
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
