Introduction

The heterogeneity of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles is well known, and studies have demonstrated that a large part of the trait variability is attributable to genetic differences (Bosse et al. 2004). In this regard, we previously characterized the importance of genetic factors on LDL particle size in the Quebec Family Study (QFS) (Bosse et al. 2003b). An autosomal genome-wide scan was performed on LDL peak-particle size (PPD), a quantitative trait reflecting the size of the major LDL subclass (Bosse et al. 2003a). The strongest evidence of linkage for LDL-PPD was found on chromosome 17q21 after adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI), and triglyceride levels [logarithm of odds (LOD) = 6.76]. In this region, several positional candidates have already been identified and associated with LDL-PPD. Family-based association tests suggest that one particular haplotype of the apolipoprotein (apo) H, with a relative allele frequency of 20.9%, was associated with increased LDL-PPD trait values (Bosse et al. 2005), whereas carriers of the c.29C (c.29A > C) allele of the phosphatidylcholine transfer protein (PCTP) gene polymorphism were characterized by larger LDL particles than A/A homozygotes (Dolley et al. 2007). Although some gene variants in positional candidates have been associated with LDL-PPD, other relevant positional candidates in the 17q21 region remain to be studied.

The myeloperoxidase (MPO) gene is located close to maker D17S1290, under the 17q21 peak (Bosse et al. 2003a). MPO is an antimicrobial agent present in neutrophils, monocytes, and some reactive microglial macrophages (Nagra et al. 1997). MPO may contribute to atherosclerosis through its ability to oxidize LDL (Carr et al. 2000), including apoE (Jolivalt et al. 1996), causing aggregation of particles that enhances uptake through macrophage scavenger receptors (Podrez et al. 2000). MPO levels in circulating leukocytes and serum are higher in individuals with coronary artery disease (CAD) (Baldus et al. 2003).

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by oxidative activity of phagocytic cells in the vessel wall and by the modification of LDL to an atherogenic, oxidized state. The increased atherogenicity of the small, dense LDL has been attributed to greater propensity for transport into the subendothelial space, increased binding to arterial proteoglycans, and susceptibility to oxidative modifications (Berneis and Krauss 2002). Thus, we hypothesize that MPO is etiologically linked to small, dense LDL alterations and that polymorphisms in this gene affect LDL particle size and plasma lipid levels. We also hypothesize that polymorphisms in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARG) gene, such as the P12A (Yen et al. 1997), exacerbate the effects of MPO gene polymorphisms on LDL characteristics. This is based on the fact that PPARG ligands have been shown to regulate MPO gene expression (Kumar et al. 2004). Thus, the objectives of our study were first to identify MPO gene sequence variations and to test the associations between these MPO gene polymorphisms and LDL features. Finally, the gene–gene interaction effects between MPO and PPARG genes on LDL features were examined.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Subjects were participants of the QFS. Details of recruitment procedures have been published elsewhere (Bouchard 1996). This cohort represents a mixture of random sampling and ascertainment through obese (BMI > 32 kg/m2) probands. A total of 680 subjects from 236 nuclear families were considered. The study was approved by the Laval University Medical Ethics Committee, and all subjects provided written informed consent.

LDL peak-particle diameter (LDL-PPD) characterization

LDL-PPD was measured on 680 subjects by gradient gel electrophoresis (GGE) from plasma obtained after a 12-h fast. Details of the technique have been previously reported (St Pierre et al. 2001). Briefly, the whole plasma was loaded on nondenaturing 2–16% polyacrylamide gradient gel. A 15-min prerun at 75 V preceded electrophoresis of the plasma samples at 150 V for 3 h. Gels were stained for 1 h with Sudan black and stored until analysis by the Imagemaster 1-D Prime computer software (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). LDL size forming the bands was determined on the basis of a calibration curve constructed from plasma standards. Based on GGE, a continuous variable was defined as LDL-PPD, reflecting the size of the major LDL subclass in an individual subject.

Metabolic measurements

Blood samples were obtained from an antecubital vein in the morning after a 12-h overnight fast. The plasma was separated immediately after blood collection by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm (850 g) for 10 min for the measurement of plasma lipoprotein/lipid levels. Cholesterol (Allain et al. 1974) and triglyceride (Fossati and Prencipe 1982) concentrations were determined enzymatically using a Technicon RA-500 automated analyzer (Bayer, Tarrytown, NY, USA). High-density-lipoprotein (HDL) fraction was obtained after precipitation of LDL in the infranatant (>1.006 g/ml) with heparin and magnesium chloride (MnCl2) (Burstein and Samaille 1960). The cholesterol content of the infranatant fraction was measured before and after the precipitation step for the measurement of HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) and for the calculation of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C). The apolipoprotein measurements were performed with the rocket immunoelectrophoretic method (Laurell 1966). LDL-apoB concentrations were measured in the infranatant (d > 1.006 g/ml) obtained after separation of very-low-density lipoprotein from the plasma by ultracentrifugation. The measurements were calibrated with reference standards obtained from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA).

