Abstract
π-Class glutathione-S-transferase (GSTP1) located on chromosome 11q13 encodes a phase II metabolic enzyme that detoxifies reactive electrophilic intermediates. GSTP1 plays an important role in the protecting cells from cytotoxic and carcinogenic agents and is expressed in normal tissues at variable levels in different cell types. Altered GSTP1 activity and expression have been reported in many tumors and this is largely due to GSTP1 DNA hypermethylation. The role of GSTP1 in pituitary tumorigenesis has not been investigated. In this study, we evaluated the GSTP1 expression level and GSTP1 DNA methylation status in a series of pituitary adenomas. Using immunohistochemistry, we identified expression of GSTP1 in all of the various normal hormone-producing adenohypophysial cell types. In pituitary adenomas, loss or reduced expression of GSTP1 was detected in 27 of 53 tumors (50.9%). Expression of GSTP1 was significantly lower in invasive adenomas than in noninvasive adenomas (P<0.05). Using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MS-PCR), GSTP1 DNA promoter hypermethylation was detected in adenomas (38 of 53, 71.7%) but not in normal tissues. GSTP1 methylation was more frequent in grade II, III, and IV tumors (66.7, 85, and 83%, respectively) than in grade I tumors (33%, P<0.05). In addition, the frequency of GSTP1 methylation was higher in invasive tumors (85%) than in noninvasive tumors (59%; P<0.05). Methylation status correlated with significant downregulation of GSTP1 expression; the frequency of GSTP1 methylation was higher in tumors with reduced-GSTP1 expression (85%) than in tumors with normal or high GSTP1 expression (54%; P<0.05).These data indicate that GSTP1 inactivation through CpG hypermethylation is common in pituitary adenomas and may contribute to aggressive pituitary tumor behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Pituitary adenomas are common intracranial neoplasms comprising 10–15% of diagnosed brain tumors. They may arise from any of the five differentiated cell types within the adenohypophysis, and reflecting their cellular origin, frequently synthesize and secrete their respective hormones. They can cause mood disorders, sexual dysfunction, infertility, obesity, visual disturbances, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and accelerated heart disease.1 However, the molecular pathway leading to pituitary tumorigenesis is one of the challenges of the endocrine oncology. While genetic events such as mutation, deletion, or rearrangement are relatively rare in pituitary adenomas, aberrant methylation-inducing tumor suppressor gene silencing is recognized as an important mechanism contributing to pituitary tumorigenesis.1, 2 Hypermethylation of gene promoter regions has been implicated in the inactivation of several genes, including p16/CDKN2A, RB1, DAPK, GADD45γ, RASSF1A, E-cadherin, H-cadherin, Ikaros, and FGFR2.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
GSTP1 encodes glutathione-S-transferase-π, a member of a family of enzymes, the glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) that function as dimers composed of subunits from five main classes: α, μ, π, σ, and θ. GSTs are phase 2 enzymes that catalyze the conjugation of glutathione with electrophilic and hydrophobic compounds including carcinogens, natural toxins, and exogenous drugs.12, 13, 14 GSTs are believed to play an important role in protecting cells from cytotoxic and carcinogenic agents. GSTP1 is expressed in normal tissues at various levels in different cell types.15 GSTP-null mice show an increased risk of skin tumorigenesis induced by carcinogens,16 suggesting that lack of GSTP1 expression increases susceptibility to cancer. Abnormal GSTP1 activity and expression and GSTP1 DNA hypermethylation have been identified in prostate, breast, liver, renal, and endometrial carcinomas.17, 18, 19, 20 However, GSTP1 expression and GSTP1 DNA methylation in pituitary adenomas has not been examined.
In this study, we evaluated the expression level and methylation status of GSTP1 in normal pituitary glands and pituitary adenomas. We performed immunohistochemical staining to determine GSTP1 protein expression and methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MS-PCR) to evaluate methylation of its promoter. Protein expression and epigenetic alterations were then correlated with clinicopathological parameters of the patients.
