Introduction

Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose as intermediate risk factors for type 2 diabetes (T2D) are characterized by reduced early-phase insulin secretion.1

Recently, 1-h plasma glucose (1-hPG) was associated with deterioration of glucose tolerance and alterations by insulin sensitivity.2 After adjustment for 1-hPG, the high fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level was not associated with an increase in the incidence of T2D. These prior results were particularly apparent for increased 1-hPG than other plasma glucose stages in an oral glucose challenge.3

Despite identification of novel loci from large-scale association analyses in Eurocentric consortium, most previous studies have a limited impact on FPG and 2-hPG values for glycemic traits.4, 5, 6 Although FPG and 2-hPG are useful as gold standards for T2D risk, identifying new genetic susceptibility predisposing to early plasma glucose condition would be more valuable as an important parameter for risk stratification in glucose abnormalities.

Materials and methods

Study subjects

The Korea Association REsource study subjects were recruited based on the Korean Genome Epidemiologic Study project. A total of 10 038 participants, 40–69 years old, were registered at the first stage of survey performed in 2001–2002. Details of this study population have been recently described.7 For this study, we excluded known diabetics individuals treated with anti-diabetic medicine and individuals with FPG more than 7 mmol l−1. Consequently, 7696 non-diabetic subjects were only tested for T2D-related quantitative traits such as FPG, 1-h glucose and 2-h glucose after oral glucose administration. Seventy-five grams of glucose was used for oral glucose administration in the Korea Association Resource and Health 2 cohort, respectively. Subjects for the replication study were selected from the community-based Health 2 cohort as described previously.7 We examined 6536 non-diabetic subjects selected from the 8500 participants (aged 40–69 years). The gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) group (n=468) was selected from a hospital-based cohort, which recruited GDM women between January 1996 and February 2003 from Cheil General Hospital. For screening, 50 g 1-h oral glucose tolerance test was performed during 24–28 weeks of gestation. A glucose level of 130 mg dl−1 or higher was considered positive and warranted diagnostic 100 goral glucose tolerance test. The glucose and insulin concentrations were measured at 0, 1, 2 and 3 h of glucose challenge. The threshold glucose values for diagnosis of GDM were fasting 105 mg dl−1, 1 h 190 mg dl−1, 2 h 165 mg dl−1 and 3 h 145mg dl−1. Mean gestational age at diagnosis of GDM was 27.9±2.9 weeks. Non-diabetic control subjects (n=1242) were selected from two population-based cohort studies, the rural Ansung and the urban Ansan cohorts. The two cohorts comprised the Korean Genome Epidemiology Study. Only women were eligible as control group according to the following criteria: age50 years, no previous history of T2D, no first-degree relatives with T2D, FPG level<100 mg dl−1 and HbA1c<6.0%.

Genotyping and quality control

A total of 10 004 samples were genotyped using Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP 5.0 arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and processed with Bayesian Robust Linear Modeling using the Mahalanobis Distance (BRLMM) genotyping algorithm.8 Markers with a high missing call rate (>5%), minor allele frequency <1% and significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (P<1 × 10−6) were excluded. The remaining 357 789 SNPs were used in subsequent analyses for association. For the replication study in Health 2 (n=6536), we genotyped 18 SNPs in 21 SNPs that showed the strongest signal in stage 1. We performed genotype assay using the TaqManTM reaction for 1 SNP (rs2074356), and using GoldenGate assay (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) for 17 SNPs.9 For three SNPs (rs16856247, rs16925807 and rs12437833), we were not able to design probes on the de novo genotyping assay.

Genotype imputation

Imputation analysis was performed using IMPUTE against all of the HapMap Asian (JPT/CHB) population (release 22/NCBI, build 36, and dbSNP build 129) for a total of 1 573 409 SNPs. We dropped SNPs with a posterior probability score (<0.90), high genotype information content (info<0.5), Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P<1 × 10−7), SNP missing rate (>0.1) and minor allele frequency (<0.01).

Association analyses

Associations were analyzed using the PLINK (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~purcell/plink/) and SAS program (version 9.1; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The diabetes-related quantitative traits were tested by multivariate linear regression analysis in an additive genetic model (1−d.f.) including age, sex and recruitment area as covariates. All traits were normally distributed and no transformations were required. The quantile–quantile (Q–Q) plots of genome-wide P values showed deviations from the null distribution due to the strong associations observed for each quantitative trait. The genomic inflation factor (λ) was estimated from the median of the χ2 statistic divided by 0.456.10 Meta-analysis was performed from the combined result using effect size and standard errors estimated of each study. The results of all cohorts were combined by an inverse-variance meta-analysis method assuming fixed effects. Cochran’s Q test was used to assess heterogeneity between three studies. All meta-analysis calculations were performed using R program (version 2.7.1).11

Results

All 357 789 SNPs were tested using linear regression analysis adjusted for age, sex and recruitment area. Each trait of genomic control inflation factor (λ) was estimated below 1.1 for assessment of population structure. The λ-value of the initial genome-wide association study consistently showed no systematic inflation (λ=1.012–1.029). The Q–Q plots for the trend test of all traits showed that the distribution of observed P-values deviated from expected P-values only in the extreme tail, suggesting true-positive association signals (Supplementary Figures 1 and 2).

