Abstract
Paramutation is a heritable epigenetic modification induced in plants by cross-talk between allelic loci. Here we report a similar modification of the mouse Kit gene in the progeny of heterozygotes with the null mutant Kittm1Alf (a lacZ insertion). In spite of a homozygous wild-type genotype, their offspring maintain, to a variable extent, the white spots characteristic of Kit mutant animals. Efficiently inherited from either male or female parents, the modified phenotype results from a decrease in Kit messenger RNA levels with the accumulation of non-polyadenylated RNA molecules of abnormal sizes. Sustained transcriptional activity at the postmeiotic stages—at which time the gene is normally silent—leads to the accumulation of RNA in spermatozoa. Microinjection into fertilized eggs either of total RNA from Kittm1Alf/+ heterozygotes or of Kit-specific microRNAs induced a heritable white tail phenotype. Our results identify an unexpected mode of epigenetic inheritance associated with the zygotic transfer of RNA molecules.
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
220,50 €
only 4,32 € per issue
All prices include VAT for France.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
from$8.99
All prices are NET prices.
References
- 1.
Brink, R. A. A genetic change associated with the R locus in maize which is directed and potentially reversible. Genetics 41, 872–879 (1956)
- 2.
Chandler, V. L. & Stam, M. Chromatin conversations: mechanisms and implications of paramutation. Nature Rev. Genet. 5, 532–544 (2004)
- 3.
Rassoulzadegan, M., Magliano, M. & Cuzin, F. Transvection effects involving DNA methylation during meiosis in the mouse. EMBO J. 21, 4404–4450 (2002)
- 4.
Herman, H. et al. Trans allele methylation and paramutation-like effects in mice. Nature Genet. 34, 199–202 (2003)
- 5.
Bernex, F. et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of c-kit-expressing cells in WlacZ/+ and WlacZ/WlacZ mouse embryos. Development 122, 3023–3033 (1996)
- 6.
Yasuda, H., Galli, S. J. & Geissler, E. N. Cloning and functional analysis of the mouse c-kit promoter. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 191, 893–901 (1993)
- 7.
Olek, A., Oswald, J. & Walter, J. A modified and improved method for bisulphite based cytosine methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 5064–5066 (1996)
- 8.
Lachner, M. & Jenuwein, T. The many faces of histone lysine methylation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 286–298 (2002)
- 9.
Kluppel, M., Nagle, D. L., Bucan, M. & Bernstein, A. Long-range genomic rearrangements upstream of Kit dysregulate the developmental pattern of Kit expression in W57 and Wbanded mice and interfere with distinct steps in melanocyte development. Development 124, 65–77 (1997)
- 10.
Manova, K., Nocka, K., Besmer, P. & Bachvarova, R. F. Gonadal expression of c-kit encoded at the W locus of the mouse. Development 110, 1057–1069 (1990)
- 11.
Motro, B., van der Kooy, D., Rossant, J., Reith, A. & Bernstein, A. Contiguous patterns of c-kit and steel expression: analysis of mutations at the W and Sl loci. Development 113, 1207–1221 (1991)
- 12.
Sorrentino, V., Giorgi, M., Geremia, R., Besmer, P. & Rossi, P. Expression of the c-kit proto-oncogene in the murine male germ cells. Oncogene 6, 149–151 (1991)
- 13.
Vincent, S. et al. Stage-specific expression of the Kit receptor and its ligand (KL) during male gametogenesis in the mouse: a Kit–KL interaction critical for meiosis. Development 125, 4585–4593 (1998)
- 14.
Albanesi, C. et al. A cell- and developmental stage-specific promoter drives the expression of a truncated c-kit protein during mouse spermatid elongation. Development 122, 1291–1302 (1996)
- 15.
Turner, J. M. et al. Silencing of unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes in the mouse. Nature Genet. 37, 41–47 (2005)
- 16.
Krawetz, S. A. Paternal contribution: new insights and future challenges. Nature Rev. Genet. 6, 633–642 (2005)
- 17.
Darzynkiewicz, Z. Differential staining of DNA and RNA in intact cells and isolated cell nuclei with acridine orange. Methods Cell Biol. 33, 285–298 (1990)
- 18.
Bernhard, W. A new staining procedure for electron microscopical cytology. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 27, 250–265 (1969)
- 19.