Materials and methods
Human Pituitary Tissues and Adenomas
Three normal human adenohypophyses were obtained at autopsy from patients with no evidence of endocrine abnormality; they were examined histologically to exclude the possibility of incidental pathology. A total of 53 pituitary adenomas were obtained at the time of surgery at Tokushima University Hospital (Tokushima, Japan) and Toranomon Hospital (Tokyo, Japan). All samples were frozen and stored at −70°C. Tumors were characterized based on clinical, radiological, histological, and immunohistochemical features (Table 1). There were 33 clinically functioning tumors (17 somatotroph adenomas, 1 mammosomatotroph adenoma, 10 lactotroph adenomas, 4 corticotroph adenomas associated with Cushing's disease, and 1 thyrotroph adenoma), and 20 clinically nonfunctioning adenomas (4 silent corticotroph adenomas, 12 gonadotroph adenomas, 3 silent subtype 3 adenomas, and 1 null cell adenoma). Tumor size and invasiveness were defined on the basis of preoperative radiological investigations and operative findings and with a modified Hardy's classification. Grade I tumors are microadenomas (<1 cm in diameter) and grade II tumors consisted of enclosed macroadenomas (≥1 cm in diameter) with or without suprasellar extension. Both grade I and II tumors were defined as noninvasive. Grade III tumors show local invasiveness with evidence of bony destruction and tumor within the sphenoid and/or cavernous sinus. Grade IV tumors demonstrate CNS/extracranial spread with or without metastases. Grade III and IV tumors were considered to be invasive. Thus, the 53 tumors included six tumors of grade I, 21 tumors of grade II, 20 tumors of grade III, and six tumors of grade IV (27 noninvasive and 26 invasive adenomas; Table 1, 5).
Immunohistochemical Analysis of GSTP1 Expression in Normal Pituitary Tissues
A double-staining technique was performed to examine the expression of GSTP1 protein in three normal pituitary tissues following a modification of the method of Hsu and Soban.21 Briefly, the GSTP1 protein was stained using the labeled streptavidin biotin (LSAB) method. After deparaffinization and antigen retrieval using an autoclave oven technique, sections were incubated at 4°C overnight with antibody that recognizes GSPT1 (DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, 1:100 dilution). The biotinylated link antibody and peroxidase-labeled streptavidin were applied for 1 h each at room temperature. Sections were washed thoroughly in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) between each of the immunostaining procedures. Antigen–antibody complexes were detected using the cobalt-3,3′-diaminobenzidine (Co-DAB) yielding a blue–black color. After washing in PBS, the sections were then incubated in 0.005% biotin solution. Subsequently, the localization of the pituitary hormones in the same sections was detected by LSAB method with antihormone antibodies (Table 2), which yielded a brown color using DAB. Sections incubated in PBS without primary antibody served as negative controls.
Immunohistochemical Analysis of GSTP1 Expression in Pituitary Adenomas
GSTP1 and Ki-67 antigen immunolocalization based on the LSAB method were performed on sections from representative blocks of paraffin-embedded tissues used for pathology diagnosis. After deparaffinization and antigen retrieval using an autoclave oven technique, sections were incubated at 4°C overnight with Ki-67 antigen mouse monoclonal antibody (Table 2) or with an antibody that recognizes GSTP1 (Table 2). Antigen–antibody complexes were detected using the DAB reaction. The slides were counterstained lightly with hematoxylin or 1% methyl green and mounted for microscopic examination. Sections incubated in PBS without the primary antibody served as negative controls.
Quantification of GSTP1 and Ki-67 Antigen Immunoreactivity
Each slide was examined by an observer blinded to the diagnosis and clinicopathologic data; and reviewed and confirmed by a second blinded observer. Any intensity of cytoplasmic staining was considered to present a positive stain for GSTP1. A total of 500–1000 cells were counted and the percentage of GSTP1-stained tumor cells was scored on a scale of 0–4 (0: no expression; 1+: 1–5%; 2+: 5–20%; 3+: 20–50%; 4+: >50%). The Ki-67 antigen labeling index (LI) was determined by counting the number of positive cells in a total of 500–1000 tumor cells observed in several representative high-power fields ( × 400).
