Passive anti-icing surfaces, or icephobic surfaces, are an area of great interest because of their significant economic, energy and safety implications in the prevention and easy removal of ice in many facets of society. The complex nature of icephobicity, which requires performance in a broad range of icing scenarios, creates many challenges when designing ice-repellent surfaces. Although superhydrophobic surfaces incorporating micro- or nanoscale roughness have been shown to prevent ice accumulation under certain conditions, the same roughness can be detrimental in other environments. Surfaces that present a smooth liquid interface can eliminate some of the drawbacks of textured superhydrophobic surfaces, but additional study is needed to fully realize their potential. As attention begins to shift towards alternative anti-icing strategies, it is important to consider and to understand the nature of ice repellency in all environments to identify the limitations of current solutions and to design new materials with robust icephobicity.
The ability to design materials that can withstand environmental challenges has been important for survival throughout human history. Critical issues, such as crop spoilage due to moisture contamination and hypothermia caused by the loss of body heat as a result of wet clothing, provided early motivation for the development of protective barriers that could effectively repel water in various forms, from condensed moisture to rain, snow and ice. Although some species have evolved features that allow them to resist the detrimental effects of water, such as the structure and hydrophobic properties of duck feathers, which can resist water penetration1, humans have needed to develop broader technologies for repelling moisture in various situations. Typically, this has involved the selection of well-suited materials from nature, such as animal furs or natural fibres, which could then be further improved by incorporating natural oils and waxes to withstand harsh environments2,3. Such strategies provided the basis for water repellency until modern understanding of liquid–solid interactions allowed for the design of more advanced materials.
Pioneering work explained the nature of solid–liquid interactions, including wetting and non-wetting scenarios. In 1805, Thomas Young described the equilibrium behaviour of a droplet on an ideal surface4. Deviations in the contact angle of a droplet on a solid surface, which are critical to liquid adhesion and mobility, were first described as ‘hysteresis’ by the metallurgy community in the early 1900s5, but the phenomenon was considered at least as far back as Gibbs's work on the thermodynamic properties of surfaces that included a discussion of “the frictional resistance to a displacement of the [contact] line” (Ref. 6), and so-called contact angle hysteresis (CAH) continues to be investigated today7,
Key materials advances in the development of water-repellent surfaces were the discovery of natural rubbers and the subsequent development of synthetic polymers in the 1900s14. This led to the production of important low-surface-energy polymers such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS; a common silicone rubber) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE; commonly known as Teflon). Furthermore, by introducing porosity, PTFE could be made breathable and more water-repellent — a discovery that revolutionized the high-performance textile industry. These polymers can be applied as coatings on various materials to modify surface wettability. The development of an alternative method to create low-energy surfaces, which involves the self-assembly of molecular monolayers, allowed for the precise control of the surface chemistry and repellency of certain materials15.
In the late 1990s, advances in visualization and fabrication techniques sparked rapid developments in the area of water repellency. Specifically, the ability to visualize and replicate the structure of the lotus leaf enabled the production of synthetic superhydrophobic surfaces (SHSs) by combining micro- and nanoscale texture and hydrophobic surface chemistry, resulting in very high water contact angles (≥150°) and low CAH (≤5°)16,17. These discoveries led to a phase of extensive development, which saw SHSs produced from a wide array of materials and processes, with a concomitant improvement in performance and stability, and an increase in fundamental understanding18,
Although this complex surface structuring introduced enhanced repellency, the voids between surface features can serve as vulnerabilities under harsh environmental conditions. This problem was addressed by creating a new class of functional materials — slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces (SLIPS) — in which a textured solid is infiltrated with a physically and chemically confined immiscible lubricant to create a smooth liquid overlayer. The resulting surfaces are stable under high pressure, exhibit essentially no contact line pinning and are omniphobic26,
Surfaces with low water wettability have been developed to possess many beneficial properties, such as fluid-flow drag reduction, increased heat transfer and improved self-cleaning ability38,
The nature of icing problems. Despite numerous advances in the development of repellent coatings, the problem of ice accretion remains significant40,44,45. Various critical structures, such as transmission lines and buildings, can be damaged by the excessive weight of accumulated ice and the stress caused by freeze–thaw cycles, and severe personal injury can result from falling ice; such hazards are exacerbated by extreme conditions. Furthermore, in a marine environment, the preponderance of water leads to additional challenges on ships and off-shore oil rigs45. Transmission line and tower failures have led to notorious power outages, such as those caused by the 2008 ice storm in the northeastern United States, which left over 1 million people without power and an estimated cost for damages exceeding US$1 billion. The efficiency and output of renewable energy sources, including wind and solar, can also be severely affected by ice formation43,46,
The diversity of icing problems presents many challenges. Icing conditions can only be controlled in certain environments. For example, heat exchangers may be designed to operate within narrow temperature and humidity ranges. However, in natural environments, ice accretion occurs over a wide range of temperatures, humidity levels and wind conditions owing to the many different forms of precipitation, including freezing rain, snow, in-cloud icing or fog icing, and frost formation44,45. Although it is typical for laboratory experiments to focus on a single aspect of icing, for many important applications icephobic materials require the ability to withstand a wide range of possible conditions. Current industry strategies for combatting icing problems primarily involve active heating, chemical deicing fluids and mechanical removal44,49,50,53. These processes can be inefficient, environmentally unfavourable, expensive and time consuming. Thus, it would be advantageous if surfaces could passively prevent ice formation and ease ice removal. In this Review, we critically examine various strategies for attaining icephobicity for the different scenarios in which ice may form on surfaces.
