Pathobiology in Focus

The master role of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor in melanocyte and melanoma biology

  • Laboratory Investigation volume 97, pages 649656 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/labinvest.2017.9
  • Download Citation
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Certain transcription factors have vital roles in lineage development, including specification of cell types and control of differentiation. Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) is a key transcription factor for melanocyte development and differentiation. MITF regulates expression of numerous pigmentation genes to promote melanocyte differentiation, as well as fundamental genes for maintaining cell homeostasis, including genes encoding proteins involved in apoptosis (eg, BCL2) and the cell cycle (eg, CDK2). Loss-of-function mutations of MITF cause Waardenburg syndrome type IIA, whose phenotypes include depigmentation due to melanocyte loss, whereas amplification or specific mutation of MITF can be an oncogenic event that is seen in a subset of familial or sporadic melanomas. In this article, we review basic features of MITF biological function and highlight key unresolved questions regarding this remarkable transcription factor.

Introduction

As cellular differentiation and organ system development are largely regulated through distinct mRNA expression programs, it is not surprising that transcription factors have central roles in governing these complex and vital cellular events. Unique combinations of transcription factors specify discrete cell types. In melanocytes, MITF (microphthalmia-associated transcription factor) has a dominant role that has been termed ‘master transcriptional regulator’ of the melanocyte lineage.1 MITF contains the basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLH-Zip) DNA binding and dimerization motif, which also defines it as a distinct transcription factor class. It regulates key genes for melanocyte development and differentiation. MITF and other related family members, TFE3 and TFEB, together comprise the ‘MiT’ transcription factor family, which regulate gene transcription through homo- or hetero-dimerization and binding to E-box motifs consisting of the core hexanucleotide sequence CA[C/T]GTG.1 MITF target genes include pigmentation enzymes and lineage survival factors, as well as many others.2, 3, 4 In melanoma, MITF may function as an oncogene. In this review, we summarize prior discoveries regarding MITF function and highlight unanswered questions regarding MITF in melanocytes and melanoma.

Discovery of mitf

In 1942, Hertwig observed the offsprings of an X-ray irradiated mouse with abnormally small eyes (microphthalmia) and loss of pigmentation and named the mutant locus m (later expanded to mi and eventually to Mitf).5 Various Mitf mutant mice show hearing loss due to loss of melanocytes in the inner ear (cochlea), as well as defective mast cells and osteoclasts, suggesting that MITF has important roles in these cell types.6, 7 Later, transgenic insertional mutagenesis identified Mitf as the gene responsible for the Mi phenotypes8 and molecular studies revealed that MITF functions as a DNA-binding transcription factor capable of recognizing and regulating a sequence element vital for control of pigmentation enzyme gene expression.1 Soon after that, Tassabehji et al9 identified MITF loss-of-function mutations as the cause of Waardenburg syndrome type IIA in humans, which is characterized by small eyes, hypopigmentation, and hearing loss.

Several isoforms of MITF with distinct 5′ exons exist, owing to differential use of alternative promoters (Figure 1).10 Expression patterns of the different isoforms range from widely expressed to tissue specific.10 The M-isoform of MITF is expressed almost exclusively in melanocytes and melanoma.10 Loss-of-function mutations in the shared bHLH-Zip regions affect not only melanocytes, but also other cell types including osteoclasts, mast cells, and retinal pigment epithelial cells.6, 7 Recent studies have suggested roles of MITF in cardiomyocytes and β cells, as well.11, 12

Figure 1
Figure 1

Spliced mRNAs (messenger RNA) of human MITF (microphthalmia-associated transcription factor) isoforms. Each isoform has a unique promoter and a first exon that is at least partially unique. Exons 2 through 9 are common to all isoforms and encode the transactivation domain (TAD) and the basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper domain (bHLH-Zip). For all isoforms except the B- and M- isoforms, exon 1 is formed from a unique exon spliced to exon 1B1b. The B-isoform contains the entire exon 1B and the M-isoform does not include any part of exon 1B. The M-isoform is specifically expressed in melanocyte lineages. Expression patterns of the other isoforms range from widely expressed to tissue specific. Expression of Mitf-Mc has not been confirmed in human cells. Asterisks indicate translation start sites.

Transcriptional regulation of mitf

PAX3 and SOX10 mutations cause Waardenburg syndrome types I, III, or IV (in contrast to type IIa, which is caused by MITF mutations).13, 14 The finding that neural crest cells express PAX3 and SOX10 earlier than MITF led researchers to hypothesize that the products of those genes regulate MITF-M transcription.15 Watanabe et al and Verastegui et al found that PAX3 and SOX10 activate MITF-M transcription in a cis-acting fashion in melanocytes and melanoma.14, 16 Meanwhile, PAX3 seems to repress MITF expression through POU3F2 (see below) in some melanomas.17, 18