Sequencing and genotyping

Direct sequencing of coding regions, exon–intron splicing boundaries, and regulatory regions was used to identify new genetic variants of the MPO gene. All sequencing of exons and exon–intron splicing boundaries were performed with specific primers derived from the 5′ and 3′ ends of intronic sequences. Primers were designed using the Primer 3.0 software available on the Whitehead Institute/MIT Centre for Genome Research server (http://www.genome.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer/primer3.cgi). Primers and cycling conditions are presented in the supplementary Table. After polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, products were purified (Multiscreen, Millipore) and sequencing was performed using BigDye Terminator (version 2.0) and analyzed on ABI 3730XL sequencers (Applied BioSystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequences were then assembled and analyzed using Staden pre-GAP4 and GAP4 programs (Bonfield et al. 1995). Sequence screening was performed on DNA from 25 unrelated subjects from the QFS cohort having LDL-PPD at each extreme of the distribution (254 Å < LDL-PPD > 276 Å). Genetic variants were subsequently genotyped on the whole cohort using TaqMan methodology of Applied Biosystem Company (Livak 1999). In the case of interspersed repeats or low-complexity DNA sequences, genetic variants were genotyped by direct sequencing, as described above. The PPARγ 2 P12A variant is caused by a C→G substitution at nucleotide 34 producing a BstU-I restriction site. Genotypes were obtained by digestion of PCR products, as described in details elsewhere (Yen et al. 1997).

Statistical analyses

The independent effect of MPO polymorphisms was tested by analysis of covariance comparing mean phenotypic values across the three MPO genotypes, using the MIXED procedure implemented in SAS (version 9.1), which takes the nonindependence of family members into account. This procedure is used when the experimental units (in this case subjects) can be grouped into clusters (family) and the data from a common cluster are possibly correlated. For metabolic parameters, age, gender, and BMI were included as covariates in predicting models. In specific analyses, LDL-PPD values were further adjusted for the effect of fasting plasma triglyceride levels. However, mean values presented in the tables are for nonadjusted phenotypes. To test for interaction between polymorphisms of the MPO and PPARγ 2 genes, a dummy variable was created to divide the subjects into six groups based on their genotypes ( PPARγ 2 P12A and MPO c.-653G > A). The effects of the PPARγ 2 P12A, MPO c-653G > A, and their interactions were quantified in the MIXED model by contrasting the dummy variable for the two main effects (PPARγ 2 P12A and MPO c.-653G > A) and their interactions.

Results

A total of 16 genetic variants were identified. Only those with a minor allele frequency (MAF) greater than 0.05 are presented in Table 1 (n = 8). Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test was performed using the Haploview software, version 4.0 (http://www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview/). All genotype distributions were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium among genetically unrelated individuals.

Table 1 Allele frequencies of variants identified in the MPO gene

In this study, we focused on SNPs with potential functional effects on gene expression or protein translation. Thus, five SNPs were retained for genotyping, two with the Taqman methodology (c.157G > T, c.2149A > G), the others (c.-822C > A, c.-765T > C, and c.-653G > A) by direct sequencing. The c.-653G > A polymorphism, also known as -463G > A in the literature, as well as c.-822C > A and c.-765T > C, are located in the 5′ region and may potentially alter gene expression. The c.157G > T polymorphism that results from the substitution of a valine for an isoleucine (Val717Ile) is located in exon 2, whereas c.2149A > G in exon 12 causes a change of a phenylalanine for a valine (Phe53Val).

To determine the pattern of LD and haplotype structure within the MPO gene, we used the Tagger function of the Haploview software. Pairwise LD was measured by r 2 among the eight sequenced MPO SNPs. LD pattern is illustrated in Fig. 1. The five genotyped SNPs, selected according to their potential impact on the MPO gene activity, account for 75% of the gene variance.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The pattern of linkage disequilibrium (LD) among the MPO gene polymorphisms. Pairwise LD was measured by r 2 among the eight sequenced MPO single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on the 25 subjects used for the sequencing. A r 2 > 80 corresponded to a strong LD

MPO association analyses

Among the five SNPs, c.-653G > A was significantly associated with LDL particle characteristics (Table 2). The c.-653A allele was associated with lower plasma total cholesterol (P = 0.026), LDL-C (P = 0.042), and LDL-apoB (P = 0.014), compared with GG homozygotes. These associations were obtained when the values were adjusted for the effects of age and gender and remained unchanged when further adjustment for BMI was applied. The two other promoter SNPs presented similar association pattern but did not reach statistical significance (data not shown). This similarity within the association patterns of these three SNPs is likely to be attributable to the strong LD. Polymorphisms c.157G > T (Val53Phe) and c.2149A > G (Ile717Val) were not associated with any of the tested phenotypes (date not shown).