Ice formation from impinging droplets
Ice often accumulates when droplets of liquid water come into contact with surfaces that are at temperatures below the freezing point. This situation is commonly encountered in the form of freezing rain, and it affects aircraft, transmission lines and many other types of infrastructure43,49. SHSs, owing to their extraordinary water repellency, are viewed as excellent candidates for icephobicity in this area40,54; however, their performance is still largely limited by environmental constraints. In this scenario, ice formation can be prevented using two approaches: by minimizing the contact time to promote rapid shedding of droplets before ice can nucleate on the surface and by delaying heterogeneous nucleation through a combination of surface roughness, chemistry and topographical modifications.
Minimized contact time. It is well known that, under certain conditions, water droplets that impact a SHS will retract and bounce from the surface because of their extremely low CAH55,56. Taking advantage of this phenomenon, SHSs can dynamically prevent ice formation, even if the surface is maintained at temperatures well below freezing57,
Much of the work investigating droplet impact on SHSs has focused on increasing the stability of the Cassie state during droplet impingement in a freezing environment. Droplet bouncing occurs when the impacting liquid maintains enough energy to depart the surface following losses during spreading and retraction; however, if a droplet strikes the surface with sufficient kinetic energy, it may displace the air pockets of the SHS and become pinned in the Wenzel state64,
The transition from the Cassie state to the Wenzel state is resisted by the Laplace pressure, which is the pressure difference across a curved interface caused by surface tension. The Laplace pressure can be increased by incorporating nanoscale topography65,
Another key consideration is the inability of SHSs to retain icephobicity under harsh environmental conditions. Lower temperatures increase the viscosity of supercooled droplets, thus increasing contact time and reducing the probability of bouncing74. In general, the bouncing-droplet effect is observed at low humidity levels. At surface temperatures below the dew point, the CAH of water droplets begins to increase owing to uniform nucleation across the surface topography of the microstructured SHS, which promotes non-bouncing Wenzel droplets75,
Nucleation reduction. Although the probability of nucleation can be reduced dynamically by promoting bouncing and rapid shedding of impinging droplets, it is also beneficial, particularly under static conditions, to delay heterogeneous nucleation through modification of surface topography and chemistry, which facilitates the potential removal of liquid water by other means. The ability of various surfaces to delay the freezing of a sessile droplet has been extensively studied to characterize the relationship between superhydrophobicity and heterogeneous ice nucleation, albeit with conflicting results. Many groups have found significantly delayed nucleation on microstructured SHSs58,59,62,63, whereas other groups have found that nucleation is influenced more strongly by nanoscale roughness57,75,79 or can be further influenced by hierarchical texture80. These discrepancies can be explained, at least in part, by the complexity of each system. There are multiple length scales to consider: the critical nucleus size required for the nucleation of ice (<10 nm)75,79,80; the nanoscopic surface roughness (<100 nm)57,75 75,79,
Classical nucleation theory has been well studied with regard to several phase-change scenarios85 and is commonly applied to icephobic surfaces. Those who have reported nucleation delay on SHSs generally attribute this property to the insulating effect of the air pockets situated between the topographical features, to reduced solid–liquid contact area and to an increased free-energy barrier to heterogeneous nucleation57,