DNA Isolation and Sodium Bisulfite Modification
DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Stanford, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Genomic DNA was modified by sodium bisulfite treatment and purified using the CpGenome DNA Modification Kit (Intergen, Purchase, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Methylation-specific PCR
The promoter methylation status of GSPT1 was investigated by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) assay as described previously.18 Two sets of GSPT1 promoter-specific primers described by Esteller et al18 were used to specifically amplify methylated and unmethylated DNA sequences. CpGenome™ Universal Methylated DNA (Intergen) was used as methylated control and bisulfite-modified genomic DNA from HeLa cells served as an unmethylated control. PCR products were separated in 2% agarose gels and visualized under ultraviolet (UV) illumination. The bisulfite reaction and MSP for all samples were repeated to confirm methylation status. Both methylated and unmethylated PCR products were purified for direct sequencing using the Nucleo Spin® Extract Kit (Macherey-nagel, Düren, Germany). Cycle sequencing was performed using the BigDye Terminator V1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and the ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).
Statistical Analyses
Using StatView J-4.5 software, Mann–Whitney U-test, χ2-test, and Spearman's correlation coefficient by rank were performed to determine the significance of associations between different variables. The level of statistical significance was P<0.05.
Results
Expression of GSTP1 in Normal Pituitary Tissues and Pituitary Adenomas
In three normal adenohypophyseal samples, GSTP1 exhibited cytoplasmic reactivity with moderate density (10–20%; 2+); no membrane or nuclear localization was identified (Figure 1a). Using double staining, GSTP1 expression colocalized with each of the adenohypophysial hormones including GH, PRL, ACTH, FSH, TSH, and LH (Figure 1b–g). These results imply that GSTP1 may protect all of the various hormone-producing cell types in normal pituitary gland against carcinogens.
In pituitary adenomas, GSTP1 expression was lost in 38% (20 of 53 tumors), was significantly reduced in 13% (7 of 53 tumors), and was normal or high in 49% (26 of 53 tumors) where staining was 2+ in 17, 3+ in 8 and 4+ in 1 (Figure 2A, Table 3).
Loss or reduced expression of GSTP1 was observed in GH cell adenomas (seven cases, 41.2%), in PRL cell adenomas (nine cases, 90%), ACTH cell adenomas with Cushing's syndrome (one case, 25%) and silent ACTH cell adenomas (four cases, 100%), but was found rarely in FSH/LH cell adenomas (two cases, 16.7%) (Table 3). The expression of GSTP1 was significantly lower in invasive adenomas than in noninvasive adenomas (Figure 3a) and the frequency of adenomas with GSTP1 expression was higher in invasive adenomas than in noninvasive adenomas (Table 3). The reduced expression of GSPT1 was not related to patient age, gender, or tumor size (data not shown).
Methylation Status of GSTP1 in Normal Pituitary Tissues and Pituitary Adenomas
We used MSP to investigate the promoter methylation of GSTP1 in three normal pituitary tissues and 53 pituitary adenomas. The methylation region included 19 CpG sites that were previously found by MSP to be associated with reduced-GSTP1 expression (Figure 2B-a). Hypermethylation of the promoter region of GSTP1 was detected in 38 of 53 (71.7%) pituitary adenomas, but not in three normal pituitary tissues (Figure 2B-b, Table 4) suggesting that GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation is tumor-specific in the pituitary. Methylated patterns of GSTP1 were found in all major types of pituitary adenomas. Unmethylated bands in MSP were detected in all four normal tissues and in all adenoma samples (Table 4).
