Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Arsenic-induced toxicity and carcinogenicity: a two-wave cross-sectional study in arsenicosis individuals in West Bengal, India

Abstract

In the state of West Bengal in India, over 26 million individuals are exposed to arsenic via drinking water. Dermatological, non-dermatological disorders and cancers are associated with arsenic toxicity. Of late, there has been a decrease in the arsenic concentration in drinking water owing to governmental efforts, raising the possibility of remediation. A cross-sectional study was conducted, where 189 arsenicosis and 171 unexposed individuals were recruited at two time points, (2005–06 and 2010–11) with concomitant decrease in the level of arsenic exposure via drinking water in the arsenicosis group in 2010–11. Parameters studied included dermatological, non-dermatological health status and cytogenetic damage. Decrease of arsenic exposure (190.1 μg/l to 37.94 μg/l) resulted in significant decline in the number of individuals having dermatological disorders (P<0.01) and in the severity of each dermatological outcome (P<0.0001). Micronucleus formation in urothelial cells and lymphocytes decreased significantly (P<0.001). However, there was a significant (P<0.001) rise in the incidence of each of the non-dermatological diseases, that is, peripheral neuropathy, conjunctivitis and respiratory distress over the period. Thirteen (6.87%) of the initially recruited arsenicosis individuals died of cancer, in this period. Remediation by arsenic-safe drinking water can reduce dermatological manifestations and cytogenetic insult; but is unable to counter the non-dermatological symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ATP:

Adenosine tri-phosphate

CI:

Confidence interval

EMG:

Electromyography

MN:

Micronucleus

NCV:

Nerve conduction velocity

NM-IBIS:

New Mexico’s Indicator-based Information System

OR:

Odds ratio

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SEARO:

South East Asia Regional Office

SMR:

Standardized morbidity ratio

WBPHED:

West Bengal Public Health Engineering Department

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Gebel T . Confounding variables in the environmental toxicology of arsenic. Toxicology 2000; 144: 155–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Polya D, Charlet L . Rising arsenic risk? Nat Geosci 2009; 2: 383–384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mondal D, Banerjee M, Kundu M, Banerjee N, Bhattacharya U, Giri AK et al. Comparison of drinking water raw rice and cooking of rice as arsenic exposure routes in three contrasting areas of West Bengal India. Environ Geochem Health 2010; 32: 463–477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. WHO. Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. Health Criteria and Other Supporting Information vol. 2 (2). World Health Organisation: Geneva, 1996, pp 940–949.

  5. Guha Mazumder DN . Chronic arsenic toxicity & human health. Indian J Med Res 2008; 128: 436–447.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. NRC. National Research Council. Variation in human sensitivity. In:. Arsenic in Drinking Water. Washington, DC: The National Academics Press, 1999, pp 229–250.

  7. Liou SH, Lung JC, Chen YH, Yang T, Hsieh LL, Chen CJ et al. Increased chromosome type chromosome aberration frequencies as biomarkers of cancer risk in blackfoot endemic area. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 1481–1484.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haque R, Mazumder DN, Samanta S, Ghosh N, Kalman D, Smith MM et al. Arsenic in drinking water and skin lesions: dose-response data from West Bengal India. Epidemiology 2003; 14: 174–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rossner P, Boffetta P, Ceppi M, Bonassi S, Smerhovsky Z, Landa K et al. Chromosomal aberration in lymphocytes of healthy subjects and risk of cancer. Environ Health Perspect 2005; 113: 517–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghosh P, Banerjee M, De Chaudhuri S, Chowdhury R, Das JK, Mukherjee A et al. Comparison of health effects between individuals with and without skin lesions in the population exposed to arsenic through drinking water in West Bengal India. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 2007; 17: 215–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghosh P, Basu A, Singh KK, Giri AK . Evaluation of cell types for assessment of cytogenetic damage in arsenic exposed population. Mol Cancer 2008; 7: 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Benramdane L, Accominotti M, Fanton L, Malicier D, Vallon JJ . Arsenic speciation in human organs following fatal arsenic trioxide poisoning-a case report. Clin Chem 1999; 45: 301–306.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guha Mazumder DN, De BK, Santra A, Ghosh N, Das S, Lahiri S et al. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of 2 3-dimercapto-l-propabesulfonate (DMPS) in the therapy of chronic arsenicosis due to drinking arsenic contaminated water. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2001; 39: 665–674.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tseng WP . Effects and dose-response relationships of skin cancer and blackfoot disease with arsenic. Environ Health Perspect 1977; 19: 109–119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen CJ, Chuang YC, Lin TM, Wu HY . Malignant neoplasms among residents of a blackfoot disease-endemic area in Taiwan: high arsenic artesian well water and cancers. Cancer Res 1985; 45: 5895–5899.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen CJ, Chen CW, Wu MM, Kuo TL . Cancer potential in liver lungs bladder and kidney due to ingested arsenic in drinking water. Br J Cancer 1992; 66: 888–892.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gomez-Caminero A, Howe P, Hughes M, Kenyon E, Lewis DR, Moore M et al Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds, Environmental Health Criteria 224 World Health Organization: Geneva, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. IARC. Monograph on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans. Some Drinking Water Disinfectants and Contaminants Including Arsenic vol. 84. IARC: Lyon, France, 2004. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol84/mono84-1.pdf. Accessed November 2011.

  19. Rahman MM, Chowdhury UK, Mukherjee SC, Mondal BK, Paul K, Lodh D et al. Chronic arsenic toxicity in Bangladesh and West Bengal India–a review and commentary. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2001; 39: 683–700.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hossain MA, Sengupta MK, Ahmad S, Rahman MM, Mondal D, Lodh D et al. Ineffectiveness and poor reliability of arsenic removal plants in West Bengal India. Environ Sci Technol 2005; 39: 4300–4306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Roychowdhury T, Uchino T, Tokunaga H, Ando M . Arsenic and other heavy metals in soils from an arsenic-affected area of West Bengal India. Chemosphere 2002; 49: 605–618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. SEARO 2005 A Field Guide for Detection, Management and Surveillance of Arsenicosis Cases. World Health Organisation: New Delhi. http://www.searo.who.int/LinkFiles/Publications_seaTP30.pdf, Last accessed on June 2012.

  23. Ghosh P, Basu A, Mahata J, Basu S, Sengupta M, Das JK et al. Cytogenetic damage and genetic variants in individuals susceptible to arsenic-induced cancer through drinking water. Int J Cancer 2006; 118: 2470–2478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. NM-IBIS. http://ibis.health.state.nm.us/resources/SMR_ISR.html (Updated January 2012). (Accessed May 2012).

  25. Valko M, Rhodes CJ, Moncol J, Izakovic M, Mazur M . Free radicals metals and anti-oxidants in oxidative-stress induced cancer. Chem Biol Interact 2006; 160: 1–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. DeVizcaya Ruiz A, Barbier O, Ruiz-Ramos R, Cebrian ME . Biomarkers of oxidative stress and damage in human population exposed to arsenic. Mutat Res 2009; 674: 85–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. RGI 2003 SRS Based Abridged Lefe Tables SRS Analytical Studies Report No. 3. Registrar General of India: New Delhi.

  28. Samadder SR . Impact of arsenic pollution in drinking water on life expectancy: A GIS study. KSCE J Civil Engineering 2010; 14: 681–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mathers CD, Iburg KM, Salomon JA, Tandon A, Chatterji S, Ustun B et al. Global patterns of healthy life expectancy in the year 2002. BMC Public Health 2004; 4: 66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schiller CM, Fowler BA, Woods JS . Effects of arsenic on pyruvate dehydrogenase activation. Environ Health Perspect 1977; 19: 205–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Banerjee N, Banerjee M, Ganguly S, Bandyopadhyay S, Das JK, Bandyopadhay A et al. Arsenic-induced mitochondrial instability leading to programmed cell death in the exposed individuals. Toxicology 2008; 246: 101–111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schinder AF, Olson EC, Spitzer NC, Montal M . Mitochondrial dysfunction is a primary event in glutamate neurotoxicity. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 6125–6133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Baloh RH . Mitochondrial dynamics and peripheral neuropathy. Neuroscientist 2008; 14: 12–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim HR, Kim EJ, Yang SH, Jeong ET, Park C, Kim SJ et al. Combination treatment with arsenic trioxide and sulindac augments their apoptotic potential in lung cancer cells through activation of caspase cascade and mitochondrial dysfunction. Int J Oncol 2006; 28: 1401–1408.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aggarwal M, Wangikar PB, Sarkar SN, Rao GS, Kumar D, Dwivedi P et al. Effects of low-level arsenic exposure on the developmental toxicity of anilofos in rats. J Appl Toxicol 2007; 27: 255–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Z, Chai L, Wang Y, Yang Z, Wang H, Wu X . Potential health risk of arsenic and cadmium in groundwater near Xiangjiang River China: a case study for risk assessment and management of toxic substances. Environ Monit Assess 2011; 175: 167–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-sponsored Network Project (NWP-0052), India. We are also grateful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research for the award of Project Assistantship to SP and ND, Research Associateship to PB and Project Associateship to MB. The authors thank Dr. A Basu, HSAC University of Canterbury, New Zealand for his expert comments upon the statistical analysis of the data. We are grateful to the Fogarty International Training Program (2D43TW000815-11) jointly with University of California, Berkley, US for providing training to SP, ND, PB and MB for the research on epidemiology and environmental health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok K Giri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paul, S., Das, N., Bhattacharjee, P. et al. Arsenic-induced toxicity and carcinogenicity: a two-wave cross-sectional study in arsenicosis individuals in West Bengal, India. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 23, 156–162 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.91

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2012.91

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links