By analysing surfaces with a range of chemistries and topographies, Jung et al.79 found that hydrophilic surfaces with minimal roughness (1.4–6 nm) had the longest freezing-delay times, followed by hydrophobic surfaces with similar roughness, microstructured SHSs and finally hydrophilic microstructured surfaces. The lower rate of ice nucleation on hydrophilic surfaces with nanometre-scale surface roughness compared with equivalently smooth hydrophobic surfaces was also reported in experiments that eliminated the effect of droplet impurities by incorporating controlled evaporation, condensation and freezing processes82,83. Eberle et al.80 found that although hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces with ultrafine roughness exhibited similar nucleation temperatures (TN), hydrophilic surfaces at temperatures slightly above TN had a longer nucleation delay. The presence of a quasi-liquid layer with reduced entropy at the solid/water or solid/ice interface was seen as a key factor for reducing ice nucleation79,80,82,83. By adapting the classical theory of heterogeneous nucleation to account for a quasi-liquid layer, it was suggested that TN could be lowered by minimizing the roughness length scale to below 10 nm (Refs 79,
In nature, organisms such as fish, insects and plants have evolved to produce antifreezing proteins, which suppress ice nucleation and growth in internal fluids. However, these proteins are generally not used by organisms or plants to prevent external ice accumulation87,
Although these controlled studies into ice nucleation are of great scientific interest, the ability to reduce the nucleation rate in practical scenarios is limited by environmental considerations. At temperatures below the dew point, many of the previously observed relationships governing ice nucleation behaviour on various surfaces could not be replicated75,78. The nucleation of ice on SHSs was systematically studied in an environmentally controlled wind tunnel, with tunable humidity and wind speed84. Under static conditions, the previously reported nucleation delay was observed; however, as shown in Fig. 2c, when there was a moderate flow of unsaturated gas, evaporative cooling of the water at the liquid/vapour interface induced homogeneous nucleation before heterogeneous nucleation at the solid surface84. A further consideration is surface contaminants, such as dust or salts, which serve as nucleation sites and lead to ice propagation across the surface78,93. These issues highlight some of the challenges facing icephobic materials in real-world environments. Even when heterogeneous nucleation is avoided on the surface itself, it is still possible for ice to accumulate.
Summary. Although the majority of work in this area has focused on the use of SHSs because of their unparalleled ability to shed liquid water through bouncing, limitations, particularly regarding humidity tolerance, have led some to explore alternatives. Sun et al.76 were able to improve the performance of SHSs by combining an inner hydrophilic membrane suffused with a freezing-point depressant with an outer porous SHS, which separated the membrane from the environment. Under dry conditions, the surface behaved like an ordinary SHS, but when water penetrated the structure (under high pressure or humidity), the freezing-point depressant mixed with the water and prevented ice accumulation on the surface76. Techniques such as this may be necessary to provide icephobic surfaces that are robust enough to be used in a wide range of conditions, although the need for freezing-point depressants may preclude some applications. Another option is to use surfaces with stable lubricant interfaces26,30. Although droplet motion on SLIPS is typically slower than on SHSs due to viscous dissipation in the lubricant94, the stability of the lubricant film under high droplet impact pressures26,95 and their high humidity tolerance26 may make SLIPS a viable alternative to SHSs in some scenarios. The advantages of such lubricated systems have predominantly been studied in frosting environments or in the context of ice adhesion, as we discuss in later sections.
Frost formation from atmospheric humidity
Although freezing experiments on impinging droplets are often carried out in low-humidity environments to eliminate the effects of condensation, performance in high-humidity environments is critical to many applications. For example, thermal management systems require that the condensate is promptly removed from the surface as it accumulates; otherwise, owing to reduced thermal conductance, water and frost will inhibit heat transfer42,52. Lubricant-infused surfaces, along with some specially designed SHSs, have shown promise in the rapid removal of condensation, thereby delaying frost formation under humid conditions.
