Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

The impact of feeding interval on feeding outcomes in very low birth-weight infants

Journal of Perinatology volume 31, pages 481–486 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

Test the hypothesis that very low birth-weight (VLBW) infants fed every 2 h (q2) are able to reach full enteral feedings more quickly than infants fed every 3 h (q3).

Study Design:

We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing q2 infants (n=103) with q3 infants (n=251). The primary outcome was days from start of a feeding advance to full feedings (120 ml per kg per day). Multivariable regression models were used to control for maternal and perinatal factors that preceded the initiation of the feeding advance.

Result:

Infants fed q2 reached full feedings 2.7 days sooner than q3 infants (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5, 3.9). After adjustment for confounders, q2 infants reached full feedings 3.7 (95% CI 1.6, 5.9) days more quickly. Infants fed q3 were more likely to receive >28 days of parenteral nutrition (odds ratio (OR) 4.7; 95% CI 1.5, 14.4), and were more likely to have feeds held for ⩾7 days (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.9, 11.7).

Conclusion:

VLBW infants demonstrate improved feeding tolerance when fed more frequently.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tyson JE, Kennedy KA, Lucke JF, Pedroza C . Dilemmas initiating enteral feedings in high risk infants: how can they be resolved? Semin Perinatol 2007; 31: 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parish A, Bhatia J . Feeding strategies in the ELBW infant. J Perinatol 2008; 28: S18–S20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bombell S, McGuire W . Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 2: CD001970.

    Google Scholar 

  4. McGuire W, Bombell S . Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 2: CD001241.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rayyis SF, Ambalavanan N, Wright L, Carlo WA . Randomized trial of ‘slow’ versus ‘fast’ feed advancements on the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 1999; 134: 293–297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Caple J, Armentrout D, Huseby V, Halbardier B, Garcia J, Sparks JW et al. Randomized, controlled trial of slow versus rapid feeding volume advancement in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2004; 114: 1597–1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bombell S, McGuire W . Early trophic feeding for very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 3: CD000504.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schanler RJ, Shulman RJ, Lau C, O’Brian Smith E, Heitkemper MM . Feeding strategies for premature infants: randomized trial of gastrointestinal priming and tube-feeding method. Pediatrics 1999; 103: 434–439.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Premji S, Chessell L . Continuous nasogastric milk feeding versus intermittent bolus milk feeding for premature infants less than 1500 grams. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 4: CD001819.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Akintorin SM, Kamat M, Pildes RS, Kling P, Andes S, Jill J et al. A prospective randomized trial of feeding methods in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1997; 100: E4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dsilna A, Christensson K, Alfredsson L, Lagercrantz H, Blennow M . Continuous feeding promotes gastrointestinal tolerance and growth in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 2005; 147: 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berseth CL, Nordyke C . Enteral nutrients promote postnatal maturation of intestinal motor activity in preterm infants. Am J Physiol 1993; 264 (6 Part 1): G1046–G1051.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aynsley-Green A . Hormones and postnatal adaptation to enteral nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1983; 2: 418–427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Indrio F, Riezzo G, Raimondi F, Bisceglia M, Cavalo L, Francavilla R . The effects of probiotics on feeding tolerance, bowel habits, and gastrointestinal motility in preterm newborns. J Pediatr 2008; 152: 801–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. DeVille K, Knapp E, Al-Tawil Y, Berseth C . Slow infusion feedings enhance duodenal motor responses and gastric emptying in preterm infants. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68: 103–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baker JH, Berseth CL . Duodenal motor responses in preterm infants fed formula with varying concentrations and rates of infusion. Pediatr Res 1997; 42: 618–622.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gartner LM, Morton J, Lawrence RA, Naylor AJ, O’Hare D, Schanler RJ et al. Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk Section on Breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2005; 115: 496–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rüdiger M, Herrmann S, Schmalisch G, Wauer RR, Hammer H, Tschirch E . Comparison of 2-h versus 3-h enteral feeding in extremely low birth weight infants, commencing after birth. Acta Paediatr 2008; 97: 764–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, Keating JP, Marshall R, Barton L et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Therapeutic decision based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg 1978; 187: 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fenton TR . A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatr 2003; 13: 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun GW, Shook TL, Kay GL . Inappropriate use of bivariable analysis to screen risk factors for use in multivariable analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 907–916.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Silvestre MA, Morbach CA, Brans YW, Shankaran S . A prospective, randomized trial comparing continuous versus intermittent feeding methods in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 1996; 128: 748–752.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Berseth CL, Bisquera JA, Paje VU . Prolonging small feeding volumes early in life decreases the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2004; 111: 529–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lucas A, Cole TJ . Breast milk and neonatal necrotising enterocolitis. Lancet 1990; 336: 1519–1523.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    S B DeMauro & S Lorch

  2. Pennsylvania Hospital and The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    S Abbasi

Authors
  1. S B DeMauro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S Abbasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S Lorch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S B DeMauro.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeMauro, S., Abbasi, S. & Lorch, S. The impact of feeding interval on feeding outcomes in very low birth-weight infants. J Perinatol 31, 481–486 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.153

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2010.153

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links