α-Melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) increases pigmentation through increasing tyrosinase (Tyr) expression in mouse B16-F1 melanoma cells,19 as well as numerous additional pigmentation related genes (see below). Based on the results that α-MSH activates the cAMP-CREB signaling pathway and MITF activates TYR transcription, Bertolotto et al20 and Price et al21 hypothesized and found that cAMP-CREB signaling activates MITF-M transcription in a cis-acting fashion. This pathway was later found to be critical for the UV-suntanning response. Here, UV radiation was seen to produce DNA damage in epidermal keratinocytes, followed by induction of p53, which transcriptionally activates expression of the pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) gene that is post-translationally cleaved to produce α-MSH.22 Secreted α-MSH binds to its receptor on epidermal melanocytes, the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R), triggering cAMP production and CREB-mediated MITF-M transcription.20, 21 Takeda et al found that the MITF-M promoter contains a LEF-1 consensus DNA-binding site, through which WNT3A activates MITF-M transcription.23 Jacquemin et al. found that ONECUT2 activates MITF-M transcription in a cis-acting fashion.24 In addition, the Hippo signaling effector proteins TAZ and YAP65 work as PAX3 co-activators to activate MITF-M transcription.25

Neural crest cells express FOXD3 before expressing MITF and differentiating into melanocytes.15 FOXD3 represses melanocyte development in chicks.26 Thomas et al27 and Curran et al28 independently found that FOXD3 represses Mitf gene expression in zebrafish and chicks. It remains unclear how FOXD3 represses MITF-M expression in humans. Goodall et al29 examined the relationship between POU3F2 (also known as Brn-2) and MITF-M and found that POU3F2 represses MITF-M transcription in a cis-acting fashion in human melanoma cell lines. Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) represses MITF-M and is thought to help maintain melanocyte stem cells in a quiescent state.30 Yang et al31 found that TGF-β represses MITF-M expression through PAX3. More recently, Pierrat et al32 found that TGF-β represses MITF-M transcription through GLI2 and inhibiting CREB transcriptional activity. Landsberg et al33 reported that tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) rendered melanoma cells tolerant to T cells targeting melanocytic differentiation antigens by repressing production of those antigens, suggesting that TNF-α represses MITF expression. Perotti et al34 found that NFATc2 represses MITF expression through inducing membrane-bound TNF-α. Smith et al35 found the opposite: TNF-α increased MITF expression. Under hypoxic conditions, HIF1α was observed to activate DEC1 (BHLHE40), and DEC1 was found to repress MITF-M transcription.36 This mechanism might contribute to variability in MITF expression seen within melanomas, where hypoxic zones show distinct (lower) expression levels.36 Mallarino et al used Rhabdomys pumilio (African striped mouse) as a model to study striped pigmentation patterns and found that ALX3 directly repressed Mitf-m transcription.37

Mitf target genes

Melanocytes produce and transfer melanin pigments to keratinocytes, where the pigments help to protect the skin from UV damage. Tyrosinase initiates the melanin biosynthetic pathway, melanogenesis, by oxidizing tyrosine to L-DOPA. MITF stimulates melanogenesis by activating transcription of TYR and other pigmentation genes including TYRP1, DCT, PMEL, and MLANA.38, 39, 40 MITF also regulates certain ubiquitously expressed genes that are important for melanocyte survival (eg, BCL2) and proliferation (eg, CDK2).41, 42

Technologies such as DNA microarrays, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) have enabled comprehensive analyses of transcription factor-target genes. By leveraging gene ontology analysis, it is possible to categorize the genes regulated by transcription factors and thereby predict potential functions of transcription factors.

Genome-wide analyses of gene expression and MITF-binding regions in melanoma cell lines and human primary melanocytes revealed that MITF target genes are enriched in pigmentation, DNA replication and repair, and mitosis.2, 4, 43, 44 MITF affects metabolism by activating expression of a key transcriptional regulator of metabolism, PGC1α, and promotes lysosome biogenesis through activating lysosomal genes.45, 46

Genome-wide analyses also identified genes that MITF binds and are induced by MITF knockdown, suggesting that MITF could work as a repressor.4 MITF and PU.1 were seen to repress gene transcription by recruiting Eos and a co-repressor complex in osteoclasts.47 MITF repressed C/EBPα, a key transcription factor for basophil differentiation, to promote mast cell differentiation48 and was seen to associate with FHL2 to repress Erbin expression in cardiomyocytes.49 MITF also repressed ZEB1 transcription in the 501mel human melanoma cell line,50 as well as inflammation genes through repressing c-Jun expression in mouse and human melanoma cell lines.51 MITF recruits RBPJK as a cofactor in repressing transcription of microRNAs miR-221 and miR-222 in human melanoma cell lines.52 It remains mechanistically unclear how MITF represses target genes and what functional roles MITF has through repressing gene expression.

Thus, MITF promotes melanocyte differentiation and regulates essential functions for cell homeostasis including survival, cell cycle, and metabolism, through regulating its numerous target genes (Figure 2). Researchers have found MITF target genes ranging from expected pigmentation genes to unexpected ubiquitously expressed fundamental genes—and more genes remain to be identified and characterized. It is curious to know how MITF regulates interactions between melanocytes and other cell types such as keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and immune cells. It is important to know whether MITF target genes are dysregulated in melanoma and, if so, what roles the dysregulated genes have in melanoma development and responses to therapies.

