Abstract
Helicobacter infections of laboratory animals may influence the results of in vivo experiments, necessitating diagnostic methods that are specific, sensitive and rapid. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is currently the preferred diagnostic tool for detecting Helicobacter infections in mice; however, detection ability may vary considerably among laboratories. Nine commercial and academic European labs participated in a 3-year ring study that was designed to explore this problem. The authors sought to identify which PCR methods were used for detection of murine Helicobacter spp. in fecal pellets and to compare the sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility of these methods. The study consisted of four rounds in which labs tested mouse fecal samples spiked with H. bilis, H. hepaticus or H. muridarum. The first round showed differences of up to 3 logs in detection sensitivity. Over the course of the study, sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility of PCR results in all labs improved substantially. By the study's conclusion, diagnostic ability in all labs was sufficient to reliably detect Helicobacter in naturally infected mice.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee, A. et al. Helicobacter muridarum sp. nov., a microaerophilic helical bacterium with a novel ultrastructure isolated from the intestinal mucosa of rodents. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42, 27–36 (1992).
Schauer, D.B., Ghori, N. & Falkow, S. Isolation and characterization of “Flexispira rappini” from laboratory mice. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31, 2709–2714 (1993).
Dewhirst, F.E. et al. 'Flexispira rappini' strains represent at least 10 Helicobacter taxa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50, 1781–1787 (2000).
Fox, J.G. et al. Helicobacter hepaticus sp. nov., a microaerophilic bacterium isolated from livers and intestinal mucosal scrapings from mice. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32, 1238–1245 (1994).
Foltz, C.J., Fox, J.G., Yan, L. & Shames, B. Evaluation of antibiotic therapies for eradication of Helicobacter hepaticus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39, 1292–1294 (1995).
Mendes, E.N. et al. Helicobacter trogontum sp. nov., isolated from the rat intestine. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 46, 916–921 (1996).
Moura, S.B. et al. Ultrastructure of Helicobacter trogontum in culture and in the gastrointestinal tract of gnotobiotic mice. J. Med. Microbiol. 47, 513–520 (1998).
Shen, Z. et al. Helicobacter rodentium sp. nov., a urease-negative Helicobacter species isolated from laboratory mice. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47, 627–634 (1997).
Franklin, C.L. et al. Helicobacter typhlonius sp. nov., a novel murine urease-negative Helicobacter species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39, 3920–3926 (2001).
Robertson, B.R., O'Rourke, J.L., Vandamme, P., On, S.L. & Lee, A. Helicobacter ganmani sp. nov., a urease-negative anaerobe isolated from the intestines of laboratory mice. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51, 1881–1889 (2001).
Shen, Z. et al. A novel enterohepatic Helicobacter species 'Helicobacter mastomyrinus' isolated from the liver and intestine of rodents. Helicobacter 10, 59–70 (2005).
Ward, J.M., Anver, M.R., Haines, D.C. & Benveniste, R.E. Chronic active hepatitis in mice caused by Helicobacter hepaticus. Am. J. Pathol. 145, 959–968 (1994).
Fox, J.G. et al. Helicobacter bilis sp. nov., a novel Helicobacter species isolated from bile, livers, and intestines of aged, inbred mice. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33, 445–454 (1995).
Ward, J.M. et al. Inflammatory large bowel disease in immunodeficient mice naturally infected with Helicobacter hepaticus. Lab. Anim. Sci. 46, 15–20 (1996).
Shomer, N.H., Dangler, C.A., Schrenzel, M.D. & Fox, J.G. Helicobacter bilis-induced inflammatory bowel disease in scid mice with defined flora. Infect. Immun. 65, 4858–4864 (1997).
Cahill, R.J. et al. Inflammatory bowel disease: an immunity-mediated condition triggered by bacterial infection with Helicobacter hepaticus. Infect. Immun. 65, 3126–3131 (1997).
Franklin, C.L. et al. Enterohepatic lesions in SCID mice infected with Helicobacter bilis. Lab. Anim. Sci. 48, 334–339 (1998).
