Solid-state electrolytes are attracting increasing interest for electrochemical energy storage technologies. In this Review, we provide a background overview and discuss the state of the art, ion-transport mechanisms and fundamental properties of solid-state electrolyte materials of interest for energy storage applications. We focus on recent advances in various classes of battery chemistries and systems that are enabled by solid electrolytes, including all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries and emerging solid-electrolyte lithium batteries that feature cathodes with liquid or gaseous active materials (for example, lithium–air, lithium–sulfur and lithium–bromine systems). A low-cost, safe, aqueous electrochemical energy storage concept with a ‘mediator-ion’ solid electrolyte is also discussed. Advanced battery systems based on solid electrolytes would revitalize the rechargeable battery field because of their safety, excellent stability, long cycle lives and low cost. However, great effort will be needed to implement solid-electrolyte batteries as viable energy storage systems. In this context, we discuss the main issues that must be addressed, such as achieving acceptable ionic conductivity, electrochemical stability and mechanical properties of the solid electrolytes, as well as a compatible electrolyte/electrode interface.
Batteries are crucial for a wide range of applications, including consumer electronics, automotive propulsion and stationary load-levelling for electricity generated from intermittent renewable sources, such as wind or solar energy1,
During the past 200 years, most battery research has focused on systems with liquid electrolytes2. Although liquid electrolytes offer the benefits of high conductivity and excellent wetting of electrode surfaces, they often suffer from inadequate electrochemical and thermal stabilities, low ion selectivity and poor safety4. Replacement of liquid electrolytes with a solid-electrolyte separator will not only overcome the persistent problems of liquid electrolytes, but also offer possibilities for developing new battery chemistries5,6. Owing to these benefits, a rapidly increasing trend of using solid electrolytes in battery research has emerged. With the number of studies growing rapidly, the scientific and technological challenges faced by these systems are now being recognized7,8. In consideration of the new developments and challenges, which are different from those encountered with liquid electrolytes, it is timely to provide the scientific community with a critical assessment of the current status and a bold vision for solid electrolytes and the new battery chemistries that could be enabled by them9,
The history of solid-state ionic conductors dates back to as early as the 1830s, when Faraday discovered the remarkable property of conduction in heated solid Ag2S and PbF2 (Ref. 13). However, the 1960s are generally considered the turning point for high-conductivity solid-state electrolytes and the starting point for the term ‘solid-state ionics’ (see Fig. 1 for a timeline of developments)14. Efforts to incorporate solid-state electrolytes into batteries can be traced to the 1960s, when a fast 2D sodium-ion-transport phenomenon was discovered in β-alumina (Na2O·11Al2O3), which was subsequently used in the development of high-temperature sodium–sulfur batteries15,16. After three successful demonstrations of energy storage with Ag3SI, β-alumina and RbAg4I5 solid-state ionic conductive materials in the 1960s and early 1970s17,
In the 1980s, sodium-ion-conductive β-alumina was used in another type of high-temperature battery system, the ZEBRA cell, in South Africa22,23. So far, the high-temperature sodium–sulfur battery has been commercialized in Japan24, whereas the ZEBRA battery is currently being developed by the General Electric Corporation in the United States25. Since 1980, the term solid-state ionics has received wide use, and a journal with the same name was launched in that year. From that time, both inorganic and organic (that is, polymer) solid-state electrolytes have received increasing attention. Along with the development of materials and theories, solid-state electrolytes have gradually been incorporated as essential components into a wide range of electrochemical devices, such as sensors, supercapacitors, fuel cells and batteries26,
Incorporation of solid-state electrolytes into ambient-temperature batteries was originally motivated by concerns over the safety of lithium-ion batteries. With ﬂammable organic electrolytes, overcharging or short-circuiting of a lithium-based cell is a ﬁre hazard and can lead to an explosion31; cases of lithium-ion battery explosions have been reported throughout the world. The solid-state electrolytes used in lithium-ion batteries belong mainly to two classes of material: lithium-ion-conductive polymers and inorganic lithium-ion-conductive ceramics. Attempts to use solid-state polymer electrolytes in lithium-based batteries began in the 1980s after the discovery of lithium-ion conduction in a PEO-based system21,32,
Since the 2000s, solid electrolytes have been used in emerging lithium batteries with gaseous or liquid cathodes, such as lithium–air batteries50,51, lithium–sulfur batteries52,53 and lithium–bromine batteries54,55. Solid-electrolyte sodium-ion batteries that operate at ambient temperatures have also been demonstrated56. Most recently, a unique ‘mediator-ion’ battery concept has been proposed, in which solid electrolytes are used for the development of high-energy, low-cost, aqueous electrochemical energy storage systems57,
In the following sections, we provide a succinct introduction to solid-state electrolytes and discuss both their ion-transport mechanisms and fundamental properties in the context of electrochemical energy storage applications. We then focus on recent advances in a range of battery chemistries and technologies that have been enabled by solid-state electrolytes, including all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries; emerging lithium–air, lithium–sulfur and lithium–bromine batteries with solid-state electrolytes; and a new aqueous battery concept enabled by a mediator-ion solid electrolyte. Finally, the challenges and future prospects for solid-electrolyte battery chemistries and technologies are outlined.
