Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Communication-related allegations against physicians caring for premature infants

Journal of Perinatology volume 37, pages 1148–1152 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

Maternal–fetal medicine physicians (MFMp) and neonatal–perinatal medicine physicians (NPMp) caring for premature infants and their families are exposed to significant risk for malpractice actions. Effective communication practices have been implicated to decrease litigious intentions but the extent of miscommunication as a cause of legal action is essentially unknown in this population. Analysis of communication-related allegations (CRAs) may help toward improving patient care and physician–patient relationships as well as decrease litigation risks.

Study Design:

We retrospectively reviewed the Westlaw database, a primary online legal research resource used by United States lawyers and legal professionals, for malpractice cases against physicians involving premature infants. Inclusion criteria were: 22 to 36 weeks gestational age, cases related to peripartum events through infant discharge and follow-up, and legal records with detailed factual narratives.

Results:

The search yielded 736 legal records, of which 167 met full inclusion criteria. A CRA was identified in 29% (49/167) of included cases. MFMp and/or NPMp were named in 104 and 54 cases, respectively. CRAs were identified in 26% (27/104) and 35% (19/54) of MFMp- and NPMp-named cases, respectively, with a majority involving physician–family for both specialties (81% and 74%, respectively). Physician–family CRAs for MFMp and NPMp most often regarded lack of informed consent (50% and 57%, respectively), lack of full disclosure (41% and 29%, respectively) and lack of anticipatory guidance (36% and 21%, respectively).

Conclusions:

This study of a major legal database identifies CRAs as significant causes of legal action against MFMp and NPMp involved in the care of high-risk women and infants delivered preterm. Physicians should be especially vigilant with obtaining genuine informed consent and maintaining open communication with families.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacDonald M, Seshia M. Avery’s Neonatology: Pathophysiology and Management of the Newborn. 7th edn. Wolters Kluwer: Philadelphia, 2016, pp 1–6.

  2. Donn SM . Medical liability, risk management, and the quality of health care. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 10: 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandraharan E, Arulkumaran S . Medico-legal problems in obstetrics. Curr Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 16: 206–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jena AB, Seabury S, Lakdawalla D, Chandra A . Malpractice risk according to physician specialty. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 629–636.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meadow W, Bell A, Lantos J . Physicians' experience with allegations of medical malpractice in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 1997; 99: E10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Studdert DM, Mello MM, Gawande AA, Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Yoon C et al. Cases, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 2024–2033.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stelfox HT, Gandhi TK, Orav EJ, Gustafson ML . The relation of patient satisfaction with complaints against physicians and malpractice lawsuits. Am J Med 2005; 118: 1126–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Entman SS, Miller CS, Githens PB, Whetten-Goldstein K et al. Obstetricians‘ prior malpractice experience and patients’ satisfaction with care. JAMA 1994; 272: 1583–1587.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hickson GB, Federspiel CF, Pichert JW, Miller CS, Gauld-Jaeger J, Bost P . Patient complaints and malpractice risk. JAMA 2002; 287: 2951–2957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore PJ, Adler NE, Robertson PA . Medical malpractice: the effect of doctor-patient relations on medical patient perceptions and malpractice intentions. West J Med 2000; 173: 244–250.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lester GW, Smith SG . Listening and talking to patients. A remedy for malpracticesuits? West J Med 1993; 158: 268–272.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Githens PB, Sloan FA . Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice cases following perinatal injuries. JAMA 1992; 267: 1359–1363.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. DeTora AW, Cummings CL . Ethics and the law: practical applications in the neonatal intensive care unit. NeoReviews 2015; 16: e384–e392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cowan PJ . Litigation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 10: 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Physician Insurers Association of America, 2016. Available at https://www.piaa.us (accessed 8 August 2016).

  16. National Practitioner Data Bank, 2016. Available at https://www.npdb.hrsa.gov (accessed 15 August 2016).

  17. WestlawNext online legal research, available at http://legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com/law-products/westlaw-legal-research (accessed 3 November 2015).

  18. Annas GJ . Extremely preterm birth and parental authority to refuse treatment—the case of Sidney Miller. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2118–2123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hawdon JM, Beer J, Sharp D, Upton M NHS Improvement Patient Safety Programme ‘Reducing Term Admissions to Neonatal Units’. Neonatal hypoglycaemia: learning from cases. Arch Dis Childhood Fetal Neonatal Ed 2016; 102: F110–F115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen J, Cascione M, Noori S . Analysis of lawsuits related to point-of-care ultrasonography in neonatology and pediatric subspecialties. J Perinatol 2016; 36: 784–786.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 587: effective patient-physician communication. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 389–393.

  22. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 681: disclosure and discussion of adverse events. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128: e257–e261.

  23. Cummings J, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation and intensive care before 25 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics 2015; 136: 588–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Batton DG, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Clinical report—antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation at an extremely low gestational age. Pediatrics 2009; 124: 422–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ACOG Committee on Ethics. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 439: informed consent. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 401–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cooke RWI . Good practice in consent. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 10: 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Committee on Medical Liability and Risk Management; Council on Quality Improvement and Patient Safety. Disclosure of adverse events in pediatrics. Pediatrics 2016; 138: e20163215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. TeamSTEPPS®: Strategies & Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety. Falls Church, VA: Dept. of Defense, TRICARE : Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2010. Available at https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/index.html (accessed 10 October 2016).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, LAC+USC Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    J Nguyen, H Muniraman & R Ramanathan

  2. UCLA School of Law, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    M Cascione

Authors
  1. J Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H Muniraman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M Cascione
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R Ramanathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, J., Muniraman, H., Cascione, M. et al. Communication-related allegations against physicians caring for premature infants. J Perinatol 37, 1148–1152 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.113

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.113

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links