Figure 2
Figure 2

MITF (microphthalmia-associated transcription factor) functions and target genes. MITF regulates gene transcription through binding as a homodimer to the E-box motifs. MITF promotes differentiation through regulating pigmentation genes including TYR, TYRP1, DCT, PMEL, and MLANA; has pro-survival roles through regulating anti-apoptotic genes such as BCL2 and BCL2A1; and regulates cell cycle and metabolism through regulating CDK2 and PPARGC1A, respectively, in melanocytes and melanoma.

Co-activators and chromatin remodeling complexes

Transcription factors, co-factors, and chromatin remodeling complexes work together to regulate gene transcription by changing chromatin states. MITF recruits histone acetyltransferases p300 and CBP to activate gene transcription.53, 54 MITF requires BRG1, a core component of SWI/SNF complexes BAF and PBAF, to regulate pigmentation genes, but not other MITF target genes such as CDK2, BCL2, and TBX2, in the SK-MEL-5 melanoma cell line.55, 56 BRM, another core component of BAF, but not PBAF, also associates with MITF to regulate pigmentation genes, but cannot completely substitute for BRG1.56 Mass spectrometry revealed that MITF forms complexes with various proteins, including the PBAF chromatin remodeling complex.57 Moreover, bioinformatic analyses of ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data showed that combinations of MITF, SOX10, TFAP2A, and YY1 recruit BRG1 and regulate genes involved in pigmentation and melanocyte development.57 These studies suggest that MITF forms protein complexes with co-factors and chromatin remodeling complexes to regulate gene transcription. It remains unclear if MITF makes different complexes and, if so, what regulates the formation of different MITF-containing complexes.

The mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway and mitf

The receptor tyrosine kinase c-Kit has important roles in melanocyte development, as does MITF.58, 59 Hemesath et al and Wu et al endeavored to decipher possible interactions between c-Kit and MITF and found that c-Kit activates mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and ribosomal S kinase 1 (RSK1), which in turn phosphorylate MITF at serine 73 and serine 409, respectively.60, 61 These phosphorylations promote ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of MITF.61 In addition, serine 73 phosphorylation is required for the interaction of MITF with p300/CBP in vitro.54 Mutations of either one or both of serines 73 and 409 did not obviously affect pigmentation in mice.62 However the role of MAPK signaling in modulating MITF levels has been clearly demonstrated in melanoma (see below) and seen to affect MITF protein and RNA levels, as well as target gene expression. Therefore, it remains to be determined whether these signal-dependent serine phosphorylations of MITF might modulate melanocyte function in vivo, but in ways that require environment-responsive contexts that remain to be determined.

The MAPK signaling pathway is activated by oncogenic mutation of BRAF, NRAS, NF1, or KIT and has key roles in melanoma.63, 64 In human primary melanocytes, activation of the MAPK pathway by exogenous BRAFV600E repressed MITF-M gene expression.65 BRAF and MEK inhibitors increased expression of MITF and MITF targets in human melanoma cell lines and increased MITF targets in human melanomas.45, 66, 67, 68 Among the targets found to be regulated by MITF in a BRAF/MAPK-dependent fashion was PGC1α, a master regulator of mitochondrial metabolism,45 demonstrating the impact of MAPK-mediated MITF regulation on metabolic state in melanoma, as well as responsiveness to targeted therapies. These studies have suggested that the MAPK signaling pathway may repress MITF-M at the protein-stability level (via ubiquitin-dependent degradation), as well as the transcriptional level (via various mechanisms). In some melanoma cell lines, however, the MAPK signaling pathway was alternatively seen to activate MITF-M transcription; it remains unclear in exactly which cellular contexts these alternative modes of regulation occur.69

Mitf as an oncogene

The EWS-ATF1 fusion protein in human clear cell sarcoma mimics the ‘cAMP activated’ state of melanocytes due to the homology between ATF1 and CREB coupled to the constitutive activation function of this fusion protein, which replaces cAMP-dependency with potent transactivation potential from the EWS fusion partner.70 In this tumor, EWS-ATF1 was seen to activate MITF-M transcription, and MITF expression was seen to be required for survival and growth of the sarcoma,70 supporting MITF’s oncogenic role in human malignancy. Furthermore, the MITF locus is amplified in 5–20% of human melanomas.64, 65 Although Harbst et al. did not detect amplification of the MITF locus in 49 tumors from 22 patients,71 amplifications were described in the Melanoma TCGA analyses from multiple institutions.64 Technical differences such as in computational algorithms could contribute to these differences. Immortalized primary melanocytes infected with viral constructs expressing BRAFV600E cannot form colonies in soft agar, but with additional infection by virus expressing MITF, these cells form colonies in soft agar, suggesting that MITF is required for anchorage-independent growth.65 Most melanomas express MITF, including BRAF mutant melanomas, suggesting MITF expression is rescued by mechanisms such as MITF gene amplification and activated Wnt signaling.64, 65, 72 Although BRAF-MEK-MAPK signaling targets MITF for ubiquitination and proteolysis,54, 60, 61 oncogenic dysregulation of MITF may help to maintain MITF levels.65 Anchorage-independent growth can be enabled by MITF target genes such as PGC1α and c-Met.45, 73, 74, 75, 76 During anchorage-independent growth, mitochondrial reactive oxygen species induced by detachment of cancer cells from extracellular matrix77 can be reduced by proteins upregulated by PGC1α.45, 75, 76 c-Met has a key role in KRAS-dependent anchorage-independent growth in KRAS mutant cancers.74 The germline MITFE318K mutation was subsequently discovered by multiple groups to encode a familial melanoma gene and to increase the risk of both melanoma and renal cell carcinoma.78, 79 The MITFE318K protein has increased transcriptional regulatory activity compared with wild-type MITF, because the mutation occurs at a consensus sequence important for SUMOylation that normally suppresses MITF transcriptional function.80 That this variant encodes gain-of-function activity was supported by the phenotypic finding of increased non-blue eye color among patients containing this germline allele.79 All of these studies suggest that MITF functions as an oncogene in at least a subset of human melanomas. It is unclear whether MITF may be dysregulated by additional mechanisms within melanomas containing neither amplification nor a coding region mutation.

