Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host–parasitoid food webs

Abstract

Global conversion of natural habitats to agriculture has led to marked changes in species diversity and composition1. However, it is less clear how habitat modification affects interactions among species2. Networks of feeding interactions (food webs) describe the underlying structure of ecological communities, and might be crucially linked to their stability and function3,4,5,6,7. Here, we analyse 48 quantitative food webs8,9 for cavity-nesting bees, wasps and their parasitoids across five tropical habitat types. We found marked changes in food-web structure10,11 across the modification gradient, despite little variation in species richness. The evenness of interaction frequencies declined with habitat modification, with most energy flowing along one or a few pathways in intensively managed agricultural habitats. In modified habitats there was a higher ratio of parasitoid to host species and increased parasitism rates, with implications for the important ecosystem services, such as pollination and biological control, that are performed by host bees and wasps12. The most abundant parasitoid species was more specialized in modified habitats, with reduced attack rates on alternative hosts. Conventional community descriptors failed to discriminate adequately among habitats, indicating that perturbation of the structure and function of ecological communities might be overlooked in studies that do not document and quantify species interactions. Altered interaction structure therefore represents an insidious and functionally important hidden effect of habitat modification by humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Quantitative host–parasitoid food webs along a gradient of increasing habitat modification (top to bottom).
Figure 2: The effects of habitat modification on rates of parasitism (mean ± s.e.m.) and six quantitative food web metrics (see Supplementary Methods 1): linkage density (LD), generality, vulnerability, evenness, connectance and compartment diversity.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tilman, D. et al. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292, 281–284 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Putten, W. H. et al. Trophic interactions in a changing world. Basic Appl. Ecol. 5, 487–494 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. McCann, K. The diversity–stability debate. Nature 405, 228–233 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Melián, C. J. & Bascompte, J. Food web structure and habitat loss. Ecol. Lett. 5, 37–46 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ives, A. R. & Cardinale, B. J. Food-web interactions govern the resistance of communities after non-random extinctions. Nature 429, 174–177 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rooney, N., McCann, K., Gellner, G. & Moore, J. C. Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs. Nature 442, 265–269 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Montoya, J. M., Pimm, S. L. & Solé, R. V. Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 442, 259–264 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Memmott, J., Godfray, H. C. J. & Gauld, I. D. The structure of a tropical host–parasitoid community. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 521–540 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Müller, C. B., Adriaanse, I. C. T., Belshaw, R. & Godfray, H. C. J. The structure of an aphid–parasitoid community. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 346–370 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bersier, L. F., Banasek-Richter, C. & Cattin, M. F. Quantitative descriptors of food-web matrices. Ecology 83, 2394–2407 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Banasek-Richter, C., Cattin, M. F. & Bersier, L. F. Sampling effects and the robustness of quantitative and qualitative food-web descriptors. J. Theor. Biol. 226, 23–32 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Losey, J. E. & Vaughan, M. The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. Bioscience 56, 311–323 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Foley, J. A. et al. Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570–574 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Paine, R. T. Food webs: Road maps of interactions or grist for theoretical development? Ecology 69, 1648–1654 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Janzen, D. H. The deflowering of Central America. Nat. Hist. 83, 48–53 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kearns, C. A., Inouye, D. W. & Waser, N. M. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29, 83–112 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen, J. E. et al. Improving food webs. Ecology 74, 252–258 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldwasser, L. & Roughgarden, J. Sampling effects and the estimation of food-web properties. Ecology 78, 41–54 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martinez, N. D., Hawkins, B. A., Dawah, H. A. & Feifarek, B. P. Effects of sampling effort on characterization of food-web structure. Ecology 80, 1044–1055 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morris, R. J., Lewis, O. T. & Godfray, H. C. J. Experimental evidence for apparent competition in a tropical forest food web. Nature 428, 310–313 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lewis, O. T. et al. Structure of a diverse tropical forest insect–parasitoid community. J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 855–873 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Memmott, J. The structure of a plant–pollinator food web. Ecol. Lett. 2, 276–280 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Henneman, M. L. & Memmott, J. Infiltration of a Hawaiian community by introduced biological control agents. Science 293, 1314–1316 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kremen, C., Williams, N. M. & Thorp, R. W. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16812–16816 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tylianakis, J. M., Klein, A. M. & Tscharntke, T. Spatiotemporal variation in the effects of a tropical habitat gradient on Hymenoptera diversity. Ecology 86, 3296–3302 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tylianakis, J. M., Klein, A. M. & Tscharntke, T. Spatial scale of observation affects α, β and γ diversity of cavity-nesting bees and wasps across a tropical land use gradient. J. Biogeogr. 33, 1295–1304 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rand, T., Tylianakis, J. M. & Tscharntke, T. Spillover edge effects: the dispersal of agriculturally-subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats. Ecol. Lett. 9, 603–614 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tylianakis, J. M., Tscharntke, T. & Klein, A. M. Diversity, ecosystem function and stability of parasitoid–host interactions across a tropical habitat gradient. Ecology 87, 3047–3057 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hawkins, B. A., Mills, N. J., Jervis, M. A. & Price, P. W. Is the biological control of insects a natural phenomenon? Oikos 86, 493–506 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Bascompte, M. B. Bonsall, M. M. Bos, H. C. J. Godfray, B. A. Hawkins, R. J. Morris, C. B. Müller and T. Roslin for discussions or comments, and J. Casquete, J. Pico, G. Sacoto, C. Valarezo, C. Calderon, A. Choez, J. Lino, R. Olschewski, G. H. J. de Koning and B. Pico for assistance with field or laboratory work and coordination. H. C. J. Godfray provided software and advice for drawing food webs and calculating compartmentalization. This research was funded by the Federal Ministry for Research and Education (BMBF) Germany, and a Royal Society University Research Fellowship to O.T.L.

Author Contributions J.M.T. was responsible for writing, field data collection, research planning and analysis; T.T. for research planning, site selection and funding application; and O.T.L. for writing, analysis and preparation of food webs (Fig. 1). All authors discussed the results and edited the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason M. Tylianakis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods 1-3 detailing calculation of food web statistics, and analyses of evenness and parasitism; Supplementary Figure 1 showing qualitative food web values across habitats; and Supplementary Tables 1-4 presenting results of supporting analyses and details of host and parasitoid codes used in Fig. 1. (PDF 563 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tylianakis, J., Tscharntke, T. & Lewis, O. Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host–parasitoid food webs. Nature 445, 202–205 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05429

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05429

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing