Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Statistical properties of longitudinal time-activity data for use in human exposure modeling

Abstract

Understanding the longitudinal properties of the time spent in different locations and activities is important in characterizing human exposure to pollutants. The results of a four-season longitudinal time-activity diary study in eight working adults are presented, with the goal of improving the parameterization of human activity algorithms in EPA’s exposure modeling efforts. Despite the longitudinal, multi-season nature of the study, participant non-compliance with the protocol over time did not play a major role in data collection. The diversity (D)—a ranked intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)— and lag-one autocorrelation (A) statistics of study participants are presented for time spent in outdoor, motor vehicle, residential, and other-indoor locations. Day-type (workday versus non-workday, and weekday versus weekend), season, temperature, and gender differences in the time spent in selected locations and activities are described, and D & A statistics are presented. The overall D and ICC values ranged from approximately 0.08–0.26, while the mean population rank A values ranged from approximately 0.19–0.36. These statistics indicate that intra-individual variability exceeds explained inter-individual variability, and low day-to-day correlations among locations. Most exposure models do not address these behavioral characteristics, and thus underestimate population exposure distributions and subsequent health risks associated with environmental exposures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hertz-Picciotto I, Cassady D, Lee K, Bennett DH, Ritz B, Vogt R . Study of Use of Products and Exposure-Related Behaviors (SUPERB): study design, methods, and demographic characteristics of cohorts. Environ Health 2010; 9: 54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McCurdy T, Glen G, Smith L, Lakkadi Y . The National Exposure Research Laboratory's consolidated human activity database. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 2000; 10: 566–578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Total USEPA . Risk Integrated Methodology (TRIM) Air Pollutants Exposure Model Documentation (TRIM.Expo/APEX, Version 4.3 Volume 1 Users Guide). EPA, 452/B-08-001a Research Triangle Park, NC: U.S: Environmental Protection Agency, 2008a.

  4. Total USEPA . Risk Integrated Methodology (TRIM) Air Pollutants Exposure Model Documentation (TRIM.Expo/APEX, Version 4.3 Volume 2: Technical Support Document. (EPA, 452/B-08-001b) . Research Triangle Park, NC: US: Environmental Protection Agency, 2008b.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenbaum A, Huang M . The HAPEM6 User’s Guide. Research Triangle Park. NC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2007.

  6. Zartarian V, Xue J, Glen G, Smith L, Tulve N, Tornero-Velez R . Quantifying children's aggregate (dietary and residential) exposure and dose to permethrin: application and evaluation of EPA's probabilistic SHEDS-Multimedia model. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 2012; 22: 267–273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Xue J, Zartarian V, Liu S, Geller A . Methyl Mercury Exposure from Fish Consumption in Vulnerable Racial/Ethnic Populations. Sci Tot Env 2012; 414: 373–379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Glen G, Smith L, Isaacs K, McCurdy T, Langstaff J . A new method of longitudinal diary assembly for human exposure modeling. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 2008; 18: 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu X, Fan Z, Ohman-Strickland P . Time-location patterns of a population living in an air pollution hotspot. J Environ Public Health [Internet] 2010, Available from http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jeph/2010/625461/.