Limitations of conventional superhydrophobic surfaces. When the temperature of a solid material falls below the dew point, water condensation occurs on the surface. On SHSs, condensed water droplets have been shown to nucleate and grow indiscriminately within hydrophobic microscale structures (Fig. 3a), as predicted by classical nucleation theory, which dictates that surfaces with spatially uniform interfacial energies will exhibit homogeneous nucleation energy barriers81,96,
This vulnerability to condensation can adversely affect the designed function of non-wetting surfaces, even in nature102,103. In one case, a water droplet placed onto a surface patterned with fluorinated triangular microspikes was observed to be in the Cassie regime (contact angle = 164±3°; CAH = 5°)104. However, when the same surface was subjected to oversaturated vapour, water penetrated the cavities after progressive nucleation and coalescence events, resulting in a Wenzel wetting state. Although a relatively large contact angle of 141±3° was maintained, the CAH (100−105°) and droplet adhesion were significantly increased, thus preventing condensed droplets from being completely removed by external forces104.
Surfaces incorporating dense nanoscale topography offer promising resistance against condensation-induced wetting and even display antifrosting behaviour105,
Jumping droplet phenomenon. During conventional dropwise condensation on a flat hydrophobic surface, condensed water droplets typically exhibit high CAH, leading to large pinned droplets with diameters on the order of the capillary length of water (approximately 2.7 mm), which are only then able to be removed from the surface with the aid of gravity109. To remove smaller condensed microdroplets from the surface before freezing, new strategies have been developed. One such technique relies on nanostructured or hierarchical SHSs that, in certain scenarios, can promote spontaneous ‘jumping-out-of-plane’ removal of water microdroplets powered by the surface energy released on coalescence110,111 (Fig. 3b). The spontaneous motion of droplets in such events is affected by various parameters, including the initial droplet volumes, viscous dissipation, surface feature sizes, structural hierarchy and work of adhesion101,112,
This phenomenon of rapid removal of merged droplets is responsible for the extremely small average droplet size observed, ranging from approximately 6 to 30 μm (Refs 111,114). However, under conditions of high supersaturation, the emergent droplets transition from mobile jumping droplets to highly pinned Wenzel droplets, which completely flood the nanostructured cavities. This behaviour exposes the inherent limitations of this approach for high heat-flux applications117. Under high supersaturation conditions, the droplet nucleation density can increase to the point at which interactions between adjacent droplets occur on a similar length scale to the nanostructure spacing, causing the eventual formation of pinned liquid films117.
The principle of self-propelled jumping droplets has been further applied to subcooling conditions under which droplets are able to repeatedly jump off the surface before heterogeneous ice nucleation can occur118. To circumvent limitations in supersaturation conditions, superhydrophobic nanostructured micropore arrays, with pitch spacing comparable to the diameter of coalescing microdroplets, have been introduced to maximize the liquid/air interfacial area beneath the coalescing microdroplets119. Although frost still forms, originating from physical or chemical defect sites, and eventually spreading over the entire surface via an interdrop frost wave, the growth of this frost front has been shown to be up to an order of magnitude slower on hierarchical SHSs than on a control hydrophobic surface120. Spatial control of heterogeneous droplet nucleation sites at the convex edges limits ice bridging and enhances the jumping droplet effect, which dynamically minimizes the average droplet size and the overall surface coverage of the condensate120. Moreover, these nanostructured SHSs have also shown promise in active defrosting situations because the growth of frost can occur in a suspended Cassie state, enabling its dynamic removal upon partial melting at low tilt angles and preservation of the underlying surface121.
Lubricant-infused surfaces. In the absence of air pockets, lubricant-infused surfaces can be expected to maintain high performance despite condensation. Under frosting conditions, a hierarchical SHS coating had over 90% of its surface covered in frost in 80 minutes, whereas its SLIPS counterpart experienced less than 20% coverage, mostly originating from edge defects and interdrop wave propagation30,120, as shown in Fig. 4a. This delay can be attributed, in part, to the high mobility of droplets arising from low CAH, which allowed water droplets less than 600 μm in diameter to depart the surface under gravity before ice nucleation could occur30. An additional factor is the significantly increased supercooling ability (at least 3–4 °C freezing point depression compared with a SHS) of lubricant-infused surfaces. This property possibly arises because of a reduction in the number of potential nucleation sites, which was shown to be effective over 150 consecutive freeze–thaw cycles122.