There was no significant correlation between GSTP1 methylation and patient age. Interestingly, GSTP1 methylation was detected more frequently in grade II, III, and IV tumors (66.7, 85, and 83%, respectively) than in grade I tumors (33%, P<0.05). In addition, the frequency of GSTP1 methylation was higher in invasive tumors (84.6%) than in noninvasive tumors (63%; P<0.05, Table 5). The difference in frequency between tumor type and patient gender was not statistically significant. The Ki-67 LI was also not significantly related to GSTP1 methylation in pituitary adenomas (data not shown).
The specificity of MSP was confirmed by direct sequencing. Six unmethylated MSP products from two normal tissues and four tumors, and six methylated MSP products from six tumors were directly sequenced. In unmethylated MSP products, all cytosine nucleotides including those in the CpG islands were changed to thymine as a result of bisulfite modification. However, in methylated MSP products, cytosine nucleotides in the CpG islands remained cytosine (Figure 2B-c).
Correlation between GSTP1 Promoter Hypermethylation and Loss or Significant Reduction of GSTP1 Expression
We analyzed the relationship between GSTP1 protein expressions and GSTP1 methylation statues in three normal pituitary tissues and 49 pituitary adenomas. Three normal pituitary tissues with unmethylated alleles showed moderate (2+) GSTP1 protein expression. Methylation was detected in 23 of 27 tumors (87%) with reduced expression of GSTP1 (Table 5, P<0.05). Furthermore, GSTP1 expression levels were significantly lower in pituitary tumors with GSTP1 methylation than in pituitary adenomas without GSTP1 methylation (Figure 3b, P<0.05). Overall, there was a significant correlation between GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation and reduced-GSTP1 expression.
Discussion
Previous studies provided a line of evidences for the presence of GSTP1 protein in various normal human tissues using biochemical methods and immunohistochemistry.22, 23 GSTP1 is strongly expressed in the epithelial cells of the urinary, digestive, and respiratory tracts, these major systems being involved in elimination of toxic substances from the human body. In endocrine organs, GSTP1 is expressed in follicular cells of the thyroid and both cortex and medulla of adrenal glands. In pancreas, GSTP1 is expressed in ducts but not in acini or islets.23 GSTP1 also is expressed in other endocrine-related organs such as the breast, prostate, uterus, and placenta.23 The expression of GSTP1 in pituitary gland has not been reported. Here, we performed a detailed study using double immunohistochemical labeling to examine the distribution of GSTP1 in the normal human pituitary gland. GSTP1 is strongly expressed in about 10–20% of endocrine cells in the adenohypophysis; GSTP1 protein colocalizes with all hormones including GH, PRL, ACTH, TSH, FSH, and LH. Thus, GSTP1 may play an important role in pituitary cells irrespective of type of hormone produced. As GSTs may be engaged in the intracellular transport and metabolism of steroid hormones,24 it is suggested that GSTP1 may have a possible role in hormone transport or metabolism.
Approximately 51% pituitary adenomas showed negative or reduced expression of GSTP1. The downregulated expression of GSTP1 was significant related to tumor invasion. However, it should be noted that reduced expression of GSTP1 was detected in a high proportion of silent ACTH and PRL adenomas (100, 90%, respectively) but only in 16.7% of gonadotroph adenomas. This interesting phenomenon implies that GSTP1 may be involved in pituitary tumorigenesis through multimechanism. GSTP1 is known to bind steroid hormones noncovalently. It allows GSTP1 protein to minimize the effects of short-term fluctuations in extracellular hormone levels.12 A role of estrogens in the development of PRL adenomas has been detected by several investigations. In vitro estrogen stimulates PRL secretion and in vivo estrogen induces PRL adenomas in human and in animal models.25 Thus loss or reduction of GSTP1 may enhance the effect of estrogens in progression of PRL adenomas. It is very meaningful and consequent that reduced expression of GSTP1 was frequently found in PRL adenomas. By the same ability, GSTP1 may impair the estrogen-induced negative feedback of gonadotropin secretion. Interestingly, one study demonstrated that estrogen-induced negative feedback of gonadotropin secretion is disrupted in patients with gonadotroph adenomas.26 Thus, we hypothesize that normal or high expression of GSTP1 may contribute to gonadotroph adenoma development through regulation of estrogen-induced negative feedback of gonadotropin secretion. Anyway, further investigation is necessary to profile the exact role of GSTP1 in each type of pituitary adenoma.