Table 2 Association between MPO c.-653G > A genotype and plasma lipids

For LDL-PPD, only MPO c.-653G > A polymorphism was statistically significant when the phenotype was adjusted for age, gender, BMI and fasting plasma triglyceride levels. Although this association was significant, the difference of mean values between the genotype groups was relatively small, with c.-653GA heterozygotes exhibiting the lowest LDL-PPD mean value (Table 2). Moreover, the maximal variance observed was inferior to 1Å, which is unlikely to have significant biological impact.

Estrogens are known to modulate MPO activity in addition to increasing the amount of MPO in the plasma. MPO activity is influenced by the c.-653G > A polymorphism with the c.-653A allele creating an estrogen-receptor binding site (Reynolds et al. 2000). In this context, association analyses were performed separately for men and women (Table 3). The results indicate that women carrying the c.-653A allele had lower plasma total cholesterol (P = 0.001), LDL-C (P = 0.004) and LDL-apoB (P = 0.005), whereas no associations were observed in men.

Table 3 Association between MPO c.-653G > A genotype and plasma lipids in women

MPO- PPARG interaction

To evaluate the potential interaction between MPO c.-653G > A and PPARG P12A polymorphisms, we contrasted the six genotype groups for an interaction effect. The independent effect of each polymorphism and their interactions are summarized in Table 4. In this model, PPARG P12A was not independently associated with plasma lipid levels. In contrast, MPO c.-653AA genotype was associated with lower plasma total cholesterol and LDL-apoB levels. However, the interaction between the two genes was not statistically significant for any of the tested phenotypes.

Table 4 Effects of MPO c.-653 G > A, PPARG P12A, and their interactions

Discussion

A previous genome scan on LDL-PPD, performed on the QFS cohort, revealed several QTLs with the strongest signal on 17q (Bosse et al. 2003a). A positional candidate, MPO is located under the 17q21 peak, near a marker (D17S1290) associated with LDL-PPD (Bosse et al. 2003a). Our study investigated the effects of MPO gene polymorphisms on LDL-PPD and other plasma-lipid-related traits. Five MPO SNPs were genotyped on the whole cohort. These SNPs account for about 75% of the MPO gene variance. They exhibited no or only marginal association (c.-653G > A) with LDL-PPD. However, the MPO c.-653A allele was associated with lower plasma total cholesterol, LDL-C and LDL-apoB levels. These results suggest that the lower plasma total cholesterol levels observed in c.-653AA homozygotes is attributable to the lower cholesterol content of LDL and to the decreased number of LDL particles (i.e., LDL-apoB).

Although no or only marginal effect was observed on LDL-PPD, the results found with LDL cholesterol support the role of MPO in atherosclerosis. Several mechanisms linking MPO to atherosclerosis have been reported so far (Nagra et al. 1997; Nauseef 2001). MPO contributes to atherosclerosis through its ability to oxidize LDL (Hazell et al. 1996), causing particle aggregation that enhances uptake through macrophage scavenger receptors (Podrez et al. 2000). MPO could also promote HDL oxidation (Bergt et al. 2004). Several studies suggested that MPO is a catalyst for lipid peroxidation via tyrosyl radical formation (Savenkova et al. 1994) and for lipid and lipoprotein oxidative modifications via generation of reactive nitrogen species (Zhang et al. 2002; Podrez et al. 1999). Thus, decreased MPO circulation levels caused by c.-653G > A polymorphism could attenuate LDL oxidation and consequently facilitate LDL reuptake by the liver. Indeed, LDL oxidation confers alternative configuration of LDL particles and then alters their recognition by the LDL receptor in the liver (Witztum and Steinberg 1991). Ultimately, through this mechanism, MPO c.-653G > A could decrease the process of atherosclerosis leading to coronary artery disease.

