Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Nurses’ compliance with alarm limits for pulse oximetry: qualitative study

Abstract

Objective:

Monthly audits for the multicenter Canadian Oxygen Trial have shown that our neonatal team has consistently maintained study participants within the intended pulse oximetry alarm limits between 68 and 79% of the time during the first 3 days of life while infants were receiving supplemental oxygen. This good performance prompted us to explore our nurses’ perceptions of what makes them compliant with alarm limits for pulse oximetry in preterm infants.

Study Design:

The local neonatal research nurse interviewed all 41 staff nurses in the neonatal intensive care unit at the University Children's Hospital in Tuebingen, Germany, for this qualitative study.

Result:

Nurses identified education (22/41), prompt response to alarms (22/41), a favorable patient-to-staff ratio (18/41), root cause analysis at the bedside (15/41), and the high priority given to control of oxygen therapy in the department (14/41) as the five most important determinants of their good compliance.

Conclusion:

These findings may be useful for other neonatal teams who struggle to improve their compliance with alarm limits for pulse oximetry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tin W, Gupta S . Optimum oxygen therapy in preterm babies. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2007; 92: F143–F147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Weinberger B, Laskin DL, Heck DE, Laskin JD . Oxygen toxicity in premature infants. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2002; 181: 60–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Saugstad OD . Bronchopulmonary dysplasia-oxidative stress and antioxidants. Semin Neonatol 2003; 8: 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cole CH, Wright KW, Tarnow-Mordi W, Phelps DL, Pulse Oximetry Saturation Trial for Prevention of Retinopathy of Prematurity Planning Study Group. Resolving our uncertainty about oxygen therapy. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 1415–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Reher C, Kuny KD, Pantalitschka T, Urschitz MS, Poets CF . Randomised crossover trial of different postural interventions on bradycardia and intermittent hypoxia in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008; 93: F289–F291. Epub 19 February 2008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Saugstad OD . Oxidative stress in the newborn—a 30-year perspective. Biol Neonate 2005; 88: 228–236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Askie LM, Henderson-Smart DJ, Irwig L, Simpson JM . Oxygen-saturation targets and outcomes in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 959–967.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tin W, Milligan DW, Pennefather P, Hey E . Pulse oximetry, severe retinopathy, and outcome at one year in babies of less than 28 weeks gestation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001; 84: F106–F110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hay Jr WW, Rodden DJ, Collins SM, Melara DL, Hale KA, Fashaw LM . Reliability of conventional and new pulse oximetry in neonatal patients. J Perinatol 2002; 22: 360–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mower WR, Sachs C, Nicklin EL, Baraff LJ . Pulse oximetry as a fifth pediatric vital sign. Pediatrics 1997; 99: 681–686.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Castillo A, Sola A, Baquero H, Neira F, Alvis R, Deulofeut R et al. Pulse oxygen saturation levels and arterial oxygen tension values in newborns receiving oxygen therapy in the neonatal intensive care unit: is 85–93% an acceptable range? Pediatrics 2008; 121: 882–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt B, Gillie P, Caco C, Roberts J, Roberts R . Do sick newborn infants benefit from participation in a randomized clinical trial? J Pediatr 1999; 134: 151–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hagadorn JI, Furey AM, Nghiem TH, Schmid CH, Phelps DL, Pillers DA et al. AVIOx Study Group. Achieved versus intended pulse oximeter saturation in infants born less than 28 weeks’ gestation: the AVIOx study. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 1574–1582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Laptook AR, Salhab W, Allen J, Saha S, Walsh M . Pulse oximetry in very low birth weight infants: can oxygen saturation be maintained in the desired range? J Perinatol 2006; 26: 337–341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun SC, Stefen E, Vangvanichyakorn K . Validation of prescribed target SpO2 range in ELBW infants: a reality check of nurses practice. E-PAS 2004; 2993.

  16. Ford SP, Leick-Rude MK, Meinert KA, Anderson B, Sheehan MB, Haney BM et al. Overcoming barriers to oxygen saturation targeting. Pediatrics 2006; 118 (Suppl 2): S177–S186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Clucas L, Doyle LW, Dawson J, Donath S, Davis PG . Compliance with alarm limits for pulse oximetry in very preterm infants. Pediatrics 2007; 119: 1056–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nghiem TH, Hagadorn JI, Terrin N, Syke S, MacKinnon B, Cole CH . Nurse opinions and pulse oximeter saturation target limits for preterm infants. Pediatrics 2008; 121: e1039–e1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all our NICU nurses for sharing their opinions with us and for doing such a wonderful job. We are also grateful to L Costantini and Prof R Roberts at the Neonatal Trials Group in Hamilton, ON, Canada, for their frequent audits of saturation data from our COT study participants, and for their timely feedback. This study has been supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D Bassler.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armbruster, J., Schmidt, B., Poets, C. et al. Nurses’ compliance with alarm limits for pulse oximetry: qualitative study. J Perinatol 30, 531–534 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.189

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.189

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links