Shomer, N.H., Dangler, C.A., Marini, R.P. & Fox, J.G. Helicobacter bilis/Helicobacter rodentium co-infection associated with diarrhea in a colony of scid mice. Lab. Anim. Sci. 48, 455–459 (1998).
Fox, J.G. et al. A novel urease-negative Helicobacter species associated with colitis and typhlitis in IL-10-deficient mice. Infect. Immun. 67, 1757–1762 (1999).
Franklin, C.L. et al. Enteric lesions in SCID mice infected with “Helicobacter typhlonicus,” a novel urease-negative Helicobacter species. Lab. Anim. Sci. 49, 496–505 (1999).
Shomer, N.H. et al. Cholangiohepatitis and inflammatory bowel disease induced by a novel urease-negative Helicobacter species in A/J and Tac:ICR:HascidfRF mice. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 226, 420–428 (2001).
Burich, A. et al. Helicobacter-induced inflammatory bowel disease in IL-10- and T cell-deficient mice. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 281, G764–778 (2001).
Jiang, H.Q., Kushnir, N., Thurnheer, M.C., Bos, N.A. & Cebra, J.J. Monoassociation of SCID mice with Helicobacter muridarum, but not four other enterics, provokes IBD upon receipt of T cells. Gastroenterology 122, 1346–1354 (2002).
Whary, M.T. & Fox, J.G. Natural and experimental Helicobacter infections. Comp. Med. 54, 128–158 (2004).
Nicklas, W. et al. Recommendations for the health monitoring of rodent and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units. Lab. Anim. 36, 20–42 (2002).
Riley, L.K., Franklin, C.L., Hook, R.R. Jr. & Besch-Williford, C. Identification of murine helicobacters by PCR and restriction enzyme analyses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34, 942–946 (1996).
Beckwith, C.S., Franklin, C.L., Hook, R.R. Jr., Besch-Williford, C.L. & Riley, L.K. Fecal PCR assay for diagnosis of Helicobacter infection in laboratory rodents. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35, 1620–1623 (1997).
Mahler, M. et al. Comparison of four diagnostic methods for detection of Helicobacter species in laboratory mice. Lab. Anim. Sci. 48, 85–91 (1998).
Hodzic, E., McKisic, M., Feng, S. & Barthold, S.W. Evaluation of diagnostic methods for Helicobacter bilis infection in laboratory mice. Comp. Med. 51, 406–412 (2001).
Jacobsen, K. et al. Monitoring a mouse colony for Helicobacter bilis using a Helicobacter-genus-specific nested PCR. Lab. Anim. 39, 400–412 (2005).
Dew, J.A. Clifton, L.G., Sander, B.L. & Reynolds, R.P. Comparison of results of Helicobacter tests performed by commercial laboratories. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 36, 60 (1997).
Fischer, G. Helicobacter-Infektionen bei Nagern: Etablierung neuer real-time PCR Assays, Kultivierung und Infektionsversuche mit ausgewählten Helicobacter-Stämmen. Thesis, Univ. Zurich (2004).
Monteiro, L. et al. Complex polysaccharides as PCR inhibitors in feces: Helicobacter pylori model. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35, 995–998 (1997).
Shames, B. et al. Identification of widespread Helicobacter hepaticus infection in feces in commercial mouse colonies by culture and PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33, 2968–2972 (1995).
Kong, L. et al. A sensitive and specific PCR method to detect Helicobacter felis in a conventional mouse model. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 3, 73–78 (1996).
Acknowledgements
We thank D. Bulian, C. Ludwig, S. Bensch, S. Scharold, I. Krüger, M. Wöhl, S. Bellgardt, K. Mueller and E. Gubanow for excellent technical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moerth, C., Mahabir, E., Brielmeier, M. et al. Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction methods for detection of murine Helicobacter in nine diagnostic laboratories. Lab Anim 37, 521–527 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1108-521
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1108-521