Fusion proteins of the other MiT family members, TFE3 and TFEB, were also seen to function as oncogenes in renal cell carcinoma or alveolar soft part sarcoma.81, 82, 83, 84 In pancreatic adenocarcinomas, MiT family members regulate autophagy and lysosomal genes required for cancer growth.85 These results suggest that MiT family members can function as oncogenes in various cancers. Thus far, the functional effects of MITF and its family members within the oncogenic context have been seen to include alterations in survival (targeting BCL2 and BCL2A1, metabolism, autophagy, and multiple additional potential mechanisms).41, 45, 85, 86, 87

Low-mitf melanoma

Bioinformatic analyses of melanoma gene expression datasets revealed that a subset of melanomas expresses a low level of MITF. MITF-low melanomas were described to be more invasive (metastatic) and MITF-high melanomas more proliferative (less invasive).88 Shuttling between high and low MITF levels has been suggested to produce rheostat-like modulation of melanoma cells between those two states, likely in response to a variety of environmental triggers.89 High MITF activates subsets of cell cycle and differentiation genes that make melanomas proliferative and more differentiated. Meanwhile, clear mechanisms to explain why MITF-low melanomas are invasive remain to be determined.

Treatment of HGF-CDK4 (R24C) mouse melanomas with gp100-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T cells resulted in decreased expression of gp100 and other pigmentation genes, suggesting that MITF was repressed.33 Also, inhibition of TNF-α increased pigmentation gene expression, suggesting that TNF-α repressed MITF expression.33 MITF-low, NF-kB-high, AXL-high human melanoma cell lines, and human melanoma tumors are relatively resistant to BRAFV600E inhibition and AXL is a candidate for the resistance.90, 91 However, the response to AXL inhibition varies among melanomas, so the precise mechanism of the resistance remains incompletely understood.90, 91

Single-cell quantitative RT-PCR revealed that the MITF expression level is heterogeneous in 501mel human melanoma cell monolayers, with high-, intermediate-, and low-MITF subpopulations of melanoma cells.92 Single-cell RNA-seq of metastatic melanoma clinical samples identified a subset of melanoma cells expressing a low level of MITF and a high level of AXL.93 These findings support the concept that cell populations within a melanoma may shuttle between high and low MITF expression levels.

It remains unclear how MITF is repressed in vivo and how melanoma cells survive with low MITF. As mentioned above, genomic amplification of MITF might help to maintain MITF expression in the setting of MAPK pathway activation, although the majority of BRAF/NRAS/NF1 mutant melanomas do not harbor MITF copy number gains. It is likely that distinct survival responses occur in MITF-low (or MITF-absent) melanomas. MITF could be repressed by several different mechanisms, and the repression mechanisms could determine how melanoma responds to therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and MAPK inhibitors.

Targeting mitf

MITF could be an attractive target for melanoma therapy, since it is essential for melanoma survival yet has limited requirements in non-melanocyte cellular lineages. In this way it parallels other lineage specific transcription factor oncogenes, such as the estrogen receptor and androgen receptor. However, unlike those nuclear hormone receptors, which are more straightforwardly targeted by small molecules (due to their ligand binding dependencies), drug targeting of MITF is significantly more challenging. HDAC inhibitors were seen to repress MITF-M transcription through potent repression of SOX10 expression.94 Ubiquitination of proteins promotes and deubiquitination attenuates protein degradation. As MITF is degraded via the proteasome, inhibition of MITF deubiquitination promotes MITF degradation.61 Zhao et al found that USP13 deubiquitinated MITF in melanoma cells and knockdown of USP13 decreased MITF protein and growth of those cells in soft agar and mouse xenografts.95 Screening using a TRPM1 promoter-driven luciferase reporter revealed that a compound ML329 reduced MITF and MITF target gene expression.96 Screening revealed that nelfinavir, a human immunodeficiency virus drug, repressed MITF-M transcription by repressing PAX3.68 Nelfinavir also sensitized melanomas to MAPK inhibitors.68

As discussed above, melanomas can be tolerant of a low level of MITF, and low-MITF melanoma can be more invasive in specific contexts.33, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93 It is unclear whether a high-MITF melanoma would survive partial inhibition of MITF; nonetheless repression of MITF must be approached with caution, and the optimal MITF levels and physiological conditions for effective therapeutic repression remain to be determined.