Mechanism of ionic transport in solids
In crystalline solid materials, ionic transport generally relies on the concentration and distribution of defects. Ion diffusion mechanisms based on Schottky and Frenkel point defects include the simple vacancy mechanism and relatively complicated diffusion mechanisms, such as the divacancy mechanism, interstitial mechanism, interstitial–substitutional exchange mechanism and the collective mechanism60,
Similar to the diffusion process in a crystal structure, ionic transport in glassy materials starts with ions at local sites being excited to neighbouring sites and then collectively diffusing on a macroscopic scale65. For most glassy materials, short- and medium-range order still exists in the amorphous structure. The interaction between charge carriers and the structural skeleton cannot be neglected66.
In polymer electrolytes, microscopic ion transport is related to the segmental motion of polymer chains above the glass transition temperature67. The segmental motion of the chains can create free volumes for the hopping of lithium ions that coordinate with the polar groups. A lithium ion can hop from one coordinating site to another coordinating site, accompanying the segmental motion of polymer chains67,
State-of-the-art solid electrolytes
Ionic conductivity is a key property for solid electrolytes. However, for practical application in electrochemical energy storage and conversion systems, other properties are also important. The main properties required for solid-state electrolytes are: high ionic conductivity, low ionic area-specific resistance, high electronic area-specific resistance, high ionic selectivity, a wide electrochemical stability window, good chemical compatibility with other components, excellent thermal stability, excellent mechanical properties, simple fabrication processes, low cost, easy device integration and environmental friendliness4,8,70,
Inorganic solid electrolytes
The main inorganic solid electrolytes that are being explored for solid-state batteries are perovskite-type, NASICON-type, garnet-type and sulfide-type materials. The representative perovskite solid electrolyte is Li3xLa2/3 − xTiO3, which exhibits a lithium-ion conductivity exceeding 10−3 S cm−1 at room temperature42. Although this material created much interest among researchers, it has been deemed unsuitable in lithium batteries because of the reduction of Ti4+ on contact with lithium metal.
