Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Brachial artery hyperaemic blood flow velocity and left ventricular geometry

Abstract

Cardiovascular risk factors and carotid atherosclerosis relate to blood flow velocity in the brachial artery during induced hyperaemia. This relation proved to be particularly strong when using the hyperaemic systolic to diastolic blood flow velocity (SDFV) ratio. In this study, we further investigated this ratio in relation to the left ventricular (LV) geometry in a cross-sectional analysis. In the Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors study, 1016 seventy-year-olds participated. Blood flow velocity during hyperaemia of the brachial artery by Doppler was analysed. Echocardiography was performed, allowing analysis of LV geometry, categorised into four different groups: normal, concentric remodelling, concentric and eccentric hypertrophy. The SDFV ratio increased in subjects with concentric LV-remodelling (P=0.006) or LV-hypertrophy (P=0.001), but not in those with eccentric hypertrophy (P=0.12) when compared with the group with normal LV geometry. These associations remained significant after adjustment for gender, blood pressure, blood glucose, body mass index and antihypertensive treatment. The SDFV ratio in the brachial artery was related to concentric geometry of the LV in an elderly population sample, suggesting this new hemodynamic variable as a marker of increased afterload. Future studies have to determine if the SDFV ratio is a powerful predictor of future CV events, in addition to LV geometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP . Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med 1990; 322 (22): 1561–1566.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Haider AW, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Levy D . Increased left ventricular mass and hypertrophy are associated with increased risk for sudden death. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32 (5): 1454–1459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gnasso A, Carallo C, Irace C, De Franceschi MS, Mattioli PL, Motti C et al. Association between wall shear stress and flow-mediated vasodilation in healthy men. Atherosclerosis 2001; 156 (1): 171–176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jarhult SJ, Sundstrom J, Lind L . Brachial artery hyperemic blood flow velocities are related to carotid atherosclerosis. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2009; 29 (5): 360–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lind L, Fors N, Hall J, Marttala K, Stenborg A . A comparison of three different methods to evaluate endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the elderly: the Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS) study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005; 25 (11): 2368–2375.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Corretti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, Celermajer D, Charbonneau F, Creager MA et al., International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force. Guidelines for the ultrasound assessment of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation of the brachial artery: a report of the International Brachial Artery Reactivity Task Force. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39 (2): 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jarhult SJ, Hall J, Lind L . Hyperaemic blood-flow velocities in systole and diastole relate to coronary risk in divergent ways. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2008; 28 (3): 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ganau A, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, de Simone G, Pickering TG, Saba PS et al. Patterns of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric remodeling in essential hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19 (7): 1550–1558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mureddu GF, Pasanisi F, Palmieri V, Celentano A, Contaldo F, de Simone G . Appropriate or inappropriate left ventricular mass in the presence or absence of prognostically adverse left ventricular hypertrophy. J Hypertens 2001; 19 (6): 1113–1119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shrier I, Platt RW . Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008; 8: 70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sundstrom J, Arnlöv J, Stolare K, Lind L . Blood pressure-independent relations of left ventricular geometry to the metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance: a population-based study. Heart 2008; 94 (7): 874–878.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Krumholz HM, Larson M, Levy D . Prognosis of left ventricular geometric patterns in the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25 (4): 879–884.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mancia G, Bombelli M, Facchetti R, Madotto F, Quarti-Trevano F, Polo Friz H et al. Long-term risk of sustained hypertension in white-coat or masked hypertension. Hypertension 2009; 54 (2): 226–232.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bombelli M, Facchetti R, Carugo S, Madotto F, Arenare F, Quarti-Trevano F et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy increases cardiovascular risk independently of in-office and out-of-office blood pressure values. J Hypertens 2009; 27 (12): 2458–2464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S J Järhult.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Järhult, S., Sundström, J. & Lind, L. Brachial artery hyperaemic blood flow velocity and left ventricular geometry. J Hum Hypertens 26, 242–246 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2011.21

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2011.21

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links