The repellency of these surfaces can be compromised by a loss of the lubricant overlayer, which can be driven by high shear, evaporation at high temperatures, gravity, or as a result of lubricant spreading onto other solid or liquid surfaces94,123,
Rykaczewski et al.128 conducted a detailed study of frost formation on lubricant-infused structured surfaces using cryogenic scanning electron microscopy. This study highlighted the importance of nanoscale surface texture and optimized interfacial energies when designing lubricant-infused surfaces. Specifically, on surfaces with underlying microtexture, it was observed that the oil not only drained from the vicinity of a frozen droplet but also from underneath it, where it was permanently displaced by water, suggesting limitations in a prolonged droplet-shedding operation128. By contrast, increased capillary forces produced by nanotextured surfaces and proper surface functionalization are much more effective in retaining oil within the structures and limiting the subsequent penetration by water31. Although the anti-icing performance of these materials has been shown to rival that of state-of-the-art SHSs, careful design of the materials system is required to minimize lubricant migration and carry-over to achieve practical longevity.
Summary. Although superhydrophobicity alone is not sufficient to provide robust anti-frosting surfaces, when these surfaces are further engineered to induce jumping droplets, frost formation can be significantly delayed.However, the delicate nanoscale roughness required to promote jumping droplet behaviour is likely to result in surfaces prone to mechanical damage130. Alternatively, SLIPS can also shed small condensed droplets. These lubricant-infused surfaces are self-healing but require the overall lubricant level above the textured solid to be maintained, which may limit prolonged operation. The precise nature of condensation on SLIPS is still under investigation and, in some cases, is predicted to occur at the solid/lubricant interface131. Further understanding of this mechanism could influence the design of future frost-repellent materials.
Offering a potentially more robust approach to lubricated nanotextured surfaces, the incorporation of a lubricating oil into a bulk polymer or gel has recently been demonstrated as a high-performance repellent coating132,
Adhesion of ice following freezing
Ice eventually forms on even the best icephobic surfaces under extreme conditions, making the easy removal of ice a critical but challenging requirement for icephobic materials. Fundamentally, the strong interaction of ice with most solids can be attributed to van der Waals forces138 and electrostatic interactions139, with the latter proposed as the dominant mechanism due to the interaction of electrical charge at the ice surface and induced charge on the solid substrate139,140. Surfaces that incorporate hydroxyl groups can also increase ice adhesion through hydrogen bonding141. Covalent chemical bonding directly associated with the ice surface can also be considered, but it is limited to very short distances (0.1–0.2 nm) and is only a factor for solids with specific chemical and crystal arrangements139.
Although there are many different methods for measuring ice adhesion, the two most common techniques involve freezing a column of ice and shearing it from a surface using a force probe142, or removing ice with the shear or tensile forces experienced during centrifugation143. It is worth noting that absolute values of ice adhesion (that is, the area-normalized force to remove ice) depend on the methods of measurement and ice formation144. To alleviate discrepancies between results, ice adhesion measurements can be normalized with respect to untreated control substrates, generating adhesion reduction factors, but there is no commonly accepted standard surface. Although aluminium is frequently used, variations in the surface quality, for example, due to surface finish or preparation, can still affect the results144. Thus, it is important to consider the specific methodology used for ice adhesion experiments and for researchers to incorporate adequate control surfaces to facilitate comparison. In Fig. 5, a broad overview is given of ice adhesion values reported in the literature30,36,37,60,132,136,137,141,142,145,
Smooth and structured surfaces. Early attempts to minimize ice adhesion used predominantly smooth surfaces with low surface energy. Polymers such as PDMS142 and PTFE163 have been shown to minimize ice adhesion compared with higher-energy substrates, and there is a strong correlation between water wettability and ice adhesion141,151,158. In a comprehensive study that comprised a large number of smooth surface coatings, it was identified that the practical work of adhesion for water, WA = γlv(1 + cosθr), has the strongest correlation with ice adhesion151, where γlv is the surface tension of the water/vapour interface and θr is the receding contact angle. Because it is not possible to attain a receding contact angle greater than ∼120° on smooth surfaces using known chemistries164, SHSs with nano- and microscale roughness were needed to achieve significantly reduced ice adhesion61,148,
Unfortunately, the durability of these surfaces continues to be a major concern. Repeated icing–shear- removal cycles and even less rigorous freeze–thaw cycles60 have been shown to increase adhesion significantly as high-aspect-ratio surface features tend to be permanently damaged during ice removal60,147,152,160. Furthermore, these surfaces still suffer from poor humidity tolerance, as discussed in previous sections. When water trapped in the Wenzel state freezes, ice adhesion scales with the actual solid/ice contact area, resulting in ice adhesion that is higher than on chemically equivalent flat surfaces101,168. Other researchers have confirmed that ice formed in humid environments is much more difficult to remove152,160 and may even form within microtextures in unsaturated environments owing to changes in local saturation caused by the latent heat of crystallization169.