Hypermethylation of CpG islands in the GSTP1 promoter and its associated gene silencing have been reported in a variety of tumors.18 In the current study, we demonstrate GSTP1 promoter hypermethylation in 72% of pituitary adenomas including all the major clinically functioning and hormonally inactive types. There was no significant correlation between GSTP1 methylation and patient age, thus methylation of GSTP1 in pituitary adenomas is not attributable to the aging process, as has been described for other genes.27 GSTP1 methylation was significantly associated with loss or reduction of protein expression in these pituitary adenomas. Noticeably, GSTP1 methylation was frequently detected in pituitary tumors that exhibited no GSTP1 expression. In contrast, the GSTP1 promoter was unmethylated and GSTP1 expression level was high in normal pituitary tissues. As GSTP1 methylation is tumor specific and has high frequency, it may be used as a biomarker in diagnosis of pituitary adenomas. The possibility of GSTP1 methylation as molecular diagnostic tool in prostate cancer has been wildly discussed. In prostate cancer patients, GSTP1 methylation was successfully detected in body fluids such as serum, urine, and ejaculates.28 Thus, to detect GSTP1 methylation in serum from pituitary adenoma patients is very necessary for determining its true value in the diagnostic clinical setting.
Previous studies have shown an association of GSTP1 methylation with tumor invasion, tumor size, sentinel lymph node metastasis, and progression in several tumor types including endometrial carcinoma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer.19, 29, 30 In this study, we demonstrate that hypermethylation of GSTP1 occurs more frequently in grade II, III, and IV adenomas (macroadenomas) and invasive adenomas than in grade I adenomas (microadenomas) and noninvasive adenomas. These findings suggest that in addition to a role in tumorigenesis, GSTP1 methylation may also relate to the progression of pituitary adenoma. However, the number of grade I and IV tumors in this series is small and mechanisms related to this risk are still unknown.
Generally, GSTP1 has several roles in tumorigenesis. First, GSTP1 might act like a tumor suppressor gene, which leads to tumor growth, when inactivated. Adler et al31 have reported that π-class GSTs can interfere with N-terminal c-Jun kinase signaling. Second, GSTP1 might act like a caretaker gene, which leads to additionally somatic genome alterations that promote tumor growth, when inactivated.32 GSTP1, like other GSTs, can catalyze the detoxification of oxidants and electrophiles that threaten genome damage.12 For example, mice carrying disrupted GSTP alleles display enhanced skin tumorigenesis on exposure to 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene.33 Interestingly, GSTP1 is able to bind steroid hormones noncovalently, allowing the protein to act as an intracellular buffer, minimizing the effects of short-term fluctuations in extracellular hormone levels.34 It is noteworthy that silencing of the GSTP1 gene appears to be restricted to prostate, breast, kidney, and endometrial carcinomas, which are related to steroid hormone exposure. Thus, epigenetic silencing of GSTP1 by promoter methylation might similarly facilitate the carcinogenic action of estrogens as endogenous tumor initiators.