NASICON-type compounds were first studied in the 1960s73 and were termed ‘NASICON’ in 1976 after the development of Na1 + xZr2SixP3 − xO12 (Ref. 43). These materials generally have an AM2(PO4)3 formula with the A site occupied by Li, Na or K. The M site is usually occupied by Ge, Zr or Ti (Ref. 74). In particular, the LiTi2(PO4)3 system has been widely investigated. The ionic conductivity of LiZr2(PO4)3 is very low, but can be improved by the substitution of Hf or Sn (Refs 75,76). This can be further enhanced with substitution to form Li1 + xMxTi2 − x(PO4)3 (M = Al, Cr, Ga, Fe, Sc, In, Lu, Y or La), with Al substitution having been demonstrated to be the most effective77,
Garnet-type materials have the general formula A3B2Si3O12, in which the A and B cations have eightfold and sixfold coordination, respectively. Since it was first discovered in 1969 (Li3M2Ln3O12 (M = W or Te)46, a series of garnet-type materials has been developed, the representative systems being Li5La3M2O12 (M = Nb or Ta), Li6ALa2M2O12 (A = Ca, Sr or Ba; M = Nb or Ta), Li5.5La3M1.75B0.25O12 (M = Nb or Ta; B = In or Zr) and the cubic systems Li7La3Zr2O12 and Li7.06M3Y0.06Zr1.94O12 (M = La, Nb or Ta)84,
Research into sulfide-type solid electrolytes started in 1986 with the Li2S–SiS2 system48,49. Since then, Li2S–SiS2-type electrolytes have been extensively studied90,
Polymer and composite solid electrolytes
The development of polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries can be divided into three classes: dry solid polymer electrolytes, gel polymer electrolytes and composite polymer electrolytes. However, as gel polymers are not in the solid state, they will not be discussed here. In dry solid polymer electrolytes, the polymer host together with a lithium salt act as a solid solvent (without any liquid)101,
Thin-film solid electrolytes
Some solid electrolyte materials can be fabricated as ultrathin films through special vapour deposition techniques, such as pulsed laser deposition, radio frequency sputtering and chemical vapour deposition. Thin-film solid electrolytes were first developed in the 1980s with Li12Si3P2O20, Li4P2S7 and Li3PO4–P2S5 used as starting materials119,
Batteries with solid electrolytes
All-solid-state lithium-ion batteries, which offer higher energy densities than the traditional batteries, are considered as one of the most important next-generation technologies for energy storage. The solid electrolyte not only sustains lithium-ion conduction but also acts as the battery separator (Fig. 3a). Cathode materials used in all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries are similar to those in the traditional lithium-ion batteries (for example, lithium transition metal oxides136,
One of the most important problems that urgently needs to be overcome is how to enhance the ionic conductivity at the interface of the electrode and the solid electrolyte. However, investigations focusing on lithium-ion migration and diffusion behaviour across the interface, as well as the mechanical and structural stability of the solid-electrolyte interphase in inorganic all-solid-state batteries are still limited. Therefore, submolecular-scale and atomic-level understanding of the interface is essential. Another important factor that affects the ionic interface is the mechanical properties of the solid electrolyte151. During the cycling of the batteries (charging and discharging), the active electrodes generally experience structural fragmentation, resulting in capacity fade152. A solid electrolyte with a low elastic modulus is always preferred, because this reduces the extent of fragmentation of the electrode materials. For battery assembly, fabrication and manufacturing, the interfacial contact between the active electrode and the solid electrolyte can be an extremely important factor for the overall battery performance. In general, the malleability and the ductility of both the solid electrolyte and the electrodes can have a pronounced influence on the contact condition at the electrode/electrolyte interface. Taking the LiPON solid electrolyte as an example, lithium-ion transport is usually hampered by the interface, and the high elastic modulus and hardness of LiPON resists the incursion of lithium dendrites153. Therefore, for the lithium-metal/electrolyte interface, the solid electrolyte should, in principle, be hard enough to resist lithium metal dendrites. In a practical sense, a complex solid-electrolyte interphase forms on the metal surface, which may also affect the ionic conduction properties of the anode/electrolyte interface. Therefore, suitable approaches to anode (for example, lithium) protection are required to enhance the overall cell performance of all-solid-state batteries154.
Polymer-based all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries have the advantages of easy fabrication, high levels of safety and a flexible shape155 (Fig. 3b). The disadvantages of polymer batteries are the instability of the electrode/electrolyte interface, the narrow operating temperatures of the polymer electrolytes and their weak mechanical stability156,157. A PEO electrolyte is still the best option owing to its high ionic conductivity and good stability in the presence of lithium metal. However, cathode materials with a high energy density, such as LiCoO2 and LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4, cannot be used with PEO-based batteries because of the low electrochemical stability of the PEO electrolyte. Therefore, LiFePO4 cathodes are generally used with PEO. The combination of a polymer electrolyte and an inorganic solid electrolyte can offer strategies to improve the performance of all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. For example, a polymer/inorganic/polymer sandwich electrolyte architecture can modify the double-layer electrical field at the electrode/polymer interface and block anion transport, leading to an improvement in the Coulombic efficiency of the battery158. Thin-film batteries based on the LiPON solid electrolyte have achieved over 10,000 cycles with a lithium-metal anode and a 4.8 V LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 cathode, thus demonstrating the advantages of using a solid electrolyte159. However, the capacities of thin-film batteries are very low, ranging from 0.1 μA h to 10 mA h, and do not meet the requirements of most applications.
