Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Challenges for environmental epidemiology research: are biomarker concentrations altered by kidney function or urine concentration adjustment?

Abstract

Biomonitoring has become a standard approach for exposure assessment in occupational and environmental epidemiology. The use of biological effect markers to identify early adverse changes in target organs has also become widely adopted. However, the potential for kidney function to affect biomarker levels in the body and the optimal approach to adjustment of biomarker concentrations in spot urine samples for hydration status are two important but underappreciated challenges associated with biomarker use. Several unexpected findings, such as positive associations between urine nephrotoxicant levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), have been reported recently in research using biomarkers. These and other findings, discussed herein, suggest an impact of kidney glomerular filtration or tubule processing on biomarker levels. This is more commonly raised in the context of decreased kidney filtration, traditionally referred to as reverse causality; however, recent data suggest that populations with normal kidney filtration may be affected as well. Misclassification bias would result if biomarkers reflect kidney function as well as either exposures or early biological effect outcomes. Furthermore, urine biomarker associations with eGFR that differ markedly by approach used to adjust for urine concentration have been reported. Associations between urine measures commonly used for this adjustment, such as urine creatinine, and specific research outcomes could alter observed biomarker associations with outcomes. Research recommendations to address the potential impact of kidney function and hydration status adjustment on biomarkers are provided, including a range of approaches to study design, exposure and outcome assessment, and adjustment for urine concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barr DB, Wilder LC, Caudill SP, Gonzalez AJ, Needham LL, Pirkle JL . Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113: 192–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Comper WD, Russo LM . The glomerular filter: an imperfect barrier is required for perfect renal function. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2009; 18: 336–342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard A, Thielemans N, Roels H, Lauwerys R . Association between NAG-B and cadmium in urine with no evidence of a threshold. Occup Environ Med 1995; 52: 177–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. D'Amico G, Bazzi C . Urinary protein and enzyme excretion as markers of tubular damage. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2003; 12: 639–643.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. National Kidney Foundation K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation, Classification, and Stratification. Guideline 1: definition and stages of chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 39: S1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Evans M, Elinder CG . Chronic renal failure from lead: myth or evidence-based fact? Kidney Int 2011; 79: 272–279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marsden PA . Increased body lead burden—cause or consequence of chronic renal insufficiency? N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 345–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, 3rd, Feldman HI et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 604–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. National Kidney Foundation. Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) FAQ's. page 4http://www.kidney.org/professionals/kdoqi/gfr.cfm Accessed August 4, 2013.