Individuals with MPO deficiency were shown to have a significantly reduced risk of CAD (Kutter et al. 2000), whereas high circulating levels of MPO is thought to increase oxidative damage and could lead to higher risk of CAD (Baldus et al. 2003; Grahl et al. 2007). In our study, MPO SNPs were selected for their potential impact on gene expression or protein activity. Thus, c.157G > T (Val53Phe) and c.2149A > G (Ile717Val) located in the coding regions represent good candidates, and they correspond to amino acid changes. To determine biological impact of these SNPs on protein activity, we used PolyPhen, a specific software for predicting the impact of amino acid substitution on the structure and function of human protein (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph/). Results indicate that both Val53Phe and Ile717Val variants are predicted to be benign and thus could unlikely modify significantly protein conformation. These results could explain the lack of association of these polymorphisms with cholesterol transport elements observed in this study. Nevertheless, previously reported results by Chevalier et al. suggested that Val53Phe enhance mRNA or precursor stability and thus increased MPO amount within the cells (Chevrier et al. 2006). In this latter study, MPO activity was measured in neutrophils of 102 subjects according to nine SNPs grouped into haplotypes. Concerning the variants located in the promoter, c.-822C > A and c.-765T > C does not appear to be located in known or putative regulatory sequence. However, they demonstrated that c.-822C > A SNP was independently associated with increase MPO activity (Chevrier et al. 2006). The authors suggested that this polymorphism could enhance promoter transcriptional activity or stabilize MPO mRNA, leading to an increase in enzyme activity. By contrast, MPO c.-653G > A, also described in numerous studies as MPO -463G > A, is a well-known functional MPO promoter polymorphism associated with gene expression levels (Piedrafita et al. 1996). Piedrafita et al. reported that the MPO c.-653G > A gene polymorphism was associated with MPO expression levels (Piedrafita et al. 1996). The c.-653GG genotype has been linked to higher MPO mRNA and protein expression than GA/AA genotypes (Piedrafita et al. 1996). In addition, GA and AA genotypes showed protective effect for CAD, whereas homozygotes GG exhibited a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease (Baldus et al. 2003; Grahl et al. 2007; Nikpoor et al. 2001). These observations are consistent with our findings, suggesting a protective effect of the c.-653A allele through lower plasma total cholesterol, LDL-C, and LDL-apoB levels.

The c.-653G > A is located within an Alu-encoded hormone response element (AluHRE) consisting of a cluster of four hexamer half sites. This cluster is recognized by various nuclear receptors (Piedrafita et al. 1996; Vansant and Reynolds 1995): c.-653G in the first hexamer creates an SP1 site, whereas c.-653A creates a binding site for the estrogen receptor α (ER-α). This raises the possibility that the estrogen receptor may contribute to differential regulation of MPO among G and A allele carriers in men and women, as reported in numerous studies (Kumar et al. 2004; Reynolds et al. 2000; Norris et al. 1995). In this regard, we analyzed the effects of the MPO c.-653G > A polymorphism on LDL characteristics separately in men and women. In accordance with a previous study (Makela et al. 2006), we observed a protective effect of this SNP in women (Table 3).

In contrast, it has been reported that estrogen enhances MPO activity (Jansson 1991) in addition to increasing the amount of MPO in plasma (Santanam et al. 1998). This is in agreement with studies reporting association between Alzheimer’s disease risk and MPO c.-653A allele in men (Reynolds et al. 2000; Leininger-Muller et al. 2003), whereas the same research group reported that the c.653G allele was more frequent in women with Alzheimer’s disease (Reynolds et al. 1999). Thus, opposite effects according to MPO genotypes were reported in previous studies, and this discrepancy in results could be attributable to gender-dependent (Reynolds et al. 1999) or age-dependent differences (Rutgers et al. 2003) in MPO activity.

However, Kumar et al. (Kumar et al. 2004) demonstrated that gender differences in MPO c.-653G > A polymorphism association are not caused by a direct impact of estrogen receptor binding on the MPO promoter. Indeed, PPARG heterodimerizes with retinoid X receptor (RXR) to bind two direct MPO hexamers. Estrogen receptor and PPARγ seem to compete for the binding to AluHRE. Thus, the ability of estrogen to block PPARγ effects, especially in the presence of the A allele, could explain the gender differences in the c.-653G > A polymorphism association with disease risk. However, our results showed that no MPO-PPARG interaction was observed and only MPO c.-653G > A was associated with plasma-cholesterol-related traits. The lack of association could be attributable to the low number of subjects upon which the present study is based. Another possible explanation may be that the c.-653A allele in the MPO promoter blocks PPARγ binding through competitive binding by the estrogen receptor.

In conclusion, among the MPO gene polymorphisms that could potentially alter gene expression or protein activity, only c.-653G > A showed independent association with plasma total cholesterol, LDL-C, and LDL-apoB levels. However, no clear association was found between MPO polymorphisms and LDL-PPD. Thus, MPO is unlikely to be the gene responsible for the QTL previously observed in the 17q21 region in the QFS cohort.