The primary goal for the further development of all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries is to achieve, at an affordable cost, both higher cycling and safety performance in comparison to traditional lithium-ion batteries, while maintaining similar or higher power and energy densities. However, achieving these goals is a daunting challenge. To overcome the key problem of how to fabricate a favourable solid/solid interface between the solid electrode and the solid electrolyte, three aspects need to be considered: the wetting properties of the solid materials, the solid/solid interfacial stability and the transport speed of ions across the interface. The contact area between the electrode and the electrolyte greatly affects the interfacial resistance. For most electrode materials, a volume change cannot be avoided during cycling, and this results in strain and stress in the electrode layer that may change the structure of the electrode/electrolyte interface and weaken the connection between them. To eliminate or alleviate the interfacial strain and stress, a deeper understanding and proper management of the electrode/electrolyte interface behaviour are of importance. Understanding the strain and stress behaviour within the electrode would also be instructive for managing the electrode/electrolyte interface. Some attention has recently been devoted to the investigation of the strain in olivine-type cathode materials (that is, LiFePO4)160,
Solid electrolytes with liquid or gaseous electrodes
Lithium–air batteries. Lithium–air batteries, which are based on the high intrinsic capacity of both the lithium anode and the air cathode together with the high operating voltage of the lithium–oxygen electrochemical couple, can yield an exceptionally high theoretical energy density of ∼11,680 Wh kg−1 (which almost rivals that of petrol (gasoline) at 13,000 Wh kg−1). The first report of a rechargeable lithium–oxygen battery was in 1987 and described a configuration similar to that of a solid-oxide fuel cell163. In the subsequent decade, there was little activity in this area. The demonstration in 1996 of a new type of rechargeable lithium–air battery with an aprotic electrolyte164 led to a resurgence of research into this battery system165,
To address the above issues, both all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries (based on inorganic electrolytes)173 and a lithium–air battery concept with a ‘dual-electrolyte’ (termed a hybrid lithium–air battery) were proposed. In the hybrid batteries, an organic electrolyte is used at the anode side (anolyte) and an aqueous electrolyte at the cathode side (catholyte), with the two electrolytes separated by a solid-state electrolyte membrane50,51,174,175 (Fig. 4a). Both polymer-based (for example, PEO) and inorganic-oxide-based (for example, Li1 + x + yAlxTi2 − xP3 − ySiyO12 (LATP)) solid electrolytes have been tested as separators in these dual-electrolyte lithium–air batteries176,
In neutral and basic electrolyte lithium–air cells, unavoidable problems are caused largely by the formation of LiOH at the cathode. Because of the low solubility of LiOH, the over-saturated LiOH solid can clog the gas diffusion pores of the air cathode and the lithium-ion channels on the surface of the solid electrolyte (for example, LATP) membrane. In addition, CO2 from air can react with LiOH to form Li2CO3 and deactivate the alkaline catholyte188. With an acidic catholyte, these problems can be overcome177,181,184,185. However, weak acids (for example, CH3COOH, H3PO4 or LiH2PO4) must be used because strong acids (for example, HCl, HNO3 or H2SO4) make the solid electrolyte membrane vulnerable to corrosion175,177,181,184,185,189. As discharge progresses, the acidity of the catholyte becomes weaker, which is beneficial for minimizing corrosion of the solid electrolyte.