  10. Nawrot T, Plusquin M, Hogervorst J, Roels HA, Celis H, Thijs L et al. Environmental exposure to cadmium and risk of cancer: a prospective population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7: 119–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lanphear BP, Hornung R, Khoury J, Yolton K, Baghurst P, Bellinger DC et al. Low-level environmental lead exposure and children's intellectual function: an international pooled analysis. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113: 894–899.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Akerstrom M, Barregard L, Lundh T, Sallsten G . The relationship between cadmium in kidney and cadmium in urine and blood in an environmentally exposed population. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2013; 268: 286–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nenov VD, Taal MW, Sakharova OV, Brenner BM . Multi-hit nature of chronic renal disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2000; 9: 85–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Khalil-Manesh F, Gonick HC, Cohen AH, Alinovi R, Bergamaschi E, Mutti A et al. Experimental model of lead nephropathy. I. Continuous high-dose lead administration. Kidney Int 1992; 41: 1192–1203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. de Burbure C, Buchet JP, Leroyer A, Nisse C, Haguenoer JM, Mutti A et al. Renal and neurologic effects of cadmium, lead, mercury, and arsenic in children: evidence of early effects and multiple interactions at environmental exposure levels. Environ Health Perspect 2006; 114: 584–590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weaver VM, Lee BK, Ahn KD, Lee GS, Todd AC, Stewart WF et al. Associations of lead biomarkers with renal function in Korean lead workers. Occup Environ Med 2003; 60: 551–562.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaumont A, Nickmilder M, Dumont X, Lundh T, Skerfving S, Bernard A . Associations between proteins and heavy metals in urine at low environmental exposures: Evidence of reverse causality. Toxicol Lett 2012; 210: 345–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Kerkhove E, Pennemans V, Swennen Q . Cadmium and transport of ions and substances across cell membranes and epithelia. Biometals 2010; 23: 823–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weaver VM, Kim NS, Lee BK, Parsons PJ, Spector J, Fadrowski J et al. Differences in urine cadmium associations with kidney outcomes based on serum creatinine and cystatin C. Environ Res 2011; 111: 1236–1242.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim R, Rotnitsky A, Sparrow D, Weiss S, Wager C, Hu H . A longitudinal study of low-level lead exposure and impairment of renal function. The Normative Aging Study. JAMA 1996; 275: 1177–1181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Watkins DJ, Josson J, Elston B, Bartell SM, Shin HM, Vieira VM et al. Exposure to perfluoroalkyl acids and markers of kidney function among children and adolescents living near a chemical plant. Environ Health Perspect 2013; 121: 625–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sommar JN, Svensson MK, Bjor BM, Elmstahl SI, Hallmans G, Lundh T et al. End-stage renal disease and low level exposure to lead, cadmium and mercury; a population-based, prospective nested case-referent study in Sweden. Environ Health 2013; 12: 9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Boeniger MF, Lowry LK, Rosenberg J . Interpretation of urine results used to assess chemical exposure with emphasis on creatinine adjustments: A review. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1993; 54: 615–627.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Suwazono Y, Akesson A, Alfven T, Jarup L, Vahter M . Creatinine versus specific gravity-adjusted urinary cadmium concentrations. Biomarkers 2005; 10: 117–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Aylward LL, Hays SM, Smolders R, Koch HM, Cocker J, Jones K et al. Sources of variability in biomarker concentrations. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 2014; 17: 45–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdelmalek JA, Gansevoort RT, Lambers Heerspink HJ, Ix JH, Rifkin DE . Estimated albumin excretion rate versus urine albumin-creatinine ratio for the assessment of albuminuria: a diagnostic test study from the Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease (PREVEND) Study. Am J Kidney Dis 2014; 63: 415–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yassine H, Kimzey MJ, Galligan MA, Gandolfi AJ, Stump CS, Lau SS . Adjusting for urinary creatinine overestimates arsenic concentrations in diabetics. Cardiorenal Med 2012; 2: 26–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wald R . Urinalysis in the diagnosis of kidney disease. In: Basow D (ed). UpToDate. UpToDate: Waltham, MA. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rose B, Post T . Chapter 13B: Meaning of urine osmolality and pH. In: Basow D (ed). UpToDate. UpToDate: Waltham, MA. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Waikar SS, Sabbisetti VS, Bonventre JV . Normalization of urinary biomarkers to creatinine during changes in glomerular filtration rate. Kidney Int 2010; 78: 486–494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Akerstrom M, Lundh T, Barregard L, Sallsten G . Sampling of urinary cadmium: differences between 24-h urine and overnight spot urine sampling, and impact of adjustment for dilution. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2012; 85: 189–196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Akerstrom M, Barregard L, Lundh T, Sallsten G . Variability of urinary cadmium excretion in spot urine samples, first morning voids, and 24 h urine in a healthy non-smoking population: implications for study design. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2014; 24: 171–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Moriguchi J, Ezaki T, Tsukahara T, Furuki K, Fukui Y, Okamoto S et al. Comparative evaluation of four urinary tubular dysfunction markers, with special references to the effects of aging and correction for creatinine concentration. Toxicol Lett 2003; 143: 279–290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ikeda M, Ezaki T, Tsukahara T, Moriguchi J, Furuki K, Fukui Y et al. Bias induced by the use of creatinine-corrected values in evaluation of beta2-microgloblin levels. Toxicol Lett 2003; 145: 197–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Shelley R, Kim NS, Parsons PJ, Lee BK, Agnew J, Jaar BG et al. Uranium associations with kidney outcomes vary by urine concentration adjustment method. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2014; 24: 58–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Akesson A, Lundh T, Vahter M, Bjellerup P, Lidfeldt J, Nerbrand C et al. Tubular and glomerular kidney effects in Swedish women with low environmental cadmium exposure. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113: 1627–1631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Stevens LA, Zhang YL, Hendriksen S et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 247–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Weaver VM, Vargas GG, Silbergeld EK, Rothenberg SJ, Fadrowski JJ, Rubio-Andrade M et al. Impact of urine concentration adjustment method on associations between urine metals and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) in adolescents. Environ Res 2014; 132C: 226–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Christensen K, Sobus J, Phillips M, Blessinger T, Lorber M, Tan YM . Changes in epidemiologic associations with different exposure metrics: A case study of phthalate exposure associations with body mass index and waist circumference. Environ Int 2014; 73C: 66–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ferraro PM, Costanzi S, Naticchia A, Sturniolo A, Gambaro G . Low level exposure to cadmium increases the risk of chronic kidney disease: analysis of the NHANES 1999-2006. BMC Public Health 2010; 10: 304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. You L, Zhu X, Shrubsole MJ, Fan H, Chen J, Dong J et al. Renal function, bisphenol A, and alkylphenols: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2003-2006). Environ Health Perspect 2011; 119: 527–533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Shelley R, Kim NS, Parsons P, Lee BK, Jaar B, Fadrowski J et al. Associations of multiple metals with kidney outcomes in lead workers. Occup Environ Med 2012; 69: 727–735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Research Participation Program at the National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, US EPA [#: EPA-ORD/NCEA-RTP-2009-02; Dr. Weaver].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virginia M Weaver.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weaver, V., Kotchmar, D., Fadrowski, J. et al. Challenges for environmental epidemiology research: are biomarker concentrations altered by kidney function or urine concentration adjustment?. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 26, 1–8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2015.8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2015.8

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links