Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Quality Improvement Article
  • Published:

Quality Improvement

Management of asymptomatic neonates born in the setting of chorioamnionitis: a safety comparison of the well-baby and intensive care setting

Abstract

Background:

Evaluate the safety of a change in care setting for asymptomatic neonates born to mothers with chorioamnionitis from the neonatal intensive care unit to the well baby nursery.

Local problem:

The neonatal intensive care unit evaluation and management of babies born to mothers with chorioamionitis often involves separation of the mother-baby dyad and more invasive interventions.

Methods:

A single-center pre/post-intervention study of neonates born from January 2011 to November 2016, comparing safety outcomes in the neonatal intensive care unit (pre-intervention) and well baby nursery (post-intervention), following initiation of a triage protocol.

Interventions:

A protocolized, systematic change was done in the practice location.

Results:

Groups were similar for time to first antibiotic administration, sepsis symptom development and positive blood cultures. Length of stay (median 73.5 vs 64.4 h, P=0.0192) and % of neonates with intravenous fluid exposure (50.4% vs 7.6%, P<0.0001) were lower in the post-intervention group. Exclusive breastfeeding rates improved (pre—7.3% vs post—46.1%, P<0.0001).

Conclusions:

Asymptomatic neonates born to mothers with chorioamnionitis were safely treated in a well baby nursery under the guidance of a protocol for triage, thereby reducing NICU exposure for these neonates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Evdokia Dimitriadis, Daniel L. Rolnik, … Ellen Menkhorst

References

  1. Gibbs RS, Duff P . Progress in pathogenesis and management of clinical intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164 (5 Pt 1): 1317–1326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Churgay CA, Smith MA, Blok B . Maternal fever during labor—what does it mean? J Am Board Fam Pract. 1994; 7 (1): 14–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson CT, Farzin A, Burd I . Current management and long-term outcomes following chorioamnionitis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014; 41 (4): 649–669.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention of perinatal group b streptococcal disease- Revised Guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010; 59 (RR-10): 1–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shakib J, Buchi K, Smith E, Young PC . Management of newborns born to mothers with chorioamnionitis: is it time for a kinder, gentler approach? Acad Pediatr 2015; 15 (3): 340–344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Renfrew MJ, Craig D, Dyson L, McCormick F, Rice S, King SE et al. Breastfeeding promotion for infants in neonatal units: a systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2009; 13 (40): 1–146iii–iv.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dall'Oglio I, Salvatori G, Bonci E, Nantini B, D'Agostino G, Dotta A . Breastfeeding promotion in neonatal intensive care unit: impact of a new program toward a BFHI for high-risk infants. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96 (11): 1626–1631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wight NE . Breastfeeding the NICU infant: what to expect. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 58 (4): 840–854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boundy EO, Dastjerdi R, Spiegelman D, Fawzi WW, Missmer SA, Leiberman E et al. Kangaroo mother care and neonatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2016; 137 (1): 2015–2238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee HC, Martin-Anderson S, Dudley RA . Clinician perspectives on barriers to and opportunities for skin-to-skin contact for premature infants in neonatal intensive care units. Breastfeed Med 2012; 7 (2): 79–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Association of Womens' Health Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. Immediate and Sustatined skin-to-skin contact for the healthy term newborn after birth: AWHONN practice brief number 5. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs 2016; 45 (6): 842–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parillo JE, Sharma S et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006; 34 (6): 1589–1596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Levels of neonatal care. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (3): 587–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. American academy of pediatrics committee on environmental health. Noise: a hazard for the fetus and newborn. Pediatrics 1997; 100 (4): 724–727.

  15. Carbajal R, Rousset A, Danan C, Coquery S, Nolent P, Cucrocq S et al. Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units. JAMA 2008; 300 (1): 60–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodriguez RG, Pattini AE . Neonatal intensive care unit lighting: update and recommendations. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2016; 114 (4): 361–367.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Feeley N, Waitzer E, Sherrard K, Boisvert L, Zelkowitz P . Fathers' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to their involvement with their newborn hospitalised in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Nurs 2013; 22 (3-4): 521–530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pennestri MH, Gaudreau H, Bouvette-Turcot AA, Moss E, Lecompte V, Atkinson L et al. Attachment disorganization among children in neonatal intensive care unit: preliminary results. Early Hum Dev. 2015; 91 (10): 601–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Doering LV, Moser DK, Dracup K . Correlates of anxiety, hostility, depression, and psychosocial adjustment in parents of NICU infants. Neonatal Netw 2000; 19 (5): 15–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Busse M, Stromgren K, Thorngate L, Thomas KA . Parents' responses to stress in the neonatal intensive care unit. Crit Care Nurse 2013; 33 (4): 52–59quiz 60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Shaw RJ, Bernard RS, Deblois T, Ikuta LM, Ginzburg K, Koopman C . The relationship between acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder in the neonatal intensive care unit. Psychosomatics 2009; 50 (2): 131–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brady MT . Health care-associated infections in the neonatal intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control 2005; 33 (5): 268–275.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Custer JW, Winters BD, Goode V, Robinson KA, Yang T, Pronovost PJ et al. Diagnostic errors in the pediatric and neonatal ICU: a systematic review. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2015; 16 (1): 29–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Davanzo R, Monasta L, Ronfani L, Brovedani P, Demarini S . Breastfeeding at NICU discharge: a multicenter Italian study. J Hum Lact. 2013; 29 (3): 374–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lefebvre F, Ducharme M . Incidence and duration of lactation and lactational performance among mothers of low-birth-weight and term infants. CMAJ 1989; 140 (10): 1159–1164.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Goodman DC, Little GA . General pediatrics, neonatology, and the law of diminishing returns. Pediatrics 1998; 102 (2 Pt 1): 396–399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harrison W, Goodman D . Epidemiologic trends in neonatal intensive care, 2007–2012. JAMA Pediatr 2015; 169 (9): 855–862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Langellier BA, Pia Chaparro M, Whaley SE . Social and institutional factors that affect breastfeeding duration among WIC participants in Los Angeles County, California. Matern Child Health J 2012; 16 (9): 1887–1895.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Li R, Darling N, Maurice E, Barker L, Grummer-Strawn LM . Breastfeeding rates in the United States by characteristics of the child, mother, or family: the 2002 National Immunization Survey. Pediatrics 2005; 115 (1): e31–e37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. World Health Organziation. Early initiation of breastfeeding. 2017, available at http://www.who.int/elena/titles/early_breastfeeding/en/Accessed 27 January 2017.

  31. American Public Health Association. A Call to Action on Breastfeeding: A Fundamental Public Health Issue. 2007, available at https://www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statements/policy-database/2014/07/29/13/23/a-call-to-action-on-breastfeeding-a-fundamental-public-health-issueAccessed on 31 May 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Hughes Driscoll.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peterson, D., Hoffman, S., El-Metwally, D. et al. Management of asymptomatic neonates born in the setting of chorioamnionitis: a safety comparison of the well-baby and intensive care setting. J Perinatol 37, 1236–1241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.120

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.120

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links