The cathode reactions of cells with neutral, basic and acidic catholytes are summarized in Fig. 4b. The theoretical oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) potentials (Fig. 4b) of neutral or basic catholytes (for alkaline-cathode lithium–air batteries) or acidic catholytes (for acidic-cathode lithium–air batteries) are 0.40 and 1.23 V, respectively. Acidic catholytes have three main advantages over alkaline catholytes for operating dual-electrolyte lithium–air batteries: they avoid the problems associated with solid LiOH, avoid CO2 contamination and enhance the cell voltage.
Traditionally, in a lithium–air battery, a bifunctional air electrode serves as both the ORR and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalyst. Such a cell design has the persistent problem of carbon corrosion during the high-voltage OER process, limiting the cycle life of hybrid lithium–air batteries. To overcome carbon corrosion during the OER, a concept in which the ORR and OER electrodes are decoupled was proposed and has been applied recently to hybrid lithium–air batteries. A second electrode consisting of a catalyst directly supported on a metal mesh (for example, nickel, stainless steel or titanium) served as the OER electrode and was independent of the ORR electrode (Fig. 4c). This decoupled design greatly enhanced the cycle life of hybrid lithium–air batteries177,182.
Lithium–sulfur batteries. Rechargeable battery systems based on non-aqueous lithium–sulfur chemistry have received overwhelming attention in the past few years. With an anode capacity of ∼3,800 mA g−1 and a cathode capacity of ∼1,675 mA g−1, the lithium–sulfur battery system can theoretically yield a high energy density of ∼2,600 Wh kg−1 (on the basis of the active lithium anode and sulfur cathode) with an operating voltage of ∼2.0 V (Refs 190,
Great effort has been expended to address the issue of the polysulfide shuttle through the encapsulation of the polysulfide species in the cathode200,
Progress made with lithium-ion batteries using inorganic lithium-ion-conductive solid electrolytes has also shed light on lithium–sulfur batteries. Solid electrolytes not only provide the possibility of preventing polysulfide diffusion, but are also able to block dendrite growth at the lithium-metal anode. Research on solid electrolyte lithium–sulfur batteries has undergone two main phases. The first phase involved integrating the solid electrolyte into lithium–sulfur cells according to an ‘all-solid-state’ development principle94,210,211 (Fig. 5a). However, the reported cell-performance data were unsatisfactory, especially in terms of rate capability, sulfur-cathode utilization and cyclability212,
In the second, recent phase of development, a dual-electrolyte (or hybrid-electrolyte) approach was proposed to address the problems outlined above52,53,215 (Fig. 5b). In the dual-electrolyte lithium–sulfur battery system, the lithium-ion-conductive solid-state electrolyte acts as: a separator to insulate the lithium-metal anode and the sulfur cathode; a lithium-ion conductor to sustain an ionic path for the electrochemical reactions at the two electrodes; and a shield to prevent polysulfide migration. The liquid electrolyte in the cathode not only provides an ionic medium for the sulfur–polysulfide–sulfide redox reactions within the cathode, but also maintains a facile lithium-ion path at the cathode/solid-electrolyte interface.
As previously discussed, in a solid-electrolyte battery system there has always been the technical challenge of building a facile lithium-ion path at the electrolyte/electrode interface. This problem is prevalent in solid-electrolyte lithium–sulfur batteries, together with the difficulty of maintaining ideal surface contact between the lithium-metal anode and the solid electrolyte membrane. Initial approaches (such as the addition of a liquid-electrolyte buffer at the lithium/solid-electrolyte interface or mechanically pressing the lithium metal to the solid electrolyte) were not able to provide a satisfactory solution. An interlayer approach was then proposed, in which a liquid-electrolyte-soaked polymer is inserted between the lithium and solid electrolytes (Fig. 5c). This approach solved the interfacial problem and ensured cyclability53,216.