  10. Xue J, McCurdy T, Spengler J, Ozkaynak H . Understanding variability in time spent in selected locations for 7-12-year old children. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 2004; 14: 222–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson T . Human Activity Patterns in Cincinnati. Ohio. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ås D . Studies of time use: problems and prospects. Acta Sociol 1978; 21: 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kan MY, Pudney S . Measurement error in stylised and diary data on time use. Sociol Meth 2008; 38: 101–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Robinson JP . How Americans Use Time. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harvey AS . Guidelines for time use data collection. Social Indic Res 1993; 30: 197–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Conover WJ . Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL . Intraclass Correlations: Uses in Assessing Rater Reliability. Psych Bull 1979; 2: 420–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giraudeau B, Mary JY . Planning a reproducibility study: how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 per cent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Stat Med 2001; 20: 3205–3214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xue J, McCurdy T, Burke J, Bhaduri B, Liu C, Nutaro J et al. Analyses of school commuting data for exposure modeling purposes. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 2010; 20: 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Graham SE, McCurdy T . Developing meaningful cohorts for human exposure models. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 2004; 14: 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McCurdy T, Graham SE . Using human activity data in exposure models: analysis of discriminating factors. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 2003; 13: 294–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Frazier EL, McCurdy T, Williams R, Linn WS, George BJ . Intra- and inter-individual variability in location data for two U.S. health-compromised elderly cohorts. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 2009; 19: 580–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ridley K, Olds T, Hands B, Larkin D, Parker H . Intra-individual variation in children’s physical activity patterns: implications for measurement. J Sci Med Sport 2009; 12: 568–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hattis DL . Distributional analyses for children’s inhalation risk assessments. J Tox Environ Health 2008; 71: 218–226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hattis DL, Anderson EL . What should be the implications of uncertainty, variability, and inherent ‘biases’/’conservatism’ for risk management decision-making. Risk Anal 1999; 19: 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Glorieux I, Minnen J . How many days? A comparison of the quality of time-use data from 2-day and 7-day diaries. Inter J Time Use Res 2009; 6: 314–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schwab M, McDermott A, Spengler JD . Using longitudinal data to understand children's activity patterns in an exposure context: data from the Kanawha County health study. Environ Inter 1992; 18: 173–189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stopher P, Greaves S . Clifford E. Multi-day household travel surveys: sampling issues. 30th Australasian Transport Research Forum 2007, 1–12.

  29. Echols SL, MacIntosh DL, Hammerstrom KA, Ryan PB . Temporal variability of microenvironmental time budgets in Maryland. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 1999; 9: 502–512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodes C, Lawless P, Thornburg J, Croghan C, Vette A, Williams R . DEARS particulate matter relationships for personal, indoor, outdoor, and central site settings for a general population. Atmos Environ 2010; 4: 1386–1399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wu X, Bennett DH, Lee K, Cassady DL, Ritz B, Hertz-Picciotto I . Longitudinal variability of time-location/activity patterns of population at different ages: a longitudinal study in California. Environ Health [Internet]. 2011; 10: 80 Available from http://www.ehjournal.net/content/10/1/80.

  32. Zuzanek J, Smale BJ . Life-cycle variations in across-the-week allocation of time to selected daily activities. Loisir et Société 1993; 15: 559–586.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Geyh AS, Xue J, Ozkaynak H, Spengler JD . The Harvard Southern California Chronic Ozone Exposure Study: assessing ozone exposure of grade-school-age children in two Southern California communities. Environ Health Perspect 2000; 108: 265–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Phillips MJ, Rodes CE, Thornburg JW, Whitmore R, Vette A, Williams R . Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Environmental Exposure Studies: Lessons from the Detroit Exposure and Aerosol Research Study. RTI Press publication No. MR-0021-1011. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI Press. 2010, Available at http://www.rti.org/pubs/mr-0021-1011-phillips.pdf.

  35. Stone SL, Graham S, Pekar Z, Mansfield C, Depro B, Isaacs K et al. Using EPA’s Air Quality Index (AQI) to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in older adults. American Public Health Association 140th Annual Meeting: San Francisco, Abstract 260301 2012.

  36. Loh MM . Houseman EA, Levy JI, Spengler JD, Bennett DH. Contribution to volatile organic compound exposures from time spent in stores and restaurants and bars. J Expos Sci Environ Epidemiol 2009; 19: 660–673.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Freeman NC, Lioy PJ, Pellizzari E, Zelon H, Thomas K, Clayton A et al. Responses to the region 5 NHEXAS time/activity diary. National Human Exposure Assessment Survey. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol 1999; 9: 414–426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Williams R, Suggs J, Rea A, Leovic K, Vette A, Croghan C et al. The Research Triangle Park particulate matter panel study: PM mass concentration relationships. Atmos Environ 2003; 37: 5349–5363.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hattis D, Russ A, Goble R, Banati P, Chu M . Human interindividual variability in susceptibility to airborne particles. Risk Anal 2001; 21: 585–599.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. McCurdy T . Modeling the dose profile in human exposure assessments: ozone as an example. Rev Tox: In Vivo Tox Risk Assess 1997; 1: 3–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin Isaacs.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through its Office of Research and Development conducted the research described in this paper. It has been subjected to Agency review and approved for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Isaacs, K., McCurdy, T., Glen, G. et al. Statistical properties of longitudinal time-activity data for use in human exposure modeling. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 23, 328–336 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.94

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.94

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links