How can loss of GSTP1 expression by promoter hypermethylation be involved in the development of pituitary adenomas? On the basis of our study, GSTP1 may act as a tumor suppressor gene and/or caretaker gene to contribute to pituitary tumorigenesis. Although loss of GSTP1 did not relate to high expression of the proliferation marker Ki-67, methylation of GSTP1 induced GSTP1 downregulation that correlates with pituitary adenoma aggressiveness. These data imply that GSTP1 may work as a tumor suppressor gene in pituitary tumor development. On the other hand, the majority of pituitary adenomas develop from transformed cells dependent on hormonal stimulation for tumor promotion.35 GHRH upregulation might promote cell proliferation in somatotrophs that are already transformed, or GHRH-induced hyperplasia might provide an environment for cell transformation. Untreated hypothyroidism is associated with a spectrum of hyperplasia-to-neoplasia transition—consistent with the idea that TRH stimulation can lead to thyrotroph adenoma formation. In rat models, estrogen treatment is associated with increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), pituitary tumor transforming gene (PTTG), and galanin.1 On the basis of our result that GSTP1 is frequently silenced in pituitary adenomas, and especially in prolactinomas, we hypothesize that loss of GSTP1 could be one basis of hormone-induced pituitary tumorigenesis. However, additional confirmation of such a hypothesis is necessary.
To conclude, we identified GSTP1 protein expression in all hormone-producing adenohypophysial cells. Furthermore, we demonstrated reduced-GSTP1 expression and hypermethylation of the GSTP1 gene in a significant proportion of pituitary adenomas and we found that reduced expression and gene methylation were related to pituitary tumor invasiveness and tumor grade. Hypermethylation of the GSTP1 gene may be a flexible and dynamic mechanism in the control of gene expression that plays a role in pituitary tumorigenesis and tumor progression.
References
Asa SL, Ezzat S . The pathogenesis of pituitary tumors. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:836–849.
Farrell WE, Clayton RN . Epigenetic change in pituitary tumorigenesis. Endocr Relat Cancer 2003;10:323–330.
Seemann N, Kuhn D, Wrocklage C, et al. CDKN2A/P16 inactivation is related to pituitary adenoma type and size. J Pathol 2001;193:491–497.
Simpson DJ, McNicol AM, Murray DC, et al. Molecular pathology shows p16 methylation in nonadenomatous pituitaries from patients with Cushing's disease. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:1780–1788.
Simpson DJ, Hibberts NA, McNicol AM, et al. Loss of pRb expression in pituitary adenomas is associated with methylation of the RB1 CpG island. Cancer Res 2000;60:1211–1216.
Simpson DJ, Clayton RN, Farrell WE . Preferential loss of Death Associated Protein kinase expression in invasive pituitary tumours is associated with either CpG island methylation or homozygous deletion. Oncogene 2002;21:1217–1224.
Bahar A, Bicknell JE, Simpson DJ, et al. Loss of expression of the growth inhibitory gene GADD45gamma, in human pituitary adenomas, is associated with CpG island methylation. Oncogene 2004;23:936–944.
Qian ZR, Sano T, Yoshimoto K, et al. Inactivation of RASSF1A tumor suppressor gene by aberrant promoter hypermethylation in human pituitary adenomas. Lab Invest 2005;85:464–473.
Qian ZR, Sano T, Yoshimoto K, et al. Tumor-specific downregulation and methylation of the CDH13 (H-cadherin) and CDH1 (E-cadherin) genes correlate with aggressiveness of human pituitary adenomas. Mod Pathol 2007;20:1269–1277.
Zhu X, Asa SL, Ezzat S . Ikaros is regulated through multiple histone modifications and deoxyribonucleic acid methylation in the pituitary. Mol Endocrinol 2007;21:1205–1215.
Zhu X, Lee K, Asa SL, et al. Epigenetic silencing through DNA and histone methylation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 in neoplastic pituitary cells. Am J Pathol 2007;170:1618–1628.
Hayes JD, Pulford DJ . The glutathione S-transferase supergene family: regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 1995;30:445–600.
Daniel V . Glutathione S-transferases: gene structure and regulation of expression. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 1993;28:173–207.
Mannervik B, Alin P, Guthenberg C, et al. Identification of three classes of cytosolic glutathione transferase common to several mammalian species: correlation between structural data and enzymatic properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985;82:7202–7206.
Terrier P, Townsend AJ, Coindre JM, et al. An immunohistochemical study of pi class glutathione S-transferase expression in normal human tissue. Am J Pathol 1990;137:845–853.