Hybrid-electrolyte lithium–sulfur batteries were initially demonstrated with a commercially available NASICON-type Li1 + xAlxTi2 − x(PO4)3 (LATP) solid electrolyte52,53. However, both electrochemical and chemical incompatibilities affect lithium–sulfur batteries owing to the easy reduction of Ti4+ (∼2.4 V versus Li+/Li) in LATP. The Ti4+ in the LATP material can be either chemically reduced to Ti3+ by the polysulfide species or electrochemically reduced during the discharge of the lithium–sulfur battery (because the discharge voltage of lithium–sulfur cells is lower than the reduction potential of LATP, as illustrated in Fig. 5d). A recent study that involved the replacement of titanium by germanium suggests that this replacement could eliminate the compatibility issue; however, the cycling performances of the lithium–sulfur batteries with the Li1 + xAlxGe2 − x(PO4)3 (LAGP) solid electrolyte are still not satisfactory217. In addition, the high cost of germanium is also problematic for its practical application. Most recently, an alternative NASICON-type solid electrolyte, Li1 + xYxZr2 − x(PO4)3 (LYZP), has been explored as a solid-electrolyte/separator in lithium–sulfur batteries. Although the lithium-ion conductivity of LYZP (∼3 × 10−5 S cm−1) is lower than that of LATP, LYZP shows both favourable chemical and electrochemical compatibility with the cell components under the operating conditions of lithium–sulfur batteries. Integration of the LYZP solid electrolyte also greatly enhances cyclability216.
Lithium–bromine batteries. The high gravimetric energy density of bromine as a liquid cathode has led to the exploration of lithium–bromine batteries218. A few different types of rechargeable lithium–bromine batteries have been reported218,
The positive bromine electrode usually provides fast redox kinetics and relatively good stability218,
Batteries with mediator-ion solid electrolytes
From practical and economic points of view of electrochemical energy storage technologies, aqueous battery systems generally offer an overall advantage over non-aqueous battery systems in terms of system maintenance, operation security, cost of the cell components and reliability. Among the aqueous batteries already developed (for example, zinc–manganese dioxide, nickel-metal hydride and nickel–cadmium batteries) or under development (for example, nickel–iron223, zinc–silver oxide224, zinc–nickel oxide225, zinc–ferrate226 and zinc–periodate227 batteries), the anode and cathode are usually separated with a porous separator. An aqueous liquid electrolyte shuttling through the porous separator provides the ionic path to sustain the anode and cathode redox reactions. Under this cell operation principle, the electrodes (either the anode or cathode) of a cell must be in the solid phase and insoluble in the aqueous electrolyte to ensure that they do not migrate through the porous separator. In addition, the development of traditional porous-separator batteries is limited by two persistent issues: during charge–discharge of a cell, any soluble intermediate products formed could induce chemical crossover between the anode and the cathode; and for a metal-based anode, dendrite formation results in a short circuit of the cell.
In terms of materials cost and electrochemical energy conversion, many Earth-abundant or easily synthesized materials, either in the liquid or gas phase, show promise as active electrodes for the development of high-energy-density, low-cost and safe aqueous batteries. Unfortunately, with a conventional porous polymer separator, the cells suffer from the chemical crossover of liquid or gaseous electrode materials between the two electrodes, resulting in self-discharge and poor efficiency. These issues can be circumvented by using solid-electrolyte separators; however, at present, ambient-temperature solid electrolytes are limited to lithium- and sodium-ion-conductive materials, which are used predominantly in non-aqueous lithium-based or sodium-based batteries. Divalent-ion-based or trivalent-ion-based anode chemistries (for example, iron, zinc and aluminium) can be applied to the aqueous battery systems, but solid-state electrolytes capable of transporting divalent or trivalent ions are practically unavailable because of the higher charge and heavier mass of the ions228,229. Thus, it seems impossible to develop totally aqueous batteries (with an aqueous electrolyte for both the anode and the cathode) with the currently available alkali-metal-ion-conductive solid electrolytes.