Conclusions and perspectives

Researchers have discovered many predicted and unpredicted roles of MITF, and these findings have revealed new aspects of melanocyte and melanoma biology. However, many important and intriguing questions remain to be resolved.

MITF-M transcription is activated by the cAMP-CREB signaling pathway, the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, PAX3, SOX10, and ONECUT2, and is repressed by ALX3, FOXD3, POU3F2, TGF-β, TNF-α, and hypoxia (Figure 3).14, 16, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37 Other signaling pathways and transcription factors may also regulate MITF-M transcription. Indeed, it is plausible that dysregulation of certain signaling pathways may be found to cause dysregulation of MITF, representing alternative oncogenic mechanisms to the previously characterized genomic amplification and E318-mutation. The relative roles of those factors in the regulation of MITF-M transcription in different physiological conditions remain important areas of current investigation.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Transcriptional regulation of MITF-M. The cAMP-CREB signaling pathway, the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, PAX3, SOX10, and ONECUT2 activate MITF-M transcription in a cis-acting fashion. The Hippo signaling effector proteins TAZ and YAP1 work as PAX3 co-activators. POU3F2 and ALX3 repress MITF-M transcription in a cis-acting fashion. PAX3 could also repress MITF-M transcription by activating POU3F2 transcription. In hypoxic conditions, DEC1, induced by HIF1α, represses MITF-M transcription in a cis-acting fashion. FOXD3 represses MITF-M transcription through inhibiting DNA binding of PAX3 or by another mechanism. Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) represses MITF-M transcription through GLI2 and through repression of PAX3 transcription by its downstream effectors SMADs. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) could activate and repress MITF-M transcription.

MITF regulates key genes in multiple vital processes, such as pigmentation, survival, invasiveness, and the cell cycle (Figure 2). Like the studies finding that MITF regulates sets of lysosomal and metabolic genes,45, 46 further analysis and categorization of MITF targets could uncover new roles of MITF, including ways in which its functions modulate responses to melanoma therapeutics. It remains incompletely understood which transcription factors and chromatin remodelers MITF cooperates with to regulate gene transcription in different functional contexts, and whether different combinations of MITF and transcription factors/chromatin remodelers determine which categories of genes MITF regulates. To what extent does MITF regulate the same genes in melanocytes and melanoma? How does the mutational or epigenetic landscape of a particular melanoma determine which functions of MITF will dominate within a specific melanoma? How might this information guide therapeutic strategies? Which melanomas are functionally independent of MITF’s biological roles, and what mechanisms have supplanted MITF-dependency? Are those factors, in turn, targetable for therapeutic benefit? Immunotherapy is an extremely promising, yet still imperfect treatment for most patients with melanoma.97 The regulation of pigmentation and other melanoma antigens by MITF raises the question of whether MITF may affect an immune response against melanoma through regulating the expression of antigens and other melanoma genes related to tumor immunity.

Advances in our understanding of the biological functions of the MITF transcription factor have revealed fundamental insights into basic biology of pigmentation, melanocyte development, and melanoma. This remarkable ‘Master Regulator’ of the melanocyte lineage has key roles in both normal and pathologic states, and there is a strong indication that it continues to hold valuable clues of importance in benign and malignant diseases. Researchers’ curiosity, serendipity, passion, and hard work may help to answer these questions, and thereby fundamentally expand our knowledge of melanocyte and melanoma biology and improve the lives of melanoma patients.

References

  1. 1.

    , , et al, microphthalmia, a critical factor in melanocyte development, defines a discrete transcription factor family. Genes Dev 1994; 8: 2770–2780.

  2. 2.

    , , et al, Novel MITF targets identified using a two-step DNA microarray strategy. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2008; 21: 665–676.

  3. 3.

    , , et al, Fifteen-year quest for microphthalmia-associated transcription factor target genes. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2010; 23: 27–40.

  4. 4.

    , , et al, Essential role of microphthalmia transcription factor for DNA replication, mitosis and genomic stability in melanoma. Oncogene 2011; 30: 2319–2332.

  5. 5.

    . Neue mutationen und Kopplungsgruppen bei der Hausmaus. Z Induct Abstammungs-Vererbungsl 1942; 80: 220–246.

  6. 6.

    , , et al, Molecular basis of mouse microphthalmia (mi mutations helps explain their developmental and phenotypic consequences. Nat Genet 1994; 8: 256–263.

  7. 7.

    , , . Melanocytes and the microphthalmia transcription factor network. Annu Rev Genet 2004; 38: 365–411.

  8. 8.