For glycemic traits (FPG, 1-hPG and 2-hPG), we examined a two-stage design involving a discovery set of 7696 individuals sampled from population-based samples (Korea Association ReEsource) and a replication set of 6536 individuals from an independent population-based sample (Health 2). The basic characteristics of the participants are described in Table 1. Finally, a meta-analysis combining stage 1 and 2 data identified a total of 11 SNPs reaching a genome-wide significant level (Table 2).

Table 1 Descriptive statistics for glycemic traits examined in GWAS and replication study populations
Table 2 Association results for glycemic traits from a combined meta-analysis that exceed a genome-wide threshold

In our results, GCK at 7p15 was more significantly replicated in FPG (rs1799884, P=4.53 × 10−18) but far less significant in 1-h and 2-hPG (P=2.82 × 10−9 and P=2.59 × 10−10), respectively. In addition, CDKAL1 at 6p22 was most significantly replicated with 1-hPG (rs9348440, P=3.13 × 10−19). MTNR1B at 11q21 also showed strong associations with FPG and 1-hPG (rs10830962, P=4.84 × 10−13 and P=3.24 × 10−12), respectively.

In the 12q24 region, C12orf51 was found to be more strongly associated with 1-hPG (rs2074356, P=1.04 × 10−16) than fasting or 2-hPG. In addition, MYL2 (rs12229654, P=8.83 × 10−13) and OAS1 (rs11066453, P=4.53 × 10−9) as novel genes were further identified with 1-hPG but not significant in FPG and 2-hPG (Figure 1). For three newly identified loci, the independence for association with 1-hPG remained significant after conditional analysis.

Figure 1
figure 1

(ac) Regional plots of novel variants associated with 1-h PG. The linkage disequilibrium between the lead single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and the other SNPs is colored blue to red. The scatter plot and peak indicate the negative logarithm of P-values for each SNP. Overall, meta-analysis result is depicted by a red diamond and stage 1 result is depicted by a blue circle. A full color version of this figure is available at the Journal of Human Genetics journal online.

To investigate the possible association between 1-hPG and GDM, we next investigated associations in a gestational diabetes study (n=1710). Two of three loci (rs2074356, P=2.6 × 10−2 and rs11066453, P=2.7 × 10−2) were associated with GDM but not significant for rs12229654.

Discussion

Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance refer to an intermediate stage for the early metabolic abnormalities that precede diabetes. The metabolic response to a carbohydrate challenge is conveniently assessed by the FPG and 2-hPG in oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) within the standardized range by World Health Organization or American Diabetes Association.

To date, genome-wide association studies have identified novel loci with susceptibility to glycemic traits in multiple populations. However, most previous studies have a limited impact on FPG and 2-hPG values in the oral glucose tolerance testing. In an effort to identify new genetic susceptibility to early-phase post-load glucose levels, we performed a meta-analysis for glycemic traits extended with 1-hPG from 14 232 non-diabetic individuals in the Korean population.

In our results, three novel variants associated with 1-hPG, located in a long-range haplotype (1.6 Mb at 12q24 region) underlying a positive selection specific to Europeans,12 were reported to have pleiotropic effects for various traits such as plasma lipid, liver enzymes and kidney function-related traits.13, 14 In addition, two SNPs, rs2074356 near C12orf51 and rs11066453 near OAS1, were further associated with GDM characterized by postprandial hyperglycemia during pregnancy. Functional characterizations for C12orf51 and OAS1 have not been fully elucidated. However, C12orf51 has been proposed to participate in protein modification or ubiquitination. OAS1, encoding an enzyme of the innate immune system, has been known to play a role in mediating resistance to virus infection, regulation of cell growth and differentiation.

Our findings were convincingly supported by specific associations of susceptibility genes reported from previous studies. CDKAL1, a prominent genetic risk factor for T2D, was most significantly replicated with 1-hPG and further associated with GDM. However, GCK, which has been previously reported for genetic susceptibility to FPG, was more significantly replicated in FPG (rs1799884, P=4.53 × 10−18) than other traits (P=2.82 × 10−9 for 1-hPG and P=2.59 × 10−10 for 2-hPG) without any association in GDM. In addition, MTNR1B known for FPG and T2D showed similar associations with FPG and 1-hPG. Considering women with GDM are at increased risk of developing T2D, these findings obviously emphasize that 1-hPG may play a role as an indicator for risk prediction or prevention in T2D. Furthermore, 1-h post-load plasma glucose levels are associated with elevated liver enzymes,15 kidney dysfunction16 coronary heart disease17 and left ventricular hypertrophy.18 Given the clinical applications, 1-hPG as an additional predictor might be helpful for detecting individuals who are at higher risk for metabolic diseases.

In conclusion, our meta-analysis has identified three new loci associated with 1-hPG in the Korean population. Two of the identified loci were further associated with GDM. Our findings suggest the possibility of a new discovery between 1-hPG and T2D risk by large-scale genetic association studies in multiple ethnic groups. Our results provide also new insights into the genetic mechanisms underlying the glucose metabolism in the pre-diabetic or diabetogenic conditions as a diagnostic/predictive maker.