During the past few years, lithium-ion-conductive solid electrolytes have been integrated into hybrid electrolyte batteries (with a non-aqueous anode electrolyte and an aqueous cathode electrolyte)57,
This battery concept has been demonstrated with two low-cost metal anodes (zinc and iron), two liquid-phase cathodes (bromine and potassium ferricyanide), one gas-phase cathode (air or oxygen), a sodium-ion solid electrolyte (Na3.4Sc2(PO4)2.6(SiO4)0.4) and a lithium-ion solid electrolyte (Li1 + x + yAlxTi2 − xP3 − ySiyO12 (LATP)). These new battery systems are shown in Fig. 7, with the charge–discharge mechanisms illustrated for the Zn(LiOH) || lithium–sulfur solid electrolyte || Br2(LiBr) system in Fig. 7b. The lithium-ion solid electrolyte in this zinc–bromine cell provides an ionic channel for mediator-ion (Li+) transport rather than acting as a Zn2+-ion-conductive medium. The lithium mediator ion balances the charge between the anode and the cathode rather than being directly involved in the electrode reactions during charge and discharge. During the discharge process, the zinc-metal anode is first oxidized to zinc ions (Zn2+), which subsequently integrate with the negatively charged hydroxide ions (OH−) to produce zincate ions [Zn(OH)4]2−. In an alkaline solution, soluble [Zn(OH)4]2− ions dissociate to form zinc oxide (ZnO, an insoluble solid) and water. At the cathode, the reduction of liquid bromine forms negatively charged bromide ions. To balance the ionic charge between the anolyte and catholyte, the lithium ions in the anolyte migrate through the lithium solid electrolyte from the anode to the cathode. During the charge process, the zincate ions are first reduced into zinc metal and hydroxide at the anode. Metallic zinc is then deposited onto the anode current collector. The hydroxide ions combine with lithium ions to form soluble LiOH in the anolyte. The bromide ions are subsequently oxidized to molecular bromine at the cathode. To sustain the ionic charge balance, lithium ions are transported in the opposite direction, from the cathode to the anode through the lithium solid electrolyte. The charge–discharge mechanism of the other battery systems (Fig. 7c,d) is similar to the system described above. The mediator ion (Li+ or Na+) migrates through the solid electrolyte without involving the redox reactions at either side of the cell and balances the ionic charge between the anolyte and catholyte. The anolytes and catholytes should be strategically prepared using soluble salts that comprise the mediator ion in the corresponding solid electrolyte.
The mediator-ion strategy with a solid-state electrolyte provides a battery-development platform that is applicable to a broad range of redox couples with various cathode and anode materials. In the long term, the mediator-ion battery concept is promising for the development of low-cost, safe and high-energy-density aqueous electrochemical energy storage systems. In addition to the commonly used zinc and iron, other metals (such as aluminium) or inorganic or organic compounds are also promising anode materials. In terms of candidate cathode materials, the list is much longer than for the anode. This list includes both inorganic and organic compounds, such as hydrogen peroxide, bromate salts, permanganate salts, nickel oxide, dichromate salts, iodate salts, polysulfides, sulfur, manganese oxide, hypochlorites, perchlorate salts, chlorate salts, nitrate salts, bismuthate salts and chromate salts.
We have described various battery chemistries operated with solid-state electrolytes, including all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries, lithium–air, lithium–sulfur and lithium–bromine batteries, as well as aqueous batteries enabled with a solid electrolyte. Performance metrics (that is, energy density, power density, life cycle and other relevant parameters) of these battery systems at the current development stage are summarized in Table 2.
Conclusions and future perspectives
At present, the high-temperature sodium–sulfur battery system is the only viable energy storage technology that uses a solid electrolyte. All-solid-state lithium-ion batteries have been pursued for many years and offer several important advantages over commercial lithium-ion batteries with liquid organic electrolytes (including improved safety, higher energy densities and wider operating temperatures). The improved reliability of all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries makes them appealing for large-scale applications. However, for all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries with inorganic solid-state electrolytes, key challenges remain, such as the volume change in the electrodes, interfacial charge-transfer resistance, flexibility concerns and poor cycling stability. Solid polymer electrolytes overcome some of the limitations of the inorganic solid-state electrolytes (that is, they have good shape flexibility and contact with the electrodes), but they have narrow electrochemical stability windows and low ionic conductivity (at room temperature), which currently impede the development of polymer-based all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries.