    , , et al, Mutations at the mouse microphthalmia locus are associated with defects in a gene encoding a novel basic-helix-loop-helix-zipper protein. Cell 1993; 74: 395–404.

  9. 9.

    , , . Waardenburg syndrome type 2 caused by mutations in the human microphthalmia (MITF gene. Nat Genet 1994; 8: 251–255.

  10. 10.

    , . Genomic analysis of the Microphthalmia locus and identification of the MITF-J/Mitf-J isoform. Gene 2005; 347: 73–82.

  11. 11.

    , , et al, Transcription factor MITF regulates cardiac growth and hypertrophy. J Clin Invest 2006; 116: 2673–2681.

  12. 12.

    , , et al, Microphthalmia transcription factor regulates pancreatic β–cell function. Diabetes 2013; 62: 2834–2842.

  13. 13.

    , , et al, SOX10 mutations in patients with Waardenburg-Hirschsprung disease. Nat Genet 1998; 18: 171–173.

  14. 14.

    , , et al, Epistatic relationship between Waardenburg syndrome genes MITF and PAX3. Nat Genet 1998; 3: 283–286.

  15. 15.

    , , . Assembling neural crest regulatory circuits into a gene regulatory network. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2010; 26: 581–603.

  16. 16.

    , , et al. Regulation of the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor gene by the Waardenburg Syndrome type 4 gene SOX10. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 30757–30760.

  17. 17.

    , , et al, A phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Pax3 axis regulates Brn-2 expression in melanoma. Mol Cell Biol 2012; 32: 4674–4683.

  18. 18.

    , , et al, MITF and PAX3 play distinct roles in melanoma cell migration; outline of a ‘genetic switch’ theory involving MITF and PAX3 in proliferative and invasive phenotypes of melanoma. Front Oncol 2013; 3: 229.

  19. 19.

    , , et al, Eumelanin biosynthesis is regulated by coordinate expression of tyrosinase and tyrosinase-related protein-1 genes. Exp Cell Res 1993; 207: 33–40.

  20. 20.

    , , et al, Microphthalmia gene product as a signal transducer in cAMP-induced differentiation of melanocytes. J Cell Biol 1998; 142: 827–835.

  21. 21.

    , , et al, α-Melanocyte-stimulating hormone signaling regulates expression of microphthalmia, a gene deficient in Waardenburg syndrome. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 33042–33047.

  22. 22.

    , , et al, Central role of p53 in the suntan response and pathologic hyperpigmentation. Cell 2007; 128: 853–864.

  23. 23.

    , , et al, Induction of melanocyte-specific microphthalmia-associated transcription factor by Wnt-3a. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 14013–14016.

  24. 24.

    , , et al, The transcription factor onecut-2 controls the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 285: 1200–1205.

  25. 25.

    , , et al, Pax3 and hippo signaling coordinate melanocyte gene expression in neural crest. Cell Rep 2014; 9: 1885–1895.

  26. 26.

    , , et al, The winged-helix transcription factor FoxD3 is important for establishing the neural crest lineage and repressing melanogenesis in avian embryos. Development 2001; 128: 1467–1479.

  27. 27.

    , . FOXD3 regulates the lineage switch between neural crest-derived glial cells and pigment cells by repressing MITF through a non-canonical mechanism. Development 2009; 136: 1849–1858.

  28. 28.

    , , . FoxD3 controls melanophore specification in the zebrafish neural crest by regulation of Mitf. Dev Biol 2009; 332: 408–417.

  29. 29.

    , , et al, Brn-2 represses microphthalmia-associated transcription factor expression and marks a distinct subpopulation of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor-negative melanoma cells. Cancer Res 2008; 68: 7788–7794.

  30. 30.

    , , et al, Key roles for transforming growth factor beta in melanocyte stem cell maintenance. Cell Stem Cell 2010; 6: 130–140.

  31. 31.

    , , et al, Inhibition of PAX3 by TGF-β modulates melanocyte viability. Mol Cell 2008; 32: 554–563.

  32. 32.

    , , et al, Expression of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), which is critical for melanoma progression, is inhibited by both transcription factor GLI2 and transforming growth factor-β. J Biol Chem 2012; 287: 17996–18004.

  33. 33.

    , , et al, Melanomas resist T-cell therapy through inflammation-induced reversible dedifferentiation. Nature 2012; 490: 412–416.

  34. 34.

    , , et al, NFATc2 is an intrinsic regulator of melanoma dedifferentiation. Oncogene 2016; 35: 2862–2872.

  35. 35.

    , , et al, The immune microenvironment confers resistance to MAPK pathway inhibitors through macrophage-derived TNFα. Cancer Discov 2014; 4: 1214–1229.

  36. 36.

    , , et al, Hypoxia-induced transcriptional repression of the melanoma-associated oncogene MITF. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: E924–E933.

  37. 37.

    , , et al, Developmental mechanisms of stripe patterns in rodents. Nature 2016; 539: 518–523.

  38. 38.

    , , et al, Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor as a regulator for melanocyte-specific transcription of the human tyrosinase gene. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14: 8058–8070.