These limitations have renewed interest in the use of smooth surfaces to decrease ice adhesion153,155,156. Silicone-based coatings have been revisited as a potential material for decreasing ice adhesion, achieving very low values142,155,156, but testing viscoelastic polymer films adds a layer of complexity. Ice adhesion on PDMS surfaces has been shown to depend on both the film thickness and the strain rate during ice removal, compared with relatively constant values for stiff samples155,156. Furthermore, the low mechanical stiffness and durability of PDMS may make it unsuitable for some applications. Smooth fluorinated surfaces that are stiffer and more durable have been developed in recent years153,155. In particular, smooth sol–gel coatings incorporating perfluorinated polyethers have been used to achieve an adhesion reduction factor of nearly 20 (approximate ice adhesion of 75 kPa)155. Maintaining low roughness was seen to be crucial to the performance of the coating155, which was far superior to that of rough fluoropolymers170.
Surfaces incorporating lubricant. Surfaces that incorporate a lubricating liquid have the potential to significantly reduce ice adhesion. Very low ice adhesion (∼10–150 kPa) was observed on various structured, lubricant-infused surfaces30,36,37,154,157. These surfaces are thus at the upper threshold (that is, ∼20 kPa) for self-removal of accreted ice by vibration or wind155,159,162. Subramanyam et al.154 studied the dependence of ice adhesion on the lubricant level and found that ice adhesion increased significantly as excess lubricant above the posts was depleted; however, the extent to which ice adhesion increased was mitigated by spacing posts closely together. Although it may seem counter-intuitive that the surface with the highest solid fraction performed the best, the authors argued that ice adhesion was minimized by the high density of crack initiation sites at the edges of the posts154. Another effect that may contribute to decreased ice adhesion is the superior lubricant retention of closely spaced posts due to the increased Laplace pressure127, which would allow closely spaced posts to maintain a smoother substrate/ice interface. Both factors should contribute to further reduce ice adhesion on lubricated surfaces incorporating nanostructures. As discussed with regard to frost formation, the longevity and durability of the lubricant-infused surfaces are significant challenges for their implementation as icephobic surfaces, and the strategies discussed for improvement in that context remain important.
Very low ice adhesion has been demonstrated using lubricant-infused polymer systems132,136,137,142, and infused polymers can be expected to maintain low ice adhesion even once the lubricant is depleted owing to their generally low surface energy and smooth surfaces. The ice adhesion of PDMS has been shown to decrease when silicone oil is mixed with the uncured PDMS precursors132,142. Similar effects can be achieved by swelling the cured polymer network with compatible oils134,137. Using liquid paraffin as the infused oil in a PDMS network, Wang et al.137 were able to achieve extraordinarily low ice adhesion of only 1.7 kPa at temperatures as low as −70 °C, and ice adhesion remained below 10 kPa after 35 icing–deicing cycles measured over the course of 100 days. However, measurements were spaced over the 100-day period, which masked the kinetic aspects of lubricant depletion and replenishment that still need to be studied and understood to characterize the performance of such systems in practical scenarios. Showcasing the importance of understanding lubricantdynamics, almost negligible ice adhesion could be obtained on a surface designed to release lubricant at low temperatures136.