In contrast to the all-solid-state strategy, batteries based on a solid electrolyte and liquid electrodes can avoid the issue of high charge-transfer resistance. This not only allows large-scale battery systems to be produced but also enables new battery chemistries that were previously impossible because of chemical crossover between the two electrodes through conventional polymeric separators soaked with liquid electrolytes. With the ability to prevent lithium-dendrite formation and to completely separate the liquixd or gaseous reactants, inorganic solid lithium-ion conductive membranes offer the possibility of developing lithium-based batteries with a wide range of cathodes through a dual-electrolyte strategy. Lithium–air and lithium–bromine batteries have been successfully demonstrated with an organic anolyte and an aqueous catholyte separated by a NASICON-type solid electrolyte. The NASICON-type solid electrolyte also enables lithium–sulfur batteries that do not experience the polysulfide shuttle. Solid electrolytes also enable aqueous batteries with liquid or gaseous reactants through a mediator-ion operating principle, using a lithium- or a sodium-ion solid electrolyte, zinc or iron anode and a range of active cathode materials. Through appropriate management of the anolyte, catholyte and solid electrolyte, a wide range of redox couples with various cathodes and anodes (either in the solid, liquid or gaseous phase) could be used for the development of low-cost and safe aqueous energy storage systems without the concerns of chemical crossover and metal-dendrite formation.
Although batteries based on solid electrolytes offer great possibilities for application in electric vehicles and grid energy storage, there is a long way to go before practical implementation at the industrial level. Transferring these systems from research laboratories to commercialized products requires intensive, systematic and integrated research efforts into multiple interlocking avenues: electrodes, solid-state electrolytes, the electrode/electrolyte interface and the cell configuration design.
Achieving solid electrolyte materials (either inorganic, polymer or composite) with high conductivity, good electrochemical stability and acceptable mechanical properties requires an integrated, in-depth approach between experiments and computational modelling, along with advanced state-of-the-art characterization techniques to understand the intricacies of the ion-transport mechanisms. In addition, steps need to be taken to keep the cost of production low for large-scale solid electrolyte membranes with acceptable mechanical properties.
Overcoming the charge-transfer resistance barrier at the solid/solid interface between the electrodes and electrolyte is a huge challenge. Solid electrolytes with a soft surface structure — either intrinsically present in the material or extrinsically generated with the incorporation of appropriate groups to the surface — could help to minimize this challenge. For example, a thin layer of either an ionically conductive or electronically conductive elastic material deposited on the surface of either the electrode or the solid electrolyte would help to enhance the ionic electrode/electrolyte interface. Insertion of an ionically conductive elastic interlayer between the electrode and the solid electrolyte would be another effective approach. Furthermore, it would be useful to introduce a liquid electrolyte integrated interlayer between the electrode and the solid electrolyte. In addition, a deeper understanding of the strain and stress behaviour within the electrode would be instructive for management of the electrode/electrolyte interface. Again, the production costs need to be kept low with such approaches in order for these systems to be competitive with existing energy storage technologies.
Batteries with a solid electrolyte and a liquid or gaseous electrode (for example, lithium–air, lithium–polysulfide and lithium–bromine) overcome the problem of interfacial charge transfer, but a few aspects need to be addressed in a cost-effective manner for them to become viable. First, it is necessary to develop solid electrolytes that are chemically and electrochemically compatible when in contact with both the anode and the cathode (for example, lithium, sodium, polysulfide, bromine and highly acidic or basic environments). Second, a robust cell structure design and reliable sealing techniques are required for inorganic (ceramic) solid electrolytes to provide a hermetic environment during long-term operation. These requirements also apply to the mediator-ion solid-electrolyte strategy with low-cost, safer anodes, such as zinc or iron, and a choice of many liquid or gaseous cathodes.
Overall, the information available at present is encouraging for batteries based on solid electrolytes. Realization of solid electrolytes with the necessary parameters would enable new battery chemistries and affordable, advanced battery systems that would revolutionize the rechargeable battery field, providing good levels of safety, high energy density, and long static and dynamic stabilities with no self-discharge and long cycle lives.
This work was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Science and Engineering under award number DE-SC0005397.