  39. 39.

    , , et al, Different cis-acting elements are involved in the regulation of TRP1 and TRP2 promoter activities by cyclic AMP: pivotal role of M boxes (GTCATGTGCT) and of microphthalmia. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18: 694–702.

  40. 40.

    , , et al, MLANA/MART1 and SILV/PMEL17/GP100 are transcriptionally regulated by MITF in melanocytes and melanoma. Am J Pathol 2003; 163: 333–343.

  41. 41.

    , , et al, Bcl2 regulation by the melanocyte master regulator Mitf modulates lineage survival and melanoma cell viability. Cell 2002; 109: 707–718.

  42. 42.

    , , et al, Critical role of CDK2 for melanoma growth linked to its melanocyte-specific transcriptional regulation by MITF. Cancer Cell 2004; 6: 565–576.

  43. 43.

    , , et al, YY1 regulates melanocyte development and function by cooperating with MITF. PLoS Genet 2012; 8: e1002688.

  44. 44.

    , , et al, Enhancer-targeted genome editing selectively blocks innate resistance to oncokinase inhibition. Genome Res 2014; 24: 751–760.

  45. 45.

    , , et al, Oncogenic BRAF regulates oxidative metabolism via PGC1α and MITF. Cancer Cell 2013; 23: 302–315.

  46. 46.

    , , et al, MITF drives endolysosomal biogenesis and potentiates Wnt signaling in melanoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015; 112: E420–E429.

  47. 47.

    , , et al, Eos, MITF, and PU.1 recruit corepressors to osteoclast-specific genes in committed myeloid progenitors. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27: 4018–4027.

  48. 48.

    , , et al, Antagonistic regulation by the transcription factors C/EBPα and MITF specifies basophil and mast cell fates. Immunity 2013; 39: 97–110.

  49. 49.

    , , et al, FHL2 switches MITF from activator to repressor of Erbin expression during cardiac hypertrophy. Int J Cardiol 2015; 195: 85–94.

  50. 50.

    , , et al, Identification of a ZEB2-MITF-ZEB1 transcriptional network that controls melanogenesis and melanoma progression. Cell Death Differ 2014; 21: 1250–1261.

  51. 51.

    , , et al, MITF and c-Jun antagonism interconnects melanoma dedifferentiation with pro-inflammatory cytokine responsiveness and myeloid cell recruitment. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 8755.

  52. 52.

    , , et al, Interactions of Melanoma Cells with Distal Keratinocytes Trigger Metastasis via Notch Signaling Inhibitor of MITF. Mol Cell 2015; 59: 664–676.

  53. 53.

    , , et al, CBP/p300 as a co-factor for the Microphthalmia transcription factor. Oncogene 1997; 14: 3083–3092.

  54. 54.

    , , et al, Lineage-specific signaling in melanocytes. C-kit stimulation recruits p300/CBP to microphthalmia. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 17983–17986.

  55. 55.

    , , et al, The microphthalmia-associated transcription factor requires SWI/SNF enzymes to activate melanocyte-specific genes. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 20233–2-241.

  56. 56.

    , , et al, Heterogeous SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes promote expression of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor target genes in melanoma. Oncogene 2010; 29: 81–92.

  57. 57.

    , , et al, Transcription factor MITF and remodeller BRG1 define chromatin organization at regulatory elements in melanoma cells. Elife 2015; 4: e06857.

  58. 58.

    , , . TRP-2/DT, a new early melanoblast marker, shows that steel growth factor (c-kit ligand) is a survival factor. Development 1992; 115: 1111–1119.

  59. 59.

    , , et al, Review: melanocyte migration and survival controlled by SCF/c-kit expression. J Investing Dermatol Symp Proc 2001; 6: 1–5.

  60. 60.

    , , et al, MAP kinase links the transcription factor Microphthalmia to c-Kit singalling in melanocytes. Nature 1998; 391: 298–301.

  61. 61.

    , , et al, c-Kit triggers dual phosphorylations, which couple activation and degradation of the essential melanocyte factor Mi. Genes Dev 2000; 14: 301–312.

  62. 62.

    , , et al, The role of MITF phosphorylation sites during coat color and eye development in mice analyzed by bacterial artificial chromosome transgene rescue. Genetics 2009; 183: 581–594.

  63. 63.

    , , et al, Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 2002; 417: 949–954.

  64. 64.

    Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Genomic classification of cutaneous melanoma. Cell 2015; 161: 1681–1696.

  65. 65.

    , , et al, Integrative genomic analyses identify MITF as a lineage survival oncogene amplified in malignant melanoma. Nature 2005; 436: 117–122.

  66. 66.

    , . Elevated expression of MITF counteracts B-RAF-stimulated melanocyte and melanoma cell proliferation. J Cell Biol 2005; 170: 703–708.

  67. 67.

    , , . BRAF inhibition is associated with enhanced melanoma antigen expression and a more favorable tumor microenvironment in patients with metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19: 1225–1231.

  68. 68.

    , , et al, Inhibiting drivers of non-mutational drug tolerance is a salvage strategy for targeted melanoma therapy. Cancer Cell 2016; 29: 270–284.

