Abstract
Objective:
To compare wound complications between staples versus subcuticular suture for skin closure in obese women (body mass index (BMI)⩾30 kg m−2) after cesarean delivery (CD).
Study Design:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare wound complications between staples and subcuticular suture closure in women, with a prepregnancy BMI⩾30 kg m−2 after CD between 2006 and 2011 at an inner-city teaching hospital. Wound complication was defined as a composite of wound disruption (hematoma or seroma) or infection diagnosed up to 6 weeks postpartum. Variables collected include age, parity, prior CDs, prior abdominal surgeries, incision type, chorioamnionitis, maternal comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes) and gestational age.
Results:
Of the 1147 women included in the study, women with staple closure were older and had higher BMIs (40.6±9.3 versus 36.1±5.4) and were more likely to be multiparous, have a prior CD, diabetes and hypertension compared with women with subcuticular suture. The overall occurrence of wound complications was 15.5% (178/1147). Women with staples had higher wound complications compared with sutures (22.0% versus 9.7%) with a 2.27 unadjusted relative risk (RR) (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.7 to 3.0) and 1.78 adjusted RR (95% CI, 1.27 to 2.49) after controlling for confounders in the final analysis, including vertical skin incisions.
Conclusions:
In obese women, skin closure with staples at the time of CD is associated with a higher rate of wound complications compared with subcuticular suture. Skin closure with subcuticular suture over staples should be considered in obese women undergoing a CD regardless of skin incision type.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: Final Data for 2014. National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 64, no. 12. National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, USA, 2015..
Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM . Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA 2014; 311 (8): 806–814.
World Health Organization (WHO). Obesity and Overweight Fact Sheet, No. 311, January 2015. Available at http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/ (retrieved 28 April 2015).
Alanis MC, Villers MS, Law TL, Steadman EM, Robinson CJ . Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (3): 271.e1–271.e7.
Conner SN, Verticchio JC, Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG . Maternal obesity and risk of post-cesarean wound complications. Am J Perinatol 2014; 31 (4): 299–304.
Dahlke JD, Mendez-Figueroa H, Rouse DJ . Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (4): 294–306.
Quality and Safety in Women’s Healthcare. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Women’s Health Care Physicians; Committee on Patient Safety and Quality Improvement, 2nd edn. www.acog.org.
Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quinones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC . Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (285): e1–e8.
Clay FS, Walsh CA, Walsh SR . Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204 (5): 378–383.
Tuuli MG, Rampersad RM, Carbone JF, Stamilio D, Macones GA, Odibo AO . Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 682–690.
Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM . Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121 (1): 33–38.
Mackeen AD, Khalifeh A, Fleisher J . Suture compared with staple skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123 (6): 1169–1175.
Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V . Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 212 (5): 621.e1–621.e10.
Mackeen AD, Devaraj T, Baxter JK . Cesarean skin closure preferences: a survey of obstetricians. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26 (8): 753–756.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Presented in poster format on 18 April 2014 at the 66th Annual Congress of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology International Session; Tokyo, Japan and at the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine; San Francisco, CA, USA held during 11–16 February 2013.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaki, M., Truong, M., Pyra, M. et al. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture. J Perinatol 36, 819–822 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.89
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.89