Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of combined sucrose and non-nutritive sucking for analgesia in newborns undergoing minor painful procedure: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objective:

The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of combined sucrose and non-nutritive sucking (NNS) for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing heel-stick procedures.

Study Design:

This randomized control trial was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital over a period of 1 year. One hundred and eighty full-term neonates with birth weight >2200 g and age >24 h were randomized to one of four interventions administered 2 min before the procedure: 2 ml of 30% sucrose (group I, n=45) or NNS (group II, n=45) or both (group III, n=45) or none (group IV, n=45). Primary outcome was composite score based on Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score.

Result:

Baseline variables were comparable among the groups. Median (interquartile range) PIPP score was 3 (2 to 4) in group III as compared with 7 (6.5 to 8) in group I, 9 (7 to 11) in group II and 13 (10.5 to 15) in group IV. Group III had significant decrease in the median PIPP score compared with other groups (P=0.000). Median PIPP score also decreased significantly with any intervention as compared with no intervention (P=0.000).

Conclusion:

Sucrose and/or NNS are effective in providing analgesia in full-term neonates undergoing heel-stick procedures, with the combined intervention being more effective compared with any single intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gibbins S, Stevens B, Hodnett E, Pinelli J, Ohlsson A, Darlington G . Efficacy and safety of sucrose for procedural pain relief in preterm and term neonates. Nurs Res 2002; 51: 375–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolf AR . Analgesia in the Neonates, 4th edn. Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gleiss J, Stuttgen G . Morphologic and functional development of the skin. In: Stave U (ed). Physiology of the Perinatal Period. Appleton-Century Crofts: New York, NY, USA, 1970, pp 889–906.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hall RW, Anand KJS . Short and long term effects of neonatal pain and stress: more than an ouchie. Neoreviews 2005; 6: e69–e75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman RD, Koren G . Biological markers of pain in the vulnerable infant. Clin Perinatol 2002; 29: 415–425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stevens B, Johnston C, Petryshen P, Taddio A . Premature infant pain profile: development and initial validation. Clin J Pain 1996; 12: 13–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ballantyne M, Stevens B, McAllister M, Dionne K, Jack A . Validation of the premature infant pain profile in the clinical setting. Clin J Pain 1999; 15: 297–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anand KJ . Pharmacological approaches to the management of pain in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinatol 2007; 27: S4–S11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vani SN, Nimbalkar S, Thakre R . Assessment and Management of Pain in the Newborn. NNF Clinical Practical Guidelines: NNF Publication, 2010, pp 199–215. Available at: http://www.ibrarian.net/navon/paper/NNF_Clinical_Practice_Guidelines.pdf?paperid=21085669 (last accessed on January 2015).

  10. Stevens B, Johnston C, Franck L, Petryshen P, Jack A, Foster G . The efficacy of developmentally sensitive interventions and sucrose for relieving procedural pain in very low birth weight neonates. Nurs Res 1999; 48: 35–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mathai S, Natrajan N, Rajalakshmi NR . A comparative study of non pharmacological methods to reduce pain in neonates. Indian Pediatr 2006; 43: 1070–1075.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stevens B, Yamada J, Lee GY, Ohlsson A . Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 1: CD001069.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Taddio A, Shah V, Hancock R, Smith RW, Stephens D, Atenafu E et al. Effectiveness of sucrose analgesia in newborns undergoing painful medical procedures. CMAJ 2008; 179: 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gray L, Miller LW, Philipp BL, Blass EM . Breastfeeding is analgesic in healthy newborns. Pediatrics 2002; 109: 590–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sexton S, Natale R . Risks and benefits of pacifiers. Am Fam Physician 2009; 79: 681–685.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carbajal R, Chauvet X, Couderc S, Olivier-Martin M . Randomised trial of analgesic effects of sucrose, glucose, and pacifiers in term neonates. BMJ 1999; 319: 1393–1397.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Goyal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thakkar, P., Arora, K., Goyal, K. et al. To evaluate and compare the efficacy of combined sucrose and non-nutritive sucking for analgesia in newborns undergoing minor painful procedure: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol 36, 67–70 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.122

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.122

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links