  69. 69.

    , , et al, Oncogenic BRAF regulates melanoma proliferation through the lineage specific factor MITF. PLoS One 2008; 3: e2734.

  70. 70.

    , , et al, Oncogenic MITF dysregulation in clear cell sarcoma: defining the MiT family of human cancers. Cancer Cell 2006; 9: 473–484.

  71. 71.

    , , et al, Molecular and genetic diversity in the metastatic process of melanoma. J Pathol 2014; 233: 39–50.

  72. 72.

    , , . The WNT-less wonder: WNT-independent β-catenin signaling. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2016; 29: 524–540.

  73. 73.

    , , et al, c-Met expression is regulated by Mitf in the melanocyte lineage. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 10365–10373.

  74. 74.

    , , et al, Enhanced MET translation and signaling sustains K-ras-driven proliferation under anchorage-independent growth conditions. Cancer Res 2015; 75: 2851–2862.

  75. 75.

    , , et al, Kinase suppressor of ras1 (KSR1) regulates PGC1 α and estrogen-related receptor α to promote oncogenic Ras-dependent anchorage-independent growth. Mol Cell Biol 2011; 31: 2453–2461.

  76. 76.

    , , et al, Mitochondrial biogenesis is required for the anchorage-independent survival and propagation of stem-like cancer cells. Oncotarget 2015; 6: 14777–14795.

  77. 77.

    , , et al, Reductive carboxylation supports redox homeostasis during anchorage-independent growth. Nature 2016; 532: 255–258.

  78. 78.

    , , et al, A SUMOylation-defective MITF germline mutation predisposes to melanoma and renal carcinoma. Nature 2011; 480: 94–98.

  79. 79.

    , , et al, A novel recurrent mutation in MITF predisposes to familial and sporadic melanoma. Nature 2011; 480: 99–103.

  80. 80.

    , , et al, Sumoylation of MITF and its related family members TFE3 and TFEB. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 146–155.

  81. 81.

    , , et al, The t(X;1)(p11.2;q21.2) translocation in papillary renal cell carcinoma fuses a novel gene PRCC to the TFE3 transcription factor gene. Hum Mol Genet 1996; 5: 1333–1338.

  82. 82.

    , , et al, Molecular genetics and cellular features of TFE3 and TFEB fusion kidney cancers. Nat Rev Urol 2014; 11: 465–475.

  83. 83.

    , , et al, Cloning of an Alpha-TFEB fusion in renal tumors harboring the t(6;11)(p21;q13) chromosome translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 6051–6056.

  84. 84.

    , , et al, The der(17)t(X;17)(p11;q25) of human alveolar soft part sarcoma fuses the TFE3 transcription factor gene to ASPL, a novel gene at 17q25. Oncogene 2001; 20: 48–57.

  85. 85.

    , , et al, Transcriptional control of autophagy-lysosome function drives pancreatic cancer metabolism. Nature 2015; 524: 361–365.

  86. 86.

    , , et al, BCL2A1 is a lineage-specific antiapoptotic melanoma oncogene that confers resistance to BRAF inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110: 4321–4326.

  87. 87.

    , . Pro-survival role of MITF in melanoma. J Invest Dermatol 2015; 135: 352–358.

  88. 88.

    , , et al, Metastatic potential of melanomas defined by specific gene expression profiles with no BRAF signature. Pigment Cell Res 2006; 19: 290–302.

  89. 89.

    , . Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor in melanoma development and MAP-kinase pathway targeted therapy. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2015; 28: 390–406.

  90. 90.

    , , et al, A melanoma cell state distinction influences sensitivity to MAPK pathway inhibitors. Cancer Discov 2014; 4: 816–827.

  91. 91.

    , , et al, Low MITF/AXL ratio predicts early resistance to multiple targeted drugs in melanoma. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 5712.

  92. 92.

    , , et al, Single-cell gene expression signatures reveal melanoma cell heterogeneity. Oncogene 2015; 34: 3251–3263.

  93. 93.

    , , et al, Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 2016; 352: 189–196.

  94. 94.

    , , et al, Pharmacologic suppression of MITF expression via HDAC inhibitors in the melanocyte lineage. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 2008; 21: 457–463.

  95. 95.

    , , et al, Regulation of MITF stability by the USP13 deubiquitinase. Nat Commun 2011; 2: 414.

  96. 96.

    , , et al, A Small Molecule Inhibitor of the MITF Molecular Pathway. Probe Reports from the NIH Molecular Libraries Program, [Internet], National Center for Biotechnology Information (US): Bethesda (MD), 2010-2012 December 13 [updated 2014 September 18].

  97. 97.

    , , et al, Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 23–34.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge C. Tom Powell for assistance with the manuscript, and NIH grants P01 CA163222 and R01 AR043369-19, and funding from the Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation, and the Melanoma Research Alliance.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    • Akinori Kawakami
    •  & David E Fisher

Authors

  1. Search for Akinori Kawakami in:

  2. Search for David E Fisher in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David E Fisher.