Ketterer B . Glutathione S-transferases and prevention of cellular free radical damage. Free Radic Res 1998;28:647–658.
Hopkins TG, Burns PA, Routledge MN . DNA methylation of GSTP1 as biomarker in diagnosis of prostate cancer. Urology 2007;69:11–16.
Esteller M, Corn PG, Urena JM, et al. Inactivation of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene by promoter hypermethylation in human neoplasia. Cancer Res 1998;58:4515–4518.
Chan QK, Khoo US, Chan KY, et al. Promoter methylation and differential expression of pi-class glutathione S-transferase in endometrial carcinoma. J Mol Diagn 2005;7:8–16.
Hsu SM, Soban E . Color modification of diaminobenzidine (DAB) precipitation by metallic ions and its application for double immunohistochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem 1982;30:1079–1082.
Tchou JC, Lin X, Freije D, et al. GSTP1 CpG island DNA hypermethylation in hepatocellular carcinomas. Int J Oncol 2000;16:663–676.
Mannervik B . The isoenzymes of glutathione transferase. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol 1985;57:357–417.
Terrier P, Townsend AJ, Coindre JM, et al. An immunohistochemical study of pi class glutathione S-transferase expression in normal human tissue. Am J Pathol 1990;137:845–853.
Listowsky I, Abramovitz M, Homma H, et al. Intracellular binding and transport of hormones and xenobiotics by glutathione-S-transferases. Drug Metab Rev 1988;19:305–318.
Heaney AP, Fernando M, Melmed S . Functional role of estrogen in pituitary tumor pathogenesis. J Clin Invest 2002;109:277–283.
Lania A, Gangi E, Romoli R, et al. Impaired estrogen-induced negative feedback on gonadotropin secretion in patients with gonadotropin-secreting and nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Eur J Clin Invest 2002;32:335–340.
Ahuja N, Li Q, Mohan AL, et al. Aging and DNA methylation in colorectal mucosa and cancer. Cancer Res 1998;58:5489–5494.
Henrique R, Jerónimo C . Molecular detection of prostate cancer: a role for GSTP1 hypermethylation. Eur Urol 2004;46:660–669.
Chan QK, Khoo US, Chan KY, et al. Distinct hypermethylation profile of primary breast cancer is associated with sentinel lymph node metastasis. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:2156–2162.
Nelson WG, DeWeese TL, DeMarzo AM . The diet, prostate inflammation, and the development of prostate cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2002;21:3–16.
Adler V, Yin Z, Fuchs SY, et al. Regulation of JNK signaling by GSTp. EMBO J 1999;18:1321–1334.
Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B . Cancer-susceptibility genes. Gatekeepers and caretakers. Nature 1997;386:761–763.
Henderson CJ, Smith AG, Ure J, et al. Increased skin tumorigenesis in mice lacking pi class glutathione S-transferases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:5275–5280.
Lee WH, Morton RA, Epstein JI, et al. Cytidine methylation of regulatory sequences near the pi-class glutathione S-transferase gene accompanies human prostatic carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:11733–11737.
Asa SL . Tumors of the pituitary gland. Atlas of tumor pathology, series fascicle 22. Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. Washington, DC, USA, 1998, pp 129–130.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, Y., Qian, Z., Sano, T. et al. Reduction of GSTP1 expression by DNA methylation correlates with clinicopathological features in pituitary adenomas. Mod Pathol 21, 856–865 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2008.60
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2008.60
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Overview of omics biomarkers in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors to design future diagnosis and treatment strategies
EPMA Journal (2021)
-
Glutathione S-transferase pi 1 variant and squamous cell carcinoma susceptibility: a meta-analysis of 52 case-control studies
BMC Medical Genetics (2019)
-
hTERT promoter methylation in pituitary adenomas
Brain Tumor Pathology (2016)
-
Gene expression in prolactinomas: a systematic review
Pituitary (2016)
-
Aging and DNA methylation
BMC Biology (2015)