One of the more intriguing properties of ice is the presence of a thin liquid-like transition layer at the ice surface, which can make ice slippery and has been used to explain various phenomena, such as the ability of skates to slide easily on ice171,
Summary. There are several promising options for reducing ice adhesion under active development, and lubricated systems in particular have demonstrated extraordinarily low ice adhesion in various studies; however, their longevity and ability to maintain performance in different environments are important considerations that require further study, in the cases of both infused polymers and structured surfaces. Another concern for these materials, including those that maintain aqueous lubricant layers, is their ability to withstand mech-anical abrasion and damage. By crosslinking a hygroscopic polymer inside silicon micropores to protect the bulk of the polymer from abrasion, Chen et al.161 made a surface that maintained low ice adhesion after 80 abrasion cycles; however, the durability of these polymer coatings on their own has not been reported. SHSs have been studied far more extensively than lubricated surfaces, and, to our knowledge, SHSs that demonstrate satisfactorily low ice adhesion along with mechanical durability and cycle tolerance have not yet been realized. Further efforts should focus on increasing durability, for example, by incorporating stronger materials or structures designed to maintain superhydrophobicity after sustaining damage130,176,177. Many natural structured materials show combinations of strength and toughness that have been difficult to replicate synthetically. It is possible that further understanding of the origin of these properties may inspire the development of new, tougher, structured surfaces that can yield more durable icephobicity178. Continued investigation into smooth surfaces may be worthwhile, as their simplicity and durability may make them the most industrially feasible avenue for many applications, particularly when lubrication is not possible.
Ice accumulation poses significant challenges in building infrastructure, marine applications, aerospace, refrigeration, power transmission, telecommunications and other industries. In this Review, we have focused on the various ways in which ice forms and passive prevention strategies that have been employed in each scenario. An ideal icephobic surface for many of these applications, however, should perform well in all possible situations. Although progress has been made, no single surface has shown the ability to rapidly shed impacting and condensing water droplets, suppress ice nucleation and reduce ice adhesion, all while operating in various environments with high durability and longevity. The strategies for developing icephobic materials, as discussed in this Review and shown in Table 1, include both dry and lubricated surfaces, spanning a range of chemical functionalities and length scales.
SHSs excel owing to their ability to shed water, but despite extensive research, issues of humidity tolerance and durability during ice removal persist. SHSs may be most effective when used in controlled environments, such as in heat exchangers, where the jumping droplet effect can delay frost formation and the surface can be maintained with limited exposure to the external environment. The ease of application and simplicity of smooth surfaces may make them attractive for use in harsher environments. Although the lack of nano- or microstructuring can make smooth surfaces more robust, roughness developed through erosion may still hinder repellency155,170.
Hydrated surfaces with aqueous lubricating layers offer the advantage of simplicity and longevity because the lubricant can be replenished by atmospheric moisture; however, performance with respect to icephobic properties other than ice adhesion remains unreported. It can be expected that hydrophilicity will lead to poor resistance against impinging droplets and condensation. Further testing under various environmental conditions is needed to demonstrate the viability of hygroscopic polymers as widely applicable icephobic materials.
Surfaces incorporating hydrophobic lubricating layers continue to show extremely high promise, despite tempered expectations owing to current limitations on longevity. We anticipate that optimization of the topographical length scale, surface functionality and lubricant chemistry will be able to minimize these concerns. It is important not only to consider the empirical optimization of these parameters but also to gain a deeper understanding of the energetics and the interactions between components of this complex system. Infused polymers may offer improved longevity compared with structured surfaces owing to the presence of excess oil in the bulk polymer network. Furthermore, a degree of icephobicity should be maintained even on depletion of the lubricant owing to the remaining smooth, low-energy surface of the polymer. Future research should focus on durability, longevity and potential replenishment of these lubricant-infused surfaces rather than achieving maximum performance under ideal conditions.
Although passive ice-repellent materials continue to be improved, each has limitations in some aspects of icephobicity. By understanding the successes and failures of each technology, it may be possible to design surfaces that incorporate features from multiple strategies to further improve versatility. Ultimately, it may be necessary to use ice-repellent surfaces to augment, rather than completely eliminate, traditional anti-icing and deicing techniques. The work of Sun et al.76, in which a SHS was used, stands out as a method for reducing the amount of deicing fluid used on airplanes. Such a technique might also be combined with bio-logical or biomimetic antifreeze proteins to offer a more environmentally friendly solution. One can imagine similar strategies, such as surfaces with low wettability being used to decrease the amount of heating needed to remove ice, or lubricant-infused surfaces that release lubricant only under certain environmental conditions136. The integration of icephobic materials with current technologies has not seen extensive study, but it is an important consideration for the eventual applicationof these materials.
The authors thank A. Grinthal and K.-C. Park for their comments on the manuscript. M.J.K. thanks Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) for a Postgraduate Scholarships-Doctoral (PGS D) scholarship. The information, data, or work presented herein was funded in part by the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), US Department of Energy, under Award Number DE-AR0000326.