Biggiogera, M. & Fakan, S. Fine structural specific visualization of RNA on ultrathin sections. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 46, 389–395 (1998)
- 20.
Bernstein, E. & Allis, C. D. RNA meets chromatin. Genes Dev. 19, 1635–1655 (2005)
- 21.
Hogan, B., Beddington, R., Costantini, F. & Lacy, L. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual 2nd edn (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1994)
- 22.
Lewis, B. P., Shih, I. H., Jones-Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, D. P. & Burge, C. B. Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets. Cell 115, 787–798 (2003)
- 23.
Shiu, P. K., Raju, N. B., Zickler, D. & Metzenberg, R. L. Meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA. Cell 107, 905–916 (2001)
- 24.
Nocka, K. et al. Molecular bases of dominant negative and loss of function mutations at the murine c-kit/white spotting locus: W37, Wv, W41 and W. EMBO J. 9, 1805–1813 (1990)
- 25.
Fire, A. et al. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391, 806–811 (1998)
- 26.
Lolle, S. J., Victor, J. L., Young, J. M. & Pruitt, R. E. Genome-wide non-mendelian inheritance of extra-genomic information in Arabidopsis. Nature 434, 505–509 (2005)
- 27.
Sambrook, J. & Russell, D. W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 2001)
- 28.
Sage, J. et al. Temporal and spatial control of the Sycp1 gene transcription in the mouse meiosis: regulatory elements active in the male are not sufficient for expression in the female gonad. Mech. Dev. 80, 29–39 (1999)
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to K. Thyagarajan for her participation in experimental work, J. J. Panthier for the gift of Kittm1Alf/+ mice and for helpful discussions, and K. B. Marcu and A. Schedl for help in preparing the manuscript. We thank M. Aupetit, Y. Fantei-Caujolle, J. P. Laugier, S. Pagnotta and K. Rassoulzadegan for expert technical assistance. This work was made possible by a grant to M.R. as ‘Equipe Labellisée’ of the ‘Ligue Nationale Française Contre le Cancer’.
Author information
Author notes
- Stéphane Vincent
†Present address: Unité de Génétique Moléculaire du Développement, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris Cedex, France
Affiliations
Inserm, U636, F-06108 Nice, France
- Minoo Rassoulzadegan
- , Valérie Grandjean
- , Stéphane Vincent
- , Isabelle Gillot
- & François Cuzin
Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Laboratoire de Génétique du Développement Normal et Pathologique, F-06108 Nice, France
- Minoo Rassoulzadegan
- , Valérie Grandjean
- , Stéphane Vincent
- , Isabelle Gillot
- & François Cuzin
Centre Commun de Microscopie Appliquée, Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, F-06108 Nice, France
- Pierre Gounon
Authors
Search for Minoo Rassoulzadegan in:
Search for Valérie Grandjean in:
Search for Pierre Gounon in:
Search for Stéphane Vincent in:
Search for Isabelle Gillot in:
Search for François Cuzin in:
Competing interests
Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Minoo Rassoulzadegan.
Supplementary information
Word documents
- 1.
Supplementary Table 1
Paternal and maternal transmission of paramutated alleles in 129/Sv and C57BL/6 genetic backgrounds.
- 2.
Supplementary Table 2
Inheritance of the white-spotted phenotype induced by RNA microinjection.
- 3.
Supplementary Figure Legends
Text to accompany the Supplementary Figures
- 4.
Supplementary Methods
Oligonucleotide primers and miR sequences. Transcription run-on assay.
PDF files
- 1.
Supplementary Figure 1
Inheritance of the white tail phenotype in crosses between Kit tm1Alf / + heterozygotes and paramutated homozygotes.
- 2.
Supplementary Figure 2
Altered regulation of Kit transcription in the male germ cells of Kit tm1Alf / + heterozygotes.
Rights and permissions
To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.
About this article
Further reading
-
1.
Exploring the extent and scope of epigenetic inheritance
Nature Reviews Endocrinology (2018)
-
2.
Paramutation-like features of multiple natural epialleles in tomato
BMC Genomics (2018)
-
3.
Fetale Programmierung – von der Epidemiologie zur Epigenetik
Journal für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie/Österreich (2018)
-
4.
Epigenetic paternal effects as costly, condition-dependent traits
Heredity (2018)
-
5.
A guide to designing germline-dependent epigenetic inheritance experiments in mammals
Nature Methods (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.